\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2017 (2017), No. 192, pp. 1--11.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2017 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2017/192\hfil Infinite elastic beam equations]
{Existence of solutions to infinite elastic beam equations with
unbounded nonlinearities}

\author[H. Carrasco, F. Minh\'os \hfil EJDE-2017/192\hfilneg]
{Hugo Carrasco, Feliz Minh\'os}

\address{Hugo Carrasco \newline
Departamento de Matem\'atica, Escola de Ci\^encias e Tecnologia,
Universidade de \'Evora,
Rua Rom\~{a}o Ramalho, 59,  7000-671 \'Evora, Portugal}
\email{hugcarrasco@gmail.com}

\address{Feliz Minh\'os \newline
Departamento de Matem\'atica, Escola de Ci\^encias e Tecnologia,
Centro de Investiga\c{c}\~{a}o em Matem\'atica e Aplica\c{c}\~{o}es (CIMA-UE),
Instituto de Investiga\c{c}\~{a}o e Forma\c{c}\~{a}o Avan\c{c}ada,
Universidade de \'Evora,
Rua Rom\~{a}o Ramalho, 59,  7000-671 \'Evora, Portugal}
\email{fminhos@uevora.pt}

\thanks{Submitted January 19, 2017. Published August 1, 2017.}
\subjclass[2010]{34B10, 34B15, 34B40}
\keywords{Half line problem; Schauder fixed point theorem;
\hfill\break\indent unbounded and nonordered upper and lower solutions;
 one-sided Nagumo condition}

\begin{abstract}
 This article concerns the existence of unbounded solutions
 to fourth-order boundary-value problem on the half-line with two-point
 boundary conditions. One-sided Nagumo condition plays a special role as it
 allows an asymmetric unbounded behavior on the nonlinearity. The arguments
 are based on the Schauder fixed point theorem and lower and upper solutions
 method. As an application, an example is given with non-ordered lower and
 upper solutions, to prove our results.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

Fourth-order differential equations can model the bending of an elastic beam
and, in this sense, we refer them as beam equations. They have received
increased interest from several fields of science and engineering, either on
bounded domains \cite{DA+FM, AC+GF, JF+FM, FM+TG+AIS, Song} either on the
real line \cite{agarwal1, Choi, Jang1, Jang2, Ma, Mah}.

We study the fully nonlinear beam equation on the half line,
\begin{equation}
u^{(4)}(t)=f(t,u(t),u'(t),u''(t),u'''(t)) ,\quad t\in [ 0,+\infty ),  \label{edo}
\end{equation}
where $f:[0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}^{4}\to \mathbb{R}$ is an
 $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function, and the boundary conditions are of
Sturm-Liouville type,
\begin{equation}
u(0)=A,u'(0)=B,\quad u''(0)+au'''(0)=C,\quad u'''(+\infty )=D,  \label{cf}
\end{equation}
$A,B,C,D\in \mathbb{R}$ , $a<0$ and $u'''(+\infty ):=
\lim_{t\to +\infty }u'''(t)$.

The non-compactness of the interval requires delicate techniques to
obtain sufficient conditions for the solvability of boundary value problems
on the half-line. As examples, we refer the extension of continuous
solutions on the corresponding finite intervals under a diagonalization
process, fixed point theory in some Banach spaces and lower and upper
solutions method (see \cite{agarwal2, Bai, Lian, Yan} and the references
therein). We present here an approach based on an adequate space of weighted
functions.

Lower and upper solutions method is a very adequate technique to deal with
boundary value problems as it provides not only the existence of bounded or
unbounded solutions but also their localization and, from that, some
qualitative data about solutions, their variation and behavior (see \cite
{AC+FM, JG+LK+FM, Lian2, Lian3, FM}). In this paper we use not necessarily
ordered lower an upper solutions, generalizing, in this way, the set of
admissible lower and upper functions. As far as we know, it is the first
time where such functions are applied to boundary value problems defined on
the half line, to obtain unbounded solutions.

An important tool is the Nagumo condition, useful to get \textit{a priori}
estimates on some derivatives of the solution. The usual growth condition of
the Nagumo type used in the literature is\ a bilateral one. However the same
estimations hold with a similar one-sided assumption, which allows unbounded
nonlinearities in boundary value problems. Therefore, it generalizes the
two-sided condition, as it is proved in \cite{JF+FM,MRG+FM+AS}.

In short, this work has the following novelties related to the existent
literature in this field:

\begin{itemize}
\item The nonlinearity $f$ is an $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function, allowing
discontinuities in time;

\item From the unilateral Nagumo growth condition assumed on $f$, equation
\eqref{edo} can deal with unbounded nonlinearities;

\item The lower and upper solutions do not need to be well ordered, or even
ordered, and, moreover, their boundary conditions are more general, making
easier to obtain lower and upper solutions to the problem.

\item The non-compactness of the associated operator is overcome by
considering an adequate space of weighted functions.
\end{itemize}

The paper is organized as it follows: In Section 2 some auxiliary result are
defined such as the space, the weighted norms, the unilateral Nagumo
condition and lower and upper solutions to be used. Section 3 contains the
main result: an existence and localization theorem, where it is proved the
existence of a solution, and some bounds on the first and second derivatives
as well. Finally, an example, which is not covered by the existent results,
shows the applicability of the main theorem.

