\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2017 (2017), No. 88, pp. 1--13.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2017 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2017/88\hfil $q$-Sturm-Liouville Problems]
{A $q$-fractional approach to the regular Sturm-Liouville problems}

\author[M. A. AL-Towailb \hfil EJDE-2017/88\hfilneg]
{Maryam A. AL-Towailb}

\address{Maryam A. AL-Towailb \newline
Department of Natural and Engineering Sciences,
Faculty of Applied Studies and Community Service,
King Saud University, Riyadh, SA}
\email{mtowaileb@ksu.edu.sa}

\dedicatory{Communicated by Mokhtar Kirane}

\thanks{Submitted January 27, 2017. Published March 28, 2017.}
\subjclass[2010]{39A13, 26A33, 34L10}
\keywords{Boundary value problems; eigenvalues and eigenfunctions;
\hfill\break\indent
left and right sided Riemann-Liouville and Caputo $q$-fractional derivatives}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article, we study the regular $q$-fractional Sturm-Liouville
 problems that include the right-sided Caputo $q$-fractional derivative
 and the left-sided Riemann-Liouville $q$-fractional derivative of the same
 order, $\alpha \in (0,1)$. We prove properties of the eigenvalues and
 the eigenfunctions in a certain Hilbert space. We use a fixed point
 theorem for proving the existence and uniqueness of the eigenfunctions.
 We also present an example involving little $q$-Legendre polynomials.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction} 

The $q$-calculus was initiated at the beginning of the 19th century.
Since then, many works have been devoted to the study of $q$-difference equations;
see e.g., \cite{A.L.,A.B.,H.B.}. Recently many researchers have focused
their attention on certain generalizations of Sturm-Liouville
problems. In particular, in \cite{M.H.1} the authors studied a $q$-analogue
of Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems and formulated a self-adjoint
$q$-difference operator in a Hilbert space. Their results are applied and
developed in different aspects; see for example \cite{M.J.M,M.Z.I,A.E.,L,A.A.}.
 Mansour \cite{ZM} introduced fractional $q$-Sturm-Liouville problems
containing the left-sided Caputo $q$-fractional derivative and the
right-sided Riemann-Liouville $q$-fractional derivative which are adjoint operators
in a certain Hilbert space.

In this paper, we formulate a regular $q$-fractional Sturm-Liouville problem
that contains the right-sided Caputo $q$-fractional derivative and the
left-sided Riemann-Liouville $q$-fractional derivative of the same order,
$\alpha \in (0,1)$. More precisely, our problem is described  as follows.

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and $p$, $r$, $w_\alpha$ be given real valued functions defined
on a $q$-linear grid $A^{*}_{q,a}$ (see Section 2.)
such that $p(x)\neq 0$ and $w_\alpha(x)>0$ for all $x$. We consider the
$q$-Sturm-Liouville operator
$$
\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}y(x):= {^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha \big(p D_{q,0^+}^\alpha y\big)(x)
+ r(x)y(x),
$$
and consider the fractional differential equation
\begin{equation} \label{M.E}
\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}y(x)-\lambda w_\alpha(x)y(x)=0, \quad x\in A^{*}_{q,a},
\end{equation}
that will be called a regular fractional $q$-Sturm-Liouville problem
(regular qFSLP). This equation is complemented with the boundary conditions
\begin{gather} \label{BC1}
\beta_1(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}y)(0)+\beta_2 (pD^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}y)(0)=0,\\
 \label{BC2}
\gamma_1(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}y)(a)+\gamma_2 (pD^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}y)(\frac{a}{q})=0,
\end{gather}
with $\beta_1^2+\beta_2^2\neq 0$ and $\gamma_1^2+\gamma_2^2\neq 0$.

This article is organized as follows. In the next section, we state
the $q$-definitions and present some preliminaries of fractional $q$-calculus
which will play an important role in our main results. The properties
of the associated eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the regular qFSLP
 \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2} are stated and proved in Section 3.
In Section 4, we apply the fixed point theorem to prove the existence
and uniqueness of the eigenfunctions and corresponding eigenvalues.
In the last section, we give an example for a regular qFSLP involving
little $q$-Legendre polynomials.

\section{Preliminaries}

Throughout this article, we assume that $0<q<1$ and we follow Gasper
and Rahman~\cite{G.M} for the definitions of the $q$-shifted factorial,
the $q$-gamma and $q$-beta functions, the basic hypergeometric series
and Jackson $q$-integrals.

For $t> 0$, the sets $A_{q,t}$, $A^*_{q,t}$ and $\mathcal{A}_{q,t}$
are defined by
$$
A_{q,t}:=\{tq^n: n\in \mathbb{N}_0\}, \quad
A^*_{q,t} := A_{q,t}\cup \{0\}, \quad
\mathcal{A}_{q,t}:=\{tq^k: k\in \mathbb{Z}\},
$$
where $\mathbb{N}_0:=\{0,1,2,\dots\}$. Note that if $t=1$ we write
$A_{q}$, $A^*_{q}$, and $\mathcal{A}_{q}$.
A function $f$ defined on $ A^*_{q,t}$ is called $q$-regular at zero
if it satisfies
$$ \lim_{n\to \infty} f(xq^n)= f(0) \quad \text{for all } x\in A^*_{q,t}.
$$
The $q$-derivative $D_q f$ of an arbitrary function $f$ is defined by
$$
(D_q f)(x):= \frac{f(x)-f(qx)}{(1-q)x}, \quad x\neq 0.
$$
Note that
\begin{gather}\label{D_q}
D_{q,x} f(\frac{x}{q})= -\frac{1}{q} D_{q^{-1},x} f(x),\\
 \label{the product rule}
D_q(fg)(x)= D_qf(x)g(x)+f(qx)D_qg(x).
\end{gather}
 The $q$-integration by parts rule on an interval $[a,b]$ (see~\cite{M.H}) is
\begin{equation} \label{integration by parts}
 \int_a^b f(x) D_{q}g(x)\, d_qx= f(x)g(x)\Big|_a^b
 - \int_a^b D_{q}f(x) g(qx) \,d_qx,
 \end{equation}
 where $f$ and $g$ are $q$-regular at zero functions.
 Using \eqref{D_q} and \eqref{integration by parts}, we obtain the
 $q^{-1}$-integration by parts rule:
\begin{equation} \label{D_q and D_q^-1}
\int_a^b f(x) D_{q^{-1}}g(x) \,d_qx
 = q f(x) g(\frac{x}{q})\Big|_{a}^b - q\int_a^b g(x) D_{q}f(x)\, d_qx.
\end{equation}

