\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 319, pp. 1--19.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2016 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2016/319\hfil Fractional Schr\"odinger-Poisson equations]
{Fractional Schr\"odinger-Poisson equations with general nonlinearities}

\author[R. C. Duarte, M. A. S. Souto \hfil EJDE-2016/319\hfilneg]
{Ronaldo C. Duarte, Marco A. S. Souto }

\address{Ronaldo C. Duarte \newline
Departamento de Matem\'atica,
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande,
Cx Postal 10044,  CEP 58.429-900, Brazil}
\email{ronaldocesarduarte@gmail.com}

\address{Marco A. S. Souto \newline
Departamento de Matem\'atica,
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande,
Cx Postal 10044,  CEP 58.429-900, Brazil}
\email{marco@dme.ufcg.edu.br}

\thanks{Submitted September 13, 2016. Published December 14, 2016.}
\subjclass[2010]{35J60, 35J10}
\keywords{Positive solutions; ground state solutions; periodic potential}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article we study the existence of positive solutions
 and ground state solutions for a class of fractional Schr\"odinger-Poisson
 equations in $\mathbb R^3$  with general nonlinearity.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\allowdisplaybreaks


\section{Introduction}

In this article we consider the Schr\"odinger-Poisson system
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
(-\Delta)^{s} u +V(x)u+\phi u= f(u),  \quad\text{in } \mathbb R^3, \\
(-\Delta)^{t} \phi=u^2, \quad\text{in } \mathbb R^3,
\end{gathered} \label{eP}
\end{equation}
where $(-\Delta)^\alpha$ is the fractional Laplacian for $\alpha = s,t$.
This article was motivated by \cite{amsss}. There the authors show the existence
 of positive solutions for the system
\begin{gather*}
- \Delta u +V(x)u+\phi u= f(u),  \quad\text{in } \mathbb R^3, \\
-\Delta \phi=u^2, \quad\text{in } \mathbb R^3,
\end{gather*}
where $V:\mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb R$ is a continuous periodic potential
and positive. Our purpose is to show that when we consider this
system with fractional Laplacian operator instead of the Laplacian,
then we obtain a positive solution and a ground state solution for the system.
 We emphasize that we prove the existence of weak solution to the system
and without using results of regularity,  we show that the weak solution
 is positive almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^3$. To prove this,
we present another version of the Logarithmic lemma and we deduce a weak
comparison principle for the solution of the system (See Theorem \ref{lm41}).

We use the following assumptions for the potential function $V$ and
the function $f\in C(\mathbb R,\mathbb R)$:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A1)]  $V(x) \geq \alpha >0$, $\forall x \in \mathbb R^3$, for some constant
$\alpha >0$,
\item[(A2)]  $V(x)=V(x+y)$,   for all $x \in \mathbb R^3$, $y\in \mathbb Z^3$.

\item[(A3)] $f(u)u>0$, $u \neq 0$;

\item[(A4)] $\lim_{u\to 0} f(u)/u = 0$;

\item[(A5)] there exists $p \in (4,2^{*}_{s})$ and $C>0$, such that
$$
|f(u)|\leq C(|u|+|u|^{p-1}),
$$
for all $u \in \mathbb{R}$, where $2^{*}_{s}=\frac{6}{3-2s}$.

\item[(A6)] $\lim_{u\to +\infty} F(u)/u^4 =+\infty$, where
$F(u)=\int_0^u f(z)dz$;

\item[(A7)] The function
$u \longmapsto f(u)/|u|^3$ is increasing in $|u|\neq 0$.
\end{itemize}
We will denote $g(u):=f(u^{+})$ and $G(t)=\int_0^{t}g(s)ds$.

System \eqref{eP} was studied in \cite{bf}, where the author consider
the one dimensional system
\begin{gather*}
- \Delta u +\phi u= a|u|^{p-1}u,  \quad\text{in } \mathbb R, \\
(-\Delta)^{t} \phi=u^2, \quad\text{in } \mathbb R,
\end{gather*}
for $p\in(1,5)$ and $t \in (0,1)$. In \cite{zjs2}, the authors show the
existence of positive solutions for the system
\begin{gather*}
- \Delta u + u + \lambda \phi u= f(u),  \quad\text{in } \mathbb{R}^3, \\
-\Delta \phi= \lambda u^2, \quad\text{in } \mathbb R,
\end{gather*}
for $\lambda>0$ and a general critical nonlinearity $f$.
In \cite{zjs}, the authors  proved the existence of radial ground state
solutions of \eqref{eP} when $V=0$. In \cite{zhang}, the system was studied,
although the sign of the solutions is not considered. In this article,
we prove the existence of positive solutions for  \eqref{eP}.
Using a Nehari manifold, we ensure the existence of a ground state solution
for the problem.
Our main result reads as follows.

\begin{theorem} \label{fth}
Suppose that $s \in (3/4,1)$, $t \in (0,1)$, and {\rm (A1)--(A7)}
are satisfied.
 Then  \eqref{eP} has a positive solution and a ground state solution.
\end{theorem}

The hypothesis  $s \in (3/4,1)$ is required to ensure that the
interval $(4,2^{\ast}_{s})$ is nondegenerate.

\begin{remark} \label{rm1} \rm
Condition (A7) implies that
 $H(u)=uf(u)-4F(u)$ is a non-negative function.
\end{remark}

In \cite[Lemma 2.3]{gsd}, the authors proved the following version of
the Lions lemma, which will be needed to prove our result.

\begin{lemma} \label{l1.3}
If $\{u_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ is a bounded sequence in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$
such that for some $R>0$ and $2\leq q< 2^{\ast}_{s}$ we have
$$
\sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}^3}\int_{B_{R}(x)}|u_n|^{q} \to 0
$$
when $n \to \infty$, then $u_n\to 0$ in $L^{r}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ for all
$r \in (2,2^{\ast}_{s})$.
\end{lemma}