\section{Definitions and preliminary results}

In this work we consider the space
\[
X=\big\{ x\in C^3[0,+\infty ):\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{x^{(i)}(t)}{1+t^{3-i}}
\text{ exists in }\mathbb{R},\; i=0,1,2,3\big\}
\]
  with the norm $\| x\| _{X}:=\max \{\| x\| _0,\| x'\|
_0,\| x''\| _0,\| x'''\| _0\} $, where
\[
\| \omega ^{(i)}\| _0=\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }|
\frac{\omega ^{(i)}(t)}{1+t^{3-i}}| ,\; i=0,1,2,3.
\]
It can be proved that $(X,\| \cdot\| _{X})$ is a Banach space
(see \cite{Lian3}).

The following definition establishes the assumptions assumed on the
nonlinearity.

\begin{definition} \rm
A function $f:[0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}^{4}\to \mathbb{R}$ is
called an $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function if it satisfies:

\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for each $(x,y,z,w) \in \mathbb{R}^{4}$
, $t\mapsto f(t,x,y,z,w)$ is measurable on $[0,+\infty )$;

\item[(ii)]  for almost every $t\in [ 0,+\infty
),(x,y,z,w)\mapsto f(t,x,y,z,w)$ is continuous in $\mathbb{R}^{4}$;

\item[(iii)] for each $\rho >0$, there exists a positive
function $\varphi _{\rho }\in L^{1}[0,+\infty )$ such that for all $
(x,y,z,w)\in $ $\mathbb{R}^{4}$ with $\| (x,y,z,w)\|
_{X}<\rho $, then
\[
| f(t,x,y,z,w)| \leq \varphi _{\rho }(t),\quad\text{a.e. }t\in [0,+\infty ).
\]
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}

Solutions of the linear problem associated with \eqref{edo}-\eqref{cf} are
defined with Green's function, which can be obtained by standard calculus.

\begin{lemma} \label{lemma-equi}
Let $t^3\eta \in L^{1}[0,+\infty )$. Then the linear
boundary value problem
\begin{equation}
u^{(4)}(t)+\eta (t)=0,\quad t\in [ 0,+\infty ),  \label{prob1}
\end{equation}
with boundary conditions \eqref{cf}, has a unique solution in $X$. Moreover,
this solution can be expressed as
\begin{equation}
u(t)=A+Bt+\frac{C-aD}{2}t^{2}+\frac{D}{6}t^3+\int_0^{+\infty }G(t,s)\eta
(s)ds  \label{sol}
\end{equation}
where
\[
G(t,s)=
\begin{cases}
\frac{s^3}{6}-\frac{s^{2}t}{2}+\frac{st^{2}}{2}-\frac{at^{2}}{2}, & 0\leq
s\leq t \\
-\frac{at^{2}}{2}+\frac{t^3}{6}, & t\leq s<+\infty .
\end{cases}
\]
\end{lemma}

To apply a fixed point theorem it is important to have an \emph{a
priori} estimation for $u'''$. In the literature this
bound is obtained from a bilateral Nagumo-type growth. In this paper it is
used a more general one-sided Nagumo condition, which allows unbounded
nonlinearities on \eqref{edo} (for more details see \cite{MRG+FM+AS2, Song,
Zhang}. Remark that, as it is proved in \cite{MRG+FM+AS} a function can
verify an unilateral Nagumo condition but not a two-sided one.

Let $\gamma _{i},\Gamma _{i}\in C[0,+\infty ),\gamma _{i}(t)\leq \Gamma
_{i}(t),i=0,1,2$ and define the set
\[
E=\big\{ (t,x_0,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})\in [ 0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}
^{4}:\gamma _{i}(t)\leq x_{i}\leq \Gamma _{i}(t),i=0,1,2\big\} .
\]

\begin{definition}\rm
An $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function $f:E\to \mathbb{R}$ is said to
satisfy the one-sided Nagumo-type growth condition in $E$ if it satisfies
either
\begin{equation}
f(t,x,y,z,w)\leq \psi (t)h(| w| ),\quad \forall (t,x,y,z,w)\in
E,  \label{cn1}
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}
f(t,x,y,z,w)\geq -\psi (t)h(| w| ),\quad \forall (t,x,y,z,w)\in
E,  \label{cn1a}
\end{equation}
for some positive continuous functions $\psi ,h$, and some $\nu >1$, such
that
\begin{equation}
\int_0^{+\infty }\psi (s)ds<+\infty ,\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }\psi
(t)(1+t)^{\nu }<+\infty ,\quad \int_0^{+\infty }\frac{s}{h(s)}ds=+\infty .
\label{cn2}
\end{equation}
\end{definition}

Next lemma provides an \textit{a priori} bound.