If $X$ is the set $A_{q,t}$ or $A^*_{q,t}$, then for $p>0$, $L_q^p(X)$
is the space of all functions defined on $X$ and satisfying
$$
\|f\|_p:=\Big( \int_0^t |f(x)|^p \, d_qx\Big)^{1/p}<\infty;
$$
it is a normed space. Moreover, if $p=2$, then $L_q^2(X)$ associated with
the inner product
\begin{equation}
\langle f,g \rangle := \int_0^t f(x)\overline{g(x)}\, d_qx
\end{equation}
is a Hilbert space. The space of all functions $f$ defined on $X$ such that
$$
\int_0^t |f(x)|^2 w(x) \, d_qx <\infty,
$$
where $w$ is a positive function defined on $X$ is called a weighted space and
denoted by $L_q^2(X,w)$. This space associated with the inner
product
\begin{equation}
\langle f,g \rangle := \int_0^t f(x)\overline{g(x)} w(x)\, d_qx
\end{equation}
is a Hilbert space.

Let $C_q(X)$ denote the space of all $q$-regular at zero functions defined on
$X$ with values in $\mathbb{R}$. The space of all $q$-absolutely continuous
functions on $A^*_{q,t}$ is denoted by $\mathcal{A}C_q(A^*_{q,t})$ and
is defined as the space of all $q$-regular at zero functions $f$ satisfying
$$
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} |f(xq^j)-f(xq^{j+1})|\leq K \quad \text{for all }
x\in A^*_{q,t},
$$
where $K$ is a constant depending on the function $f$.
Note that $ \mathcal{A}C_q(A^*_{q,t})\subseteq C_q(A^*_{q,t})$.

 In the following we recall some definitions, roles and properties of fractional
$q$-calculus (for more details see \cite{R.P,W.A}).

Let $\alpha>0$ and $f\in L_q(A^*_{q,a})$. The left-sided Riemann-Liouville
$q$-fractional operator of order $\alpha$ is
\begin{equation*}
I^\alpha_{q,a^+}f(x):= \frac{x^{\alpha-1}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}
\int_a^x (qt/x;q)_{\alpha-1} f(t)\,d_qt,
\end{equation*}
If $f\in L_q(A^*_{q,b})$, then the right-sided Riemann-Liouville $q$-fractional
operator of order $\alpha$ is
\begin{equation*}
I^{\alpha}_{q,b^-} f(x):= \frac{1}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}
\int_{qx}^b t^{\alpha-1}(qt/x;q)_{\alpha-1} f(t)\,d_qt.
\end{equation*}
 The left and right side Riemann-Liouville fractional $q$-derivatives
are defined by
\[
D^\alpha_{q,a^+}f(x):= D_q^{m} I_{q,a^+}^{m-\alpha} f(x),
\quad D^\alpha_{q,b^-}f(x):= \Big(\frac{-1}{q}\Big)^{m}\, D_{q^{-1}}^{m} I_{q,b^-}^{m-\alpha} f(x),
\]
and the left and right sided Caputo fractional $q$-derivatives are defined by
\begin{equation}\label{Caputo}
{^cD}_{q,a^+}^\alpha f(x):= I_{q,a^+}^{m-\alpha} D_q^{m} f(x), \quad
{^cD}_{q,b^-}^\alpha f(x):= \Big(\frac{-1}{q}\Big)^{m}\, I_{q,b^-}^{m-\alpha}
D_{q^{-1}}^{m} f(x),
\end{equation}
where $ m=\ulcorner \alpha \urcorner$ denotes the ceiling function.
According to \cite[pp. 124, 148]{M.H}, $D^\alpha_{q,a^+}f(x)$ exists if
$f\in L_q(A^*_{q,a})$ such that
$I_{q,a^+}^{1-\alpha} f\in \mathcal{A}C_q(A^*_{q,a})$, and
${^cD}_{q,a^+}^\alpha f$ exists if $f\in \mathcal{A}C_q(A^*_{q,a})$.

We end this section by the following results from \cite{ZM}, which will
 be needed later.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem1}
Let $\alpha >0$. If $f$ is a function defined on $A^{*}_{q,a}$, then
\begin{gather}\label{ID(a-)}
I^{\alpha}_{q,a^-}{^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha f(x)=f(x)-f(a/q),\\ \label{2.8}
 {^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha I^{\alpha}_{q,a^-}f(x)
= f(x)-\frac{a^{-\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(1-\alpha)}(qx/a;q)_{-\alpha}
\big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,a^-}f\big)(\frac{a}{q}).
\end{gather}
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2}
Let $\alpha >0$. If $f\in L^1_q(A^{*}_{q,a})$ and bounded, then
\begin{gather}
{^cD}_{q,0^+}^\alpha I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} f(x)
=f(x), \quad I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}f \in \mathcal{A}C_q(A^*_{q,a}),\\ \label{2.9-}
I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} {D}_{q,0^+}^\alpha f(x)
= f(x)- \frac{f(0)}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}\, x^{\alpha-1},\\ \label{2.9}
 {D}_{q,0^+}^\alpha I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}f(x)= f(x).
\end{gather}
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma} \label{lem3}
Let $\alpha\in (0,1)$. If
\begin{itemize}
 \item $f\in L_q^1(X)$ and $g$ is a bounded function on $A_{q,a}$, or
 \item $\alpha\neq 1/2$ and $f,g\in L_q^2(X)$,
 \end{itemize}
 then
 \begin{equation} \label{C}
 \int_0^a g(x) I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} f(x)\, d_qx
= \int_0^a f(x) I^{\alpha}_{q,a^-} g(x)\, d_qx.
 \end{equation}
\end{lemma}

 \section{Properties of regular fractional $q$-Sturm-Liouville problems}

 Recall that a complex number $\lambda^*$ is said to be an eigenvalue
of  problem \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2} if there is a non-trivial solution
$y^*(\cdot)$ which satisfies the problem for this $\lambda^*$.
 In this case, we say that $y^*(\cdot)$ is an eigenfunction of the
regular qFSLP corresponding to the eigenvalue $\lambda^*$.

