\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2017 (2017), No. 154, pp. 1--11.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2017 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2017/154\hfil Positive ground state solutions for KGM systems]
{Positive ground state solutions for quasicritical Klein-Gordon-Maxwell
type systems with potential vanishing at infinity}

\author[E. L. de Moura, O. H. Miyagaki, R. Ruviaro \hfil EJDE-2017/154\hfilneg]
{Elson Leal de Moura, Olimpio Hiroshi Miyagaki, Ricardo Ruviaro}

\address{Elson Leal de Moura\newline
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri,
39803-371 Te\'ofilo Otoni-MG, Brazil}
 \email{elson.moura@ufvjm.edu.br}

\address{Olimpio Hiroshi Miyagaki \newline
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora,
Departamento de Matem\'atica, 36036-330 Juiz de Fora-MG, Brazil}
\email{ohmiyagaki@gmail.com}


\address{Ricardo Ruviaro \newline
Universidade de Bras\'ilia, Departamento de Matem\'atica,
70910-900 Bras\'ilia-DF, Brazil}
\email{ruviaro@mat.unb.br}

\dedicatory{Communicated by Vicentiu Radulescu}

\thanks{Submitted April 19, 2017. Published June 27, 2017.}
\subjclass[2010]{35A15, 35Q61, 35B38, 35B09}
\keywords{Klein-Gordon-Maxwell; positive solution; ground state; 
\hfill\break\indent vanishing potential}

\begin{abstract}
 This article concerns the Klein-Gordon-Maxwell type system when the
 nonlinearity has a quasicritical growth at infinity, involving
 {\it zero mass}  potential, that is, $V(x)\to 0$, as $|x|\to\infty$.
 The interaction of the behavior of  the potential and nonlinearity recover
 the lack of the compactness of Sobolev embedding in whole space.
 The positive ground state solution is obtained by proving that the solution
 satisfies Mountain Pass level.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\allowdisplaybreaks


\section{Introduction}

This article concerns the existence of nontrivial solution to the
Klein-Gordon-Maxwell system
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
-\Delta u +V(x)u-(2\omega + \phi)\phi u
  =   K(x)f(u), \quad\text{in } \mathbb{R}^3,\\
\Delta  \phi      =   (\omega +\phi)u^{2},\quad\text{in } \mathbb{R}^3,
\end{gathered} \label{KGM}
\end{equation}
where  $ u\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^3):=H$, $\omega >0$ is a parameter, and we
assume that  $V, K: \mathbb{R}^3\to \mathbb{R}$ and $f: \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ 
are continuous functions, with $V, K$  nonnegative and $f$ having a quasicritical 
growth at infinity.  We will treat problem  \eqref{KGM} with {\it zero mass} 
potential, that is, $V(x)\to 0$, as $|x|\to\infty$. Problems 
involving   zero mass potential,  with $\phi=0$, have been studied by several 
researchers, and extended or improved in several  ways; see
   for instance  \cite{Montenegro,AS2012,AS,AW,BPR,BGM,BL,BV,GM,LW} and 
reference therein. 
In all these papers above, there are restrictions on $V$ and $K$ to get
some compact embedding into a weighted $L^p$ space.

In a remarkable work,  Benci and Fortunato in \cite{BenciF1} considered problem
 \eqref{KGM}, with $V(x)=m_{0}^{2}-\omega^2$,
 as a model  describing nonlinear Klein-Gordon fields in $\mathbb{R}^3$
interacting with the electromagnetic field. 
Thus  the solution represents a solitary wave of the type 
$\Phi(x,t)=u(x)e^{i \omega t}$ in equilibrium with a purely electrostatic field
 $\bf E= -\nabla \phi(x)$. There are a lot of works  devoted to system
 \eqref{KGM}, and we would like to  cite some
of them.   Benci and Fortunato  \cite{BenciF2}  proved the
existence of infinitely many radially symmetric solutions when $m_0 > \omega$  
and $K(x)f (u) = |u|^{p-2}u$, $ 4 <p< 6$. D'Aprile and Mugnai 
 \cite{Mugai1,Mugai2}
 covered the case $2 < p \leq 4$ and  established some   non-existence results 
for $p>6$.
For  the critical nonlinearity  $K(x)f (u) = |u|^{p-2}u$, with $p=6$, 
Cassani \cite{Cassani} obtained a  non-existence  result for  the above system, 
and he showed the existence  of  radially symmetric solution  when $ 4 <p< 6$ or
  $p = 4$. In the critical case,    radially symmetric solutions 
for this system were studied  in \cite{Carriao1,Carriao2, Mugai1, Fwang} 
and references therein.
With respect to the existence of  a  {\it  ground state solution,}
that is, a couple $(u,\phi)$ which solves \eqref{KGM}  and minimize the action 
functional associated to \eqref{KGM}  among all possible nontrivial solutions,
 we mention  \cite{Azzollini1,Azzollini2, Carriao2, WangNA} 
and theirs references.
  In \cite{He,LiTang}  were considered  \eqref{KGM} systems imposing 
a coercivity condition, as that in \cite{Bartsch}, to recover the lack of 
compactness of the Sobolev space embedding.

The interest in this kind of problem is twofold: on the one hand the vast 
range of applications, and on the other hand the mathematical challenge 
of solving  a nonlocal problem and zero mass potential.