\begin{lemma} \label{Lemma1}
Let $f:[0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}^{4}\to \mathbb{R}
$ be an $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function satisfying \eqref{cn1}, or
\eqref{cn1a}, and \eqref{cn2} in $E$. Then for every $r>0$ there exists $R>0$
(not depending on $u$) such that every $u$ solution of \eqref{edo}, \eqref{cf}
 satisfying
\begin{equation}
\gamma _0(t)\leq u(t)\leq \Gamma _0(t),\gamma _{1}(t)\leq u'(t)\leq \Gamma _{1}(t),\gamma _{2}(t)\leq u''(t)\leq \Gamma
_{2}(t),  \label{lem-a}
\end{equation}
for $t\in [ 0,+\infty )$, satisfies
$\| u'''\| _0<R$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $u$ be a solution of \eqref{edo}, \eqref{cf} such that \eqref{lem-a}
holds. Consider $r>0$ such that
\begin{equation}
r>\max \Big\{ | \frac{C-\Gamma _{2}(0)}{a}| ,|
\frac{C-\gamma _{2}(0)}{a}|, | D | \Big\} . \label{eq-r}
\end{equation}
By this inequality we cannot have $| u'''(t)| >r$ for all $t\in [ 0,+\infty )$,
because
\begin{equation}
| u'''(0)| =| \frac{
C-u''(0)}{a}| \leq \max \Big\{ | \frac{
C-\Gamma _{2}(0)}{a}| ,| \frac{C-\gamma _{2}(0)}{a}
| \Big\} <r  \label{eq-rC}
\end{equation}
and $| u'''(+\infty )| =|D| <r$.

If $| u'''(t)| \leq r$ for all $t\in[ 0,+\infty )$, taking $R>r/2$ the
proof is complete as
\[
\| u'''\|_0 =\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty
}| \frac{u'''(t)}{2}| \leq \frac{r}{2 }<R.
\]

If there exists $t\in (0,+\infty )$ such that $| u'''(t)| >r$, then by
 \eqref{cn2} we can take $R>r$ such that
\[
\int_{r}^{R}\frac{s}{h(s)}ds>M\max \Big\{ M_{1}+\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }
\frac{\Gamma _{2}(t)}{1+t}\frac{\nu }{\nu -1},M_{1}-\inf_{0\leq t<+\infty }
\frac{\gamma _{2}(t)}{1+t}\frac{\nu }{\nu -1}\Big\}
\]
with $ M:=\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }\psi (t)(1+t)^{\nu }$ and
$ M_{1}:=\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }\frac{\Gamma _{2}(t)}{(1+t)^{\nu
}}-\inf_{0\leq t<+\infty }\frac{\gamma _{2}(t)}{(1+t)^{\nu }}$.

Assume that growth condition \eqref{cn1} holds.
By \eqref{eq-r}, suppose that there are $t_{\ast }$,
$t_{+}\in (0,+\infty ) $ such that $u'''(t_{\ast })=r$,
$u'''(t)>r$ for all $t\in (t_{\ast },t_{+}]$. Then
\begin{align*}
\int_{u'''(t_{\ast })}^{u'''(t_{+})}\frac{s}{h(s)}ds
&= \int_{t_{\ast }}^{t_{+}}\frac{u'''(s)}{h(u'''(s))}u^{(4)}(s)ds   \\
&= \int_{t_{\ast }}^{t_{+}}\frac{f(s,u(s),u'(s),u''(s),u'''(s))}{h(u'''(s))}
u'''(s)ds   \\
&\leq \int_{t_{\ast }}^{t_{+}}\psi (s)\text{ }u'''(s)
\text{ }ds\leq M\int_{t_{\ast }}^{t_{+}}\frac{u'''(s)}{
(1+s)^{\nu }}\text{ }ds   \\
&= M\int_{t_{\ast }}^{t_{+}}\Big(\frac{u''(s)}{(1+s)^{\nu }}
\Big) '+\frac{\nu u''(s)}{(1+s)^{1+\nu }}ds
\\
&= M\Big(\frac{u''(t_{+})}{(1+t_{+})^{\nu }}-\frac{
u''(t_{\ast })}{(1+t_{\ast })^{\nu }}+\int_{t_{\ast }}^{t_{+}}
\frac{\nu u''(s)}{(1+s)^{1+\nu }}ds\Big)   \\
&\leq M\Big(M_{1}+\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }\frac{\Gamma _{2}(t)}{1+t}
\int_0^{+\infty }\frac{\nu }{(1+s)^{\nu }}ds\Big)   \\
&< \int_{r}^{R}\frac{s}{h(s)}ds.
\end{align*}

So $u'''(t_{+})<R$ and as $t_{\ast },t_{+}$ are
arbitrary in $(0,+\infty )$, we have $u'''(t)<R$ for all
$t\in [ 0,+\infty )$.

By the same technique as in \eqref{eq-rC}, and considering $t_{-}$ and
$t_{\ast }$ such that $u'''(t_{\ast })=-r$, $u'''(t)<-r$ for all
$t\in [ t_{-},t_{\ast }]$, it can be proved that
$u'''(t)>-R$ for all $t\in [ 0,+\infty) $ and, therefore
$\| u'''\| <R/2<R$ for all $t\in [ 0,+\infty )$.

If $f$ satisfies \eqref{cn1a}, following similar arguments, the same
conclusion is achieved.
\end{proof}

Next result will play a key role to apply a fixed-point theorem.

\begin{lemma}[{\cite[Theorem 6.2.2]{agarwal1}}] \label{chin}
A set $ M\subset X$ is relatively compact if the following three conditions hold:

\begin{enumerate}
\item all functions from $M$ are uniformly bounded;

\item all functions from $M$ are equicontinuous on any compact interval of $
[0,+\infty )$;

\item all functions from $M$ are equiconvergent at infinity, that is, for
any given $\epsilon >0$, there exists a $t_{\epsilon }>0$ such that
\[
\big| \frac{u^{(i)}(t)}{1+t^{3-i}}-\underset{t\to +\infty }{
\lim }\frac{u^{(i)}(t)}{1+t^{3-i}}\big| <\epsilon ,\text{ for all }
t>t_{\epsilon }, x\in M\text{ and }i=0,1,2,3.
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

