\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2018 (2018), No. 312, pp. 1--22.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2018 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2018/312\hfil Almost global existence ]
{Almost global existence for the Neumann problem of quasilinear wave
 equations outside star-shaped domains in 3D}

\author[L. Ren, J. Xin \hfil EJDE-2018/312\hfilneg]
{Lulu Ren, Jie Xin}

\address{Lulu Ren \newline
School of Mathematics and Statistics Science,
Ludong University,
Yantai City, Shandong Province 264025, China}
\email{17853595701@163.com}

\address{Jie Xin (corresponding author)\newline
School of Mathematics Science,
Qufu Normal University,
Qufu City, Shandong Province 273165, China}
\email{fdxinjie@sina.com}

\dedicatory{Communicated by Goong Chen}

\thanks{Submitted August 8, 2017. Published December 31, 2017.}
\subjclass[2010]{35L70, 74H20, 74B20}
\keywords{Quasilinear wave equations; exterior problem;
 almost global existence; \hfill\break\indent
Neumann boundary condition}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article, we prove the almost global existence of solutions
 for quasilinear wave equations in the complement of star-shaped
 domains in three dimensions, with a Neumann boundary condition.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

Assume the obstacle $\mathcal{K} \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ be
a smooth, closed and strictly star-shaped domain with respect to the origin.
Then consider the Neumann problem for the quasilinear wave equation
\begin{equation}\label{l1.01}
\begin{gathered}
\Box_cu=F(d u,d^2u), \quad
(t,x)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K},\\
\partial_\nu u\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
u(0,x)=f(x),\quad \partial_tu(0,x)=g(x).
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Here
$\Box_c=(\Box_{c_1},\Box_{c_2},\cdot\cdot\cdot,\Box_{c_N})$
is a vector-value multiple-speed D'Alembertian with
$\Box_{c_I}=\partial_t^2-c_I^2 \Delta $,
and we suppose that all $c_I$'s are positive but not necessarily distinct.
\[
\partial_\nu u=\vec{n}\cdot\nabla_xu=\sum_{j=1}^3\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_j}n_j
\]
denotes differentiation with respect to the outward normal to $\mathcal{K}$.
If we set $\partial_t=\partial_0$, then
$$
F^I(d u,d^2u)=\sum_{0\leq j,k,l\leq3 ,\, 0\leq J,K\leq N}^3C_{K,l}^{IJ,jk}
\partial_lu^K\partial_j \partial_k u^J, \quad 1\leq I\leq N,
$$
where
$C_{K,l}^{IJ,jk}$ are real constants satisfying the symmetry conditions
\[
C_{K,l}^{IJ,jk}=C_{K,l}^{JI,jk}=C_{K,l}^{IJ,kj}.
\]
Let $\partial=(\partial_t,\partial_{1},\partial_{2},\partial_{3})
=(\partial_0, \nabla)$ Denote the time-space gradient, and
 $\partial u=u'$.
We write $\Omega=\{\Omega_{ij}\}$, where
$\Omega_{ij}=x_i\partial_j-x_j\partial_i$, $1\leq i \leq j \leq3$,
are the Euclidean $\mathbb{R}^3$ rotation operators.
Set
$Z=\{\partial_t,\partial_j,\Omega_{ij}\}$,
$S=t\partial_t+x\cdot\nabla_x=t\partial_t+r\partial_r$,
$\langle x\rangle =(1+|x|^{2})^{1/2}$.

To simplify the notation, we let
$$
\Box=\partial_t^2-\Delta
$$
be the scale unit-speed D'Alembertian. Since the estimates for $\Box$
yield ones for $\Box_{c}$,
we will state most of our estimates in terms of $\Box$ instead of $\Box_{c}$.

We suppose that the Cauchy data satisfies the relevant compatibility conditions.
Let $J_{k}u=\{\partial_{x}^{\alpha}u:0\leq|\alpha|\leq k\}$.
If $m$ is fixed and $u$ is a formal $H^{m}$ solution of \eqref{l1.01}, then
we write $\partial_{t}^{k}u(0,\cdot)=\psi_{k}(J_{k}f,J_{k-1}g)(0\leq k\leq m)$.
The compatibility condition for \eqref{l1.01} with $(f,g)\in H^{m}\times H^{m-1}$
is just the requirement that $\psi_{k}$ vanish on $\partial\mathcal{K}$ for
$0\leq k\leq m$.
Furthermore, $(f,g)\in C^{\infty}$ satisfies the compatibility conditions
to infinite order if these conditions hold for all $m$.

There have been many results on the almost global existence of wave equations,
mostly with Dirichlet boundary condition.
The almost global existence for nonlinear wave equations was proved
in \cite{F.John1984} on Minkowski space by using the Lorentz invariance of
the wave operator.
In \cite{S.K1996}, the authors gave the same result without relying on Lorentz
invariance. The exterior problem of nonlinear wave equation was considered in
\cite{p.s.1990}.
Mitsuru Ikawa \cite{M.I1968} studied some mixed problems for hyperbolic system
of second order.
The almost global existence for the Dirichlet problem of quasilinear, semilinear
wave equations in three space dimensions were proved in \cite{M.K2004, K. H2004}
and \cite{M.H.C2002}, respectively.
Also \cite{Makoto2012, Jason2005,Jason2006} give the global existence for
Dirichlet problem of nonlinear wave equations in exterior domains.
The nonexistence of  global solutions for exterior problem to
critical semilinear wave equations in high dimensions was obtained in \cite{N.Y.2016}.

There are also some results on the almost existence to Neumann problem for
wave equations.
The Neumann problem for the wave equation in wedge was considered in \cite{a.y2000}.
\cite{p.y.2003} considered the Neumann exterior problem for wave equation in 2D
and studied the asymptotic behavior of the solutions for large times.
Katayama et al \cite{S.K2013} proved the almost global existence of solutions
to exterior problem for semilinear wave equations with Neumann condition.
Metcalfe et al \cite{J. M2008} gave the almost global existence for
quasilinear Neumann wave equations on infinite homogeneous waveguides.


To our acknowledge there are very few results on the almost global existence
or lifespan estimate of exterior Neumann problem for quasilinear wave equations in 3D.
In this paper, we study the almost global existence of solutions to the exterior
 problem for quasilinear wave equations with Neumann condition by using the
estimates similar to Dirichlet problem in \cite{M.K2004}.
 Compared with the Dirichlet problem, $u=0$ changes into $\partial_{\nu}u=0$ on
$\partial\Omega$.
So the estimates on the boundary, we decompose the estimated terms into the
terms which contain $\partial_{\nu}u$.
The key steps in this paper are the piontwise estimates and weighted
$L^{2}$ estimates. At last, we proof the almost global existence to this
problem and give a lower bound for the lifespan of the solutions.
To study this problem conveniently, we need some known lemmas (see \cite{M.K2004}).

\begin{lemma}\label{yingli1.1}
Suppose that $u\in C^5$ solves the Cauchy problem
\begin{equation}\label{l1.02}
\begin{gathered}
\Box u=F(s,x), \quad  (s,x)\in [0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\\
u(0,x)=\partial_tu(0,x)=0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Then
\begin{equation}\label{l1.03}
 (1+t)|u(t,x)|\leq
C\int_0^t\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq 3,j\leq1}
 |S^jZ^\alpha F(s,y)| \frac{1}{|y|}\,dy\,ds.
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{yingli1.2}
Let $u\in C^5$ solve \eqref{l1.02}, and fix
 $x\in \mathbb{R}^3$ with $|x|=r$.
Then
\begin{equation}\label{11.04}
|x|\,|u(t,x)|\leq \frac{1}{2}\int_0^t \int_{|r-(t-s)|}^{r+t-s}
\sup_{|\theta|=1}|F(s,\rho\theta)|\rho d\rho ds.
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{yingli1.3}
Suppose that $u$ solves the Cauchy problem
\begin{equation}\label{l1.05}
\begin{gathered}
\Box u=F, \\
u(0,x)=f,\quad \partial_tu(0,x)=g.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Then
\begin{gather}\label{11.06}
\begin{aligned}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}  \|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2} u'\|_{L^2( \mathbb{R}^3)}\\
&\leq C \|u'(0,x)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)}ds
+C\int_0^t \|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)}ds,
\end{aligned}\\
\label{11.07}
\|u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\{|x|<1\}}
\leq C \|u'(0,x)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)}ds
+C\int_0^t \|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)}ds.
\end{gather}
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{yinli1.4}
Suppose that $h\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Then for $R>1$,
$$
\|h\|_{L^{\infty}(R/2 <|x|<R)}
\leq CR^{-1}\sum_{|\alpha|+|\gamma|\leq2}\|\Omega^{\alpha}\partial_{x}^{\gamma}
h\|_{L^{2}(R/4 <|x|<2R)}.
$$
\end{lemma}