First of all, we would like to study the case in which $V$ is bounded and then, 
in  Section $5$,  we  treat problem  \eqref{KGM} with  zero mass potential,
 that is,  when $V(x)\to 0$, as $|x|\to\infty$.

We will work with the following assumptions:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A1)] $V,K:\mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R}$ are smooth functions,
 $K\in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ and there are constants 
$\xi_0, a_1, a_2, V_0>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{V}
 0< V_{0}\leq V(x)\leq a_1,\quad \forall  x\in\mathbb{R}^3
 \end{equation}
and if $2<\theta <4$, then
\begin{equation}\label{V0}
 0< \frac{2(4-\theta)}{\theta -2}\leq V_{0},\quad \forall x\in\mathbb{R}^3\,;
\end{equation}
also
\begin{equation}\label{K}
0< K(x)\leq \frac{a_2}{1+|x|^{\xi_0}},\quad \forall  x\in\mathbb{R}^3.
\end{equation}

\item[(A2)] If $\{A_n\}\subset\mathbb{R}^3$ is a sequence of Borel sets such 
that the Lebesgue measure of $A_n$ is bounded uniformly, that is,  
$\mu(A_n)\leq R$, for all $n$ and some $R>0$, then
\begin{equation}\label{eq1}
 \lim_{r\to+\infty}\int_{A_n\bigcap B^c_r(0)}K(x)\,dx=0,\quad \text{uniformly for }
 n\in\mathbb{N}.
\end{equation}


\item[(A3)] (behavior at zero) 
$\limsup_{s\to 0^+}f(s)/s=0$,  

\item[(A3')]  (behavior at zero) there is a constant $p\in (2,6)$  such that 
$\limsup_{s\to 0^{+}}\frac{f(s)}{s^{p-1}}< +\infty$,

\item[(A4)]  (quasicritical growth) $\limsup_{s\to +\infty}f(s)/s^{5}=0$,

\item[(A5)] (Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz) there exists $\theta>4$, such that 
$0< \theta F(u)\leq f(u)u$ for all $u>0$,
where  $F(u)=\int^u_0f(s)\,ds$.	
\end{itemize}

\begin{remark} \rm
	From \eqref{V}, \eqref{K} and  $p\in(2,6)$, we have
	\begin{equation}\label{K3}
	\frac{K(x)}{[V(x)]^{(6-p/4}}\to 0,\quad \text{as } |x|\to +\infty.
	\end{equation}
\end{remark}


Our main results are as follows.


\begin{theorem}\label{teo1}
Suppose that {\rm (A1)--(A5)} hold. Then  problem \eqref{KGM} possess 
a positive ground state solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem}\label{teo2}
Suppose that {\rm (A1), (A2), (A3'), (A4), (A5)} hold. Then
 problem \eqref{KGM} possess a positive ground state solution.
\end{theorem}

Let us briefly sketch the contents of this article.
 In the next section we present some preliminaries. 
In Section 3, we prove the boundedness of the Cerami sequence  and 
in the Section 4, we  prove of the main results. 
In the Section 5,  we analyze the case when $V(x)\to 0$, as $|x|\to\infty$.

\section{Preliminary results}

By the reduction method described in \cite{BenciFC}, the Euler-Lagrange 
functional associated with the system \eqref{KGM}, $J:H\equiv H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^3)\to \mathbb{R}$, 
is 
$$ 
J(u)  = \frac{1}{2}\| u\|^{2}
 -\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\omega \phi_{u}u^{2}\,dx
 - \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)F(u)\,dx,
$$
where $F(u)=\int^u_0f(s)\,ds$. From the conditions on $f$ and by standard
arguments, the functional $J\in C^{1}(H,\mathbb{R})$ has Frechet derivative 
$$ 
J'(u)v  = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( \nabla u\nabla v+V(x)uv)\, dx
-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \phi_{u})\phi_{u}uv\,dx
- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u)v\,dx,
$$ 
for all  $v\in H$.
The norm in $H$  given by
 $$
\| u \|^2 = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3 }(| \nabla u|^2+V(x)u^{2})dx
$$
is equivalent to the usual  norm in  $H$. The induced  inner product is 
 $$ 
\langle u,v\rangle:=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3 }( \nabla u\nabla v+V(x)uv)\,dx,
$$
We recall that the critical points of functional $J$ are precisely the weak 
solutions of \eqref{KGM}. We also assume that $f(s)=0$ for all $s\in (-\infty, 0]$.

A fundamental tool in our analysis will be the following Lemma.

\begin{lemma}\label{L2.1}
For every $ u\in H$, there exists a unique 
$ \phi_{u}\in D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ which solves
\begin{equation}\label{e22}
\Delta  \phi      =  (\omega +\phi)u^{2}.
\end{equation}
Furthermore, in the set $ \{x : u(x)\neq 0\}$ we have 
$-\omega \leq \phi_{u}\leq 0$ if $\omega>0$.
\end{lemma}


