\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2017 (2017), No. 108, pp. 1--11.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2017 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2017/108\hfil  Liouville type theorem sfor elliptic equations]
{Liouville type theorems for elliptic equations involving Grushin
operator and advection}

\author[A. T. Duong, N. T. Nguyen \hfil EJDE-2017/108\hfilneg]
{Anh Tuan Duong, Nhu Thang Nguyen}

\address{Anh Tuan Duong \newline
 Department of Mathematics,
 Hanoi National University of Education,
136 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Ha noi, Viet Nam}
\email{tuanda@hnue.edu.vn}

\address{Nhu Thang Nguyen \newline
Department of Mathematics,
Hanoi National University of Education,
136 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Ha noi, Viet Nam}
\email{thangnn@hnue.edu.vn}

\thanks{Submitted January 19, 2017. Published Arpil 25, 2017.}
\subjclass[2010]{35J61, 35B53}
\keywords{Liouville type theorem; stable weak solution; Grushin operator;
\hfill\break\indent degenerate elliptic equation}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article, we study  the  equation
 $$
 -G_{\alpha}u+\nabla_G w\cdot\nabla_Gu=\|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p-1}u , \quad
 \mathbf{x}=(x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^N= \mathbb{R}^{N_1}\times \mathbb{R}^{N_2},
 $$
 where $ G_\alpha$ (resp., $\nabla_G$) is Grushin operator
 (resp.\ Grushin gradient), $p>1$ and $s\geq 0$.
 The scalar function $w$ satisfies a decay condition,
 and $\|\mathbf{x}\|$ is the norm corresponding to the Grushin distance.
 Based on the approach by Farina \cite{Far07}, we establish a Liouville
 type theorem for  the class of  stable sign-changing weak  solutions.
 In particular, we show that the  nonexistence result  for stable positive
 classical solutions  in \cite{CF12} is still valid for the above equation.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

In this article, we  examine the nonexistence of stable sign-changing  weak
 solutions of
\begin{equation}\label{e1}
 -G_{\alpha} u+\nabla_Gw\cdot\nabla_Gu=\|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p-1}u ,\quad
\mathbf{x}=(x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^N= \mathbb{R}^{N_1}\times \mathbb{R}^{N_2},
\end{equation}
 where the constants  $p,\alpha, s$ satisfy $p>1,\alpha\geq 0$ and  $s\geq 0 $.
The Grushin operator $ G_{\alpha}  $ (resp.\  the Grushin gradient $\nabla_G$)
is defined by
$$
G_{\alpha} u= \Delta_x u+|x|^{2\alpha}\Delta_y u  \quad  (\text{resp. }
\nabla_Gu=(\nabla_xu,|x|^\alpha\nabla_yu)).
$$
The  advection term  $w$ is smooth and  satisfies
$$
|\nabla_Gw(\mathbf{x})|\leq \frac{C}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^\theta+1}\quad
\text{for some } \theta\geq 0.
$$
Here
\[
\|\mathbf{x}\|=\Big(|x|^{2(\alpha+1)}+|y|^2\Big)^{\frac{1}{2(\alpha+1)}}
\]
 corresponds to the Grushin distance.

Let us begin by noting  that  $G_0 $ is just the Laplace operator.
So far, there have been  many works dealing with the stable solutions
of \eqref{e1} with $\alpha=0$ and $w=0$ (see \cite{Far07, DDG11,WY12}
and the references therein). The pioneering work in this direction is due to
 Farina \cite{Far07}  where the classification of stable classical solutions
was completely established in nonweighted case, i.e., $s=0$.
One of the main results in \cite{Far07} is the following.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{Far07}] \label{thmA}
 Let $\alpha=s=0$ and $w\equiv 0$. Let $u\in C^2(\mathbb{R}^N)$ be a
stable classical solution of \eqref{e1} with
\begin{gather*}
1<p<+\infty \quad\text{if } N\leq 10\\
1<p<p_c(N)=\frac{(N-2)^2-4N+8\sqrt{N-1}}{(N-2)(N-10)} \quad\text{if }N\geq 11.
\end{gather*}
Then $u\equiv 0$.
\end{theorem}

After that, Theorem \ref{thmA} was  generalized  to the weighted case in \cite{DDG11, WY12}. 
 In \cite{DDG11}, the authors proved the nonexistence of nontrivial
 stable weak solutions  under the restriction that the solutions are locally bounded.  This restriction was removed in \cite{WY12}.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{WY12}] \label{thmB}
 Let $\alpha=0$ and $w\equiv 0$. Suppose that $s>-2$. Let $u$ be a  stable
weak solution of \eqref{e1} with $1<p<p(N,s)$, where
$$
p(N,s)= \begin{cases}+\infty &\text{if } N\leq 10+4s\\
\frac{(N-2)^2-2(s+2)(s+N)+2\sqrt{(s+2)^3(s+2N-2)}}{(N-2)(N-10-4s)}
&\text{if }N> 10+4s.
\end{cases}
$$
Then $u\equiv 0$.
\end{theorem}

It was also shown in \cite{WY12}   that there exists a family of stable solutions
of \eqref{e1} with $\alpha=0$ and $w=0$ if $p\geq p(N,s)$.
From Theorem \ref{thmB}, one can see the explicit effect of the weight on the
critical exponent.