\section{Preliminaries}

For $s \in (0,1)$, we denote by $\dot{H}^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ the homogeneous
fractional space. It is defined as the completion of $C_0^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ under the norm
$$
\|u\|_{\dot{H}^{s}}
=\Big(\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy)^{1/2}
$$
and we define
$$
H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3):=\big\{u \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^3);
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}
\,dx\,dy<\infty \big\}.
$$
The space $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ is a Hilbert space with the norm
$$
\|u\|_{H^{s}}=\Big(\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|u|^2dx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy\Big)^{1/2}
$$
We define the fractional Laplacian operator
$(-\Delta)^{s}:\dot{H}^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)\to (\dot{H}^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3))'$ by
 $((-\Delta)^{s}u,v)=\frac{\zeta}{2}(u,v)_{\dot{H}^{s}}$, where
$
\zeta=\zeta(s)=(\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{1-cos(\xi_{1})}{|\xi|^{3+2s}}d \xi )^{-1}
$ and $(\cdot,\cdot)_{H^{s}}$ is an inner product of $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
The constant $\zeta$ satisfies
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}
\,dx\,dy=2\zeta^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|\xi|^{2s}\mathcal{F}u(\xi)
\overline{\mathcal{F}v(\xi)}d \xi,
$$
where $\mathcal{F}u$ is the Fourier transform of $u$
(see \cite[Proposition 3.4]{dpv}). The fractional Laplacian operator is a
bounded linear operator.

A pair $(u, \phi_{u})$ is a solution of \eqref{eP} if
$$
\frac{\zeta(t)}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(\phi_{u}(x)
-\phi_{u}(y))(w(x)-w(y))}{|x-y|^{3+2t}}\,dx\,dy = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}u^2w\,dx.
$$
for all $w \in \dot{H}^{t}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, and
$$
((-\Delta)^{s}u,v)+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)uvdx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}uvdx
=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(u)v\,dx
$$
for all $v\in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.

Let us recall some facts about the Schr\"odinger-Poisson equations
(see \cite{Ruiz,ap,zz,G} for instance). We can transform \eqref{eP} into a
fractional Schr\"odinger problem with a nonlocal term.
For all $u\in H^{s}(\mathbb R^3)$, there exists a unique
$\phi=\phi_u \in \dot{H}^{t}(\mathbb R^3)$ such that
$$
(-\Delta)^{t} \phi=u^2.
$$
In fact, since
$H^{s}(\mathbb R^3)\hookrightarrow L^{\frac{22^{\ast}_{t}}{2^{\ast}_{t}-1}}
(\mathbb R^3)$ (continuously), a simple application of the Lax-Milgram theorem
shows that $\phi_u$ is well defined and
$$
\|\phi_{u}\|_{\dot{H}^{t}}^2
\leq S^2 \|u\|^4_{\frac{22^{\ast}_{t}}{2^{\ast}_{t}-1}},
$$
where $\|\cdot\|_p$ denotes the $L^p(\mathbb R^3)$ norm and $S$ is the best
 constant of the Sobolev immersion
$H^s(\mathbb R^3) \to L^{2^{\ast}_{t}}(\mathbb R^3)$; that is
$$
S= \inf_{u \in \dot{H}^{t}(\mathbb{R}^3)\setminus
\{0\}}\frac{\|u\|_{\dot{H}^{t}}^2}{\|u\|_{2^{\ast}_{t}}^2}.
$$

\begin{lemma}{\label{lm1}}
We have:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] there exists $C>0$ such that $\|\phi_u\|_{\dot{H}^{t}}
\leq C\|u\|_{H^{s}}^2$ and
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(\phi_{u}(x)-\phi_{u}(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2t}}\,dx\,dy \leq C\|u\|_{{H}^{s}}^{4}
$$
for all $u\in H^s(\mathbb R^3)$;

\item[(ii)] $\phi_u\geq 0$, $\forall u\in H^s(\mathbb R^3)$;

\item[(iii)] $\phi_{tu}=t^2\phi_u$, $\forall t>0, u\in H^s(\mathbb R^3)$.

\item[(iv)] If $\tilde{u}(x):=u(x+z)$ then $\phi_{\tilde{u}}(x) = \phi_{u}(x+z)$ and
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u^2dx
= \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{\tilde{u}}\tilde{u}^2dx.
$$
for all $z \in \mathbb{R}^3$ and $u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.

\item[(v)] If $\{u_n\}$  converges weakly to $u$ in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$,
then $\{\phi_{u_n}\}$  converges weakly to $\phi_{u}$ in
$\dot{H}^{t}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

The proof of the above lemma is analogous to the case of Poisson equation in
$\mathcal{D}^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ (See \cite{amsss, Ruiz, zz}).

At first, we are interested in showing the existence of a positive solution
for \eqref{eP}. We will consider the  Euler-Lagrange functional
$I:H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)\to\mathbb{R}$ given by
\begin{align*}
I(u) &=\frac{\zeta(s)}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u^2dx \\
&\quad +\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u^2dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}G(u)dx,
\end{align*}
whose derivative is
\begin{align*}
I^{'}(u)(v)
&=\frac{\zeta}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)
 -v(y))}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&\quad +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)uvdx
+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u vdx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u)vdx \\
&= ((-\Delta)^{s}u,v)+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)uvdx
+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u vdx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u)vdx.
\end{align*}
We remark that critical points of $I$ determine solutions for \eqref{eP}.

\begin{lemma}
The function
$$
u \mapsto \|u\|:=\Big(\frac{\zeta(s)}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u^2dx\Big)^{1/2}
$$
defines a norm in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ which is equivalent to the standard norm.
\end{lemma}