 We denote by $V$ the Hilbert subspace of $L^2_q(A^{*}_{q,a})\cap C_q(A^{*}_{q,a})$
which consists of all $q$-regular at zero functions satisfying the boundary
conditions \eqref{BC1} and \eqref{BC2} with inner product
$$
\langle u,v\rangle := \int_0^a u(t)\overline{v(t)} \, d_qt.
$$
Note that for $f, g\in V$ and $\alpha> 0$, we have the following equation
 (see \cite[Lemma 2.4]{ZM}):
\begin{equation} \label{lemma 2.4}
\int_0^a g(x) I^\alpha_{q,0^+} f(x)\, d_qx
= \int_0^a f(x) I^\alpha_{q,a^-} g(x) \, d_qx
\end{equation}

\begin{lemma}\label{*1}
Let $\alpha\in(0,1)$ and $f,g\in V$. Then
$$
\langle {^cD}^\alpha_{q,a^-} f,g\rangle
= - f(\frac{x}{q}) I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+} g(x)\Big |_{x=0}^a
+ \langle f, D_{q,0^+}^\alpha g\rangle.
$$
\end{lemma}

The proof of the above lemma follows directly by using \eqref{D_q and D_q^-1},
\eqref{lemma 2.4} and the definitions of ${^cD}^\alpha_{q,a^-}$ and
$D_{q,0^+}^\alpha$. We omit it.
Now, we prove the following important identity known as $q$-Lagrange's identity.

\begin{proposition} \label{prop1}
Let $u,v\in V$. Then
$$
\langle\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}u,v \rangle
-\langle u,\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha} v \rangle
= \Big[ (I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}u)(x) (pD^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}v)(\frac{x}{q})
- (I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v)(x) (pD^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}u)(\frac{x}{q})\Big]_{x=0}^a.
$$
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Using the definition of $\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}$ and applying Lemma \ref{*1},
it follows that
\begin{align*}
\langle\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}u,v \rangle
&= \langle {^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha u +ru,v \rangle \\
&= -(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha u)(\frac{x}{q})I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v(x)\Big |_{x=0}^a
+ \langle ru,v \rangle + \langle D_{q,0^+}^\alpha u,p D_{q,0^+}^\alpha v \rangle \\
&= (I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}u)(x)(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha v)(\frac{x}{q})\Big |_{x=0}^a
 - (I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v)(x) (pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha u)(\frac{x}{q})\Big |_{x=0}^a \\
&\quad + \langle u, {^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha v+ rv \rangle.
\end{align*}
Since $\langle u, {^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha v
+ rv \rangle= \langle u,\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha} v \rangle$,
we obtained the required equality.
\end{proof}

By using $q$-Lagrange's identity, we obtain the following properties
of the operator $\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}$ on the Hilbert space $V$.

\begin{proposition}\label{self-adjoint}
Let $\alpha\in(0,1)$. Then
\begin{itemize}
 \item [(I)] $\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}$ is a self-adjoint operator on $V$.
In other words,
 $$
\langle\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}u,v \rangle
= \langle u,\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha} v \rangle \quad u,v\in V.
$$
 \item [(II)] $\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}$ has only real eigenvalues.
\end{itemize}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
First, we prove (I). Let $u,v\in V$. Then from the boundary condition \eqref{BC1},
we have
\begin{gather*}
\beta_1(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}u)(0)+\beta_2 (pD^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}u)(0)=0,\\
\beta_1(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v)(0)+\beta_2 (pD^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}v)(0)=0.
\end{gather*}
That is,
$$
 \begin{pmatrix}
 I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}u(0) & I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v(0) \\
 (pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha u)(0) & (pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha v)(0)
 \end{pmatrix}
 \begin{pmatrix}
 \beta_1 \\
 \beta_2
 \end{pmatrix}
=  \begin{pmatrix}
 0 \\
 0
 \end{pmatrix}.
$$
But $\beta_1^2+\beta_2^2\neq 0$ which implies
$$
I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}u(0)(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha v)(0)- I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v(0)
 (pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha u)(0)=0.
$$
Similarly, from the boundary condition \eqref{BC2}, we obtain
$$
I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}u(a)(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha v)(\frac{a}{q})- I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}v(a)
(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha u)(\frac{a}{q})=0.
$$
Hence, using $q$-Lagrange's identity, we conclude that $\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}$
is a self-adjoint operator on $V$.

 To prove (II), we assume that $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue associated with
 an eigenfunction $y$. Then
\begin{gather}\label{Ly}
\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}y(x)=\lambda w_\alpha(x)y(x),\\ \label{Ly2}
\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}\overline{y(x)}=\bar{\lambda} w_\alpha(x)\overline{y(x)}.
\end{gather}
Multiply equation \eqref{Ly} by $\bar{y}$ and \eqref{Ly2} by $y$ and then
subtracting, we obtain
$$
y(x)\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}\overline{y(x)}
- \overline{y(x)}\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}y(x)
= (\bar{\lambda}-\lambda)w_\alpha(x)y(x)\overline{y(x)}.
$$
Now, the $q$-integration over the interval $[0,a]$, and the application of
$q$-Lagrange's identity yield
$$
0= \int_0^a \Big( y(x)\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}\overline{y(x)}
- \overline{y(x)}\mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha}y(x)\Big)\, d_qx
=(\bar{\lambda}-\lambda)\int_0^a
w_\alpha(x)|y(x)|^2\, d_qx.
$$
But $y$ is non trivial solution and $w_\alpha> 0$, this implies
 $\lambda=\bar{\lambda}$.
\end{proof}

\begin{proposition} \label{prop3}
The eigenfunctions corresponding to different eigenvalues of the regular
qFSLP are orthogonal on the weighted space $L^2_q(A^{*}_{q,a},w_\alpha)$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Let $u_i$ ($i=1,2$) be eigenfunctions of the regular qFSLP
\eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2} associated with different eigenvalues
$\lambda_i$ ($i=1,2$). Then
\begin{equation*}
 \mathcal{L}_{q,\alpha} \{u_i\}=\lambda_i w_\alpha u_i, \quad i=1,2
\end{equation*}
By using Proposition \ref{self-adjoint}, we obtain
$$
(\lambda_1-\lambda_2)\int_0^a u_1(x) u_2(x) w_\alpha(x)\, d_qx=0.
$$
Since $\lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2$, then $u_1$ and $u_2$ are orthogonal on
$L^2_q(A^{*}_{q,a},w_\alpha)$.
\end{proof}

\section{Uniqueness of eigenfunctions of the regular qFSLP}

In this section, we give a sufficient condition of $\lambda$ to guarantee the
existence and uniqueness of the eigenfunctions up to a multiplier constant.