\section{Pointwise estimates outside of obstacles}

In this section, we shall consider the exterior problem of Neumann wave equations
\begin{equation}\label{l2.01}
\begin{gathered}
\Box u=F(t,x), \quad   (t,x)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K},\\
\partial_\nu u(t,x)=0,\quad x\in \partial \mathcal{K},\\
u(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Any of the following estimates for $\Box$ extend to estimates for
$\Box_{c}$ after applying straightforward scaling argument.
We will prove the following pointwise estimate.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli2.1}
Suppose that $u=u(t,x)\in C^\infty$ is the solution of \eqref{l2.01}.
Then for each $|\alpha|=N>1$,
\begin{equation}\label{l2.02}
\begin{aligned}
t|Z^\alpha u(t,x)|
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\gamma|+j\leq N+3,\, j\leq1}
\| S^j\partial^\gamma  F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}
\sum_{|\beta|+j\leq N+6\,\, j\leq1}  |S^jZ^\beta F(s,y)| \frac{1}{|y|}\,dy\,ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

We assume, without loss of generality, that
$\mathcal{K} \subset \{x\in \mathbb{R}^3:|x|<1\}$.
As a first step, we prove the following lemma.


\begin{lemma}\label{yinli2.1}
Suppose that $u=u(t,x)\in C^\infty$ is the solution of \eqref{l2.01}.
Then for each $|\alpha|=N>1$,
\begin{equation}\label{l2.03}
\begin{aligned}
t|Z^\alpha u(t,x)|
&\leq C\int_0^t\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}
\sum_{|\gamma|+j\leq 3,j\leq1}|S^jZ^{\alpha+\gamma} F(s,y)| \frac{1}{|y|}\,dy\,ds\\
 &\quad +C \sup_{|y|\leq2,0\leq s\leq t}(1+s)(|Z^\alpha u'(s,y)|+|Z^\alpha u(s,y)|).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Inequality \eqref{l2.03} obviously holds for $|x|<2$.
Let $\rho\in C^\infty (\mathbb{R})$ be a cut function satisfying
$$
\rho(r)=\begin{cases}
1,& r\geq2,\\
0, & r\leq1.
\end{cases}
$$
Then $\omega(t,x)=\rho(|x|)\partial^\alpha u(t,x)$, solves the following problem
in $\mathbb{R}^3$,
\begin{gather*}
\Box \omega=\rho\partial^\alpha F+G,\\
\omega(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0,
\end{gather*}
where
$$
G=-2\nabla\rho(|x|)\cdot\nabla\partial^\alpha u-(\Delta\rho(|x|))u.
$$
Split $\omega=\omega_1+\omega_2$, where $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$
solve the following problems:
\begin{gather*}
\Box \omega_1=\rho\partial^\alpha F,\\
\omega_1(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0,
\end{gather*}
and
\begin{gather*}
\Box \omega_2=G,\\
\omega_2(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0,
\end{gather*}
respectively.
Applying Lemma \ref{yingli1.1}, we conclude that
$$
t|\omega_1(t,x)|\leq C\int_0^t\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}
\sum_{|\gamma|+j\leq 3,j\leq1}
 |S^jZ^\gamma\partial^\alpha F(s,y)| \frac{1}{|y|}\,dy\,ds.
 $$
By Lemma \ref{yingli1.2},
\begin{equation}\label{12.04}
|\omega_2(t,x)|\leq C \frac{1}{|x|}
\int_0^t \int_{||x|-(t-s)|}^{|x|+t-s}
\sup_{|\theta|=1}|G(s,r\theta)|r \,dr\,ds.
\end{equation}
For $|x|\leq1$ and $|x|\geq 2$, $G(t,x)=0$.
Hence the right-hand side of \eqref{12.04} is nonzero only when
$$
-2\leq|x|-(t-s)\leq2,
$$
namely,
$$
(t-|x|)-2\leq s\leq(t-|x|)+2.
$$
We conclude that
\begin{equation}\label{12.05}
\begin{aligned}
&|\omega_2(t,x)| \\
&\leq C \frac{1}{|x|}\frac{1}{1+|t-|x||}
\sup_{ \substack{(t-|x|)-2\leq s\leq(t-|x|)+2 ,\\ |y|\leq2}}
(1+s)(|Z^\alpha u'(s,y)|+|Z^\alpha u(s,y)|).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
This implies that \eqref{l2.03} still holds for $|x|\geq2$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}\label{yingli2.2}
Suppose that $u\in C^\infty$ solves \eqref{l2.01} and $F(t,x)=0$ for $|x|>4$.
Then there exists a constant $c>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{12.06}
  \|u'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}
\leq  C \int_0^t e^{-c(t-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds.
\end{equation}
Consequently, for any fixed nonnegative integer $M$, we have
\begin{gather}\label{12.07}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}\|(t\partial_t )^j\partial^\alpha
u'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}\\
&\leq C \sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M-1 ,\, j\leq1}\|(t\partial_t )^j\partial^\alpha
 F(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t e^{-\frac c2(t-s)}\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}
\|(s\partial_s)^j\partial^\alpha F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds,
\end{aligned} \\
\label{12.08}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}\| (t\partial_t )^j\partial^\alpha
 u'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}\\
&\leq C \sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M-1 ,\, j\leq1}\|S^j\partial^\alpha
 f(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t e^{-\frac c2(t-s)}\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}
\|S^j\partial^\alpha F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{gather}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
First, we provide the exponential energy decay
\cite[Theorem III, p. 480]{p.d.63} and
\cite[(iii), p. 230]{s.m.75}:
Suppose that $\omega$ is the solution to the  problem
\begin{equation}\label{0b101}
\begin{gathered}
\Box \omega=0,\\
\partial_\nu \omega=0, \quad x\in \partial\mathcal{K}.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Let
 $$
E(\omega,D,t)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{D}\Big(|\partial_{t}\omega|^{2}
+|\nabla\omega|^{2}\Big)dx.
$$
Then there exist positive constants $C,c$, such that
$$
E(\omega,D,t)\leq Ce^{-ct}E(\omega,D,0).
$$
Next, homogenizing \eqref{l2.01}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{0101}
\begin{gathered}
\Box \omega=0,\\
\partial_\nu \omega\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
\omega|_{t=s}=0,\quad \partial_{t}\omega|_{t=s}=F(s,x).
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Suppose that $\omega$ solves problem \eqref{0101},
then $u=\int_{0}^{t}\omega(x,t,s)ds$ solves \eqref{l2.01}.
Thus we derive
\begin{align*}
  \|u'\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3}\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}^{2}
  &\leq \int_{0}^{t}\|\omega'(x,t,s)\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3}
\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}^{2}ds\\
  &\leq C\int_{0}^{t}E(\omega,(\mathbb{R}^{3}
\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4),t-s)ds\\
  &\leq C\int_{0}^{t}e^{-c(t-s)}E(\omega,(\mathbb{R}^{3}
\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4),s)ds\\
  &\leq C\int_{0}^{t}e^{-c(t-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3}
\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}^{2}ds,
\end{align*}
which implies
\begin{equation*}
  \|u'\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3}\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}
  \leq C\int_{0}^{t}e^{-c(t-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3}\backslash
\mathcal{K})}ds.
\end{equation*}
Therefore, estimate \eqref{12.06} holds.