The proof of the previous lemma is trivial and therefore we will omit it in this paper. %\textcolor{green}{(In this proof, we use $V$ is limited. This is a consequence of the fact that $V$ is continuous and periodic. - retirar isto?)}
\section{Existence of the Solution}

\begin{theorem}\label{th31}
Suppose that $1>s>3/4$, $t \in (0,1)$, and {\rm (A1)--(A6} are satisfied.
 Then \eqref{eP} has a nontrivial solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
By usual arguments, we prove that the functional $I$ has the mountain pass
 geometry. By Montain Pass theorem, there is a Cerami's sequence for $I$ at
the mountain pass level $c$. That is, there is
$\{u_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ such that
\begin{gather*}
I(u_n)\to c, \\
(1+\|u_n\|)I^{'}(u_n) \to 0.
\end{gather*}
where
\begin{gather*}
c= \inf_{\gamma \in \Gamma}\sup_{t \in [0,1]}I(\gamma(t)), \\
\Gamma=\{\gamma \in C([0,1], H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3));\gamma(0)=0, \gamma(1)=e \},
\end{gather*}
where $e \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, and $e$ satisfies $I(e)<0$.
By Remark \ref{rm1}
\[
4I(u_n)-I'(u_n)u_n
=\|u_n\|^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}[f(u_n)u_n-4F(u_n)]dx
\geq \|u_n\|^2
\]
Therefore $\{u_n\}$ is bounded in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$.
So, there is $u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ such that $\{u_n\}$ converges
weakly to $u$. The Lemma \ref{lm1}, (A4), and (A5) imply that $u$ is a critical
point for $I$. If $u \neq 0$ then $u$ is a nontrivial solution for
\eqref{eP}. Suppose that $u = 0$.
We claim that $\{u_n\}$ does not converge to $0$ in $L^{r}(\mathbb{R}^3)$
for all $r \in (2,2^{\ast}_{s})$. Indeed, otherwise, by (A4), (A5) and
the boundedness of $\{u_n\}$ in  $L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$
we have
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u_n)u_ndx \to 0;
$$
By Lemma \ref{lm1}
\[
\|u_n\|^2 \leq \|u_n\|^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx
= \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u_n)u_ndx + I'(u_n)u_n.
\]
The right-hand side of the above inequality converges to $0$.
In this case, $u_n\to 0$ in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Consequently
$$
c=\lim I(u_n)=0.
$$
This  equality can not occur. Then, we can  assume that there are $R>0$
and $\delta>0$ such that passing to a subsequence if necessary
$$
\int_{B_{R}(y_n)}u_n^2dx\geq \delta,
$$
for some sequence $\{y_n\} \subset \mathbb{Z}^3$ (See Lemma \ref{l1.3}).
For each $n \in \mathbb{N}$, we define
$$
w_n(x):=u_n(x+y_n).
$$
Note that $w_n \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Moreover, changing the variables
in the integral below, we have
\begin{align*}
I(w_n)
&= \frac{\zeta}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u_n(x+y_n)-u_n(y+y_n))^2}{|(x+y_n)-(y+y_n)|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 +\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u_n(x+y_n)^2dx\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{w_n}w_n^2dx
 -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}G(u_n(x+y_n))dx \\
& = \frac{\zeta}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u_n(z)-u_n(w))^2}{|z-w|^{3+2s}}dzdw
 +\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(z)u_n(z)^2dz\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx
 -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}G(u_n(z))dz \\
& = I(u_n).
\end{align*}
Analogously, for every $\phi \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$,
\begin{align*}
I'(w_n)\phi
&=\frac{\zeta}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(w_n(x)-w_n(y))(\phi(x)-\phi(y))}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)w_n\phi dx\\
&\quad +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{w_n}w_n\phi dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(w_n)\phi dx
 \\
& = \frac{\zeta}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u_n(x+y_n)-u_n(y+y_n))(\phi(x)-\phi(y))}{|(x+y_n)-(y+y_n)|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&\quad +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x+y_n)u_n(x+y_n)\phi(x) dx
 +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}(x+y_n)u_n(x+y_n)\phi dx\\
&\quad -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u_n(x+y_n))\phi(x) dx\\
& = \frac{\zeta}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u_n(z)-u_n(w)(\phi(z-y_n)-\phi(w-y_n))}{|z-w|^{3+2s}}dzdw\\
&\quad +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(z)u_n(z)\phi(z-y_n) dz
+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}(z)u_n(z)\phi(z-y_n) dz \\
&\quad -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u_n(z))\phi(z-y_n) dz \\
& = I'(u_n)\overline{\phi}
\end{align*}
where $\overline{\phi}(x)=\phi(x-y_n)$. This implies that $\{w_n\}$ is a
Cerami's sequence for $I$ at the level $c$. Analogously, we can show
that $\{w_n\}$ is bounded, $\{w_n\}$ converges weakly to some
$w_0\in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ and that $I'(w_0)=0$.
Passing to a subsequence, if necessary, we can assume that $\{w_n\}$
converges on $L^2_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ to $w_0$. Then
\begin{align*}
\int_{B_{R}(0)}w_0^2dx
& = \lim_{n \to \infty}\int_{B_{R}(0)}w_n^2dx \\
& = \lim_{n \to \infty}\int_{B_{R}(0)}u_n(x+y_n)^2dx \\
& = \lim_{n \to \infty}\int_{B_{R}(y_n)}u_n(z)^2dz \geq \delta.
\end{align*}
Therefore, $w_0$ is a nontrivial solution for \eqref{eP}.
Thus, if $u=0$ we prove that there is a critical point for $I$,
that is nontrivial.
\end{proof}

\section{Positivity of solutions}

In this section, we  prove that the solution in Theorem \ref{th31} is positive.
Initially, we  prove a version of a logarithmic lemma.
The logarithmic lemma was presented by Di Castro, Kuusi and Palatucci.
\cite[lemma 1.3]{dkp}). In the Logarithmic lemma, the authors give an
estimate for weak solutions of the equation
\begin{gather*}
(-\Delta_p)^{s}u=0\quad\text{in }\Omega \\
u=g\quad\text{in } \mathbb{R}^n\setminus\Omega
\end{gather*}
in $B_r(x_0)\subset B_{\frac{R}{2}}(x_0) \subset \Omega$, for
$x_0\in \Omega$ and $u \geq 0$ in $B_{R}(x_0)$. Following the ideas from
Di Castro, Kuusi and Palatucci, we will show a similar estimate for
 a supersolution of the problem
\[
(-\Delta)^{s}u+a(x)u=0\quad\text{in }\mathbb{R}^n
\]
(See Lemma \ref{lm41} bellow).
Supersolutions are defined as follows
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}
\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)v(x)dx\geq 0,
$$
for all $v \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with $v \geq 0$ almost everywhere.
Also, in this situation, we need not to assume that $u\geq0$ in some subset
of $\mathbb{R}^n$.
With this estimate, we conclude that the supersolution satisfies $u > 0$
almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^3$ or $u=0$ almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^3$.