Recall that the multiplicity of an eigenvalue is defined to be the number of
linearly independent eigenfunctions associated with it. In particular,
an eigenvalue is simple if and only if it has only one eigenfunction.

First, we study the solution of the $q$-difference equation
\begin{equation} \label{q-DE}
{^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha p(x)D_{q,0^+}^\alpha \phi_0(x)
= \frac{c\,a^{-\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(1-\alpha)} (qx/a;q)_{-\alpha},
\end{equation}
where $c$ is constant. Note that
$$
I^{-\alpha}_{q,a^-}(1)= \frac{a^{-\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(1-\alpha)} (qx/a;q)_{-\alpha}.
$$
So, acting on the two sides of \eqref{q-DE} by the operator $ I^{\alpha}_{q,a^-}$,
we obtain
$$
I^{\alpha}_{q,a^-}{^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha p(x)D_{q,0^+}^\alpha \phi_0(x)
= c I^{\alpha}_{q,a^-}I^{-\alpha}_{q,a^-}(1).
$$
Using \eqref{ID(a-)} and \eqref{2.9-}, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
 \phi_0(x) = c_1\,x^{\alpha-1}+ c_2\, I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} \frac{1}{p(x)},
 \end{equation*}
where
$$
c_1= c- \Big(p(\cdot)D_{q,0^+}^\alpha \phi_0(\cdot)\Big)(a/q), quad
 c_2=\frac{\phi(0)}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}.
$$
Thus, we have the following result.

\begin{lemma}\label{general solution}
 The general solution of the $q$-difference equation \eqref{q-DE} takes the form
 $$
\phi_0(x) = c_1 x^{\alpha-1}+ c_2 \psi_\alpha(x),
$$
 where $ \psi_\alpha(x)=I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} \frac{1}{p(x)}$ and $c_1, c_2$
are constants.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{Basic lemma}
Let $\alpha\in(0,1)$, $\psi_\alpha(x)=I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} \frac{1}{p(x)}$ and
\begin{gather}\label{Y_y}
 Y_y(x) := r(x)y(x)-\lambda w_\alpha(x)y(x),\\
 \Delta := \Gamma_q(\alpha)\Big[\beta_1\gamma_2-\beta_2\gamma_1
 + \beta_1\gamma_1(\psi_\alpha(a)-\psi_\alpha(0))\Big].
\end{gather}
If $\Delta\neq 0$, then, on the space $ C(A^{*}_{q,a})$, the regular
qFSLP \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2} is equivalent to the $q$-integral equation
\begin{align*}
 y(x)&=- \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(\cdot)}
 I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big)(x)
 + A(x)\Big(I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=0}\\
&\quad + B(x)\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(\cdot)}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big)(x)
\Big|_{x=a}
+ C(x)\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(\cdot)}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=0},
\end{align*}
 where
\begin{gather*}
 A(x)= \frac{\beta_2}{\Delta}\Big[x^{\alpha-1}(\gamma_1\psi_{\alpha}(a)+\gamma_2)
 -\gamma_1\, \psi_{\alpha}(x) \Gamma_q(\alpha)\Big],\\
 B(x)= \frac{\gamma_1}{\Delta}\Big[\beta_1\, \psi_{\alpha}(x) \Gamma_q(\alpha)
  - x^{\alpha-1}(\beta_1\psi_{\alpha}(0)+\beta_2)\Big],\\
 C(x)= \frac{\beta_1\, A(x)}{\beta_2}.
\end{gather*}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since $Y_y$ is defined by
$$
Y_y(x):=r(x)y(x)-\lambda w_\alpha(x)y(x),
$$
 equation \eqref{M.E} takes the form
\begin{equation*}
 {^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha p(x)D_{q,0^+}^\alpha y(x)+ Y_y(x)=0.
\end{equation*}
Using \eqref{2.8}, we can rewrite $Y_y$ as
$$
Y_y(x):=\Big({^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}
\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y\Big)(x)
+ \frac{ a^{-\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(1-\alpha)} (qx/a;q)_{-\alpha}
\Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,a^-}Y_y\Big)(\frac{a}{q}).
$$
This implies
$$
{^cD}_{q,a^-}^\alpha p(x)D_{q,0^+}^\alpha \Big[y(\cdot)
+ I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(\cdot)} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big](x)
= \frac{c\,a^{-\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(1-\alpha)} (qx/a;q)_{-\alpha},
$$
where $c= \Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big)(a/q)$.
Now, set
$$
\phi_0= y(x)+ I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}
 \Big(\frac{1}{p(\cdot)} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(\cdot)\Big)(x),
$$
and using Lemma \ref{general solution}, we obtain
\begin{equation} \label{*}
y(x)+ I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(x)} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(x)
= c_1  x^{\alpha-1}+ c_2 \psi_\alpha(x).
\end{equation}
This implies the following equalities
\begin{gather}\label{3}
\Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}y\Big)(x)+ \Big(I_{q,0^+}
\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y\Big)(x)
= c_1\,\Gamma_q(\alpha)+ c_2\, I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(x)},\\ \label{4}
\Big(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha y\Big)(x)+ I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y(x)= c_2.
\end{gather}
Using \eqref{3} and \eqref{4}, we obtain
\begin{gather}\label{5}
\Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}y\Big)(0)
 + \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y\Big)(0)
= c_1 \Gamma_q(\alpha)+ {c}_2\, \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}\Big)(0),\\
\label{6}
\Big(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha y\Big)(0)+ \Big(I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y\Big)(0)= {c}_2,\\
\label{7}
\Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}y\Big)(a)+ \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}
\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y\Big)(a)= {c_1}\,\Gamma_q(\alpha)+ {c}_2
 \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}\Big)(a),\\ \label{8}
\Big(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha y\Big)(a/q)= {c_2}.
\end{gather}
Substituting from \eqref{5} and \eqref{6} into \eqref{BC1} and from \eqref{7}
and \eqref{8} in \eqref{BC2}, we obtain the  system
\begin{gather*}
{c_1}(\beta_1 \Gamma_q(\alpha))+{c_2}
 \Big[\beta_1 I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(0)}+\beta_2\Big]
 = \beta_1X(0)+\beta_2Z\\
{c_1}(\gamma_1 \Gamma_q(\alpha))+ {c_2}
 \Big[\gamma_1 I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(a)}+ \gamma_2\Big]=\gamma_1 X(a),
\end{gather*}
where $X:= I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y$ and
$Z=I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_y (0)$.