Estimate \eqref{12.08} follows from \eqref{12.07}.
Using induction and elliptic regularity we can prove the estimate \eqref{12.07}.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{dingli2.1}]
By Lemma \ref{yinli2.1}, we need only to proof that the last term on the right-hand side of \eqref{l2.03}
can be dominated by the right-hand side of \eqref{l2.02}, namely prove
$$
t\sup_{|x|<2}|\partial^\alpha u(t,x)|\leq \text{ right-hand side of } \eqref{l2.03},
$$
holds for each $|\alpha|=N$.
We have
\begin{equation}\label{12.09}
  |t\partial^\alpha u(t,x)|
\leq \int_0^t\sum_{j\leq1}|(s\partial_s)^j\partial^\alpha u(s,x)|ds.
  \end{equation}
First we discuss the case: $F(s,y)\equiv0$ when $|y|>4$.

By Sobolev Lemma, from \eqref{12.08}, we obtain that for $|\alpha|=N$,
\begin{equation}\label{12.10}
\begin{aligned}
& t\sup_{|x|<2}|\partial^\alpha u(t,x)| \\
&\leq  C\int_0^t\sum_{|\gamma|+j\leq N+2 ,\, j\leq1}
\| S^j\partial^\gamma F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K}:|x|\leq4)}ds\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\int_{0}^s e^{-\frac c2(s-\tau)}\sum_{|\gamma|+j\leq N+2 ,\, j\leq1}
\| S^j\partial^\gamma F(\tau,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|\leq4)}d\tau ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Therefore,
$$
t\sup_{|x|<2}|\partial^\alpha u(t,x)|\leq \text{first term on the right-hand side of }
 \eqref{l2.03}.
$$

Now we deal with the second case: $F(s,y)\equiv0$ when $|y|<3$.
Suppose that $u_0$ solves the  Cauchy problem
\begin{equation}\label{l2.11}
\begin{gathered}
\Box u_0=F(t,x), \quad
 (t,x)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^3,\\
 u_0(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Let $\eta\in C_0^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3)$ be a cut function satisfying
$$
\eta(x)=\begin{cases}
1, & |x|<2,\\
0, & |x|\geq3.
\end{cases}
$$
If we set $\tilde{u}=(\eta-1)u_0+u$, then $\tilde{u}$ solves the problem
\begin{equation}\label{l2.12}
\begin{gathered}
\Box \tilde u=G(t,x), \quad  (t,x)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K},\\
\partial_\nu \tilde u\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
\tilde u(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where
$$
G=-2\nabla\eta \cdot \nabla u_0-(\Delta\eta)u_0
$$
vanishes unless $2\leq|x|\leq4$.
Hence by the first case,
\begin{equation}\label{12.13}
  \begin{aligned}
 t\sup_{|x|<2}|\partial^\alpha u(t,x)|
&=t\sup_{|x|<2}|\partial^\alpha \tilde u(t,x)|\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\gamma|\leq N+2 ,\, j\leq1}
\| S^j\partial^\gamma G(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\gamma|\leq N+3 ,\, j\leq1}
\| S^j\partial^\gamma u_0(s,\cdot)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
\mathcal{K}:2\leq|x|\leq4)}ds.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Set $\omega=S^j\partial^\gamma u_0$ with $j=0,1$.
By \eqref{11.04}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{12.14}
\begin{aligned}
&\|S^j\partial^\gamma u_0(s,\cdot)\|_{L^\infty(2\leq|x|\leq4)} \\
&\leq C\int_0^s\int_{|s-\tau-\rho|\leq4}\sup_{|\theta|=1}
 |S^j\partial^\gamma F(\tau,\rho\theta)|\rho d\rho d\tau\\
&\leq C\sum_{|\mu|\leq2}\int_0^s\int_{|s-\tau-\rho|\leq 4}
 |S^j\partial^\gamma\Omega^\mu F(\tau,\rho\theta)|\rho d\rho d\theta d\tau\\
&=C\sum_{|\mu|\leq2}\int_0^s\int_{|s-\tau-|y||\leq 4}
|S^j\partial^\gamma\Omega^\mu F(\tau,y)|\frac{dyd\tau}{|y|}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Set $\Lambda_s=\{(\tau,y):0\leq\tau\leq s,|s-\tau-|y||\leq4\}$ satisfying
$\Lambda_s\cap \Lambda_{s'}=\emptyset$ if $|s-s'|>20$.
Therefore, by \eqref{12.13} and \eqref{12.14}, we conclude that
$$
t\sup_{|x|<2}|\partial^\alpha u(t,x)|
\leq C\sum_{\gamma\leq N+3,\, |\mu|\leq2,j\leq1}
\int_0^t\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}
|S^j\Omega^\mu\partial^\gamma F(\tau,y)|\frac{dyd\tau}{|y|}\,.
$$
The proof is complete.
\end{proof}

\section{Weighted $L_{t,x}^2$ estimates for D'Alembertian outside
 of star-shaped obstacles}

In this section, we prove the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli13.01}
Suppose that $u=u(t,x)$ solves problem \eqref{l2.01}.
Then if $N$ is fixed, we have
\begin{equation}\label{13.01}
\begin{aligned}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}
  \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C \int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},\quad \forall t\geq0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Additionally,
\begin{equation}\label{13.02}
 \begin{aligned}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}
\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}
\|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}S^m\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C \int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}
\|\Box S^m\partial^\alpha u(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N-1 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box
S^m\partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},\quad
\forall t\geq0,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{13.03}
 \begin{aligned}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2} \sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}
 \|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}S^m Z^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times
\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C \int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box S^mZ^\alpha u(s,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N-1 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box S^mZ^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},\quad \forall t\geq0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proposition}\label{mingting13.01}
Suppose that $u$ solves problem \eqref{l2.01}. Then we have
\begin{equation}\label{13.04}
\|u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}
\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box u(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds,\quad
\forall t\geq0
\end{equation}
and for any given positive integer $N$,
\begin{equation}\label{13.05}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha\leq N}\|\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times
\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|m\leq N}\|\Box \partial_s^m u(s,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
+C \sum_{|\alpha\leq N-1}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},\\
&\quad  \forall t\geq0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Using the elliptic regularity argument, we know that \eqref{13.05}
is a consequence of \eqref{13.04}.
To prove \eqref{13.04}, we discuss the first case:
$F(s,y)\equiv0$ for $|y|>6$.

By \eqref{12.06} and the Schwarz inequality, we have
\begin{align*}
&\|u'(\tau,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}^2 \\
&\leq C\int_0^\tau e^{-c(\tau-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
\mathcal{K})}ds
\int_0^\tau \|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds,\quad
\end{align*}
for all $\tau\geq0$.
Integrating $\tau$ from $0$ to $t$ on the above inequality,
\begin{align*}
&\int_0^t\|u'(\tau,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}^2d\tau\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\int_0^\tau e^{-c(\tau-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
\int_0^\tau \|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}dsd\tau\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\int_0^\tau e^{-c(\tau-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}dsd\tau
\int_0^t \|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&=C\int_0^t\int_s^t e^{-c(\tau-s)}\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}d\tau ds
\int_0^t \|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
\leq&C\Big(\int_0^t\|F(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K})}ds\Big)^2,\ \forall t\geq0
\end{align*}
therefore, \eqref{13.04} holds.