For a proof of the above lemma, see \cite[Proposition 2.1]{Mugai2}.
From assumption (A3) and (A4) [or (A3') and (A4)] and combining with
 Lemma \ref{L2.1} follows that the functional $J$ satisfies the 
geometric conditions of the Mountain Pass Theorem of Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz
 in  \cite{Ambrosetti}. So,  there is a sequence  $ (u_n)\subset H$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{Cer}
 J(u_n)\to c \quad  \text{and} \quad
(1+\| u_n\|)\| J'(u_n)\|\to 0, \quad n\to \infty,
\end{equation}
where
$$ 
c= \inf_{\gamma\in \Gamma}\max_{t\in [0,1 ]}J(\gamma (t))
$$
is the Mountain Pass level,
with 
$$ 
\Gamma = \{\gamma \in C([0,1 ], H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^3));
\gamma (0)=0, J(\gamma (1))\leq 0  \} .
$$
The second result in this section is the following Hardy-type inequality.

\begin{lemma}\label{p21}
Suppose that {\rm (A1)--(A4)} or {\rm (A1), (A3), (A4)} hold.
 Then, $H$  is compactly embedded into 
$$ 
\Gamma^{q}(\mathbb{R}^3):= \{\varphi: \mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R};
\varphi  \text{ is measurable and }  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)| \varphi|^{q}\,dx
<\infty \},
$$
for all $q\in (2,6)$.
 \end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 Consider (A1), (A3) and (A4); thus fixed  $q\in(2,6)$ and given 
$\varepsilon>0$, there are  $0<s_0<s_1$ and $C>0$ such that
 \begin{equation}\label{24}
 K(x)|s|^q\leq \varepsilon C(V(x)|s|^2+|s|^{6})+CK(x)\mathcal{X}_{[s_0,s_1]}
(|s|)|s|^{6},\quad \forall  s\in\mathbb{R}.
 \end{equation}
Hence,
\begin{equation}\label{25}
\int_{B^c_r(0)} K(x)|u|^q\,dx\leq \varepsilon CQ(u)
+C\int_{A\cap B^c_r(0)}K(x)\,dx,\quad \forall  u\in H
 \end{equation}
where
\begin{gather*}
Q(u)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)|u|^2\,dx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|u|^{6}\,dx, \\
A=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^3: s_0\leq|u(x)|\leq s_1 \}.
\end{gather*}
If $(v_n)$ is a sequence such that $v_n\rightharpoonup v$ weakly in $H$, 
as $ n \to \infty$, there is some constant $M_1>0$ such that
$$
\| v_n  \|^2=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(|\nabla v_n|^2+V(x)|v_n|^2)\,dx
\leq M_1, \quad \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|v_n|^{6}\,dx \leq M_1,\quad
\forall n\in \mathbb{N},
$$
implying that $(Q(v_n))$ is bounded. On the other hand, setting
$$
A_n=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^3:s_0\leq |v_n(x)|\leq s_1 \},
$$
the above inequality implies 
$$
s_0^{6}\mu(A_n)\leq \int_{A_n}|v_n|^{6}\,dx\leq M_1,\quad \forall  n\in\mathbb{N},
$$
showing that $\sup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mu(A_n)<+\infty$. Therefore, from  (II), 
there is a $r>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{26}
\int_{A_n\cap B^c_r(0)}K(x)\,dx<\frac{\varepsilon}{s^{6}_1},\quad
\forall n\in\mathbb{N}.
\end{equation}
Now, \eqref{25} and \eqref{26} lead to
\begin{equation}\label{27}
\int_{B^c_r(0)}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx
\leq \varepsilon CM_1+s^{6}_1\int_{A_n\cap B^c_r(0)}K(x)\,dx
<(CM_1+1)\varepsilon,\quad \forall n\in\mathbb{N}.
\end{equation}

Since $q\in(2,6)$ and $K$ is a continuous function, from 
the Sobolev embeddings it follows that
\begin{equation}\label{28}
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int_{B_r(0)}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx=\int_{B_r(0)}K(x)|v|^q\,dx.
\end{equation}

In light of  \eqref{27}$ and \eqref{28}$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{29}
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)|v|^q\,dx.
\end{equation}
This means that
 $$
v_n\to v,\quad \text{in }  \Gamma^{q}(\mathbb{R}^3), \quad
 n \to \infty, \;\forall q\in(2,6).
$$
Now, we fix $x \in \mathbb{R}^3$ and $\forall  s>0$  there is a constant
$C=C(p)$ such that
 $$ 
CV(x)^{\frac{6-p}{4}}\leq V(x)s^{2-p}+s^{6-p};
$$
%
it follows from the fact that the function 
 $$
h(s)=V(x)s^{2-p}+s^{6-p}, \quad s>0,
$$
 has the minimum value $CV(x)^{\frac{6-p}{4}}$.