 Since $\Delta\neq 0$, the solution for coefficients ${c}_1$ and
 $\tilde{c}_2$ is unique, and is given by
\begin{gather*}
{c}_1 = \frac{1}{\Delta} \Big[(\beta_1 X(0)+\beta_2 Z)
 (\gamma_1\psi_{\alpha}(a)+\gamma_2)-\gamma_1 X(a)
  (\beta_1 \psi_\alpha(0)+\beta_2)\Big],\\
c_2 = \frac{\gamma_1\Gamma_q(\alpha)}{\Delta} \Big[\beta_1 X(a)
 - (\beta_1 X+\beta_2 Z)(0)\Big].
\end{gather*}
Now, substituting the expressions of ${c_1}$ and ${c}_2$ into \eqref{*},
we obtain the desired result.
\end{proof}

Note that by using Lemma \ref{Basic lemma}, we can verify that the regular
 qFSLP \eqref{M.E} can be interpreted as a fixed point for the mapping
$T:C(A^{*}_{q,a})\to C(A^{*}_{q,a})$ which defined by
 \begin{align*}
Tf(x)&= - \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)
+ A(x)\Big(I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=0} \\
&\quad + B(x)\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=a}
+ C(x)\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=0}.
\end{align*}
Set
$$
Y_f(x):= r(x)y(x)-\lambda w_\alpha(x)y(x),
$$
we obtain
$$
\|Y_g-Y_h\|\leq \|g-h\|\, \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|, \quad g,h \in C(A^{*}_{q,a}).
$$
Now, denoting
$$
A=\|A(x)\|, \quad B=\|B(x)\|, \quad
m_p=\inf_{x\in A^{*}_{q,a}} |p(x)|, \quad
M_{\phi}:= \|\phi\|, \quad \tilde{M}:= \|\tilde{\phi}\|,
$$
where $\phi:= I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\,I^\alpha_{q,a^-}$ and
$\tilde{\phi}:=I^\alpha_{q,a^-}$, it follows that
\begin{align*}
\|T_g-T_h\| \leq \|g-h\|\, L, \quad
L:= \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|\Big( \frac{M_\phi}{m_p}+ A\, \tilde{\phi}(0)
+\frac{Ba}{m_p}\tilde{\phi}(a)\Big).
\end{align*}
Therefore, if
\begin{equation} \label{norm}
\|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|< \frac{m_p}{M_\phi+ m_p A \tilde{\phi}(0)+ Ba
\tilde{\phi}(a)},
\end{equation}
we conclude that there is a unique fixed point $f_\lambda\in C(A^{*}_{q,a})$
which satisfies the regular qFSLP \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2}.
Hence we have the following result.

\begin{theorem}\label{qFSLP}
Let $\alpha\in (0,1)$. If $\Delta\neq 0$, then unique $q$-regular at zero
function $f_\lambda$ for the regular qFSLP \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2}
corresponding to each eigenvalue obeying \eqref{norm} exists, and such
eigenvalue is simple.
\end{theorem}

Note that if $r$ and $w_\alpha$ are $L^2_q(A^{*}_{q,a})$ functions, then
we have the following version of Theorem \ref{qFSLP}.