We now turn to the case where $\alpha> 0$, $s=0$ and $w\equiv 0$.
 Let us first recall some facts about the problem involving the Grushin operator.
It is well-known that the operator $G_\alpha$ belongs to the wide class of
 subelliptic operators studied by Franchi et al. in \cite{FGW94}
(see also \cite{BCC97, BP99}). The Liouville type theorem has been recently
proved by Monticelli~\cite{Mon10} for nonnegative classical solutions, and
by Yu~\cite{Yu14} for nonnegative weak solutions of the problem
$$
-G_\alpha u=u^p\quad \text{in } \mathbb{R}^N.
$$
The optimal condition on the range of the exponent is
$p<\frac{N_\alpha+2}{N_\alpha-2}$, where
$$
N_\alpha:=N_1+(1+\alpha)N_2
$$
is  called the homogeneous dimension. The main tool in \cite{Mon10, Yu14}
is  the Kelvin transform combined with the  moving planes technique.
Before that,  Dolcetta and Cutr\`{i} \cite{DC97} established the Liouville
type theorem for nonnegative super-solutions under the condition
 $p\leq \frac{N_\alpha}{N_\alpha-2}$ (see also \cite{DL03}).

In addition,  we should mention that problem \eqref{e1} with $\alpha=0$
and $w\not =0$ satisfying some additional conditions was studied in \cite{CF12}.
By using Farina's approach, the authors obtained the Liouville property
for stable positive classical  solutions. We summarize here some results
in \cite{CF12}.

\begin{theorem}[{\cite[Corollary 2 and Theorem 1.3]{CF12}}] \label{thmC}
Let $\alpha=0$.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] Suppose that $w$ is bounded together with its gradient. If  $s=0$ and
$$
N<1+\frac{2}{p-1}(p+\sqrt{p(p-1)})
$$
then there is no stable positive  classical sub-solution of \eqref{e1}.

\item[(ii)]  Let $w=-\log(|x|+|y|+1)^\beta$ and
$$
N+\beta-2<\frac{2(2+s)(p+\sqrt{p(p-1)})}{p-1}.
$$
\end{itemize}
Then there is no stable positive  classical sub-solution of \eqref{e1}.
\end{theorem}

Naturally, a question raised from Theorem \ref{thmC} is about the
 Liouville property for  a more general class, for example,
the class of stable sign-changing weak  solutions.
As far as we know, the Liouville type theorem for the problem \eqref{e1}
with $\alpha\not=0$ and $w\not=0$ has not been studied in the literature.
The purpose of this paper is then to  establish the Liouville property
for the class of stable sign-changing weak  solutions of \eqref{e1}.
In particular,  we  show that Theorem \ref{thmC} remains valid for  this class
of  solutions and recover Theorems \ref{thmA} and \ref{thmB} in the case $s\geq 0$.

 Before stating our main result,  we need to make precise several terminologies.
Denote by $H^{1,\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ the space of $u\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)$
satisfying $\nabla_Gu\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)$ endowed with the norm
\begin{equation*}\label{esp1}
\|u\|=\Big(\|u\|^2_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)}+\|\nabla_Gu\|^2_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)}
\Big)^{1/2}.
\end{equation*}
It is easy to see that when $\alpha=0$,  $H^{1,\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^N)$
is the usual Sobolev space $H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^N)$. Denote  also by
$H^{1,\alpha}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ the space of  all functions $u$
such that $u\psi\in H^{1,\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ for all
$\psi\in C_c^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$. Here  and in what follows,
$C_c^k(\mathbb{R}^N)$ is the set of $C^k$ - functions with compact support
in $\mathbb{R}^N$.

\begin{definition} \label{def1} \rm
We say that $u$  is  a weak  solution of  the equation \eqref{e1}
if $u\in H^{1,\alpha}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^N)\cap L^p_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ and
\begin{equation}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}  (\nabla_G u\cdot\nabla_G\psi+\nabla_Gw\cdot\nabla_Gu\psi
-\|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p-1}u\psi)= 0, \quad\text{for all }
\psi\in C^1_c(\mathbb{R}^N).
\label{e2}
\end{equation}
\end{definition}