The functions considered as lower and upper solutions for the initial
problem are defined as it follows.

\begin{definition} \label{sub} \rm
Given $a<0$ and $A,B,C,D\in\mathbb{R}$, a function
$\alpha \in C^{4}[0,+\infty )\cap X$ is said to be a lower
solution of problem \eqref{edo},\eqref{cf} if
\[
\alpha ^{(4)}(t)\geq f(t,\overline{\alpha }(t),\alpha '(t),\alpha
''(t),\alpha '''(t)),\quad t\in [ 0,+\infty ),
\]
and
\begin{equation}
\alpha '(0)\leq B,\quad \alpha ''(0)+a\text{ }
\alpha '''(0)\leq C,\quad \alpha '''(+\infty )<D,  \label{BCsub}
\end{equation}
where $\overline{\alpha }(t):=\alpha (t)-\alpha (0)+A$.

A function $\beta $ is an upper solution if it satisfies the reversed
inequalities with $\overline{\beta }(t):=\beta (t)-\beta (0)+A$.
\end{definition}

We point out that $\alpha $ and $\beta $ need not to be well ordered or even
ordered.

\section{Main result}

In this section we prove the existence of at least one solution for
problem \eqref{edo}, \eqref{cf}.

\begin{theorem} \label{MainThm}
Let $f:[0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}^{4}\to \mathbb{R}$ be an
$L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function, and $\alpha ,\beta $ lower and
upper solutions of \eqref{edo}, \eqref{cf}, respectively, such that
\begin{equation}
\alpha ''(t)\leq \beta ''(t),\quad \forall t\in
[ 0,+\infty ).  \label{desi-subsob}
\end{equation}

If $f$ satisfies the one-sided Nagumo condition \eqref{cn1}, or \eqref{cn1a},
in the set
\begin{align*}
E_{\ast }=\Big\{& (t,x,y,z,w)\in [ 0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}^{4}:
\overline{\alpha } (t)\leq x\leq \overline{\beta }(t),\;
\alpha '(t)\leq y\leq \beta '(t), \\
&\alpha ''(t)\leq z\leq \beta ''(t) \Big\},
\end{align*}
and
\begin{equation}
f(t,\overline{\alpha }(t),\alpha '(t),z,w) \geq
f(t,x,y,z,w)\geq f(t,\overline{\beta }(t),\beta '(t),z,w) ,  \label{desi}
\end{equation}
for $(t,z,w)$ fixed and $\overline{\alpha }(t)\leq x\leq \overline{\beta }
(t)$, $\alpha '(t)\leq y\leq \beta '(t)$, then problem
\eqref{edo}, \eqref{cf} has at least a solution $u\in C^{4}(0,+\infty )\cap X$
and there exists $R>0$ such that
\begin{gather*}
\overline{\alpha }(t)
\leq u(t)\leq \overline{\beta }(t),\alpha '(t)\leq u'(t)\leq \beta '(t), \\
\alpha ''(t) \leq u''(t)\leq \beta ''(t),-R<u'''(t)<R,\quad
\forall t\in [ 0,+\infty).
\end{gather*}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Integrating  \eqref{desi-subsob} and \eqref{BCsub}, we have
$\alpha '(t)\leq \beta '(t)$ and $\overline{\alpha }(t)\leq \overline{\beta
}(t)$, for $t\in [ 0,+\infty )$. Therefore we can consider the
modified and perturbed equation
\begin{equation} \label{edo-m}
\begin{aligned}
u^{(4)}(t)&=f(t,\delta _0(t,u),\delta _{1}(t,u'),\delta_{2}(t,u''),
 \delta _{3}(t,u''')) \\
&\quad +\frac{1}{1+t^{2}}\frac{u''(t)
 -\delta _{2}(t,u'')}{1+| u''(t)-\delta _{2}(t,u'')| },\quad t\in [ 0,+\infty ),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where the functions $\delta _{j}:[0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}\to
\mathbb{R},j=0,1,2,3$ are given by
\begin{gather*}
\delta _0(t,x)
=\begin{cases}
\overline{\beta }(t), & x>\overline{\beta }(t) \\
x, & \overline{\alpha }(t)\leq x\leq \overline{\beta }(t) \\
\overline{\alpha }(t),& x <\overline{\alpha }(t),
\end{cases}
\\
\delta _{i}(t,y_{i})
=\begin{cases}
\beta ^{(i)}(t), & y_{i}>\beta ^{(i)}(t) \\
y_{i}, &  \alpha ^{(i)}(t)\leq y_{i}\leq \beta ^{(i)}(t) \\
\alpha ^{(i)}(t), & y_{i}<\alpha ^{(i)}(t),
\end{cases}\qquad i=1,2, \\
\delta _{3}(t,w)
= \begin{cases}
R, & w>R \\
w, & -R\leq w\leq R \\
-R, & w<-R.
\end{cases}
\end{gather*}

For clearness, we do the  proof in several steps.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Step 1:} Every solution of \eqref{edo-m}, \eqref{cf}
satisfies $\alpha ''(t)\leq u''(t)\leq \beta ''(t)$ for all $t\in [ 0,+\infty )$.
Let $u$ be a solution of the modified problem \eqref{edo-m}, \eqref{cf} and
suppose, by contradiction, that there exists $t\in (0,+\infty )$ such that
$\alpha ''(t)>u''(t)$. Therefore
\[
\inf_{0\leq t<+\infty }(u''(t)-\alpha ''(t))<0.
\]