Using (A1), (A3') and (A4),and  choosing $\varepsilon \in (0,C)$ for some 
$C>0$ we infer  that
 $$
 K(x)| s|^{p}\leq \varepsilon (V(x)| s|^{2}
+| s|^{6}), \quad \forall s \in \mathbb{R}, | x| \geq r .
$$
Consequently, for all $u \in H$ we have
$$
  \int_{B^{c}_{r}(0)}K(x)| s|^{p}\,dx
\leq  \int_{B^{c}_{r}(0)}\varepsilon (V(x)| s|^{2}
+| s|^{6})\,dx.
$$
If $(v_n)$ is a sequence such that $v_n\rightharpoonup v$ weakly in $H$, 
as $n \to \infty$, there is $M_2>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{32}
 \int_{B^c_r(0)}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx\leq 2\varepsilon M_2.
\end{equation}
Since $q\in(2,6)$ and $K$ is a continuous function, it follows from the  
Sobolev embeddings
 \begin{equation}\label{33}
 \lim_{n\to+\infty}\int_{B_r(0)}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx=\int_{B_r(0)}K(x)|v|^q\,dx.
 \end{equation}

From \eqref{32} and \eqref{33}, we obtain
$$
 \lim_{n\to+\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)|v|^q\,dx.
$$
implying that
 $$
v_n\to v\quad \text{in }  \Gamma^{q}(\mathbb{R}^3), \quad
 n \to \infty, \;\forall q\in(2,6).
$$
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma} \label{L22}
Suppose that  {\rm (A1)--(A4)} are satisfied, and consider  a sequence 
$ (v_n)$ in $H$ such that $ v_n\rightharpoonup v$   weakly in $H$,
as $n \to \infty$. Then 
$$
\lim_{n\to +\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(v_n)v_n\,dx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(v)v\,dx.
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 Assuming (A1), (A3) and (A4), for a fixed $q\in(2,6)$ and  $\varepsilon>0$, 
there is $C>0$ such that
 \begin{equation}\label{212}
 |K(x)f(s)s|\leq\varepsilon C(V(x)|s|^2+|s|^{6})+K(x)|s|^q,\quad \forall 
s\in\mathbb{R}.
 \end{equation}

From Lemma \ref{p21}, we have
 $$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx\to\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)|v|^q\,dx,
$$
then there exists  $r>0$ such that
  \begin{equation}\label{213}
 \int_{B^c_r(0)}K(x)|v_n|^q\,dx<\varepsilon,\quad \forall  n\in\mathbb{N}.
 \end{equation}
Since $(v_n)$ is bounded in $H$, there exists  $M_3>0$ such that
 $$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)|v_n|^2\,dx\leq M_3\quad \text{and}\quad
 \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)|v_n|^{6}\,dx\leq M_3.
$$
Combining the  last two inequalities with \eqref{212} and \eqref{213}, we obtain
$$
 \big|\int_{B^c_r(0)}K(x)f(v_n)v_n\,dx\big|<(2CM_3+1)\varepsilon,\quad
\forall  n\in\mathbb{N}.
$$
To complete the proof we need to show that
  $$
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int_{B_r(0)}K(x)f(v_n)v_n\,dx
=\int_{B_r(0)}K(x)f(v)v\,dx.
$$
However, this limit is obtained by  using  hypothesis (A4) and arguing 
as  in  \cite{Chabrowski}, setting  
$$
P(x,s)=K(x)f(s)s, \quad  Q(x,u_n(x)) = | u_n(x)|^{6}.
$$
\end{proof}


\begin{lemma} \label{L23}
Suppose that $f$ satisfies {\rm (A1), (A3'), (A4)},
and consider a sequence $ (v_n)$ in $H$ such that $ v_n\rightharpoonup v$
 weakly in $H$, as $n \to \infty$. Then 
  $$
\lim_{n\to +\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(v_n)v_n\,dx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(v)v\,dx.
$$
  \end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 Using the Lemma \ref{p21}, for $r>0$ sufficiently small, arguing  as in 
 \eqref{212} we infer that
  $$ 
K(x)\leq \varepsilon (V(x)| s|^{2-p}
+| s|^{6-p}),\quad  \forall | x|\geq r .
$$
The rest of the proof follows  similarly to the proof of Lemma \ref{L22}.
\end{proof}

\section{Boundedness of Cerami sequence}

\begin{lemma}\label{ltda}
The Cerami sequence $ (u_n)\subset H$ given in \eqref{Cer} is bounded.\\
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 We have  a positive constant $ M $ such that
\begin{equation}\label{LD}
 M+o_n{(1)}\| u_n\|\geq \theta J(u_n)-J'(u_n)u_n
\end{equation}
for $ 2< q < 6$.
From (A1), (A5) and Lemma \ref{L2.1} the Cerami sequence $ (u_n)$ is such that
\begin{align*}
 \theta J(u_n)-J'(u_n)u_n
 & =  \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\| u_n\|^{2}
 + \big(\frac{-\theta +4}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \omega \phi_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \phi_{u_n}^{2}u_n^{2}\,dx \\
 &\quad +  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)(f(u_n)u_n-\theta F(u_n))\,dx \\
  & \geq   \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\| u_n\|^{2}, \quad
  \text{if }  \theta >4.
\end{align*}
Similarly, if $2< \theta <4$ we use the hypothesis 
$$ 
0< \frac{2(4-\theta)}{\theta -2}\leq V_{0}\leq V(x),
$$
and Lemma \ref{L2.1} to obtain
\begin{equation} \label{LD1}
\begin{aligned}
& \theta J(u_n)-J'(u_n)u_n \\
& \geq  \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}| \nabla u_n|^{2}\,dx
 + \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u_n^{2}\,dx
 +\omega \big(\frac{-\theta +4}{2}\big) \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
  \phi_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx \\
&\geq \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}| \nabla u_n|^{2}\,dx
+\big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V_{0}u_n^{2}\,dx
+\omega \big(\frac{-\theta +4}{2}\big) \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\phi_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx \\
&\geq  \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}| \nabla u_n|^{2}\,dx
 +\big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V_{0}u_n^{2}\,dx
 +\omega^{2} \big(\frac{\theta -4}{2}\big) \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} u_n^{2}\,dx\\
&= \big(\frac{\theta -2}{2}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}| \nabla u_n|^{2}\,dx
 + \big[\frac{(\theta -2)V_{0}+(\theta -4)\omega^{2}}{2}\big]
 \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u_n^{2}\,dx\\
& \geq C \| u_n\|^{2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
In light of \eqref{LD} and \eqref{LD1} we conclude that $(u_n)$ is bounded.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma} \label{L26}
 If $ u_n\rightharpoonup u$  weakly in $H$, as $n \to \infty$,
then passing to a subsequence if necessary, $\phi_{u_n}\rightharpoonup \phi_{u} $
 weakly in $  D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, as $n \to \infty$.
 \end{lemma}