Next we recall  the stability of solutions.  Note that the energy functional
corresponding to \eqref{e1} is given by
$$
E(u)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}|\nabla_G u|^2e^{-w}-\frac{1}{p+1}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^N} \|\mathbf{x}\|^s|u|^{p+1}e^{-w}.
$$
Roughly speaking, a solution $u$ is stable if the second variation at $u$
of the energy functional is nonnegative (see \cite{Dup11}).
Therefore,  we say that  a  weak  solution $u$ of the equation \eqref{e1}
is stable if
\begin{equation}\label{ee}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}  (|\nabla_G\psi|^2-p \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p-1}\psi^2)
e^{-w}\geq 0,\quad \text{for all }\psi\in C^1_c(\mathbb{R}^N).
\end{equation}

Now we present the main results in this paper. Throughout this paper,
we always assume that $p>1, s\geq 0$.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm1}
Suppose that  there is a nonnegative constant $\theta$ such that
$$
|\nabla_Gw|\leq \frac{C}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^\theta+1}.
$$
 Assume in addition that for  $\gamma\in (1,2p+2\sqrt{p(p-1)}-1)$ we have
\begin{equation}\label{eee}
 \lim_{R\to+\infty}R^{-\frac{(1+\min(\theta;1))(p+\gamma) +s(\gamma+1)}{p-1}}
\int_{R<\|\mathbf{x}\|<2R}e^{-w}=0.
\end{equation}
Then any stable weak  solution $u$ to \eqref{e1} must be the trivial one.
\end{theorem}

It is easy to see that, when $w$ is bounded from below, one has
$$
\int_{R<\|\mathbf{x}\|<2R}e^{-w}\leq C R^{N_\alpha}.
$$
Thus, the following is a direct  consequence of Theorem \ref{thm1}.

\begin{corollary}\label{coro1}
Suppose that  there is a nonnegative constant $\theta$ such that
$$
|\nabla_Gw|\leq \frac{C}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^\theta+1}.
$$
 Assume in addition that  $w$ is bounded from below and
\begin{equation}\label{eee1}
 N_\alpha-1-\min(\theta,1)-\frac{2(p+\sqrt{p(p-1)})(1+\min(\theta,1)+s)}{p-1}<0.
\end{equation}
Then any stable weak  solution $u$ to \eqref{e1} must be the trivial solution.
\end{corollary}

 Furthermore, we choose $w=-\log(\|\mathbf{x}\|+1)^\beta$ for some
$\beta\in \mathbb{R}$,  then $w$  is  bounded from below if $\beta<0$
and is unbounded from below if $\beta>0$. Note that, in this case
$$
|\nabla_Gw|\leq \frac{C}{\|\mathbf{x}\|+1}.
$$
 Thus,  Theorem \ref{thm1} implies the following.

\begin{corollary}\label{coro0}
 If  $u$ is a stable weak  solution of \eqref{e1} with
$w=-\log(\|\mathbf{x}\|+1)^\beta$ and
\begin{equation}\label{eee2}
N_\alpha+\beta-2<\frac{2(2+s)(p+\sqrt{p(p-1)})}{p-1},
\end{equation}
then $u$ is  the trivial solution.
\end{corollary}

\begin{remark} \rm
(i) By using the same argument as below, one can show that our main result
is still valid for the class of stable positive weak sub-solutions to \eqref{e1}.
Moreover, our arguments  can be applied to study the equation \eqref{e1}
where the non-linear term $|u|^{p-1}u$ is replaced by $e^u$.

(ii) Theorem \ref{thm1} is sharp in the sense that when $\alpha=0, w\equiv 0$
and \eqref{eee} is not satisfied, one can construct a sequence of stable
weak solutions of \eqref{e1}, see e.g., \cite{WY12}. On the other hand,
one can see from our main result the explicit effects of $\alpha$ and the
 advection term on the range of the exponent.

(ii) The first assertion in Theorem \ref{thmC} follows from Corollary \ref{coro1} by
choosing $\alpha=0$ and $\theta=0$. The second one  is a consequence of
Corollary \ref{coro0}.  Theorems \ref{thmA} and \ref{thmB} in the case $s\geq 0$ are also
consequences of Corollary \ref{coro1} by choosing $\alpha=0$ and $w=0$.
\end{remark}

Although this work is motivated by the idea by Farina \cite{Far07},
it should be mentioned that the use of this  technique in our case was by
no means straightforward and required many nontrivial additional ideas.