By \eqref{BCsub} this infimum can not be attained at $+\infty $.
If
\[
\inf_{0\leq t<+\infty }(u''(t)-\alpha ''(t)):=u''(0^{+})-\alpha ''(0^{+})<0,
\]
then the following contradiction is achieved
\begin{align*}
0 &\leq u'''(0^{+})-\alpha '''(0^{+})
=\frac{C-u''(0)}{a}+\frac{\alpha ''(0)-C}{a} \\
&= -\frac{1}{a}(u''(0)-\alpha ''(0)) <0.
\end{align*}

If there is $t_{\ast }\in (0,+\infty )$ then, we can define
\[
\min_{0\leq t<+\infty }(u''(t)-\alpha ''(t)):=u''(t_{\ast })-\alpha ''(t_{\ast })<0,
\]
with $u'''(t_{\ast })=\alpha '''(t_{\ast })$ and
$u^{(4)}(t_{\ast })-\alpha ^{(4)}(t_{\ast })\geq 0$.
Therefore by \eqref{desi} and Definition \ref{sub} we get the contradiction
\begin{align*}
0 &\leq u^{(4)}(t_{\ast })-\alpha ^{(4)}(t_{\ast }) \\
&= f(t_{\ast },\delta _0(t_{\ast },u(t_{\ast })),\delta _{1}(t_{\ast
},u'(t_{\ast })),\delta _{2}(t_{\ast },u''(t_{\ast
})),\delta _{3}(t_{\ast },u'''(t_{\ast }))) \\
&\quad +\frac{1}{1+t_{\ast }^{2}}\frac{u''(t_{\ast })-\delta
_{2}(t_{\ast },u''(t_{\ast }))}{1+| u''(t_{\ast })-\delta _{2}(t_{\ast },u''(t_{\ast }))|
}-\alpha ^{(4)}(t_{\ast }) \\
&= f(t_{\ast },\delta _0(t_{\ast },u(t_{\ast })),\delta _{1}(t_{\ast
},u'(t_{\ast })),\alpha ''(t_{\ast }),\alpha
'''(t_{\ast })) \\
&\quad +\frac{1}{1+t_{\ast }^{2}}\frac{u''(t_{\ast })-\alpha
''(t_{\ast })}{1+| u''(t_{\ast
})-\alpha ''(t_{\ast })| }-\alpha ^{(4)}(t_{\ast })
\\
&\leq \frac{1}{1+t_{\ast }^{2}}\frac{u''(t_{\ast })-\alpha
''(t_{\ast })}{1+| u''(t_{\ast
})-\alpha ''(t_{\ast })| }<0.
\end{align*}
So $u''(t)\geq \alpha ''(t),\forall t\in [ 0,+\infty )$.
Analogously it can be shown that $u''(t)\leq \beta ''(t),\forall t\in [ 0,+\infty )$.

As $\alpha '(0)\leq B\leq \beta '(0)$ and $u'(0)=B $, integrating on $[0,+\infty )$,
\begin{gather*}
\begin{aligned}
\alpha '(t)-\alpha '(0)
&= \int_0^{t}\alpha ''(s)ds\leq \int_0^{t}u''(s)ds=u'(t)-B \\
&\leq \int_0^{t}\beta ''(s)ds=\beta '(t)-\beta'(0),
\end{aligned}\\
\alpha '(t)\leq \alpha '(t)-\alpha '(0)+B\leq
u'(t)\leq \beta '(t)-\beta '(0)+B\leq \beta '(t),
\\
\alpha (t)-\alpha (0)=\int_0^{t}\alpha '(s)ds\leq
\int_0^{t}u'(s)ds=u(t)-A\leq \int_0^{t}\beta '(s)ds=\beta (t)-\beta (0),
\\
\overline{\alpha }(t)\leq u(t)\leq \overline{\beta }(t).
\end{gather*}
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Step 2:} Problem \eqref{edo-m}, \eqref{cf} has at least
one solution.
Let us define the operator $T:X\to X$ by
\[
Tu(t)=A+Bt+\frac{C-aD}{2}t^{2}+\frac{D}{6}t^3-\int_0^{+\infty
}G(t,s)F(u(s))ds,
\]
with
\begin{align*}
F(u(s)) &:=f(s,\delta _0(s,u),\delta _{1}(s,u'),\delta
_{2}(s,u''),\delta _{3}(s,u''')) \\
&\quad +\frac{1}{1+s^{2}}\frac{u''(s)-\delta _{2}(s,u'')}{1+| u''(s)
-\delta _{2}(s,u'')| }.
\end{align*}
By Lemma \ref{lemma-equi}, the fixed points of $T$ are solutions of problem
\eqref{edo-m}, \eqref{cf}. So it is sufficient to prove that $T$ has a fixed
point.

(i) $T:X\to X$ is well defined.
Let $u\in X$. As $f$ is an $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function, so, for
\[
\rho >\max \{ {\| u\| _{X},\| \alpha
\| _{X},\| \beta \| _{X}}\} ,
\]
we obtain
\begin{align*}
\int_0^{+\infty }| F(u(s))| ds
&\leq \int_0^{+\infty}\phi _{\rho }(s)+\frac{1}{1+s^{2}}\frac{u''(s)-\delta
_{2}(s,u'')}{1+| u''(s)-\delta
_{2}(s,u'')| }ds \\
&\leq \int_0^{+\infty }\phi _{\rho }(s)+\frac{1}{1+s^{2}}ds<+\infty ,
\end{align*}
that is, $F$ is also an $L^{1}$-Carath\'eodory function.