Now we consider the second case: $F(s,y)\equiv0$ for $|y|<4$.
By \eqref{13.04}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{13.06}
\|u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}
\leq C\|F\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)},
\ \mathrm{if}\ F(s,y)\equiv0,\ |y|>4.
\end{equation}
Let $\eta\in C^\infty (\mathbb{R}^3)$ be a cut function satisfying
$$
\eta(x)=\begin{cases}
1,& |x|\leq2,\\
0,& |x|\geq4.
\end{cases}
$$
Suppose that $u_0$ solves the Cauchy problem \eqref{l2.11}.
Set $\tilde u=(\eta-1)u_0+u$, then $\tilde u$ solves the following problem
\begin{gather*}
\Box\tilde u=\tilde F,\\
\partial_\nu \tilde u\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
\tilde u(0,x)=0,\quad  t\leq0,
\end{gather*}
where
$$
\tilde F=-2\nabla\eta \cdot\nabla u_0-(\Delta\eta)u_0.
$$
Note that $\tilde u=u$ for $|x|<2$, and $\tilde F(s,y)=0$ for $|y|>4$.
Then by \eqref{13.06} and \eqref{11.07}, we obtain
\begin{align*}
\|u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}
&\leq C\|u_0'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}
 + C\|u_0\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<4)}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box u\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds,\quad
\forall t\geq0.
\end{align*}
\end{proof}

Repeating the proof of Proposition \ref{mingting13.01} and using \eqref{12.08},
we have the following proposition.

\begin{proposition}\label{mingti3.2}
Suppose that $u$ solves problem \eqref{l2.01}. Then
\begin{equation}\label{13.07}
 \begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|+m \leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+m \leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box S^m \partial^m u(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C \sum_{|\alpha|+m \leq N-1 ,\, m\leq1}\|
\Box S^m\partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},
\quad \forall t\geq0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Additionally,
\begin{equation}\label{13.08}
  \begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|+|\gamma|+m \leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\Omega^\gamma\partial^\alpha
u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+|\gamma|+m \leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|
 \Box S^m\Omega^\gamma \partial^m u(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C \sum_{|\alpha|+|\gamma|+m \leq N-1 ,\, m\leq1}
 \|\Box S^m\Omega^\gamma\partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}, \quad
 \forall t\geq0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}


\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{dingli13.01}]
Let us first proof estimate \eqref{13.01}.
By Proposition \ref{mingting13.01} it suffices to prove that
\begin{equation}\label{13.09}
\begin{aligned}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}   \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}
\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|>2)}\\
&\leq C \int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
+C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

Let $\beta\in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3)$ be a cut function satisfying
$$
\beta(x)=\begin{cases} 1, & |x|\geq2,\\
0,& |x|\leq1.
\end{cases}
$$
Then $\omega=\beta u$ solves the  Cauchy problem
\begin{gather*}
\Box \omega=\beta\Box u-2\nabla \beta \cdot \nabla u-(\Delta\beta)u,\\
\omega(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0,
\end{gather*}
We split $\omega=\omega_1+\omega_2$,
where $\Box \omega_1=\beta\Box u$ and $\Box \omega_2=-2\nabla \beta \cdot \nabla u-(\Delta\beta)u$.
By \eqref{11.06}, we have
\begin{align*}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}
  \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}\partial^\alpha
\omega_1'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|>2)}\\
&\leq C \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\int_0^t\| \partial^\alpha(\beta\Box u)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
\leq C \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\int_0^t\|\Box \partial^\alpha
 u\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
\end{align*}
To bound the left of \eqref{13.09} it suffices to proof
\begin{equation}\label{13.10}
 \begin{aligned}
&(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}
  \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}
\partial^\alpha \omega_2'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}
:|x|>2)}\\
&\leq C \int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
+C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Note that $G=-2\nabla \beta \cdot \nabla u-(\Delta\beta)u=\Box \omega_2$
vanishes unless $1<|x|<2$.
To use this, let $\chi\in C_0^\infty (\mathbb{R})$
satisfying $\chi(s)=0,\ |s|>2$, and $\sum_j \chi(s-j)=1$.
Then we split $G=\sum_jG_j$, where $G_j(s,x)=\chi(s-j)G(s,x)$,
and let $\omega_{2,j}$ solves $ \omega_{2,j}=G_j$ on Minkowski space with zero
initial data.
By the sharp Huygens principle, we have
$|\partial^\alpha \omega_2(t,x)|^2\leq C\sum_j|\partial^\alpha \omega_{2,j}(t,x)|^2$.
Therefore, by \eqref{11.06} it follows that
\begin{align*}
&\Big((\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\langle x \rangle^{-1/2}
 \partial^\alpha \omega_2'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times
\mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}:|x|>2)}\Big)^2\\
&\leq \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\sum_j\Big(\int_0^t\|\partial^\alpha G_j(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)}ds\Big)^2\\
&\leq C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\partial^\alpha G\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3)}^2\\
&\leq C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\{1<|x|<2\})}^2
+C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\{1<|x|<2\})}^2\\
&\leq C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\partial^\alpha u'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\{|x|<2\})}^2\\
&\leq C\Big( \int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
+C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Box \partial^\alpha u\|_{L^2([0,t]
 \times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big)^2,
\end{align*}
which completes the proof of \eqref{13.01}.
Estimates \eqref{13.02} and \eqref{13.03} follow by a similar argument.
\end{proof}

\section{$L_x^2$ estimates outside of obstacles}

Suppose that $v$ is a sufficiently smooth function such that
\begin{equation}\label{14.01}
  \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty([0,T]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\leq \delta,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{14.02}
 \|\partial\nabla v\|_{L_t^1L_x^\infty([0,T]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K})}\leq C_0,
\end{equation}
where $\delta>0$ is a sufficiently small constant, $C_0$ is a positive constant.
Let $\Box_\gamma$ denote a second order operator given by
\begin{equation}\label{14.03}
  \Box_\gamma=\Box_c-\sum_{l,m}C^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_l\partial_m.
\end{equation}
Consider the  Neumann wave equations
\begin{equation}\label{14.04}
  \begin{gathered}
\Box_\gamma \omega=G,\quad  (t,x)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K},\\
\partial_\nu\omega\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
\omega(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Let
\begin{gather*}
E_0=|\partial_0\omega|^2+c_I^2|\nabla\omega|^2
 +\sum_{l,m=1}^3(\partial_l\omega)^TC^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_m\omega,\\
E_j=-2c_I^2(\partial_0\omega)^T(\partial_j\omega)
 -2\sum_{k=1}^3(\partial_0\omega)^TC^{jk}(\nabla v)\partial_k\omega,\quad j=1,2,3,\\
e=\sum_{l,m=1}^3\left((\partial_l\omega)^T\partial_0C^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_m\omega-
2(\partial_l\omega)^T\partial_lC^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_m\omega
\right).
\end{gather*}
Noting the symmetry condition of $C^{lm}(\nabla v)$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{14.05}
  \partial_0E_0+\sum_{j=1}^3\partial_jE_j=2(\partial_0\omega)^T\Box_\gamma \omega+e.
\end{equation}
By \eqref{14.01}, there exist positive constants $\lambda, \mu$ depending only
on $c_1, c_2, \delta$,
such that
\begin{equation}\label{14.06}
  \lambda|\omega'|^2\leq E_0\leq \mu |\omega'|^2.
\end{equation}
Integrating \eqref{14.06} over $[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}$,
we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{14.07}
 \begin{aligned}
&\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(t,x)dx-
  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(0,x)dx-
  \int_{[0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}}\sum_{j=1}^3E_jn_jd\sigma \,ds\\
&=2\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}}(\partial_0\omega)^T
\Box_\gamma \omega \,ds\,dx+\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}}e\,ds\,dx.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Noticing the Neumann condition
$\partial_\nu \omega=\sum_{j=1}^3\partial_j\omega n_j=0$
when $\omega\in\partial \mathcal{K}$,
we have $\sum_{j=1}^3E_jn_j=0$ on $\partial \mathcal{K}$,
and $E_0(0,x)=0$.
Therefore,
\begin{equation}\label{14.08}
  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(t,x)dx
  =2\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\mathcal{K}}(\partial_0\omega)^T
\Box_\gamma \omega \,ds\,dx
+\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\mathcal{K}}e\,ds\,dx.
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{14.06} and \eqref{14.08}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{14.09}
 \begin{aligned} \|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}^2
  \leq &C\int_0^t\|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\|G\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
  &+C\int_0^t\sum_{l,m}\|\partial C^{lm}(\nabla v)\|_{L_x^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
  \|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}^2ds.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
From assumption \eqref{14.02} and applying Gronwall inequality, we obtain
\begin{align*}
\|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}^2
&\leq  C\int_0^t\|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
 \|G\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\leq C\Big(\sup_{0\leq s\leq t}\|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big)
  \int_0^t\|G\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds.
  \end{align*}
Therefore,
\begin{equation}\label{14.10}
  \|\omega'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
  \leq C \int_0^t\|G\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds,\quad
 0\leq t\leq T.
\end{equation}
In general, we have the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli14.01}
Assume that \eqref{14.01} and \eqref{14.02} hold,
and $\omega=\omega(t,x)\in C^\infty$ solves problem \eqref{14.04}.
Then for any nonnegative integer $N$, there is a positive constant $C$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{14.11}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\partial^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K})} \\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\Box_\gamma\partial_s^m\omega(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha\omega(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},\quad 0\leq t\leq T.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The second term on the right-hand side of \eqref{14.11} vanishes when $N=0$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Proof by induction.
When $N=0$, \eqref{14.10} shows that \eqref{14.11} holds.