\begin{proof} 
 Consider $ (u_n), u \in H$ such that $ u_n\rightharpoonup u$ weakly  in $H$,
as $n \to \infty$. It follows that
\begin{gather*}
u_n\rightharpoonup u \quad \text{ weakly in $L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, as
$n \to \infty$, }2\leq p\leq 6, \\
 u_n\to u \quad \text{in $L^{p}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3)$,  as
$n \to \infty$, }2\leq p< 6.
\end{gather*}
From Lemma \ref{L2.1}, note that for all $n\geq 1$ we have
\begin{align*}
 \| \phi_{u_n}\|^{2}_{D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)}
& =    -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\omega \phi_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx
  - \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi^{2}_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx\\
& \leq  -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\omega \phi_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx
  \leq C \| \phi_{u_n}\|_{D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)}
 \| u_n\|^{2}_{\frac{12}{5}}.
\end{align*}

It means that $ (\phi_{u_n})$ is bounded in $ D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
Since  $ D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ is a Hilbert space,  there is a
$\xi \in  D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ such that
\begin{gather*}
\phi_{u_n}\rightharpoonup \xi \quad \text{ weakly in }
  L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^3), \text{ as } n \to \infty,\; 2\leq p\leq 6, \\
\phi_{u_n}\to \xi \quad \text{in }  L^{p}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3),\text{ as }
 n \to \infty,\quad 2\leq p< 6.
\end{gather*}
We desire to prove the following equality $\phi_{u}=\xi$. For this, it is
 necessary to show, in the sense of distributions, 
$$
\Delta \xi = (\omega +\xi)u^{2}
$$
and use the uniqueness of the solution given in Lemma \ref{L2.1}.

Consider a test function $\psi \in C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
We know by Lemma \ref{L2.1} we have
$$
\Delta \phi_{u_n} = (\omega +\phi_{u_n})u^{2}_n.
$$
Then we just need to see how each term of the equality above converges. 
To verify that
\begin{gather*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\nabla \phi_{u_n}\nabla \psi\,dx
\to \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\nabla \xi\nabla \psi\,dx, \quad \text{as }
 n \to \infty, \\
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \phi_{u_n}u^{2}_n\psi\, dx
\to \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\xi u^{2}\psi\, dx, \quad \text{as }  n \to \infty,
\end{gather*}
it is sufficient to note that it is a consequence of the definition the weak 
convergence.
By the strong convergence in $L^{p}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3),2\leq p<  6$,
we obtain
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u^{2}_n\psi\,dx \to \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} u^{2}\psi\,dx,
  \quad \text{as } n \to \infty.
 $$

We consider a test function $\varphi \in C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
 Using boundedness of  $(\phi_{u_n})$, the strong convergences in
 $ L^{p}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3),2\leq p< 6$ and the
 Sobolev embeddings follows that as $n\to+\infty$, we have
\begin{align*}
 \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( \phi_{u_n}u_n-\xi u)\varphi\, dx
& =    \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \phi_{u_n}(u_n-u)\varphi\, dx
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u(\phi_{u_n}-\xi)\varphi\, dx\\
& \leq  C\| \phi_{u_n}\|_{D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)}
 \Big(  \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}| u_n-u|^{6/5}|\varphi|^{6/5} \,dx \Big)^{5/6} \\
&\quad +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(\phi_{u_n}-\xi)u\varphi\, dx \to 0,\quad
 \text{as }n\to \infty\to+\infty.
\end{align*}
For the same reasons, it follows that
\begin{align*}
 \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( \phi^{2}_{u_n}u_n-\xi^{2} u)\varphi \,dx
& =    \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \phi^{2}_{u_n}(u_n-u)\varphi\, dx
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u(\phi^{2}_{u_n}-\xi^{2})\varphi \,dx\\
& \leq  C \| \phi_{u_n}\|_{D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)}
\Big( \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}| u_n-u|^{3/2}
|\varphi|^{3/2} \,dx \Big)^{2/3}\\
&\quad +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(\phi^{2}_{u_n}-\xi^{2})u\varphi \,dx
\to 0,\quad \text{as } n\to+\infty.
\end{align*}
From density, for all  $\varphi \in H$ we infer that
\begin{gather*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( \nabla u_n\nabla\varphi +V(x)u_n\varphi)\, dx
 \to \int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}( \nabla u\nabla \varphi+V(x)u\varphi)\, dx, \\
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \phi_{u_n})\phi_{u_n}u_n\varphi \,dx
 \to \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \xi)\xi u \varphi\, dx,
\end{gather*}
as $n\to +\infty$, thus we prove the lemma.
\end{proof}