By the Lebesgue Dominated Convergence Theorem,
\begin{align*}
\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{(Tu)(t)}{1+t^3}
&= \frac{D}{6} -\int_0^{+\infty }\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{G(t,s)}{1+t^3}
F(u(s))ds \\
&= \frac{D}{6}-\frac{1}{6}\int_0^{+\infty }F(u(s))ds<+\infty ,
\end{align*}
and analogously for
\[
\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{(Tu)'(t)}{1+t^{2}},\text{ }
\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{(Tu)''(t)}{1+t}\text{ and }
\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{(Tu)'''(t)}{2}.
\]
Therefore $Tu\in X$.


(ii) $T$ is continuous.
For any convergent sequence $u_{n}\to u$ in $X$, there exists $\rho
>0$ such that $\sup_{n}\| u_{n}\| _{X}<\rho $, we have
\begin{align*}
\| Tu_{n}-Tu\| _{X}
&= \max \Big\{\| Tu_{n}-Tu\| ,\| (Tu_{n})'-(Tu)'\| , \\
&\quad \| (Tu_{n})''-(Tu)''\|,\| (Tu_{n})'''-(Tu)'''\|\Big\}   \\
&\leq \int_0^{+\infty }M| F(u_{n}(s))-F(u(s))|
ds\to 0,\\quad n\to +\infty ,
\end{align*}
where
\begin{align*}
M&=\max \Big\{\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }| \frac{G(t,s)}{1+t^3}|,\;
 \sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }| \frac{1}{1+t^{2}}\frac{\partial G(t,s)}{
\partial t}| , \\
&\quad \sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }| \frac{1}{1+t}\frac{\partial ^{2}G(t,s)}{
\partial t^{2}}| ,\; 1 \Big\}.
\end{align*}


(iii) $T$ is compact.
Let $B\subset X$ be any bounded subset, therefore there is $R>0$ such that $
\| u \|_X< R$ for all $u\in B$.
For each $u\in B$, one has
\begin{align*}
\| Tu\| &= \sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }\frac{|
Tu(t)| }{1+t^3}\leq |A|+|B|+|C-aD|+|D|   \\
&\quad +\int_0^{+\infty }\sup_{0\leq t<+\infty }\frac{|
G(t,s)| }{1+t^3}| F(u(s))| ds \\
&\leq |A|+|B|+|C-aD|+|D|+\int_0^{+\infty }M(\phi _{R}(s)+\frac{1}{
1+s^{2}}) <+\infty .
\end{align*}
By the same arguments it can be proved that $\| (Tu)
^{(i)}\| <+\infty $, for $i=1,2,3$, and, therefore,
\[
\| Tu\| _{X}=\max \left\{ \| Tu\|
,\| (Tu)'\| ,\| (Tu)''\| ,\| (Tu)'''\| \right\}
<+\infty ,
\]
that is, $TB$ is uniformly bounded.

$TB$ is equicontinuous, because, for $L>0$ and $t_{1},t_{2}\in [ 0,L]$, we have
\begin{align*}
\big| \frac{Tu(t_{1})}{1+t_{1}^3}-\frac{Tu(t_{2})}{1+t_{2}^3}\big|
 &\leq \big| \frac{A+Bt_{1}+\frac{C-aD}{2}t_{1}^{2}+\frac{D
}{6}t_{1}^3}{1+t_{1}^3}-\frac{A+Bt_{2}+\frac{C-aD}{2}t_{2}^{2}+\frac{D}{6
}t_{2}^3}{1+t_{2}^3}\big| \\
&\quad +\int_0^{+\infty }\big| \frac{G(t_{1},s)}{1+t_{1}^3}-\frac{
G(t_{2},s)}{1+t_{2}^3}\big| | F(u(s))| ds \\
&\leq \big| \frac{A+Bt_{1}+\frac{C-aD}{2}t_{1}^{2}+\frac{D}{6}t_{1}^3
}{1+t_{1}^3}-\frac{A+Bt_{2}+\frac{C-aD}{2}t_{2}^{2}+\frac{D}{6}t_{2}^3}{
1+t_{2}^3}\big| \\
&\quad +\int_0^{+\infty }\big| \frac{G(t_{1},s)}{1+t_{1}^3}-\frac{
G(t_{2},s)}{1+t_{2}^3}\big| \big(\phi _{R}(s)+\frac{1}{1+s^{2}}
\big) ds\to 0,
\end{align*}
as $\ t_{1}\to t_{2}$.
By the same technique one shows that
\[
\big| \frac{(Tu) ^{(i)}(t_{1})}{1+t_{1}^{3-i}}-\frac{(
Tu) ^{(i)}(t_{2})}{1+t_{2}^{3-i}}\big| \to 0,
\]
uniformly, for $i=1,2,3$, as $t_{1}\to t_{2}$.