We suppose that \eqref{14.11} is valid if $N$ is replaced by $N-1$,
then we proof it is valid for $N$.
We first notice that $\partial_t\omega$ satisfies \eqref{14.04},
then by the assumption of induction,
$$
\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\partial^\alpha(\partial_t\omega)'(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
\leq \text{ right-hand side of } \eqref{14.11}.
$$
Hence it suffices to show that, for $N\geq1$
$$
\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\partial_x^\alpha\nabla_x \omega(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
\leq \rm{the\ right\ side\ of\ } \eqref{14.11}.
$$
However,
\begin{equation}\label{14.12}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Delta\partial_x^\alpha \omega(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\partial_x^\alpha\partial_t^2
 \omega(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
+C \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\Box_c\partial_x^\alpha
 \omega(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $C$ depends only on the wave speeds $c_I$.

The first term on the right-hand side of \eqref{14.12} is bounded by the right-hand side of \eqref{14.11}, thus the right-hand side of \eqref{14.12} is similarly bounded.
By elliptic regularity, so is
$\sum_{|\alpha|=N} \|\partial_x^\alpha\nabla_x \omega(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}$,
which completes the proof.
\end{proof}

\section{$L_x^2$ estimates involving operators $S^jZ^\alpha$ outside of obstacles}

We suppose that $\omega$ solves problem \eqref{14.04}.
Let $P=P(t,x,D)$ be differential operator
and $\partial_\nu P\omega$ not necessarily vanishes on $\partial\mathcal{K}$.
We will give some rough $L^2$ estimates for $P\omega$.
In this section, we assume that $v$ satisfies \eqref{14.01} and \eqref{14.02}.
\begin{proposition}\label{mingti15.01}
Suppose that $P\omega(0,\cdot)=\partial_tP\omega(0,\cdot)=0$ and there exist
an integer $M$ and a constant $C_0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{15.01}
  |(P\omega)'(t,x)|\leq C_0t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq M-1}|\partial_t\partial^\alpha \omega'(t,x)|+
  C_0\sum_{|\alpha|\leq M}|\partial^\alpha \omega'(t,x)|,\ x\in\partial\mathcal{K}.
\end{equation}
Then,
\begin{equation}\label{15.02}
 \begin{aligned}
\|(P\omega)'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
&\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box_\gamma P\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M+1 ,\, j\leq1}
 \|\Box_c S^j \partial^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}\|\Box_c S^j \partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
We will use the analogue of \eqref{14.07} where $\omega$ is replaced by $P\omega$.
Then we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{15.03}
 \begin{aligned}
&\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(t,x)dx
-  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(0,x)dx
-  \int_{[0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}}\sum_{j=1}^3E_jn_jd\sigma ds\\
&=2\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}}(\partial_0P\omega)^T
 \Box_\gamma P\omega \,ds\,dx
 +\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}}e\,ds\,dx,
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{gather*}
E_0=|\partial_0P\omega|^2+c_I^2|\nabla P\omega|^2+\sum_{l,m=1}^3
 (\partial_lP\omega)^TC^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_mP\omega,\\
E_j=-2c_I^2(\partial_0P\omega)^T(\partial_jP\omega)-2
 \sum_{k=1}^3(\partial_0P\omega)^TC^{jk}(\nabla v)\partial_kP\omega,\quad j=1,2,3,\\
e=\sum_{l,m=1}^3\left((\partial_lP\omega)^T\partial_0C^{lm}
 (\nabla v)\partial_mP\omega-
2(\partial_lP\omega)^T\partial_lC^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_mP\omega\right).
\end{gather*}
It is obvious that $E_0(0,x)=0$.
Use \eqref{14.01} and \eqref{14.02} and apply Gronwall's inequality,
we obtain that if $\delta>0$ is small enough, then
\begin{equation}\label{15.04}
\begin{aligned}
&\|(P\omega)'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box_\gamma P\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\Big(\int_{[0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}}(|\partial_t
 P\omega(s,x)|^2+|\nabla_xP\omega(s,x)|^2)d\sigma\Big)^{1/2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Recall that $\mathcal{K}\subset \{|x|<1\}$. By \eqref{15.01} and trace inequality,
we have
\begin{equation}\label{15.05}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_{[0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}}(|\partial_tP\omega(s,x)|^2
 +|\nabla_xP\omega(s,x)|^2)d\sigma\\
&\leq C \int_{[0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}}\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}
|S^j\partial^\alpha\omega'|^2d\sigma\\
&\leq C\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M+1 ,\, j\leq1}
\|S^j\partial^\alpha\omega'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}^2,\quad
 \forall t\geq 0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Therefore, by \eqref{15.04}, \eqref{15.05} and \eqref{13.07}, we obtain
\begin{align*}
&\|(P\omega)'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box_\gamma P\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
\mathcal{K})}ds
+C\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M+1 ,\, j\leq1}
\|S^j\partial^\alpha\omega'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box_\gamma P\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
\mathcal{K})}ds
+C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M+1 ,\, j\leq1}\|\Box_cS^j\partial^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}\|\Box_cS^j\partial^\alpha
 \omega\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},
\quad \forall t\geq0.
\end{align*}
\end{proof}

Obviously, $P=S^jZ^\alpha(j\leq1)$ satisfies \eqref{15.01}, then we have
the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli15.02}
Suppose that $\omega=\omega(t,x)\in C^\infty$ solves \eqref{14.04}.
If $M=1,2,\ldots$, we have
 \begin{equation}\label{15.06}
 \begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}
 \|(S^jZ^\alpha\omega)'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}
  \|\Box_\gamma S^jZ^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M+1 ,\, j\leq1}
  \|\Box_c S^j \partial^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+j\leq M ,\, j\leq1}\|\Box_c S^j
\partial^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

\section{$L_x^2$ estimates involving $S^m\partial^\alpha$ outside of star-shaped
obstacles}
In this section, we shall assume furthermore that
\begin{equation}\label{16.01}
 \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
 \leq \frac\delta {1+t},
\end{equation}
with $\delta$ small enough. Assume that $\omega$ solves problem \eqref{14.04}.
Using that $\mathcal{K}$ is a star-shaped obstacle, we will obtain a better
estimate for $S\omega$.