$\bullet$ The first difficulty in the study of problem \eqref{e1} is that
the principal linear term, the Grushin operator, has nonconstant coefficients.
This requires to design appropriate
scaled test functions in the integral estimate.

$\bullet$ Secondly, the fact  that weak  solutions are not locally bounded
also leads to another  difficulty. We  need to construct a  sequence of
suitable cut-off functions and the estimates become very delicate.

$\bullet$  It seems that the presence of the advection term $w(\mathbf{x})$
makes the problem more challenging. We need to use a suitable weighted integral
to treat this term.

Moreover, we  use  the properties of the Grushin gradient and the associated
distance to derive the nonlinear  integral estimates. We also note that in
the case $\alpha=0$, $w=0$,  $N\geq 10+4s$ and $p\geq p(N,s)$,
it is not too complicated to build a radial solution to \eqref{e1} (see \cite{WY12}).
Nevertheless,  it seems very difficult to prove the existence of solutions
to \eqref{e1}. Up to now, there have been two articles  \cite{MM06,WWY15} dealing
with this  problem in the case  $p=\frac{N_\alpha+2}{N_\alpha-2}$, $w=0$.

Since Corollaries \ref{coro1} and \ref{coro0} are immediate consequences of
Theorem \ref{thm1}, the rest of this paper is  devoted to proving Theorem \ref{thm1}.

\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{thm1}}\label{s3}

In what follows,  for the sake of simplicity, we denote by $\int$  the integral
 $\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}  dxdy$.
The following proposition plays a crucial role in the proof of our main result.

\begin{proposition}\label{prop1}
Let $ p>1$ and $u$ be a  stable weak  solution of $\eqref{e1}$.
Fix  a real number $\gamma\in [1,2p+2\sqrt{p(p-1)}-1)$ and an integer
$m\geq \frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}$. Then there is a constant
$C_{p,m,\gamma}>0$ depending only on $p,m$ and $\gamma$, such that
\begin{equation} \label{e3}
\begin{split}
&\int \Big(|\nabla_x (|u|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)|^2
+|x|^{2\alpha}|\nabla_y (|u|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)|^2
+\|\mathbf{x}\|^s|u|^{p+\gamma}\Big)\psi^{2m}e^{-w}\\
&\leq C_{p,m,\gamma}\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{-\frac{(\gamma+1)s}{p-1}}
\Big(|\nabla_G\psi|^2+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi| \\
&\quad +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|)\Big)^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w},
\end{split}
\end{equation}
for all $\psi\in C^2_c(\mathbb{R}^N;[-1;1])$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
As mentioned above, the  solution $u$ is not necessary locally bounded.
Then, we need to construct a sequence of  suitable cut-off functions.

Let $k$ be a positive integer. A sequence of cut-off functions is chosen as follows
\begin{equation*}
\varphi_k(t)=\begin{cases}
-k  &\text{if }  t<-k \\
t &\text{if } -k\leq t\leq k\\
k &\text{if } t>k.
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
It is easy to see that $\varphi_k'(t)=1$ for $|t|<k$, $ \varphi_k'(t)=0$ for
$|t|>k$ and  $|\varphi_k(t)|\leq|t|$ for all $t\in\mathbb{R}$.
We shall  prove the  inequality
\begin{align}
\begin{split}\label{e4}
&\int \Big(\big|\nabla_x (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2
 +|x|^{2\alpha}\big|\nabla_y (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2\\
& +\|\mathbf{x}\|^s|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\Big)\psi^{2m}e^{-w}\\
&\leq C_{p,m,\gamma}\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{-\frac{(\gamma+1)s}{p-1}}|
\Big(|\nabla_G\psi|^2+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|\\
&\quad +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|)\Big)^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w},
\end{split}
\end{align}
for all $\psi\in C^2_c(\mathbb{R}^N;[-1;1])$. Here the constant
$C_{p,m,\gamma}$ depends only  on $p,m,\gamma$.

Suppose that \eqref{e4} is holds. Letting $k\to+\infty$ in \eqref{e4}
and using   Fatou's Lemma, we obtain  \eqref{e3}. Hence, it is sufficient
to prove \eqref{e4}.