\section{Proof of the main results}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{teo1}]
Let $(u_n)$ be  a Cerami sequence as given in \eqref{Cer}.
 From Lemma \ref{ltda} follows that $(u_n)$ is bounded and, up to
 subsequence, we can assume that there is $u\in H $, such that
$$
u_n\rightharpoonup u,\quad  \text{weakly in $H$, as } n \to \infty.
$$
We will show that $u_n\to u$, as $n \to + \infty$. From Lemma \ref{L22}, we have
$$
\lim_{n\to +\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u_n)u_n\,dx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u)u\,dx.
$$

On the other hand, we know that  
$$ 
J'(u)v  = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( \nabla u.\nabla v+V(x)uv)\,dx
-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \phi_{u})\phi_{u}uv\,dx
- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u)v\,dx.
$$
Since $J'(u_n)u_n=o_n(1)$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{316}
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\| u_n \|^2=\lim_{n\to+\infty}
\Big[ \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \phi_{u_n})\phi_{u_n}u^2_n \,dx
+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u_n)u_n\,dx\Big].
\end{equation}
By Lemma \ref{L22}, we have
$$
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u_n)u\,dx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u)u\,dx
$$
and from Lemma \ref{L26}, we obtain that
$$
\lim_{n\to \infty} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \phi_{u_n})\phi_{u_n}u^2_n \,dx
= \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \xi)\xi u^2\,dx.
$$
Then
\begin{equation}\label{3170}
\lim_{n\to + \infty}\| u_n \|^2
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \xi)\xi u^2\,dx
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u)u\,dx.
\end{equation}
Moreover, since $J'(u_n)u=o_n(1)$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{317}
\| u \|^2=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}( 2\omega+ \xi)\xi u^2\,dx
 +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}K(x)f(u)u\,dx.
\end{equation}
Therefore, from \eqref{3170} and \eqref{317}, we obtain
$\lim_{n\to + \infty}\| u_n \|^2=\| u \|^2$,
showing that
$$
u_n\to u,\quad \text{in } H,  \text{ as } n \to \infty.
$$
Consequently,
$$
J(u)=c\quad \text{and}\quad J'(u)=0,
$$
implying that $u$ is a ground state solution for $J$.
 Since $u_n\geq 0$, we have that $u\geq 0$. 
The positivity of $u$ follows by using the maximum principle.
\end{proof}


\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{teo2}]
It is similar to that of Theorem \ref{teo1}. However
using the Lemma \ref{L23} instead of  Lemma \ref{L22}.
We omit the proof here.
\end{proof}

\section{Case $V(x)\to 0$, as $|x|\to\infty$}

In this section, we study the problem \eqref{KGM}, inspired by
 \cite{Ambro}, replacing the hypothesis (A1) by
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A1')]  $V,K:\mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R}$ are smooth functions, 
$K\in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ and there are constant 
$\tau, \xi_1, a_1, a_2, a_3>0$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{Vk1}
 \frac{a_1}{1+|x|^{\tau}}\leq V(x)\leq a_2\quad\text{and}\quad 
 0< K(x)\leq \frac{a_3}{1+|x|^{\xi_1}},\quad \forall  x\in\mathbb{R}^3.
\end{equation}
with $\tau, \xi_1$ satisfying
$$
5-\frac{4\xi_1}{\tau}<p, \text{ if } 0< \xi_1<\tau, \quad\text{or}\quad
 1<p,  \text{ if } \xi_1 \geq\tau\,.
$$
Also we assume that
$ \frac{K}{V}\in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
\end{itemize}

In this case,  the norm for $H$ is   
$$
\| u \|^2_V = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3 }(| \nabla u|^{2}+V(x)u^{2})\,dx
$$
 whose induced inner product is  
$$ 
\langle u,v\rangle_V =\int_{\mathbb{R}^3 }( \nabla u\nabla v+V(x)uv)\,dx.
$$

\begin{remark} \rm
At this moment, it is important to observe that \eqref{eq1} is weaker than 
any one of the following conditions:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] there are $r\geq 1$ and $\rho\geq 0$ such that 
$K\in L^r(\mathbb{R}^3\setminus B_{\rho}(0))$;

\item[(b)] $K(x)\to 0$ as $|x|\to \infty$;

\item[(c)] $K=H_1+H_2$, with $H_1$ and $H_2$ verifying (a) and (b) respectively.
\end{itemize}
\end{remark}

In this section, all the past results achieved  follow naturally
 by using the hypothesis (A1') instead of (A1),  except of Lemma \ref{ltda}.
 We would like to show another statement for the boundedness Cerami sequence.