\begin{proposition}\label{mingti16.01}
Suppose that \eqref{16.01} holds and $\omega=\omega(t,x)\in C^\infty$ solves
problem \eqref{14.04}, then
\begin{equation}\label{16.02}
   \begin{aligned}
\|(S\omega)'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
&\leq C\int_0^t\|\Box_\gamma S\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash
 \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq2}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq1}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha
 \omega\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Using the analogue of \eqref{14.07} where $\omega$ is replaced by $S\omega$,
we have
\begin{equation}\label{16.03}
 \begin{aligned}
&\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(t,x)dx
-  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(0,x)dx
-  \int_{[0,t]\times \partial\mathcal{K}}\sum_{j=1}^3E_jn_jd\sigma ds\\
&=2\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}}(\partial_0S\omega)^T
\Box_\gamma S\omega \,ds\,dx+\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\backslash\mathcal{K}}
e\,ds\,dx,
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{gather*}
E_0=|\partial_0S\omega|^2+c_I^2|\nabla S\omega|^2
 +\sum_{l,m=1}^3(\partial_lS\omega)^TC^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_mS\omega,\\
E_j=-2c_I^2(\partial_0S\omega)^T(\partial_jS\omega)
 -2\sum_{k=1}^3(\partial_0S\omega)^TC^{jk}(\nabla v)\partial_kS\omega,\quad j=1,2,3,\\
e=\sum_{l,m=1}^3\left((\partial_lS\omega)^T\partial_0C^{lm}(\nabla v)
 \partial_mS\omega
-2(\partial_lS\omega)^T\partial_lC^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_mS\omega\right).
\end{gather*}
First we consider the right most  term on the left-hand side of \eqref{16.03}.
 When $(s,x)\in \mathbb{R}_+\times \partial \mathcal{K}$, the Neumann condition
 $\partial_\nu\omega=\langle\vec{n},\nabla_x\rangle\omega=0$ gives us
 $$
\partial_sS\omega=s\partial_s^2\omega+\partial_s\omega
 +\partial_s\langle x,\nabla_x\rangle\omega
 =s\partial_s^2\omega+\partial_s\omega+\langle x,\vec{n}\rangle
\partial_s\partial_\nu\omega
 =s\partial_s^2\omega+\partial_s\omega.
$$
Similarly,
$$
\sum_{j=1}^3n_j\partial_jS\omega=\sum_{j=1}^3sn_j\partial_j\partial_s\omega
+\sum_{j=1}^3n_j\partial_j\langle x,\nabla_x\rangle\omega
=s\partial_\nu\partial_s\omega+\partial\nu\langle x,\nabla_x\rangle\omega=0
$$
on $\mathbb{R}_+\times \partial \mathcal{K}$.
Noticing the assumption \eqref{16.01}, we have
\begin{align*}
&-\sum_{j=1}^3E_jn_j=2(s\partial_s^2\omega+\partial_s\omega)^T
\sum_{j,k=1}^3C^{jk}(\nabla v)(s\partial_k\partial_s\omega
+\partial_k(\langle x,\nabla\rangle\omega))n_j \\
&\leq C\sum_{1\leq|\alpha|\leq2}|\partial^\alpha\omega|^2.
\end{align*}
Hence, identity \eqref{16.03} yields
\begin{equation}\label{16.04}
\begin{aligned}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}E_0(t,x)dx
&\leq 2\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\mathcal{K}}(\partial_0S\omega)^T
 \Box_\gamma S\omega \,ds\,dx\\
&\quad +\int_{[0,t]\times \mathbb{R}^3\mathcal{K}}e\,ds\,dx
+C\int_{[0,t]\times\partial \mathcal{K}}\sum_{1\leq|\alpha|\leq2}|\partial^\alpha
\omega|^2d\sigma.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Applying Gronwall's inequality, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{16.05}
\begin{aligned}
&\|(S\omega)'(t,\cdot)\| _{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}\\
&\leq \int_0^t\|\Box_\gamma S\omega(t,\cdot)\| _{\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}}ds
+C\Big(\int_{[0,t]\times\partial \mathcal{K}}
\sum_{1\leq|\alpha|\leq2}|\partial^\alpha\omega|^2d\sigma\Big)^{1/2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By the trace inequality and \eqref{13.05}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{16.06}
\begin{aligned}
&\Big(\int_{[0,t]\times\partial \mathcal{K}}\sum_{1\leq|\alpha|\leq2}
 |\partial^\alpha\omega|^2d\sigma\Big)^{1/2} \\
&\leq \sum_{|\alpha|\leq2}\|\partial^\alpha\omega'(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,t]
 \times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K}:|x|<2)}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq2}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha \omega(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds
 +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq1}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha \omega\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Inequalities \eqref{16.05} and \eqref{16.06} complete the proof of \eqref{16.02}.
\end{proof}

Applying Proposition \ref{mingti16.01} and repeating the procedure of
Theorem \ref{dingli14.01}, we have the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli16.02}
Suppose that \eqref{16.01} holds and $\omega=\omega(t,x)\in C^\infty$ solves
problem \eqref{14.04}. Then
for any nonnegative integer $N$,
\begin{equation}\label{16.07}
   \begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \\
&\leq C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}
  \|\Box_\gamma S^m\partial^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}ds \\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N -1,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_c S^m\partial^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+1}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha \omega(s,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds \\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha \omega\|_{L^2([0,t]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})},
\quad \forall t\geq0\,.
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

\section{Main $L^2$ estimates outside of star-shaped obstacles}

We assume that $v$ satisfies \eqref{14.02} and \eqref{16.01}, then we have
the following result.

\begin{proposition}\label{mingti17.01}
Suppose that $\omega=\omega(t,x)\in C^\infty$ solves problem \eqref{14.04}. Then
for any fixed nonnegative integer $N$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{17.01}
 \begin{aligned}
 &\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+4}\|\partial^\alpha \omega'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
 \backslash \mathcal{K})}
 +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+2 ,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
& +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|S^mZ^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C\int_0^t\Big(\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+4}\|\Box_\gamma \partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\| _{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+2 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_\gamma S^m \partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_\gamma S^m Z^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big)ds \\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N +3}\|\Box_\gamma \partial^\alpha \omega(t,\cdot)\|
 _{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +C \sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+1 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_\gamma S^m\partial^\alpha
 \omega(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N +2}\|\Box_c \partial^\alpha \omega\|
 _{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad  +C \sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_c S^m\partial^\alpha
\omega\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
We denote the left side of \eqref{17.01} by
$I+II+III$,
and the right-hand side side of \eqref{17.01} by $RHS$.
Noticing that $\Box_c=\Box_\gamma +\sum_{l,m=1}^3C^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_l\partial_m$,
then by Theorem \ref{dingli14.01}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{17.02}
 I \leq RHS+C\sum_{l,m=1}^3\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+3}
  \|C^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_l\partial_m\partial^\alpha \omega(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
\end{equation}
Similarly, by Theorem \ref{dingli16.02}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{17.03}
\begin{aligned}
II &\leq RHS+C\int_0^t\sum_{l,m=1}^3\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+3}
\|C^{lm}(\nabla v)\partial_l\partial_m\partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\sum_{j,k=1}^3\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+1,\, m\leq1}
  \|C^{jk}(\nabla v)\partial_j\partial_kS^m\partial^\alpha
\omega(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Similarly, by Theorem \ref{dingli15.02}, we obtain
\[ %\label{17.04}
 III \leq RHS+C\int_0^t\sum_{j,k=1}^3\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+1,\, m\leq1}
  \|C^{jk}(\nabla v)\partial_j\partial_kS^m\partial^\alpha
\omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds.
\]
Applying assumption \eqref{16.01}, the last term on the right-hand side of \eqref{17.02}
is dominated by
$$
C\Big(\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^3,\, l,m}|C^{lm}(\nabla v)|\Big)
\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+4}\|\partial^\alpha \omega'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3
\backslash \mathcal{K})}
\leq C \delta \uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral1}.
$$
It can be counteracted by the left-hand  side of \eqref{17.02}, if $\delta$
is small enough.
Similarly, the last term on the right-hand side of \eqref{17.03} can be counteracted
by the left side of \eqref{17.03}.
Hence, we have
\begin{align*}
&I+II+III \\
&\leq RHS+C\int_0^t\Big(\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^3,\, l,m}|C^{lm}(\nabla v)|\Big)
\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+4}\|\partial^\alpha \omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\quad +C\int_0^t\Big(\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^3,\, l,m}|C^{lm}(\nabla v)|\Big)
\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+2 ,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}ds\\
&\leq RHS+C\int_0^t\Big(\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^3,\, l,m}|C^{lm}(\nabla v)|\Big)
(I+II)ds.
\end{align*}
Applying Gronwall's inequality and assumption \eqref{16.01}, we conclude that
$I+II+III \leq RHS$.
\end{proof}