Since the proof of \eqref{e4} is quite long and technical,
we first give the outline of the proof.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Step 1.}  By using the definition of  weak solutions and
the stability condition, we show that
\begin{equation} \label{e100}
\begin{aligned}
&\int \big|\nabla_G \big(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u\big)\big|^2 \phi^2e^{-w}
+\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&\leq C\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2(|\nabla_G\phi|^2
 +|G_\alpha\phi^2|+|\nabla_G\phi^2\|\nabla_Gw|)e^{-w}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for all $\phi\in C^2_c(\mathbb{R}^N)$.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Step 2.}
By choosing $\phi=\psi^m$ where $\psi\in C^2_c(\mathbb{R}^N;[-1;1])$ and
employing H\"{o}lder's inequality we demonstrate that the right hand side
of \eqref{e100} is smaller than or equal to
$$
C_{p,m,\gamma } \int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{-\frac{(\gamma+1)s}{p-1}}
(|\nabla_G\psi|^2+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|
+|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|))^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w}.
$$
Thus,  \eqref{e4} follows from  these two steps.
\end{proof}

We now present the proof of \eqref{e4} in detail.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Proof of Step 1}
Let  $u$ be  a weak  solution of \eqref{e1}. For $\phi\in C^2_c(\mathbb{R}^N)$,
using the density argument,  \eqref{e2} remains true for the test function
$ |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u\phi^2e^{-w}\in H^{1,\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^N)$.
Consequently, \eqref{e2} and  a simple computation gives
\begin{equation}
\int  \nabla_G u\cdot\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u\phi^2)e^{-w}
-\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}= 0.
\label{e5}
\end{equation}
 Note that
\begin{align*}
&\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u\phi^2) \\
&=((\gamma-1)\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}
+|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\nabla_Gu)\phi^2+|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u\nabla_G\phi^2
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
\big|\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2\phi^2
&=\big(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\big)^2|\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)|^2
 |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2+|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}|\nabla_Gu|^2\phi^2\\
&\quad +(\gamma-1)\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)\nabla_Gu|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2.
\end{align*}
These computations lead to
\begin{align}\label{e88}
\begin{split}
&\int  \nabla_G u\cdot\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u\phi^2)e^{-w}\\
&=\int  (\big|\nabla_G\big(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u\big)\big|^2\phi^2
 +u|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\nabla_Gu\cdot\nabla_G\phi^2)e^{-w}\\
&\quad -\int  \big(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\big)^2|\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)|^2
|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}.
\end{split}
\end{align}
Combining \eqref{e5},\eqref{e88}, we conclude that
\begin{equation} \label{e10}
\begin{split}
&\int \big|\nabla_G (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2 \phi^2e^{-w}\\
&=\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}
 -\int u|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1} \nabla_Gu\cdot\nabla_G\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&\quad +\big(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\big)^2\int |\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)|^2|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}
 \phi^2e^{-w}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
 Notice that
\begin{align*}
&2 u|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\nabla_Gu\cdot\nabla_G\phi^2\\
&= \nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2)\nabla_G\phi^2
 -(\gamma-1)\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|)|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma}\nabla_G\phi^2\\
&= \nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2)\nabla_G\phi^2
 -\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\nabla_G|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma+1}\nabla_G\phi^2.
\end{align*}
Using this and  the integration by parts, we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\int  u|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\nabla_Gu\cdot\nabla_G\phi^2e^{-w} \\
&=-\frac{1}{2}\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2(G_\alpha\phi^2
 -\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}\\
&\quad +\frac{(\gamma-1)}{2(\gamma+1)}
 \int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma+1}(G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}.
\end{aligned} \label{e11}
\end{equation}
 Inserting \eqref{e11} in \eqref{e10} we  arrive at