\begin{lemma}\label{lm41}
Suppose that $a:\mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$ is a nonnegative function and
$u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. If
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}
\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)v(x)dx\geq 0.
$$
for all $v \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with $v \geq 0$ almost everywhere,
then $u \geq 0$ almost everywhere. In other words, if $(-\Delta)^{s}u+a(x)u\geq0$
then $u \geq 0$ almost everywhere.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Define $v=u^{-} = \max\{0,-u\}$. By hypothesis
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(u^{-}(x)
 -u^{-}(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)u^{-}(x)dx\geq 0.
$$
However:
\begin{itemize}
\item if $u(x)>0$ and $u(y)>0$ then $(u(x)-u(y))(u^{-}(x)-u^{-}(y)) =0$;

\item if $u(x)<0$ and $u(y)<0$ then $(u(x)-u(y))(u^{-}(x)-u^{-}(y))
= - (u(x)-u(y))^2 \leq 0$;

\item if $u(x)>0$ and $u(y)<0$ then $(u(x)-u(y))(u^{-}(x)-u^{-}(y)) = (u(x)-u(y))u(y)
 \leq 0$;

\item if $u(x)<0$ and $u(y)>0$ then $(u(x)-u(y))(u^{-}(x)-u^{-}(y))
= (u(x)-u(y))(-u(x)) \leq 0$;

\item if $u(x) < 0$, then $a(x)u(x)u^{-}(x)
= -a(x)u^2(x)<0$, and $a(x)u(x)u^{-}(x)$ $= 0$ in the case $u(x)\geq0$.
\end{itemize}
We conclude that each one of the integrals above is equal to zero. Therefore
$$
\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(u^{-}(x)-u^{-}(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}= 0.
$$
Also $u^{-}$ is constant in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$, that is, $u^{-}=0$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}\label{lm42}
Suppose that $\epsilon \in (0,1]$ and $a,b \in \mathbb{R}^n$. Then
$$
|a|^2\leq |b|^2+2\epsilon|b|^2+\frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon}|a-b|^2
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Note taht
\[
|a|^2  \leq (|b|+|a-b|)^2 = |b|^2+2|b\|a-b|+|a-b|^2 \\
\]
By the Cauchy inequality with $\epsilon$,
$$
|b\|a-b|\leq \epsilon|b|^2+\frac{|a-b|^2}{4\epsilon} \leq
\epsilon|b|^2+\frac{|a-b|^2}{2\epsilon}
$$
Replacing in the inequality above,
\[
|a|^2  \leq |b|^2+2\epsilon|b|^2+\frac{|a-b|^2}{\epsilon}+|a-b|^2
 = |b|^2+2\epsilon|b|^2+\frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon}|a-b|^2.
\]
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}\label{lm43}
With the same assumptions as in Lemma \ref{lm41} and
$a \in L^{1}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, we have that for all $r,d>0$ and
$x_0 \in \mathbb{R}^n$,
\begin{equation}
\int_{B_r}\int_{B_r}\Big|\log\Big(\frac{d+u(x)}{d+u(y)}\Big)\Big|^2
\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
\leq Cr^{n-2s} + \int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx,
\end{equation}
where $B_r=B_r(x_0)$ and $C=C(n,s)>0$ is a constant.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider $\phi \in C_0^{\infty}(B_{\frac{3r}{2}})$, $0\leq \phi \leq 1$,
$\phi = 1$ in $B_r$ and $K>0$ such that $\|D\phi\|_{\infty} \leq Kr^{-1}$.
The function
$$
\eta=\frac{\phi^2}{u+d}
$$
is in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and $\eta\geq0$ (see \cite[Lemma 5.3]{dpv}).
 By hypothesis,
\begin{align*}
0&\leq \int_{R^n}\int_{R^n}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)\eta(x)dx \\
&= \int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)
 -\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad + \int_{R^n-B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))
 (\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad + \int_{B_{2r}}\int_{R^n-B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))
 (\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad + \int_{R^n-B_{2r}}\int_{R^n-B_{2r}}
 \frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad + \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)\eta(x)dx.
\end{align*}
We will prove some statements about the five integrals above.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Claim 1.}
 There are constants $C_{2},C_3>0$, such that, they depend only
on $n$ and $s$ and
\begin{align*}
&\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
& \leq -C_{2}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}
 \Big|\log\Big(\frac{d+u(x)}{d+u(y)}\Big)\Big|^2
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\min\{\phi(y)^2, \phi(x)^2\}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad +C_3\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}
 \frac{|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy,
\end{align*}
where $\min\{a,b\} = a$ if $a \leq b$ and $\min\{a,b\} = b$
if $a \geq b$, for all $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$.