Using Theorem \ref{dingli13.01} and repeating above proof yields the following
 theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli17.02}
Suppose that $\omega=\omega(t,x)\in C^\infty$ solves problem \eqref{14.04}. Then
for any fixed nonnegative integer $N$,
 \begin{align}
&\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+4}\|\partial^\alpha \omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
 +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+2 ,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \nonumber \\
&+\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|S^mZ^\alpha\omega'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&+(\ln(2+t))^{-1/2}
 \Big(\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+3}\|\langle x\rangle^{-1/2}\partial^\alpha
 \omega'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&+\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+1,\, m\leq1}
 \|\langle x\rangle^{-1/2}S^m\partial^\alpha \omega'\|_{L^2([0,t]
 \times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&+\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N-1,\, m\leq1}
 \|\langle x\rangle^{-1/2}S^mZ^\alpha \omega'\|_{L^2([0,t]\times
 \mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big) \nonumber \\
&\leq C\int_0^t\Big(\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+4}\|\Box_\gamma\partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+2 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_\gamma S^m\partial^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \nonumber \\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_\gamma S^mZ^\alpha\omega(s,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big)ds  \nonumber \\
&\quad+C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+3}\|\Box_\gamma\partial^\alpha \omega(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N+1 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_\gamma S^m\partial^\alpha
 \omega(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N+2}\|\Box_c\partial^\alpha \omega
 \|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}  \nonumber \\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_c S^m\partial^\alpha\omega
 (s,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \nonumber \\
&\quad +C\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq N-2 ,\, m\leq1}\|\Box_c S^mZ^\alpha
 \omega(s,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,t]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}. 
\label{17.05}
 \end{align}
\end{theorem}

\section{Almost global existence for quasilinear wave equations outside of
star-sharped obstacles}

In this section, we shall use above estimates to give the main result of
this article, namely the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{dingli18.01}
Suppose that $f, g \in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})$
satisfies the compatibility conditions of infinite order.
Then there exist constants $\kappa, \varepsilon_{0}>0$, and a positive
integer $N$, such that for all $\varepsilon\leq\varepsilon_{0}$,
if
\begin{equation}\label{18.01}
  \sum_{|\alpha|\leq N}\|\langle x\rangle^{|\alpha|}\partial_{x}^{\alpha}f
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
  +\sum_{|\alpha|\leq N-1}\|\langle x\rangle^{|\alpha|+1}
\partial_{x}^{\alpha}g\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\leq\varepsilon,
\end{equation}
then \eqref{l1.01} has a unique solution
$u\in C^{\infty}([0,T_{\varepsilon}]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})$,
with
\begin{equation}\label{18.02}
  T_{\varepsilon}=\rm{exp}(\frac {\kappa}{\varepsilon}).
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Suppose that the integer $N>14$ and we will take $N=14$ in the following proof.
By local existence we know that if $\varepsilon$ is small enough,
problem \eqref{l1.01} has a local solution $u$ in $0<t<1$
satisfying the  estimate
\begin{equation}\label{18.03}
\begin{aligned}
&\sup_{0\leq t\leq 1}\Big(\sum_{|\alpha|\leq14}\|\partial^\alpha u'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
 +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq12,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha u'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&+\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq10,\, m\leq1}\|S^mZ^\alpha u'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big) \\
& +\sum_{|\alpha|\leq13}\|\langle x\rangle^{-1/2}\partial^\alpha u'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^2([0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&+\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq11,\, m\leq1}\|\langle x\rangle^{-1/2}S^m\partial^\alpha
 u'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&+\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq9,\, m\leq1}\|\langle x\rangle^{-1/2}S^mZ^\alpha
 u'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2([0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C\varepsilon.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

Let $\eta\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})$ be a cut function satisfying
$$
\eta(t)=\begin{cases} 1, & t\leq\frac{1}{2},\\
0, & t\geq1.
\end{cases}
$$

Set $u_{0}=\eta u$, $\omega=u-u_{0}=(1-\eta)u$,
where $u$ is the local solution.
Since $\omega=0$ for $t\leq\frac12$, we shall prove the almost global
existence of $\omega$ by iteration instead of $u$.
Also,
$$
\Box_{c}u_{0}=\eta F(\nabla u,\nabla^{2}u)+[\Box_{c},\eta]u.
$$
Thus $u$ solves problem \eqref{l1.01} for $0<t<T_{\varepsilon}$ if and only if
$\omega$ solves
\begin{equation}\label{l8.04}
\begin{gathered}
\Box_c\omega=(1-\eta)F(\nabla u_{0}+\omega),\nabla^2(u_{0}+\omega)
 -[\Box_{c},\eta](u_{0}+\omega),\\
\partial_\nu \omega\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
\omega(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
for $0<t<T_{\varepsilon}$.

Set $\omega_{0}=0$, and define $\omega_{k}$ recursively for $k=1,2,\dots$ by
requiring that
\begin{equation}\label{l8.05}
\begin{gathered}
\Box_c\omega_{k}=(1-\eta)F(\nabla u_{0}+\omega_{k-1}),\nabla^2(u_{0}+\omega_{k})-[\Box_{c},\eta](u_{0}+\omega_{k}),\\
\partial_\nu \omega_{k}\big|_{\partial \mathcal{K}}=0,\\
\omega_{k}(t,x)=0,\quad t\leq0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Let
%\label{18.06}
\begin{align*}
& M_{k}(T) \\
&=\sup_{0\leq t\leq T}\Big(\sum_{|\alpha|\leq14}\|\partial^\alpha
 \omega_{k}'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
 +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq12,\, m\leq1}\|S^m\partial^\alpha
 \omega_{k}'(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq10,\, m\leq1}\|S^mZ^\alpha \omega_{k}'(t,\cdot)
\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
 +(1+t)\sum_{|\alpha|\leq2}\|Z^\alpha \omega_{k}'(t,\cdot)
 \|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big)\\
&\quad +\big(\ln(2+T)\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\Big(\sum_{|\alpha|\leq13}
 \|\langle x\rangle^{-\frac{1}{2}}\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}'
 \|_{L^2([0,T]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq11,\, m\leq1}\|\langle x
 \rangle^{-\frac{1}{2}}S^{m}\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}'\|_{L^2([0,T]
 \times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \\
&\quad +\sum_{|\alpha|+m\leq9,\, m\leq1}\|\langle x\rangle^{-\frac{1}{2}}S^{m}Z^{\alpha}
\omega_{k}'\|_{L^2([0,T]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\Big)\\
&=A_{1}+A_{2}+A_{3}+A_{4}+A_{5}+A_{6}+A_{7}.
 \end{align*}
Now we prove that there exists a constant $C_{1}$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{18.07}
 M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon})\leq C_{1}\varepsilon,\quad k=0,1,2,\dots
\end{equation}
 if $\varepsilon>0$ and constant $\kappa$ in
$T_{\varepsilon}=\exp^{\frac\kappa \varepsilon}$ are sufficiently small.
 It is obviously that $ M_{0}(T_{\varepsilon})\leq C_{1}\varepsilon$.
 Providing $M_{k-1}(T_{\varepsilon})\leq C_{1}\varepsilon$, we shall proof
$M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon})\leq C_{1}\varepsilon$.
 To do this, we first prove
 \begin{equation}\label{18.08}
 M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon})\leq C\varepsilon+CC_{1}\kappa\big(M_{k-1}(T_{\varepsilon})
+M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon})\big).
 \end{equation}
The bound \eqref{18.07} follows from \eqref{18.08}.
By Theorem \ref{dingli2.1} and \eqref{18.03}, we know that $A_{4}$ can be
controlled by the right-hand side of \eqref{18.08}.
The other terms of $M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon})$ can be controlled by the right-hand
side of \eqref{17.05}, where $N=10,\ \omega=\omega_{k}$.
 Denote the right-hand side of \eqref{17.05} by
 $$
 B_{1}+B_{2}+B_{3}+B_{4}+B_{5}+B_{6}+B_{7}+B_{8}.
 $$
  $B_{1}+B_{2}+B_{3}$ can be controlled by the right-hand side of \eqref{18.08}
using the argument in \cite{M.K2004}.
  It is easy to prove that $B_{4}+B_{5}$ is estimated by the right-hand side of
\eqref{18.08}.