Moreover $TB$ is equiconvergent at infinity, because
\begin{align*}
&\big| \frac{Tu(t)}{1+t^3}-\lim_{t\to +\infty }\frac{Tu(t)}{1+t^3}\big| \\
&\leq | \frac{A+Bt+\frac{C-aD}{2}t^{2}+\frac{D}{6}t^3}{1+t^3}-\frac{D}{6}|
 +\int_0^{+\infty }| \frac{G(t,s)}{1+t^3}-\frac{1}{6}| | F(u(s))| ds \\
&\leq \big| \frac{A+Bt+\frac{C-aD}{2}t^{2}+\frac{D}{6}t^3}{1+t^3}
 -\frac{D}{6}\big|
+\int_0^{+\infty }\big| \frac{G(t,s)}{1+t^3}-\frac{1}{6}
\big| \big(\phi _{\rho _{1}}+\frac{1}{1+s^{2}}\big) ds\to
0,
\end{align*}
as $t\to +\infty $, and analogously for
\[
\big| \frac{(Tu) ^{(i)}(t)}{1+t^{3-i}}-\lim_{t\to
+\infty }\frac{(Tu) ^{(i)}(t)}{1+t^{3-i}} \big|
\to 0,\quad  \text{as } t\to +\infty .
\]
So, by Lemma \ref{chin}, the set $TB$ is relatively compact.

As $T$ is completely continuous then by Schauder Fixed Point Theorem, $T$
has at least one fixed point $u\in X$.
\end{proof}

\section{Example}

Consider the  fourth-order differential equation
\begin{equation}
(1+t^{2})u^{(4)}(t)=-u(t)| u'''(t)-6| e^{u'''(t)}-e^{-t}(6t+2-u''(t)),\quad t>0,
 \label{ex1}
\end{equation}
with the boundary conditions
\begin{equation}
u(0)=A,\ u'(0)=0,\quad  u''(0)+au'''(0)=0,\quad
 u'''(+\infty )=D,  \label{ex1-cf}
\end{equation}
where $A\geq 0$, $-\frac{1}{3}\leq a<0$ and $0<D<6$.

We remark that the above problem is a particular case of \eqref{edo}, \eqref{cf}
 with $B=C=0$ and
\begin{equation}
f(t,x,y,z,w)=\frac{-x| w-6| e^{w}-e^{-t}(6t+2-z)}{1+t^{2}}.  \label{f}
\end{equation}
Moreover the functions $\alpha (t)\equiv 0$ and $\beta (t)=t^3+t^{2}-1$
are, respectively, non ordered lower and upper solutions for
\eqref{ex1}, \eqref{ex1-cf}), with $\overline{\alpha }(t)=A$ and
$\overline{\beta } (t)=t^3+t^{2}+A$, $f$ satisfies the Nagumo condition
 \eqref{cn1} with
\[
\psi (t)=\frac{1}{1+t^{2}},1<\nu <2,h(| w| )\equiv 1,
\]
on
\begin{align*}
E_0&=\Big\{(t,x,y,z,w)\in [ 0,+\infty )\times \mathbb{R}^{4}:
A\leq x\leq t^3+t^{2}+A,\; 0\leq y\leq 3t^{2}+2t, \\
&\quad 0\leq z\leq 6t+2\Big\},
\end{align*}
and satisfies the assumptions of Theorem \ref{MainThm}.

Therefore, there is at least a non trivial solution $u$ of \eqref{ex1},
\eqref{ex1-cf}, and $R>0$, such that
\begin{gather*}
A\leq u(t)\leq t^3+t^{2}+A,\quad
0\leq u'(t)\leq 3t^{2}+2t,\\
0\leq u''(t)\leq 6t+2, \quad
\| u'''\| _0\leq R,\quad \forall t\in [ 0,+\infty ).
\end{gather*}

We remark that, this solution is unbounded and, from the location part, we
notice that $u$ is nondecreasing and convex.
It is important to stress that the nonlinearity \eqref{f} does not satisfy
the usual two-sided Nagumo-type condition.
In fact, if there exist $\psi _0,h_0\in C(\mathbb{R}_0^{+},\mathbb{R}
^{+})$ satisfying
\[
| f(t,x,y,z,w)| \leq \psi _0(t)h_0(|w| ),\quad \forall (t,x,y,z,w)\in E_0,
\]
with $\int_0^{+\infty }\frac{s}{h_0(s)}ds=+\infty $, then,
in particular,
\[
-f(t,x,y,z,w)\leq \psi _0(t)h_0(| w| ),
\]
and, for $t\in [ 0,+\infty )$, $x=1$, $0\leq y\leq 3t^{2}+2t$, $z=6t+2$,
and $w\in \mathbb{R}$,
\[
-f(t,1,y,6t+2,w)=\frac{| w-6| e^{w}}{1+t^{2}}\leq \psi
_0(t)h_0(| w| ),
\]
For $\psi _0(t)=1/(1+t^{2})$ we have
$| w-6| e^{w}\leq h_0(| w| )$ and the following contradiction
holds
\[
+\infty >\int_0^{+\infty }\frac{s}{(s-6)e^{s}}ds\geq \int_0^{+\infty }
\frac{s}{h_0(s)}ds=+\infty .
\]

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
This work was supported by National Founds through FCT-Funda\c{c}\~{a}o para
a Ci\^{e}ncia e a Tecnologia as part of project : SFRH/BSAB/114246/2016.

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee for his/her comments
and suggestions.


\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{agarwal1} R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan;
 \emph{Infinite Interval Problems for Differential, Difference and Integral Equations}, Kluwer
Academic Publisher, Glasgow 2001.