Fix $x,y \in B_{2r}$ and suppose that $u(x)>u(y)$. Define
$$
\epsilon = \delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}
$$
where $\delta \in (0,1)$ is chosen small enough such that
$\epsilon \in (0,1)$. Taking $a= \phi(x)$ and $b=\phi(y)$ in the Lemma \ref{lm42},
we obtain
$$
|\phi(x)|^2\leq |\phi(y)|^2+2 \delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}|\phi(y)|^2
+(\delta^{-1}\frac{u(x)+d}{u(x)-u(y)}+1)|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2
$$
Then
\begin{align*}
&\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\\
&=(u(x)-u(y))(\frac{\phi^2(x)}{u(x)+d}-\frac{\phi^2(y)}{u(y)+d})
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\\
&\leq (u(x)-u(y))\Big(\frac{ |\phi(y)|^2+2 \delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}|\phi(y)|^2
 +(\delta^{-1}\frac{u(x)+d}{u(x)-u(y)}+1)|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{u(x)+d} \\
&\quad -\frac{\phi^2(y)}{u(y)+d}\Big)\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\\
&=(u(x)-u(y))\frac{|\phi(y)|^2}{u(x)+d}
\Big[ 1+ 2\delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d} \\
&\quad +(\delta^{-1}\frac{u(x)+d}{u(x)-u(y)}+1)
\frac{|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{|\phi(y)|^2} 
 -\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}\Big]\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 \\
&=(u(x)-u(y))\frac{|\phi(y)|^2}{u(x)+d}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
( 1+ 2\delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\\
&\quad + (\delta^{-1} + \frac{(u(x)-u(y))}{u(x)+d})|\phi(x)
 -\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\\
&\leq (u(x)-u(y))\frac{|\phi(y)|^2}{u(x)+d}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 ( 1+ 2\delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}) \\
&\quad + 2\delta^{-1}|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}.
\end{align*}
We rewrite the first part of the sum appearing on the right side of the
above inequality as
\begin{align*}
&(u(x)-u(y))\frac{|\phi(y)|^2}{u(x)+d}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big( 1+ 2\delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}\Big)\\
& = \Big(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\Big)^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big[ \frac{u(x)+d}{u(x)-u(y)}+ 2\delta-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}\cdot
\frac{u(x)+d}{u(x)-u(y)} \Big]\\
& = (\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d})^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big[\frac{1-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}}{1-\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d}} + 2\delta \Big].
\end{align*}
Define the function $g:(0,1) \to \mathbb{R}$ defined by
$$
g(t)= \frac{1-t^{-1}}{1-t}
$$
satisfies $g(t) \leq -\frac{1}{4}\frac{t^{-1}}{1-t}$ if
$t \in (0,\frac{1}{2}]$ and $g(t)\leq -1$ for all $t \in (0,1)$.
We have two cases. If $\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d} \leq \frac{1}{2}$ then,
 we conclude that
\begin{align*}
&\Big(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\Big)^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big[\frac{1-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}}{1-\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d}} + 2\delta \Big]\\
& \leq (\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d})^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 \Big[-\frac{1}{4}\frac{\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}}{\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}}
 + 2\delta \Big]\\
& = \frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 \Big[-\frac{1}{4}\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d} + 2\delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d} \Big] \\
& = \frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(y)+d}\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 \Big[-\frac{1}{4} + 2\delta\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(u(y)+d)}{(u(x)+d)^2} \Big] \\
&\leq \frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(y)+d}\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
[-\frac{1}{4} + 2\delta].
\end{align*}
In the last inequality, we used
$$
\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(u(y)+d)}{(u(x)+d)^2} \leq 1.
$$
Choosing $\delta=1/16$
we have
\begin{align*}
&\Big(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\Big)^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big[\frac{1-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}}{1-\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d}} + 2\delta \Big]\\
& \leq -\frac{1}{8}\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(y)+d}\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\\
& \leq -\frac{1}{8}\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 \phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}.
\end{align*}
Above, we used that $(\log(t))^2\leq t-1$ for all $t\geq2$, and that
$\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}\geq 2$.
But, if $ \frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d} > 1/2$, then using $g(t) \leq -1$
and  $\delta=1/16$,
\begin{align*}
&\Big(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\Big)^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big[\frac{1-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}}{1-\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d}} + 2\delta \Big]\\
&\leq \Big(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\Big)^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 [-1 + 2\delta]\\
& \leq-\frac{7}{8}\Big(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\Big)^2\phi(y)^2
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}} \\
&\leq-\frac{7}{32}\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2\phi(y)^2
\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}.
\end{align*}
Here, we  used
\[
\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 = \Big[\log(1+ \frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 \leq 4(\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d})^2.
\]
This is a consequence of the inequality $\log(1+t)\leq t$ for all $t>0$, and
$$
t=\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(y)+d}=\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\cdot
\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}\leq 2\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}.
$$
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
 &(u(x)-u(y))\frac{|\phi(y)|^2}{u(x)+d}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\Big( 1+ 2\delta\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}-\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d}\Big)\\
 &\leq -\frac{1}{8}\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2\phi(y)^2
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}.
\end{align*}
We have proved that: if $u(x)>u(y)$, then
\begin{align*}
&\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\\
&\leq -\frac{1}{8}\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2\phi(y)^2
\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}} + 32|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}.
\end{align*}
Integrating on $B_{2r}$ the above inequality, we obtain
\begin{align*}
&\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&=\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x;u(x)>u(y)\}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)
 -\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad +\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x;u(x)<u(y)\}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)
 -\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
& \leq -\frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x;u(x)>u(y)\}}
\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad -\frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x;u(x)<u(y)\}}
 \Big[\log(\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d})\Big]^2\phi(x)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad + 32\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy. \\
\end{align*}
Using that $|\log(x)| = |\log (\frac{1}{x})|$ for all $x\neq 0$, we obtain
$$
\Big[\log(\frac{u(y)+d}{u(x)+d})\Big]^2
= \Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2.
$$
Then
\begin{align*}
&\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
& \leq -\frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x; u(x)>u(y)\}}
 \Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2\phi(y)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad - \frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x;u(x)<u(y)\}}
 \Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2\phi(x)^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&\quad + 32\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
& \leq -\frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x; u(x)>u(y)\}}
 \Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 \min\{\phi(y)^2,\phi(x)^2\} \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\quad - \frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{\{x;u(x)<u(y)\}}
 \Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 \min{\{\phi(y)^2,\phi(x)^2\}}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&\quad + 32\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
 \,dx\,dy \\
& =  -\frac{1}{8}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}
\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 \min{\{\phi(y)^2,\phi(x)^2\}}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&\quad +32\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy,
\end{align*}
Thus, we have proved claim 1.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Claim 2.} There exist $C_3>0$,  depending  only on $s$
and $n$, such that
$$
\int_{R^n-B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\,dx\,dy \leq C_3r^{n-2s}.
$$
Indeed,
\begin{align*}
&\int_{R^n-B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))
 (\eta(x)-\eta(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy\\
&=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n-B_{2r}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}(u(x)-u(y))
\Big(\frac{\phi^2(x)}{u(x)+d}-\frac{\phi^2(y)}{u(y)+d}\Big)
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
& =\int_{\mathbb{R}^n-B_{2r}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}|\phi(x)|^2
 \frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
& \leq \int_{\mathbb{R}^n-B_{2r}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}|\phi(x)|^2
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
\end{align*}
In the above equality, we  used that $u(y)\geq 0$. Therefore
$$
\frac{u(x)-u(y)}{u(x)+d} \leq 1.
$$
A simple calculation shows that
\[
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n-B_{2r}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}|\phi(x)|^2
\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \leq C_3r^{n-2s}
\]
and $C_3$ depends only on $n$ and $s$. Therefore we obtain Claim 2.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Claim 3.}
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)\eta(x)dx \leq \int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx
$$.
Indeed,
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)\eta(x)dx
& = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)\frac{\phi^2(x)}{u(x)+d}dx \\
& =\int_{B_{2r}}a(x)u(x)\frac{\phi^2(x)}{u(x)+d}dx \\
& =\int_{B_{2r}}a(x)\frac{u(x)}{u(x)+d} \phi^2(x)dx\\
& \leq \int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx
\end{align*}
We  used that $\operatorname{supp}(\eta)\subset B_{2r}$,
that $\phi(x)\in (0,1)$ and that $\frac{u(x)}{u(x)+d} \leq 1$.