\begin{equation}\label{e14}
\begin{split}
&\int \left|\nabla_G (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\right|^2 \phi^2e^{-w}\\
&=\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{2}\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2
 (G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}\\
&\quad -\frac{(\gamma-1)}{2(\gamma+1)}\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma+1}
 (G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}\\
&\quad +(\frac{\gamma-1}{2})^2\int |\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)|^2
 |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Note also that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\int |\nabla_G\varphi_k(u)|^2|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&=\frac{4}{(\gamma+1)^2}\int \big|\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}
 \varphi_k(u))\big|^2\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&\leq \frac{4}{(\gamma+1)^2}
\int \big|\nabla_G(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2\phi^2e^{-w},
\end{aligned}\label{e16}
\end{equation}
where in the last inequality we have used $|\varphi_k(u)|= |k|$ for $|u|>k$.
Thus, \eqref{e14} becomes
\begin{equation} \label{e30}
\begin{split}
&\frac{4\gamma}{(\gamma+1)^2}\int
 \big|\nabla_G (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2 \phi^2e^{-w} \\
&\leq\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{2}\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2
 (G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}\\
&\quad -\frac{(\gamma-1)}{2(\gamma+1)}\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma+1}
 (G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
In the next part, we shall utilize the stability condition.
We remark that \eqref{ee} also holds for the  test function
$|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u\phi \in H^{1,\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^N)$
by density argument. From \eqref{ee}, we have
\begin{equation*}
\int \big|\nabla_G (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u \phi)\big|^2e^{-w}
-p\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}\geq 0.
%\label{e8}
\end{equation*}
 By Young's inequality, for any $\delta>0$,
\begin{align*}
&\int \big|\nabla_G (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u \phi)\big|^2e^{-w}\\
&\leq (1+\delta)\int \big|\nabla_G (|\varphi_k(u)|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2
\phi^2e^{-w}
+(1+\frac{1}{\delta})\int  |\nabla_G\phi|^2|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2e^{-w}.
\end{align*}
Then, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{e155}
\begin{split}
&\big(p-\frac{(\gamma+1)^2}{4\gamma}(1+\delta)\big)
\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w} \\
&\leq (1+\frac{1}{\delta}) \int  |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2|\nabla_G\phi|^2e^{-w}\\
&\quad +\frac{(\gamma+1)^2}{8\gamma}(1+\delta)\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2
(G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}\\
&\quad -\frac{(\gamma^2-1)}{8\gamma}(1+\delta)
\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma+1}(G_\alpha\phi^2-\nabla_G\phi^2\cdot\nabla_Gw)e^{-w}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Now we choose
\[
\delta=\frac{4\gamma}{(\gamma+1)^2}\frac{1}{2}(p-\frac{(\gamma+1)^2}{4\gamma})>0.
\]
Then 
\begin{align*}
&\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\phi^2e^{-w}\\
&\leq  C\int |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2(|\nabla_G\phi|^2
+|G_\alpha\phi^2|+|\nabla_G\phi^2\|\nabla_Gw|)e^{-w}.
\end{align*}
 This and \eqref{e30} imply \eqref{e100}.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Proof of Step 2.}
Let $m\geq \frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}$ be a fixed integer.
For $\psi\in C_c^2(\mathbb{R}^N;[-1;1])$, we set $\phi=\psi^m$. Hence,
\begin{gather*}
\left|\nabla_x\psi^m\right|^2=m^2|\nabla_x\psi|^2\psi^{2m-2},\\
 |x|^{2\alpha} \left|\nabla_y\psi^m\right|^2=m^2 |x|^{2\alpha}|\nabla_y\psi|^2\psi^{2m-2}
\end{gather*}
and
\begin{gather*}
 \Delta_x\psi^{2m}=2m\psi^{2m-2}((2m-1)|\nabla_x\psi|^2+\psi\Delta_x\psi),\\
 |x|^{2\alpha}\Delta_y\psi^{2m}=2m\psi^{2m-2}((2m-1)|x|^{2\alpha}
 |\nabla_y\psi|^2+\psi|x|^{2\alpha}\Delta_y\psi).
\end{gather*}
Therefore, the right hand side of the last inequality in  \eqref{e100} is
less than or equal to
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&C\int  |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2\psi^{2m-2}\Big(|\nabla_G\psi|^2
+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi| \\
&+|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|)\Big)e^{-w}.
\end{aligned}\label{e31}
\end{equation}
Applying H\"{o}lder's inequality to \eqref{e31}, we obtain
\begin{align}\label{e32}
\begin{split}
&\int  |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2\psi^{2m-2}(|\nabla_G\psi|^2
 +|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|\\
& +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|))e^{-w}\\
&\leq \Big[\int (\|\mathbf{x}\|^{s\frac{\gamma+1}{p+\gamma}}
 |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2\psi^{2m-2})^{\frac{p+\gamma}{\gamma+1}}
 e^{-w}\Big]^{\frac{1+\gamma}{p+\gamma}}
\Big[\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{-s\frac{\gamma+1}{p-1}}\Big(|\nabla_G\psi|^2\\
&\quad +|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi| 
 +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|)\Big)^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w}
 \Big]^{\frac{p-1}{p+\gamma}}.
\end{split}
\end{align}
Moreover, it follows from $m\geq \frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}$ that
\begin{equation*}
(2m-2)\frac{p+\gamma}{\gamma+1}-2m\geq 0.
\end{equation*}
By using this  with $|\psi|\leq 1,  |\varphi_k(u)|\leq |u|$, we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
(|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2\psi^{2m-2})^{\frac{p+\gamma}{\gamma+1}}
&\leq |\varphi_k(u)|^{(\gamma-1)\frac{p+\gamma}{\gamma+1}}
 u^{2\frac{p+\gamma}{\gamma+1}}\psi^{2m} \\
&\leq |u|^{p+1}|\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1} \psi^{2m}
\end{aligned} \label{e33}
\end{equation}
which together with \eqref{e32}  gives
\begin{align*}
&\int  |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2\psi^{2m-2}(|\nabla_G\psi|^2
 +|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|
 +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|))e^{-w}\\
&\leq C_{p,m,\gamma}\Big[\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{s}|u|^{p+1}|
\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}\psi^{2m}e^{-w}\Big]^{\frac{1+\gamma}{p+\gamma}}\\
&\times\Big[\int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{-s\frac{\gamma+1}{p-1}}(|\nabla_G\psi|^2
+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|
 +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|))^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w}
 \Big]^{\frac{p-1}{p+\gamma}}.
\end{align*}
This inequality and \eqref{e155} with $\phi=\psi^m$  imply
%\label{e35}
\begin{align*}
&\int  |\varphi_k(u)|^{\gamma-1}u^2\psi^{2m-2}
 (|\nabla_G\psi|^2+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|
 +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|))e^{-w}\\
&\leq C_{p,m,\gamma}^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}
 \int \|\mathbf{x}\|^{-s\frac{\gamma+1}{p-1}}
 (|\nabla_G\psi|^2+|\psi|(|\Delta_x\psi|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi|
 +|\nabla_G\psi\|\nabla_Gw|))^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w}.
\end{align*}
The assertion in Step 2 is then proved, and
the proof of Proposition \ref{prop1} is complete.