\begin{theorem}
Let $\alpha\in (\frac{1}{4},1)$. Assume that the functions $r$ and
$w_\alpha$ are $L^2_q(A^{*}_{q,a})$ functions, and $p$ is a function satisfying
$\inf_{x\in A^{*}_{q,a}} p(x)>0$. If $\Delta\neq 0$, then there exists a unique
$q$-regular at zero function $y_\lambda$ for the regular
qFSLP \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2} corresponding to each eigenvalue obeying
$$
\|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \leq \frac{\sigma_\alpha m_p }
{ \sqrt{a}\big( B a^{\frac{1}{2}-\alpha}+B_q(\alpha,\alpha+\frac{1}{2})\big)},
$$
where
$$
\sigma_\alpha= \Gamma_q(\alpha)(q^\alpha;q)_\infty
\sqrt{\frac{1-q^{1-2\alpha}}{1-q}}, \quad \text{for }
\frac{1}{4}<\alpha<\frac{1}{2},
$$
and satisfying
$$
\|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \leq \frac{\mu_\alpha\,m_p }
{ a^\alpha \big(\Gamma_q(\alpha)a^{\alpha - \frac{1}{2}}+B(1-q)^{1-\alpha} \big)},
$$
where
$$
\mu_\alpha=\frac{\Gamma_q(\alpha)(q;q)_\infty \sqrt{1-q^{ 2\alpha-1}}}
{(1-q)^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}}, \quad \text{for }  \frac{1}{2}<\alpha<1.
$$
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
As in the proof of Theorem \ref{qFSLP}, the regular qFSLP \eqref{M.E} can be
interpreted as a fixed point for the mapping $T:C(A^{*}_{q,a})\to C(A^{*}_{q,a})$
which is defined by
 \begin{equation}\label{th0}
\begin{aligned}
Tf(x)&= - \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)
 + A(x) \Big(I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=0}\\
&\quad + B(x)\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=a}
+ C(x)\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)\Big|_{x=0}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
We will use the estimate
 \begin{equation}\label{th1}
\begin{aligned}
&\| I^\alpha_{q,a^-}(Y_g-Y_h)(x)\|_2 \\
&\leq \|g-h\| \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \frac{1}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}
 \Big( \int_{qx}^a t^{2\alpha-2} (qx/t;q)^2_{\alpha-1} \,d_qt
 \Big)^{1/2},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and the following inequalities (see \cite[Theorem 3.8]{ZM}):
\begin{equation} \label{th2}
\begin{aligned}
&\|I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\Big(\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}(Y_g-Y_h)\Big)(x)\|\\
&\leq  \begin{cases}
 \|g-h\| \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2  \frac{\sigma_{1\alpha}\,\sqrt{a}}{m_p} ,
 & \frac{1}{4}<\alpha< 1/2, \\
\|g-h\| \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2  \frac{\sigma_{2\alpha}
 a^{2\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}}{m_p} , & \frac{1}{2}<\alpha<1,
 \end{cases}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where
$$
\sigma_{1\alpha}= \frac{\Gamma_q(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}{(q^\alpha;q)_\infty
\Gamma_q(2\alpha+\frac{1}{2})} \sqrt{\frac{1-q}{1-q^{1-2\alpha}}} ,\quad
\sigma_{2\alpha}= \frac{(1-q)^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}}
 {(q;q)_\infty \sqrt{1-q^{ 2\alpha-1}}}.
$$
For the first case ($\frac{1}{4}<\alpha<\frac{1}{2}$), we have
\begin{equation} \label{th4}
\int_{qx}^a t^{2\alpha-2} (qx/t;q)^2_{\alpha-1} \,d_qt
\leq \frac{x^{1-2\alpha}}{(q^\alpha;q)_\infty^2}\frac{(1-q)}{1-q^{1-2\alpha }}.
\end{equation}
From \eqref{th1} and \eqref{th4}, we obtain
\begin{equation} \label{th5}
\| I^\alpha_{q,a^-}(Y_g-Y_h)(x)\|_2
\leq \|g-h\| \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \frac{\sigma_{1\alpha}
 x^{\frac{1}{2}-\alpha}}{B_q(\alpha,\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}.
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{th0}, \eqref{th2} and \eqref{th5}, we obtain
\begin{align*}
\|T_g-T_h\|_2
&\leq \|g-h\|\, \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2
 \Big[\frac{\sigma_{1\alpha}\sqrt{a}}{m_p}
\big(1+ \frac{ Ba^{\frac{1}{2}-\alpha}}{B_q(\alpha,\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}\big)\Big] \\
 &= L_1 \|g-h\|,
\end{align*}
where
\[
L_1= \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \Big[\frac{\sigma_{1\alpha}\sqrt{a}}{m_p}
\big(1+ \frac{ Ba^{\frac{1}{2}-\alpha}}{B_q(\alpha,\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}\big)\Big].
\]
Using the assumption of the theorem, we conclude that there is a unique
fixed point $y_\lambda\in C(A^{*}_{q,a})$ which satisfies the regular
qFSLP \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2}. Therefore, such eigenvalue is simple.

 For the second case ($\frac{1}{2}<\alpha<1$), we have
\begin{gather*}
\int_{qx}^a t^{2\alpha-2} (qx/t;q)^2_{\alpha-1} \,d_qt
 \leq \frac{a^{2\alpha-1}}{(q^\alpha;q)_\infty^2} \frac{(1-q)}{1-q^{2\alpha-1 }},\\
\| I^\alpha_{q,a^-}(Y_g-Y_h)(x)\|_2
 \leq \|g-h\| \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \frac{\sigma_{2\alpha}(1-q)^{1-\alpha}}
 {\Gamma_q(\alpha)} x^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}.
\end{gather*}
This implies
\begin{align*}
\|T_g-T_h\|_2
&\leq \|g-h\|\, \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2
 \Big[\frac{\sigma_{2\alpha}a^\alpha}{m_p}( a^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}
 + \frac{B}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}(1-q)^{1-\alpha})\Big] \\
&= L_2 \|g-h\|,
\end{align*}
where
\[
L_2= \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|_2 \Big[\frac{\sigma_{2\alpha}a^\alpha}{m_p}
\big( a^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}} + \frac{B}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}(1-q)^{1-\alpha}\big)\Big].
\]
 Using the assumption of the theorem, we conclude that there is a unique
fixed point $y_\lambda\in C(A^{*}_{q,a})$ which satisfies the
regular qFSLP \eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2}. Therefore, such eigenvalue
is simple, The proof is complete.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}\label{thm3.7}
Let $0<\alpha<1$ and $k_0$, $k_1$ be real numbers. Assume that the functions
$p$, $r$ and $w_\alpha$ are $ C(A^{*}_{q,a})$ functions such that
$\inf_{x\in A^{*}_{q,a}} p(x)>0$. Then, the regular qFSLP
\eqref{M.E}--\eqref{BC2} with the initial conditions
 \begin{equation}\label{0}
 \Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}\,y\Big)(0)=k_0, \quad
\Big(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha\,y\Big)(0)=k_1,
\end{equation}
has a unique solution in $C(A^{*}_{q,a})$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Assume that $y_1$ and $y_2$ are two solutions of \eqref{M.E} satisfying
the initial conditions \eqref{0}. Then $z=y_1-y_2$ is a solution of \eqref{M.E}
with the conditions
 \begin{equation}\label{00}
 \Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}\,z\Big)(0)= \Big(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha\,z\Big)(0)= 0.
\end{equation}
From Lemma \ref{Basic lemma}, we have
\begin{gather*}
 z(x)+ \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_z\Big) (x)
= {c}_1 \, x^{\alpha-1}+ {c}_2 \psi_\alpha(x),\\
\Big(I^{1-\alpha}_{q,0^+}z\Big)(x)+ \Big(I_{q,0^+}
\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_z\Big)(x)= {c_1}\,\Gamma_q(\alpha)+ {c}_2
 I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p(x)},\\
\Big(pD_{q,0^+}^\alpha z\Big)(x)+ I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_z(x)= {c}_2.
\end{gather*}
Thus, we can verify that the regular qFSLP \eqref{M.E} can be interpreted
as a fixed point for the mapping $T:C(A^{*}_{q,a})\to C(A^{*}_{q,a})$
which defined by
 \begin{equation}\label{z}
\begin{aligned}
Tf(x)&= - \Big(I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p} I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(x)+
\frac{x^{\alpha-1}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}
\Big(I_{q,0^+}\frac{1}{p}I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(0) \\
&\quad + \psi_\alpha(x)\Big(I^\alpha_{q,a^-}Y_f\Big)(0).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Using the  inequality (see \cite{ZM})
\begin{equation}
\| I^{\alpha}_{q,0^+} f \| \leq \frac{a^\alpha}{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)} \| f(x) \|,
\end{equation}
we obtain $\| \psi_\alpha (x)\| \leq \frac{a^\alpha}{m_p \Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}
 \| f(x) \|$, and using the estimate
 $$
\|Y_g-Y_h\|\leq \|g-h\|\, \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|, \quad g,h \in C(A^{*}_{q,a}),
$$
we have
 $$
\|T_g-T_h\|\leq \|g-h\|\, \|r-\lambda w_\alpha\| \Big( \frac{M_\phi}{m_p}
+ \frac{a^\alpha}{m_p \Gamma_q(\alpha+1)} \tilde{\phi}(0) \Big).
$$
 So, if
$$
\frac{\|r-\lambda w_\alpha\|}{m_p\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}\Big( \Gamma_q(\alpha+1)
M_\phi+a^\alpha \tilde{\phi}(0) \Big)<1,
$$
then $ T:C(A^{*}_{q,a})\to C(A^{*}_{q,a})$ is a contraction mapping and
$z$ is a unique fixed point of \eqref{z}. Therefore, $z\equiv 0$,
 i.e., $y_1=y_2$ on $A^{*}_{q,a}$.
\end{proof}