 Claims 1,2 and 3 imply
\begin{align*}
 &\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\Big[\log(\frac{u(x)+d}{u(y)+d})\Big]^2
 \min\{\phi(y)^2, \phi(x)^2\}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\leq C_5\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 +C_6r^{n-2s}+\int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx.
\end{align*}
for constants $C_5,C_6$. The constants $C_5,C_6$ depend only on $n$ and $s$.
Since $\phi=1$ in $B_r$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq1}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_{B_r}\int_{B_r}\Big|\log(\frac{d+u(x)}{d+u(y)})\Big|^2
 \frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\leq C_5\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 +C_6r^{n-2s}+\int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Finally, we  show that
$$
\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 \leq C_7r^{n-2s}\,.
$$
By assumption,
\begin{align*}
\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy
&\leq Kr^{-2}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{|x-y|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
&=Kr^{-2}\int_{B_{2r}}\int_{B_{2r}}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2(s-1)}}\,dx\,dy \\
&\leq Kr^{-2}\frac{r^{2(1-s)}}{2(1-s)}|B_{2r}|=C_7r^{n-2s}
\end{align*}
where $C_7$ depends only on $n$ and $s$. Replacing the above estimate in \eqref{eq1},
 we obtain the Lemma \ref{lm43}.
\end{proof}

Following the same ideas as in \cite[Theorem A.1]{bf2},
we  prove the theorem stated at the beginning of the section.

\begin{theorem}\label{th44}
Suppose that $u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and $a\geq 0$ with
$a \in L^{1}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^n)$. We  assume that
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
\,dx\,dy+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}a(x)u(x)v(x)dx\geq 0,
$$
for all $v \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with $v \geq 0$ almost everywhere.
Then $u > 0$ almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^n$ or $u=0$ almost everywhere
in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
By Lemma \ref{lm41}, $u \geq 0$. Suppose that $x_0\in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $r>0$.
Define
$$
Z:=\{x \in B_r(x_0); u(x)=0\}
$$
If $|Z|>0$, then we define $F_{\delta}:B_r(x_0) \to  \mathbb{R}$ as
$$
F_{\delta}(x)= \log(1+\frac{u(x)}{\delta})
$$
for all $\delta>0$.
We have $F_{\delta}(y)=0$ for all $y\in Z$. Therefore, if $x \in B_r(x_0)$
and $y \in Z$,
$$
|F_{\delta}(x)|^2 = \frac{|F_{\delta}(x)-F_{\delta}(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}
|x-y|^{n+2s}
$$
Integrating with respect to $ y \in Z $ we obtain
$$
|Z\|F_{\delta}(x)|^2
= \int_{Z}\frac{|F_{\delta}(x)-F_{\delta}(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}|x-y|^{n+2s}dy \\
\leq 2r^{n+2s}\int_{Z}\frac{|F_{\delta}(x)-F_{\delta}(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}dy
$$
Now, integrating with respect to $x \in B_r$ we obtain
\begin{align*}
\int_{B_r(x_0)}|F_{\delta}(x)|^2dx
& \leq \frac{1}{|Z|} 2r^{n+2s}\int_{B_r(x_0)}\int_{Z}
 \frac{|F_{\delta}(x)-F_{\delta}(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dy\,dx\\
&\leq \frac{1}{|Z|} 2r^{n+2s}\int_{B_r(x_0)}
 \int_{B_r(x_0)}\frac{|F_{\delta}(x)-F_{\delta}(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dy\,dx \\
& = \frac{1}{|Z|} 2r^{n+2s}\int_{B_r(x_0)}\int_{B_r(x_0)}
 \Big|\log (\frac{\delta+u(x)}{\delta+u(y)})\Big|^2\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy \\
& \leq \frac{1}{|Z|} 2r^{n+2s}\Big(Cr^{n-2s}+\int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx\Big) \\
& =  \frac{1}{|Z|} 2Cr^{2n}+ \frac{1}{|Z|} 2r^{n+2s}\int_{B_{2r}}a(x)dx:=L.
\end{align*}
The number $L$ does not depend on $\delta$. In summary, we have proved that
$$
\int_{B_r(x_0)}\Big|\log(1+\frac{u(x)}{\delta})\Big|^2dx \leq C
$$
for some constant $C>0$ which  does not depend on $\delta$.
If $u(x) \neq 0$ then $F_{\delta}(x) \to \infty$ when $\delta \to 0$.
By Fatou's lemma, if $|B_r \cap Z^{c}|>0$,
$$
+\infty \leq \liminf_{\delta \to 0}\int_{B_r\cap Z^{c}}|F_{\delta}(x)|^2 \leq C.
$$
Therefore $|Z|=|B_r|$ and $u=0$ almost everywhere in $B_r(x_0)$. Now, we define
\begin{gather*}
A=\{B_r(x); r>0, x \in \mathbb{R}^n, u>0\ in\ B_r(x)\}, \\
B=\{B_r(x); r>0, x \in \mathbb{R}^n, u=0\  in\ B_r(x)\}, \\
S=\cup_{V\in A}V, \quad
W=\cup_{V\in B}V\,.
\end{gather*}
Note that $S$ and $W$ are open sets.
 Consider $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $r>0$. We have two possibilities,
either $u \neq 0$ in $B_r(x)$ or $u=0$ in $B_r(x)$.
If $u \neq 0$ in $B_r$ then $u>0$ in $B_r$. In this case, $x \in S$.
If $u=0$ in $B_r(x)$, then $x \in W$. Consequently
$$
\mathbb{R}^n= S \cup W.
$$
By connectedness, we should have $S=\emptyset$ or $W=\emptyset$.
If $\mathbb{R}^n=S$ then $u>0$ almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
If $\mathbb{R}^n=W$ then $u=0$ almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}\label{cl45}
The solution $u$ found in Theorem \ref{th31} is positive
 almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^3$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
For some $v\in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, with $v \geq0$ almost everywhere, we have
\begin{align*}
&\frac{(\zeta)}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 + \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)uvdx
 +\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}uv\,dx \\
&=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}g(u)v\,dx \geq 0.
\end{align*}
If we define $a(x)=\frac{2}{\zeta}(V(x)+\phi_{u}(x))$, we have that
$a \in L^{1}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, because
$L^{2^{\ast}_{t}}(\mathbb{R}^3)\subset L^{1}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^3)$
and $V$ is continuous. By (A1) and Lemma \ref{lm1} we have $a(x)>0$
in $\mathbb{R}^3$.
Therefore
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\frac{(u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}a(x)uv\,dx \geq 0.
$$
for all $v\in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ with $v\geq0$.
But $u \neq 0$. Then, Theorem \ref{th44} implies that $u>0$ almost everywhere
in $\mathbb{R}^3$.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}\label{rm46} \rm
Define $\mathcal{N}=\{u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)\setminus\{0\};I'(u)u=0\}$, where
\begin{align*}
I(u)&=\frac{\zeta(s)}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
 +\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u^2dx
 +\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u^2dx \\
&\quad -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u)dx.
\end{align*}
If $f$ satisfies (A3)--(A7), then
$$
I_{\infty}=\inf_{u\in \mathcal{N}} I(u)
$$
coincides with the mountain pass level associated with $I$.
\end{remark}