\subsection*{Completion of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm1}}
Let $\chi_1$ in $C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^{N_1};[0,1])$ and
$\chi_2$ in $C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^{N_2};[0,1])$ be  cut-off functions satisfying
\begin{gather*}
\chi_1(x)=1 \quad \text{for } |x|\leq 1; \chi_1(x)=0  \text{  for } |x| \geq 2,\\
\chi_2(y)=1 \quad \text{for } |y|\leq 1; \chi_2(y)=0  \text{  for } |y| \geq 2.
\end{gather*}
For $R$ large enough, we choose
$\psi_R(x,y)=\chi_1(\frac{x}{R})\chi_2(\frac{y}{R^{\alpha+1}})$
 which belongs to the space $ C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N;[0,1])$. 
Then, it is easy to see that
\begin{gather*}
|\nabla_x\psi_R(x,y)|=\frac{1}{R}
 \big|\nabla_x\chi_1(\frac{x}{R})\chi_2(\frac{y}{R^{\alpha+1}})\big|\\
|\nabla_y\psi_R(x,y)|=\frac{1}{R^{1+\alpha}}
 \big|\chi_1(\frac{x}{R})\nabla_y\chi_2(\frac{y}{R^{\alpha+1}})\big| ,\\
|\Delta_x\psi_R(x,y)|=\frac{1}{R^2}
 \big|\Delta_x\chi_1(\frac{x}{R})\chi_2(\frac{y}{R^{\alpha+1}})\big|, \\
|\Delta_y\psi_R(x,y)|=\frac{1}{R^{2(1+\alpha)}}
 \big|\chi_1(\frac{x}{R})\Delta_y\chi_2(\frac{y}{R^{\alpha+1}})\big|.
\end{gather*}
This and the boundedness of $\chi_1,\chi_2$ and the assumption
$|\nabla_Gw|\leq \frac{C}{ \|\mathbf{x}\|^\theta+1}$  imply
\begin{gather}\label{e19}
|\nabla_G\psi_R|^2+|\psi_R|(|\Delta_x\psi_R|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi_R|
+|\nabla_G\psi_R\|\nabla_Gw|))\leq \frac{C_1}{R^{1+\min(\theta;1)}}, \\
\label{e199}
|\nabla_G\psi_R|^2+|\psi_R|(|\Delta_x\psi_R|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi_R|
+|\nabla_G\psi_R\|\nabla_Gw|))=0
\end{gather}
outside the annulus
 $U_R:= \{(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^N;R\leq \|\mathbf{x}\|
\leq 2^{1+\frac{2}{2+2\alpha}R}\}$.
 Note that  the constant $C_1$ in \eqref{e19} is independent of $R$.

 Thus, \eqref{e3} with $\psi=\psi_R$, \eqref{e19} and  \eqref{e199} give
\begin{align}\label{e15}
\begin{split}
&\int (\big|\nabla_x (|u|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2
 +|x|^{2\alpha}\big|\nabla_y (|u|^{\frac{\gamma-1}{2}}u)\big|^2
 +\|\mathbf{x}\|^s|u|^{p+\gamma})\psi_R^{2m}e^{-w}\\
&\leq \int_{U_R}\|\mathbf{x}\|^{-s\frac{\gamma+1}{p-1}}\Big(|\nabla_G\psi_R|^2
 +|\psi_R|(|\Delta_x\psi_R|+|x|^{2\alpha}|\Delta_y\psi_R|\\
&\quad +|\nabla_G\psi_R\|\nabla_Gw|)\Big)^{\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1}}e^{-w}\\
&\leq \frac{C}{R^{(1+\min(\theta;1))(\frac{p+\gamma}{p-1})}
 R^{\frac{s(\gamma+1)}{(p-1)}}}\int_{U_R}e^{-w} \\
&=CR^{-\frac{(1+\min(\theta;1))(p+\gamma) +s(\gamma+1)}{p-1}}\int_{U_R}e^{-w},
\end{split}
\end{align}
where $C$ is independent of $R$.