\begin{lemma}\label{ltda1}
The Cerami sequence $ (u_n)\subset H$ given in \eqref{Cer} is bounded.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 Once that  $(J(u_n))$ is bounded and $|J'(u_n)u_n|\leq \|u_n\|_V$   
for $n$  large enough, so there are some constant $ M > 0$  and 
$n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that
$$
J(u_n)-\frac{1}{\theta}J'(u_n)u_n\leq M+\|u_n\|_V, \ \ \forall  n\geq n_0.
$$
On the other hand, it is certain that $u_n>0$ for each  $x\in\mathbb{R}^3$ 
and using the assumption $(f_{2})$ for  $\theta>4$ combined with  Lemma \ref{L2.1}, 
we have
\begin{align*}
J(u_n)-\frac{1}{\theta}J'(u_n)u_n
&\geq \big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{\theta}\big)\|u_n\|^2_V
 -\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\omega \phi_{u_n}u_n^{2}\,dx
 +\frac{2\omega}{\theta}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u^2_n\,dx\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{\theta}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi^2_{u_n}u^2_n\,dx\\
&\geq \big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{\theta}\big)\|u_n\|^2_V
 +\omega\big(\frac{4-\theta}{2\theta}\big)\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u^2_n\,dx\\
&\geq \big(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{\theta}\big)\|u_n\|^2_V,
\end{align*}
which shows that $(u_n)$  is bounded.
\end{proof}

In this way,  we  obtained the same results  as those presented of
Theorems \ref{teo1} and \ref{teo2}, using  (A1') instead of (A1).

\subsection*{Acknowledgments} 
O. H. Miyagaki was supported by  grants from CNPq/Brazil 
304015/2014-8 and INCTMAT/CNPQ/Brazil.
R. Ruviaro  was supported by grant  FAPDF/Brazil 193.000.939/2015.

This article was completed while  first author was visiting, 
as  graduate student in the Ph.D. program, the
Department of Mathematics of University of Brasilia, 
their hospitality is gratefully acknowledged,
mainly from his adviser Professor Liliane A. Maia.


\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{Montenegro} C. O. Alves, M. Montenegro, M. A. S. Souto;
\emph{Existence of solution for three classes of elliptic problems in
$\mathbb{R}^N$ with zero mass,} J. Differential Equations \textbf{252} (2012),
 5735--5750.

\bibitem{AS2012} C. O. Alves, M. A. S. Souto; 
\emph{Existence of solutions for a class of elliptic equations in
	$\mathbb{R}^N$ with vanishing potentials}, J. Differential Equations 
\textbf{252} (2012), 5555--5568.

\bibitem{AS} C. O. Alves, M. A. S. Souto; 
\emph{Existence of solutions for a class of nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations 
with potential vanishing at infinity}, J. Differential Equations, 
\textbf{254} (2013),  1977--1991.

\bibitem{Ambro} A. Ambrosetti, V. Felli, A. Malchiodi; 
\emph{Ground states of nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations with potentials 
vanishing at infinity}, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), \textbf{7} (2005), 117--144.

\bibitem{Ambrosetti} A. Ambrosetti, P. H. Rabinowitz;
\emph{Dual varational methods in critical point theorem and application},
 J. Funct. Anal., \textbf{14} (1973), 349--381.

\bibitem{AW} A. Ambrosetti, Z.-Q. Wang; 
\emph{Nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations with vanishing and decaying potentials,}
Differential Integral Equations, \textbf{18} (2005), 1321--1332.

\bibitem{Azzollini1} A. Azzollini, A. Pomponio;
\emph{Ground state solutions for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon-Maxwell equations,}
 Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., \textbf{35} (2010), 33-42.
	
\bibitem{Azzollini2}  A. Azzollini, L. Pisani, A. Pomponio; 
\emph{Improved estimates and a limit case for the electrostatic Klein-Gordon-Maxwell
 system,} Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A., \textbf{141} (2011),
449--463.

\bibitem{BPR} M. Badiale, L. Pisani, S. Rolando; 
\emph{ Sum of weighted Lebesgue spaces and nonlinear elliptic equations,}
NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., \textbf{18} (2011), 369--405.

\bibitem{Bartsch} T. Bartsch, Z.-Q. Wang, M. Willem; 
\emph{ The Dirichlet problem for superlinear elliptic equations,} 
in: Stationary Partial Differential Equations. Vol. II,
in: Handb. Differ. Equ., Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2005, pp. 1--55.


\bibitem{BenciF1} V. Benci, D. Fortunato; 
\emph{The nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation coupled with the Maxwell equations,} 
Nonlinear Anal. \textbf{47} (2001), 6065--6072.

\bibitem{BenciF2} V. Benci, D. Fortunato; 
\emph{ Solitary waves of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation coupled
	with the Maxwell equations,} Rev. Math. Phys., \textbf{14} (2002), 409-420.

\bibitem{BenciFC} V. Benci, D. Fortunato, A. Masiello, L. Pisani; 
\emph{Solitons and the electromagnetic field,} Math. A., \textbf{232} (1999), 73--102.
	
\bibitem{BGM} V. Benci, C. R. Grisanti, A. M. Micheletti; 
\emph{Existence of solutions for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger
equation with $V(\infty)=0$}, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl.,
 \textbf{66} (2005), 53--65.

\bibitem{BL} H. Berestycki, P. L. Lions; 
\emph{Nonlinear scalar field equations. I. Existence of a ground state,}
 Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., \textbf{82} (1983), 313-- 346.

\bibitem{BV} D. Bonheure, J. Van Schaftingen; 
\emph{Ground states for nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation
	with potential vanishing  at infinity,} 
 Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., \textbf{189} (2010), 273--301.