\begin{theorem}
If {\rm (A1)--(A7)} are satisfied,  then \eqref{eP} has a ground state solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Defining the Euler-Lagrange functional $I:H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)\to\mathbb{R}$ by
\begin{align*}
I(u)&= \frac{\zeta(s)}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u^2dx
+\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u^2dx \\
&\quad -\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u)dx,
\end{align*}
and following with the  ideas in Theorem \ref{th31}, we prove that there is a
nonzero solution $u$ to the system \eqref{eP}. Also, we prove that there
is a Cerami's sequence $\{w_n\}$ in the mountain pass level associated with
 $I$ converging to $u$. By Remark \ref{rm1} and Fatou's lemma
\begin{align*}
4c&= \liminf_{n \to \infty}(4I(w_n)-I'(w_n)w_n) \\
& = \liminf_{n \to \infty}(\|w_n\|^2+ \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}H(w_n)dx) \\
& \geq  \liminf_{n \to \infty}\|w_n\|^2
 +  \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}H(w_n)dx \\
& \geq \|u\|^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}H(u)dx \\
& = 4I(u)-I'(u)u \\
& = 4I(u).
\end{align*}
where $H(u)=uf(u)-4F(u)$.
By definition $u \in \mathcal{N}$. Then $I(u) \leq \inf_{u\in \mathcal{N}}I(u)$.
By Remark \ref{rm46}
$$
I(u)=\inf_{u\in \mathcal{N}}I(u).
$$
\end{proof}

\section{Asymptotically periodic potential}

In this section, we study  problem \eqref{eP}, when  $V$ satisfies
the Assumption (A1) and
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A8)] There is a function $V_p$ satisfying $(V_{1})$ such that
$$
\lim_{|x|\to \infty}|V(x)-V_p(x)|=0;
$$
\item[(A9)] $V(x)\leq V_p(x)$ and there is a open set
$\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ with $|\Omega|>0$ and $V(x)< V_p(x)$ in $\Omega$.
\end{itemize}
Here $V_p$ is a periodic continuous potential. This case follows the
ideas already studied in Schr\"odinger-Poisson system with asymptotically periodic
 potential in \cite{amsss}. We are writing this case to make a  complete work
for the reader.