Finally, letting $R\to\infty$ in \eqref{e15} and using \eqref{eee}, we obtain
$u\equiv 0$ on $\mathbb{R}^N$. The proof of Theorem \ref{thm1} is complete.


\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable
 comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
This work is supported by the Vietnam Ministry of Education
and Training under Project No. B2016-SPH-17.

\begin{thebibliography}{00}



\bibitem{BCC97} I.~Birindelli, I.~Capuzzo~Dolcetta, A.~Cutr{\`{\i}};
\newblock Liouville theorems for semilinear equations on the {H}eisenberg
  group.
\newblock {\em Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Anal. Non Lin\'eaire}, 14(3):295--308,
  1997.

\bibitem{BP99} I.~Birindelli J.~Prajapat;
\newblock Nonlinear {L}iouville theorems in the {H}eisenberg group via the
  moving plane method.
\newblock {\em Comm. Partial Differential Equations}, 24(9-10):1875--1890,
  1999.

\bibitem{DC97} A. Cutr{\`{\i}}, I.C. Dolcetta;
\newblock On the liouville property for sublaplacians.
\newblock {\em Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di
  Scienze}, 25(1-2):239--256, 1997.

\bibitem{CF12} C. Cowan M. Fazly;
\newblock On stable entire solutions of semi-linear elliptic equations with
  weights.
\newblock {\em Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society},
  140(6):2003--2012, 2012.

\bibitem{DDG11} E.~N.  Dancer, Y.  Du, Z.  Guo;
\newblock Finite {M}orse index solutions of an elliptic equation with
  supercritical exponent.
\newblock {\em J. Differential Equations}, 250(8):3281--3310, 2011.

\bibitem{DL03} L. D'Ambrosio, S. Lucente;
\newblock Nonlinear {L}iouville theorems for {G}rushin and {T}ricomi operators.
\newblock {\em J. Differential Equations}, 193(2):511--541, 2003.

\bibitem{Dup11} L.  Dupaigne;
\newblock {\em Stable solutions of elliptic partial differential equations},
  volume 143 of {\em Chapman \& Hall/CRC Monographs and Surveys in Pure and
  Applied Mathematics}.
\newblock Chapman \& Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2011.

\bibitem{Far07} A. Farina;
\newblock On the classification of solutions of the {L}ane-{E}mden equation on
  unbounded domains of {$\mathbb{R}\sp N$}.
\newblock {\em J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)}, 87(5):537--561, 2007.

\bibitem{FG14} M. Fazly, N. Ghoussoub;
\newblock On the {H}\'enon-{L}ane-{E}mden conjecture.
\newblock {\em Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.}, 34(6):2513--2533, 2014.

\bibitem{FGW94} B. Franchi, C. E. Guti{\'e}rrez, R. L. Wheeden;
\newblock Weighted {S}obolev-{P}oincar\'e inequalities for {G}rushin type
  operators.
\newblock {\em Comm. Partial Differential Equations}, 19(3-4):523--604, 1994.


\bibitem{MM06} R. Monti D. Morbidelli;
\newblock Kelvin transform for {G}rushin operators and critical semilinear
  equations.
\newblock {\em Duke Math. J.}, 131(1):167--202, 2006.

\bibitem{Mon10} D. D.  Monticelli;
\newblock Maximum principles and the method of moving planes for a class of
  degenerate elliptic linear operators.
\newblock {\em J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)}, 12(3):611--654, 2010.

\bibitem{WWY15} C. Wang, Q. Wang, J. Yang;
\newblock On the {G}rushin critical problem with a cylindrical symmetry.
\newblock {\em Adv. Differential Equations}, 20(1-2):77--116, 2015.

\bibitem{WY12} C. Wang, D.  Ye;
\newblock Some {L}iouville theorems for {H}\'enon type elliptic equations.
\newblock {\em J. Funct. Anal.}, 262(4):1705--1727, 2012.

\bibitem{Yu14} X. Yu;
\newblock Liouville type theorem for nonlinear elliptic equation involving
  {G}rushin operators.
\newblock {\em Commun. Contemp. Math.}, 17(5):1450050, 12, 2015.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}