\section{An application}

The little $q$-Legendre polynomials $p_n(x|q)$, cf. (\cite{R.F.,M.Q}),
are defined by
\begin{align*}
p_n(x|q)
&= {_2\phi_1}(q^{-n},\,q^{n+1};\,q;\,q,\,qx) \\
&= \sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{( q^{-n};q)_k(q^{n+1};q)_k }{(q;q)_k(q;q)_k} q^k x^k .
\end{align*}
Recall that the little $q$-Legendre polynomials are the little $q$-Jacobi
polynomials $p_n(x;q^\alpha,q^\beta|q)$ with $q^\alpha=q^\beta=1$.
These polynomials satisfy the orthogonality relation
$$
\sum_{k=0}^\infty q^k p_m(q^k|q) p_n(q^k|q)
= \frac{q^n}{(1-q^{2n+1})}\,\delta_{mn}.
$$
They also satisfy the  second-order $q$-differential equation
$$
\frac{-1}{q}D_q\Big( (x(1-x)) D_q^{-1}y(x)\Big)+ q^{-n} [n]_q[n+1]_q\,y(x)=0,
$$
where
$$
[n]_q=\frac{1-q^n}{1-q}, \quad n\in \mathbb{R}.
$$

In this section, we prove that the little $q$-Legendre polynomials
satisfy a fractional $q$-Sturm-Liouville problem.
Consider the $q$-fractional differential equation
\begin{equation} \label{ex1}
 {^cD}_{q,1^-}^\mu (x^\mu (qx;q)_\mu) D_{q,0^+}^\mu y(x) =\lambda y(x),
\quad x\in A^{*}_q, \mu\in(0,1),
\end{equation}
 subject to the boundary conditions
\begin{equation} \label{BC3}
(I^{1-\mu}_{q,0^+}y)(0)= (x^\mu (qx;q)_\mu  D^{\alpha}_{q,0^+}y)(\frac{1}{q})=0.
\end{equation}
We shall prove that Problem \eqref{ex1}--\eqref{BC3} has a discrete
spectrum $\{\phi_n, \lambda_n\}$, where $\phi_n$ is a little
 $q$-Legendre polynomials and the eigenvalues $\{\lambda_n\}$ has no
finite limit points. The main result reads as follows.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm5.5}
For $\mu\in(0,1)$ and $\beta> -1$, the little $q$-Legendre polynomials
$$
\phi_n(x)= p_n(x;1,1|q), \quad n\in \mathbb{N}_0
$$
are eigenfunctions of the qFSLP \eqref{ex1}--\eqref{BC3} associated to the
eigenvalues
$$
\lambda_n= q^{-n\mu}\frac{\Gamma_q(1+n+\mu)}{\Gamma_q(1+n-\mu)}.
$$
\end{theorem}

To prove Theorem \ref{thm5.5}, we need the following results from \cite{ZM}.

\begin{lemma}\label{lem5.2}
$$
I^{\mu}_{q,0^+}\Big( (\cdot)^\alpha \, p_n(.;q^\alpha, q^\beta|q)\Big) (x)
= \frac{\Gamma_q(1+\alpha)}{\Gamma_q(1+\alpha+\mu)}\, x^{\alpha+\mu}\,
p_n(x;q^{\alpha+\mu},\, q^{\beta-\mu}|q).
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{lem5.3}
If $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\mu$ are real numbers satisfying $\alpha>-1$,
$\beta>-1$ and $\beta-1<\mu<\alpha+1$, then
\begin{gather*}
 I^{\mu}_{q,1^-} \Big((qt;q)_\beta p_m(t;q^\alpha,q^\beta|q)\Big)= \\
 q^{m\mu}  \frac{\Gamma_q(\beta+m+1)\Gamma_q(1+\alpha+m-\mu)
\Gamma_q(1+\alpha)}{\Gamma_q(1+m+\beta+\mu)\Gamma_q(1+\alpha+m)
\Gamma_q(1+\alpha-\mu)}(qt;q)_{\beta+\mu} p_m(t;q^{\alpha-\mu},q^{\beta+\mu}|q).
\end{gather*}
\end{lemma}