\bibitem{agarwal2} R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan;
\emph{Non-linear boundary value problems on the semi-infinite interval:
an upper and lower solution approach}, Mathematika \textbf{49}, no. 1-2,
(2002) 129--140.

\bibitem{DA+FM} D. Anderson, F. Minh\'os;
\emph{A discrete fourth-order Lidstone problem with parameters},
Applied Mathematics and Computation, 214 (2009) 523--533.

\bibitem{Bai} C. Bai and C. Li;
\emph{Unbounded upper and lower solution
method for third-order boundary-value problems on the half-line,} Electronic
Journal of Differential Equations, \textbf{119} (2009), 1--12.

\bibitem{AC+GF} A. Cabada, G. Figueiredo;
\emph{A generalization of an
extensible beam equation with critical growth in }$\mathbb{R}^{N}$,
Nonlinear Anal.-Real World Appl., 20 (2014), 134-142.

\bibitem{AC+FM} A. Cabada, F. Minh\'os;
\emph{Fully nonlinear fourth
order equations with functional boundary conditions,} J. Math. Anal. Appl.,
Vol. 340/1 (2008), 239-251.

\bibitem{Choi} S.W. Choi, T.S. Jang;
\emph{Existence and uniqueness of nonlinear deflections of an infinite
beam resting on a non-uniform nonlinear
elastic foundation}, Boundary Value Problems 2012, 2012:5, 24 pages.

\bibitem{JF+FM} J. Fialho, F. Minh\'os;
\emph{Existence and location results for hinged beams with unbounded nonlinearities},
Nonlinear Anal., 71 (2009), 1519-1525.

\bibitem{JG+LK+FM} J. Graef, L. Kong, F. Minh\'os;
\emph{Higher order boundary value problems with $\phi $-Laplacian and functional
boundary conditions,} Computers and Mathematics with Applications,
\textbf{61} (2011), 236-249.

\bibitem{MRG+FM+AS} M. R. Grossinho, F. Minh\'os, A. I. Santos;
\emph{A note on a class of problems for a higher order fully nonlinear equation
under one sided Nagumo type condition}, Nonlinear Anal., \textbf{70} (2009),
4027--4038.

\bibitem{MRG+FM+AS2} M. R. Grossinho, F. Minh\'os, A. I. Santos;
\emph{A third-order boundary value problem with one-sided Nagumo condition, }
Nonlinear Anal., \textbf{63 }(2005), 247-256.

\bibitem{Jang1} T. S. Jang, H. S. Baek, J. K. Paik;
\emph{A new method for the non-linear deflection analysis of an infinite
beam resting on a non-linear elastic foundation},
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 46 (2011), 339-346.

\bibitem{Jang2} T. S. Jang;
\emph{A new semi-analytical approach to large
deflections of Bernoulli--Euler-v.Karman beams on a linear elastic
foundation: Nonlinear analysis of infinite beams}, International Journal of
Mechanical Sciences 66 (2013) 22--32.

\bibitem{Lian} H. Lian, P. Wang, W. Ge;
\emph{Unbounded upper and lower
solutions method for Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem on infinite
intervals,} Nonlinear Anal., \textbf{70} (2009), 2627--2633.

\bibitem{Lian2} H. Lian, J. Zhao;
\emph{Existence of Unbounded Solutions
for a Third-Order Boundary Value Problem on Infinite Intervals,} Discrete
Dynamics in Nature and Society, \textbf{2012}, Article ID 357697, 14 pages.

\bibitem{Lian3} H. Lian, J. Zhao, R. P. Agarwal;
\emph{Upper and lower solution method for nth-order BVPs on an infinite interval},
Boundary Value Problems 2014, 2014:100, 17 pages.

\bibitem{Ma} X. Ma, J. W. Butterworth, G. C. Clifton;
\emph{Static analysis of an infinite beam resting on a tensionless Pasternak
foundation}, European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids 28 (2009), 697--703.

\bibitem{Mah} P. Maheshwarin, S. Khatri;
\emph{Nonlinear analysis of infinite beams on granular bed-stone column-reinforced
earth beds under moving loads}, Soils and Foundations, 52 (2012), 114--125.

\bibitem{FM} F. Minh\'os;
\emph{Location results: an under used tool in higher order boundary value problems},
International Conference on Boundary
Value Problems: Mathematical Models in Engineering, Biology and Medicine,
American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, \textbf{1124} (2009),
244--253.

\bibitem{FM+TG+AIS} F. Minh\'os, T. Gyulov, A. I. Santos;
\emph{Lower and upper solutions for a fully nonlinear beam equations},
Nonlinear Anal., 71 (2009), 281--292.

\bibitem{Song} Y. P. Song;
\emph{A nonlinear boundary value problem for
fourth-order elastic beam equations}, Boundary Value Probl., 191, 2014.

\bibitem{Yan} B. Yan, D. O'Regan, R. P. Agarwal;
\emph{Unbounded solutions for sigular boundary value problems on the
semi-infinite interval: Upper and
lower solutions and multiplicity}, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 197 (2006) 365-386.

\bibitem{Zhang} J. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Ni, T. Chen;
\emph{The existence and multiplicity of solutions of three-point
$p$-Laplacian boundary
value problems with one-sided Nagumo condition}, Journal of Applied
Mathematics and Computing, 24, Issue 1--2, (2007) 209--220.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