\bibitem{Carriao1} P. Carri\~ao, P. Cunha, O. Miyagaki;
\emph{Existence results for the Klein-Gordon-Maxwell
	equations in higher dimensions with critical exponents,}
 Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., {\bf	10} (2011), 709-718.

\bibitem{Carriao2} P. Carri\~ao, P. Cunha, O. Miyagaki;
\emph{Positive and ground state solutions for the critical
	Klein-Gordon-Maxwell system with potentials,} arXiv:1005.4088v2 [math.AP].

\bibitem{Cassani} D. Cassani; 
\emph{Existence and non-existence of solitary waves for the critical Klein-Gordon
	equation coupled with Maxwell's equations,} 
Nonlinear Analysis, \textbf{58} (2004), 733--747.

\bibitem{Chabrowski} J. Chabrowski; 
\emph{Weak convergence methods for semilinear elliptic equations}.
World Scientific, 1980.

\bibitem{Mugai1} T. D'Aprile, D. Mugnai; 
\emph{Solitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-Maxwell and
	Schrodinger-Maxwell equations,} Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A,
 {\bf 134} (2004), 1-14.

\bibitem{Mugai2} T. D'Aprile, D. Mugnai; 
\emph{Non-existence results for the coupled Klein-Gordon-Maxwell
	equations,} Adv. Nonlinear Stud. \textbf{4} (2004) 307-322.

\bibitem{GM} M. Ghimenti, A. M. Micheletti; 
\emph{Existence of minimal nodal solutions for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger 
	equation with $V(\infty)=0$}, Adv. Diff. Equations, \textbf{11} (2006), 1375--1396.

\bibitem{He} X. He;
\emph{Multiplicity of solutions for a nonlinear Klein-Gordon-Maxwell system,}
 Acta Appl. Math., \textbf{130} (2014), 237--250.

\bibitem{LiTang} L, Li, C.-L. Tang;
\textit{Infinitely many solutions for a nonlinear
	Klein-Gordon-Maxwell System,} Nonlinear Analysis, \textbf{110} (2014), 157--169.

\bibitem{LW} Y. Liu, Z.-Q. Wang, J. Zhang; 
\emph{Ground states of nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations with potentials,}
Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Anal. Non Lin\'eaire, \textbf{23} (2006), 829--837.

\bibitem{WangNA} F. Wang; 
\emph{Ground-state solutions for the electrostatic nonlinear Klein-Gordon-Maxwell 
system,} Nonlinear Anal., \textbf{74} (14) (2011), 4796--4803.

\bibitem{Fwang} F. Wang; 
\emph{Solitary waves for the Klein-Gordon-Maxwell system with critical exponent,} 
Nonlinear Anal. , \textbf{74 (3)} (2011), 827--835.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}









\bibitem{LWa} Z. Liu, Z-Q. Wang; \emph{On the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz superlinear condition,} Adv. Nonlinear Stud. \textbf{4} (2004), 563--574.

\bibitem{AFM} A. Ambrosetti, V. Felli, A. Malchiodi; \emph{ Ground states of nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations
	with potentials vanishing at infinity,} J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 7 (2005) 117--144.

\bibitem{AR} A. Ambrosetti, P. H. Rabinowitz,\textit{Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications,} J. Funct. Anal.
\textbf{14} (1973), 349--381.

\bibitem{ambrosetti} A. Ambrosetti, J. Garcia Azorero, I. Peral; \emph{Elliptic variational problems in $ \mathbb{R}^N$  with
	critical growth,} J. Differential Equations \textbf{168} (2000), 10--32.







\bibitem{BN} H. Brezis, L. Nirenberg; \emph{Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents,}
Comm. Pure Appl. Math. \textbf{36} (1983), 437--477.



\bibitem{Ce} G. Cerami; \emph{ Un criterio de esistenza per i punti critici su varieta ilimitate,} Istit. Lombardo Accad. Sc. Lett.
Rend. \textbf{112} (1978), 332--336.



\bibitem{costa-1}
D.G.\ Costa, C.A.\ Magalhaes; \emph{Variational elliptic problems which are nonquadratic at infinity,}
Nonlinear Anal. \textbf{23} (1994), 1401--1412.






\bibitem{jean}L. Jeanjean; \emph{On the existence of bounded Palais?Smale sequences and application to a Landesman?Lazer type problem set on $ \mathbb{R}^N$,
} Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A \textbf{129} (1999), 787--809.





\bibitem{zou} M. Schechter, W. Zou,\textit{ Superlinear problems,} Pacific J. Math. \textbf{214} (2004), 145--160.

\bibitem{St} W.\ Strauss; \emph{ Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions,} Comm. Math. Phys. \textbf{55} (1977), 149--162.





\bibitem{willem} M. Willem; \emph{Minimax theorems}, Birkh\"auser, Boston, 1996.


[2] C. O. Alves, S. H. M. Soares, M. A. S. Souto, Schršodinguer-Poisson equations with
supercritical growth, Elect. J. Diff. Equations, 2011, 1-11 (2011).


[12] I. Ekeland, Convexity Methods in Hamilton Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
[13] L. Jeanjean, K. Tanaka, A Positive Solution for an Asymptotically linear elliptic
Problem on RN autonomous at infinity, ESIAM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 7, 597-
614 (2002).