 The following equation follows immediately from Lemma \ref{lem5.2} and \eqref{2.9},
\begin{equation} \label{e5.3}
D_{q,0^+}^\mu p_n(x;1,q^{\beta-\mu}|q)
= \frac{1}{\Gamma_q(1-\mu)} x^{-\mu} [p_n(x;q^{-\mu},q^\beta|q)-1].
\end{equation}
Also, from Lemma \ref{lem5.3} and \eqref{2.8} we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{5.4}
\begin{aligned}
&{^cD}_{q,1^-}^\mu (qx;q)_{\beta+\mu} p_n(x;q^{\alpha-\mu},q^{\beta+\mu}|q) \\
&= q^{-m\mu} \frac{\Gamma_q(1+n+\beta+\mu)
 \Gamma_q(1+\alpha+n)\Gamma_q(1+\alpha-\mu)}{\Gamma_q(\beta+n+1)
 \Gamma_q(1+\alpha+n-\mu)\Gamma_q(1+\alpha)}
 (qx;q)_{\beta} p_n(x;q^{\alpha},q^{\beta}|q)\\
&\quad-  \frac{ (qx;q)_{-\mu}}{\Gamma_q(1-\mu)}\Big(I^{\mu}_{q,1^-}
(q(\cdot);q)_{\beta} p_n(.\,;q^{\alpha},q^{\beta}|q)\Big)(\frac{1}{q}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm5.5}]
Setting $\beta=\mu$ in \eqref{e5.3} we obtain
\begin{equation} \label{5.7}
D_{q,0^+}^\mu p_n(x;1,1|q)= \frac{x^{-\mu}}{\Gamma_q(1-\mu)}
[p_n(x;q^{-\mu},q^\beta|q)-1].
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{BC3}, \eqref{5.4} and \eqref{5.7}, it follows that
\begin{equation} \label{5.8}
\begin{aligned}
&{^cD}_{q,1^-}^\mu (x^\mu (qx;q)_{\mu}) D_{q,0^+}^\mu p_n(x;1,1|q) \\
&= \frac{{^cD}_{q,1^-}^\mu (qx;q)_{\mu}}{\Gamma_q(1-\mu)}
  [p_n(x;q^{-\mu},q^\mu|q)-1] \\
&= q^{-m\mu} \, \frac{\Gamma_q(1+n+\mu)}{\Gamma_q(1+n-\mu)}
 (qx;q)_{\beta} p_n(x;1,1|q).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Now, combining \eqref{ex1} and \eqref{5.8} gives the required result.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark} \rm
Theorem \ref{thm5.5} is a $q$-analogue of the following classical eigenvalue
problem for the Legendre polynomials (see \cite{Churchill})
$$
((1- x^2)y')' + \lambda y = 0, \quad - 1 \leq x \leq 1.
$$
\end{remark}


\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
 The author thanks the anonymous referee for the suggestions and remarks that
 helped us improve this article.
Also the author wants to thank Prof. Z. S. Mansour for the discussions
about this material.


\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{A.L.} L. Abreu; 
\emph{Sampling theory associated with $q$-difference equations of the 
Sturm-Liouville type}, J. Phys. A, \textbf{38} (48) (2005), 10311-10319.

\bibitem{A.B.} M. Adivar, M. Bohner; 
\emph{Spectral analysis of $q$-difference aquations with spectral singularities},
 Math. Comput. Modelling, \textbf{43} (2006), 695-703.

\bibitem{R.P} R.P. Agarwal; \emph{Certain fractional $q$-integrals and $q$-derivatives}, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., \textbf{66}(1969), 365-370.

\bibitem{W.A} W.A. Al-Salam; 
\emph{Some fractional $q$-integrals and $q$-derivatives}, 
Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc., \textbf{2}(15) (1966/1967), 135-140.

\bibitem{M.J.M} M. Annaby, J. Bustoz, M. Ismail; 
\emph{On sampling theory and basic SturmLiouville systems}, 
J. Comput. Appl. Math., \textbf{206} (2007), 73-85.

\bibitem{M.H.1} M. Annaby, Z. Mansour; 
\emph{Basic Sturm–Liouville problems}, J. Phys. A:Math. Gen.,
 \textbf{38} (2005), 3775-3797.

\bibitem{M.H} M.H. Annaby, Z.S. Mansour; $q$-\emph{Fractional Calculus and Equations}. Springer, 2056, (2012).

\bibitem{M.Z.I} M. Annaby, Z. Mansour, I. Soliman; 
\emph{$q$-Titchmarsh–Weyl theory: series expansion}, 
Nagoya Math. J., \textbf{205} (2012), 67-118.

\bibitem{Churchill}, Ruel V. Churchill; 
\emph{Fourier Series and Boundary Value Problems}. 
McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, (1941).

\bibitem{A.E.} A. Eryilmaz; 
\emph{Spectral analysis of $q$-Sturm-Liouville problem with the spectral parameter
in the boundary condition}, J. Funct. Spaces Appl., \textbf{2012} (2012), 
Article ID 736437.

\bibitem{G.M} G. Gasper, M. Rahman; 
\emph{Basic Hypergeometric Series}. Cambridge university Press, Cambrdge, (2004).

\bibitem{H.B.} A. Huseynov, E. Bairamov; 
\emph{An eigenvalue problems for quadratic pencils of $q$-difference equations
 and its applications}, Appl. Math. Lett., \textbf{22}(2009), 521-527.

\bibitem{R.F.} R. Koekoek, R. F. Swarttouw; 
\emph{The Askey-scheme of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials and its $q$-analogue},
 Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Informatics Report, Technical University 
Delft, (1998) 98-17.

\bibitem{L} A. Lavagno; 
\emph{Basic-deformed quantum mechanics}, Rep. Math. Phys., 
\textbf{64}(1-2) (2009), 79-91.

\bibitem{ZM} Z. Mansour; 
\emph{On Fractional $q$-Sturm Liouville Problems}, 
J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., doi:10.1007/s11784-016-0331-y (2016).

\bibitem{A.A.} A. Nemri, A. Fitouhi; 
\emph{Polynomial expansions for solutions of wave equation in quantum calculus},
 Matematiche \textbf{65} (1) (2010), 73-82.

\bibitem{M.Q} M. Rahman, Q. M. Tariq; 
\emph{Addition formulas for $q$-Legendre-type functions}, 
Meth. Appl. Anal., \textbf{6}(1) (1999), 3-20.

 \end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