  Now we deal with $B_{6}$.
For $t>1$, we have
$$
\sum_{|\alpha|\leq12}|S\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}|\leq C\sum_{|\alpha|\leq13,|\beta|\leq6}
\big(|\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}'| |\partial^{\beta}\omega_{k-1}'|+|\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k-1}'| |\partial^{\beta}\omega_{k}'|\big),
$$
therefore,
\begin{equation}\label{18.09}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{|\alpha|\leq12}\|S\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}\|_{L^2([1,T_{\varepsilon}]
\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C \sum_{|\alpha|\leq13,|\beta|\leq6}
\big(\|\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}'\partial^{\beta}\omega_{k-1}'
 \|_{L^2([1,T_{\varepsilon}]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})} \\
&\quad +\|\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k-1}'\partial^{\beta}\omega_{k}'
 \|_{L^2([1,T_{\varepsilon}]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\big).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Consider the first term on the right-hand side of \eqref{18.09}.
Applying Lemma \ref{yinli1.4}, we have
\begin{align*}
&\sum_{|\alpha|\leq13,|\beta|\leq6}
\|\partial^{\alpha}\omega_{k}'\partial^{\beta}\omega_{k-1}'
 \|_{L^2([1,T_{\varepsilon}]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq C\sum_{|\beta|\leq8}\|\langle x\rangle^{-1}z^{\beta}
 \omega_{k-1}'\|_{L^2([1,T_{\varepsilon}]\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}
\sup_{1<t<T_{\varepsilon}}\sum_{|\alpha|\leq13}\|\partial^{\alpha}
 \omega_{k}'\|_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})}\\
&\leq CC_{1}\varepsilon \ln(T_{\varepsilon})^{1/2}M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon})\\
&\leq CC_{1}\kappa M_{k}(T_{\varepsilon}).
\end{align*}
In a similar way, we can prove the second term on right-hand side of \eqref{18.09}
can be controlled by the right-hand side of \eqref{18.08}.
For $t<1$, noticing the estimate of local solution and the assumption of induction,
 we can get that
$B_{6} $ is bounded by the right-hand side of \eqref{18.08}.
Similarly, we obtain that $B_{7}+B_{8}$ is also estimated by the right-hand
side of \eqref{18.08}.
Hence, we complete the proof of \eqref{18.08}.

Next, using the energy inequality, we can show that $\{\omega_{k}(t,x)\}$
converges in the energy norm.
Suppose that its limit is $\omega(t,x)$, then $u=u_{0}+\omega$ solves problem
 \eqref{l1.01}.
If $(f,g)\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})$ satisfying the
compatibility conditions to infinite order,
then $u\in C^{\infty}([0,T_{\varepsilon})\times\mathbb{R}^3\backslash \mathcal{K})$.
\end{proof}


\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
This work was supported by the NSF of China (No.\\ 11371183).


\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{F.John1984} F. John, S. Klainerman;
\emph{Almost global existence to nonlinear wave equations in three dimensions},
Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 37 (1984), 443-455.

\bibitem{p.s.1990} P. S. Datti;
\emph{Nonlinear wave equations in exterior domains},
 Nonlinear Analysis: TMA, 15 (1990), 321-331.

\bibitem{S.K1996} S. Klainerman, T. Sideris;
\emph{On almost global existence for nonrelativistic wave equations in 3D},
 Comm. Pure. Appl. Math., 49 (1996), 307-321.

\bibitem{M.I1968} M. Ikawa;
\emph{Mixed problems for hyperbolic equations of second order},
J. Math. Soc. Japan, 20 (1968), 580-608.

\bibitem{M.K2004} M. Keel, H. Smith, C. D. Sogge;
\emph{Almost global existence for quasilinear wave equations in three space
dimensions}, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 17 (2004), 109-153.

\bibitem{M.Keel2002} M. Keel, H. Smith, C. D. Sogge;
\emph{Global existence for a qualinear wave equation outside of star-shaped domains},
J. Funct. Anal., 189 (2002), 155-226.

\bibitem{M.H.C2002} M. Keel, H. Smith, C. D. Sogge;
\emph{Almost global existence for some semilinear wave equations},
J. Anal. Math., 87 (2002), 265-279.

\bibitem{K. H2004} K. Hidano;
\emph{An elenemtary proof of global or almost global existence for quasi-linear
wave equations}, Tohoku Math. J., 56 (2004), 271-287.

\bibitem{N.Y.2016} N. A. Lai, Y. Zhou;
\emph{Nonexistence of global solutions to critical semilinear wave equations
in exterior domain in high dimensions},
Non. Anal., 143 (2016), 89-104.

\bibitem{S.K2013} S. Katayama, H. Kubo, S. Lucente;
\emph{Almost global existence for exterior Neumann problems of semilinear
equations in 2D}, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 12 (2013), 2331-2360.

\bibitem{J. M2008} J. Metcalfe, A. Stewart;
\emph{Almost global existence for quasilinear wave equations in waveguides with
Neumann boundary conditions},
T. Am. Math. Soc., 360 (2008), 171-1888.

\bibitem{Makoto2012} M. Nakamura;
\emph{Global solutions for nonlinear wave equations with localized dissipations
in exterior domains}, J. Differential Equations, 252 (2012), 4742-4785.

\bibitem{Jason2005} J. Metcalfe, C. D. Sogge;
\emph{Hyperbolic trapped rays and global existence of quasilinear wave equations},
Invent. Math., 159 (2005), 75-117.

\bibitem{Jason2006} J. Metcalfe, C. D. Sogge;
\emph{Global existence for Dirichlet-wave equations with quadratic nonlinearities
in high dimensions}, Math. Ann., 336 (2006), 391-420.

\bibitem{a.y2000} A. Y. Kokotov, P. Neitta\"{a}maki, B. A. Plamenevskii;
\emph{The Neumann problem for the wave equation in a cone}, J. Math. Sci.102 (2000),
4400-4428.

\bibitem{p.y.2003} P. Secchi, Y. Shibata;
\emph{On the decay of solutions to the 2D Neumann exterior problem for the wave
equation}, J. Differential Equations, 194 (2003), 221-236.

\bibitem{p.d.63} P. D. Lax, C. S. Morawetz, R. S. Phillips;
\emph{Exponential decay of solutions of the wave equation in the exterior of
a star-shaped obstacle}, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 16 (1963), 477-486


\bibitem{s.m.75} C. S. Morawetz;
\emph{Decay for solutions of exterior problem for the wave equation},
 Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28 (1975), 229-264.

\end{thebibliography}

















\end{document}