\begin{theorem}
Suppose that {\rm (A1), (A3)--(A9)} are satisfied. Then \eqref{eP} has a ground
 state solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
In  $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ we define the norm
$$
\|u\|_p=\Big(\frac{\zeta}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy
+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V_p(x)u^2dx\Big)^{1/2}.
$$
Consider the functional
$$
I_p(u)=\frac{1}{2}\|u\|_p^2+\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u^2dx
- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u)dx.
$$
We claim that there is $w_p \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ such that
$I_p'(w_p)=0$ and $I_p(w_p)=c_p$, where $c_p$ is the mountain pass level
associated with $I_p$.
We  consider another norm in  $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$:
$$
\|u\|=\Big(\frac{\zeta}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{(u(x)
-u(y))^2}{|x-y|^{3+2s}}\,dx\,dy+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}V(x)u^2dx\Big)^{1/2}.
$$
Then, we define
$$
I(u)=\frac{1}{2}\|u\|^2+\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u}u^2dx
- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u)dx.
$$
The functional $I$  has a mountain pass geometry. If $c$ is the mountain
pass level associated with $I$ then $c<c_p$. Indeed, there is a $t_{\ast}$
such that $t_{\ast}w_p \in \mathcal{N}$ (see remark \ref{rm46}) and it is
the unique with this property. Then
\begin{align*}
c &\leq I(t^{\ast}w_p)\\
&<I_p(t^{\ast}w_p) \\
& \leq \max_{t\geq 0}I_p(tw_p) \\
& = I_p(w_p)=c_p
\end{align*}
Consider $\{u_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ a Cerami's sequence at the mountain
pass level $c$ associated with $I$. Similarly to the periodic case,
we prove that the sequence $\{u_n\}$ is bounded and therefore, converges
 weakly to $u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Additionally $I'(u)=0$.
Now we  prove that $u \neq 0$. Suppose that $u=0$.
Regarding the sequence $\{u_n\}$, the following equalities are true
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\lim_{n \to \infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|V(x)-V_p(x)|u_n^2dx= 0$
\item $\lim_{n \to \infty}\||u_n\|-\|u_n\|_p|=0$.
\item $\lim_{n \to \infty}|I_p(u_n)-I(u_n)|=0$
\item $\lim_{n \to \infty}|I_p'(u_n)u_n-I'(u_n)u_n|=0$
\end{enumerate}
We will prove (1). The limits (2), (3) and (4) are immediate consequences of (1).
Consider $\epsilon>0$ and $A>0$ such that $\|u_n\|_{2}^2< A$ for all
$n \in \mathbb{N}$.  By (A8), there is $R>0$ such that, for all $|x|>R$
we have
$$
|V(x)-V_p(x)|< \frac{\epsilon}{2A}.
$$
But $\{u_n\}$ converges weakly to $u=0$. Then $u_n\to 0$ in $L^2(B_{R}(0))$.
This convergence implies that there is $n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that
$$
\int_{B_{R}(0)}|V(x)-V_p(x)|u_n^2dx< \frac{\epsilon}{2}
$$
for all $n \geq n_0$. Then, if $n\geq n_0$
\begin{align*}
&\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|V(x)-V_p(x)|u_n^2dx\\
&=\int_{B_{R}(0)}|V(x)-V_p(x)|u_n^2dx+\int_{(B_{R}(0))^{c}}|V(x)-V_p(x)|u_n^2dx \\
&<\frac{\epsilon}{2}+\frac{\epsilon}{2}=\epsilon.
\end{align*}
Consider $s_n>0$ such that
$s_nu_n \in \mathcal{N}_p$
for every $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
Where $N_p=\{u \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)\setminus\{0\};I_p'(u)u=0\}$.
We claim that $\limsup_{n \to \infty}s_n\leq 1$.
Otherwise, there is $\delta>0$ such that, passing to a subsequence if necessary,
we can assume that $s_n\geq 1+\delta$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
By (4) we have $I_p'(u_n)u_n\to 0$; that is,
$$
\|u_n\|_p^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx
 = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(u_n)u_ndx+o_n(1)
$$
From $s_nu_n\in \mathcal{N}_p$ we have $I_p'(s_nu_n)u_n=0$. Equivalently
$$
s_n\|u_n\|_p^2+s_n^3\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx
 = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(s_nu_n)u_ndx
$$
Therefore,
\begin{equation}\label{eq53}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\Big[\frac{f(s_nu_n)}{(s_nu_n)^3}-\frac{f(u_n)}{(u_n)^3}\Big]
u_n^{4}dx = \big(\frac{1}{s_n^2}-1\big)\|u_n\|_p^2+o_n(1) \leq o_n(1).
\end{equation}
If $\{u_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ converges to $0$ in  $L^{q}(\mathbb{R}^3)$
for all $q \in (2,2^{\ast}_{s})$, then by Lemma \ref{lm1},
$$
\|u_n\|^2\leq\|u_n\|^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(u_n)u_n+I'(u_n)u_n
$$
consequently $\{u_n\}$ would have limit $0$ in $H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ and this would contradict the fact that $c>0$. Therefore, there is a sequence $\{y_n\} \subset \mathbb{Z}^n$, $R>0$ and $\beta>0$ such that
$$
\int_{B_{R}(y_n)}u_n^2dx \geq \beta>0
$$
Taking $v_n(x):=u_n(x+y_n)$ we have $\|v_n\|=\|u_n\|$ and therefore we can
assume that $\{v_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ converges weakly to some
$v \in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^3)$. Note that
$$
\int_{B_{R}(0)}v^2dx \geq \beta>0\,.
$$
The inequality $\eqref{eq53}$, Remark \ref{rm1} and Fatou's lemma imply that
\begin{align*}
0<&\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\Big[\frac{f((1+\delta)v)}{((1+\delta)v)^3}
 -\frac{f(v)}{(v)^3}\Big]v^{4}dx \\
& \leq \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
\Big[\frac{f((1+\delta)v_n)}{((1+\delta)v_n)^3}-\frac{f(v_n)}{(v_n)^3}\Big]v_n^{4}dx \\
& \leq \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \Big[\frac{f(s_nv_n)}{(s_nv_n)^3}-\frac{f(v_n)}{(v_n)^3}\Big]v_n^{4}dx \\
& =  \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}
 \Big[\frac{f(s_nu_n)}{(s_nu_n)^3}-\frac{f(u_n)}{(u_n)^3}\Big]u_n^{4}dx \\
& \leq \liminf_{n \to \infty}o_n(1)=0.
\end{align*}
The above inequality is a contradiction. Therefore
$\limsup_{n \to \infty}s_n\leq 1$. Now, we will prove that for $n$ large enough,
$s_n> 1$. Suppose that the statement is false. In this case, passing to a
subsequence if necessary, we can assume that $s_n\leq 1$ for all
$n \in \mathbb{N}$. Note that by $(f_5)$, the function $H(u):=uf(u)-4F(u)$
is increasing in $|u| \neq 0$. Then
\begin{align*}
4c_p
&=4\inf_{u \in N_p}I_p(u) \\
& \leq 4I_p(s_nu_n) \\
& = 4I_p(s_nu_n) - I_p'(s_nu_n)(s_nu_n)\\
& = s_n^2\|u_n\|_p^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(s_nu_n)(s_nu_n)-4F(s_nu_n)dx \\
& \leq \|u_n\|_p^2+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(u_n)(u_n)-4F(u_n)dx \\
& \leq 4I(u_n)-I'(u_n)u_n+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|V(x)-V_p(x)|u_n^2dx.
\end{align*}
This implies  $ 4c_p \leq 4c$.
But, this last inequality is false, because we have proved that $c<c_p$.
Therefore, we have that $s_n> 1$ for $n$ large enough.
Then we have proved that
$$
1 \leq \liminf_{n \to \infty}s_n \leq \limsup_{n \to \infty}s_n \leq 1.
$$
and therefore
\begin{equation}\label{eq54}
\lim_{n \to \infty}s_n=1.
\end{equation}
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus implies
\begin{equation}\label{eq55}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(s_nu_n)dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u_n)dx
= \int_{1}^{s_n}\Big[\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(\tau u_n)u_ndx \Big] d \tau.
\end{equation}
Also, by (A5) we obtain $C>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq56}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}f(\tau u_n)u_ndx \leq C(s_n\|u_n\|^2+s_n^{p-1}\|u_n\|^{p}).
\end{equation}
for all $\tau \in (1,s_n)$.
We have that the sequence $\{u_n\}$ is bounded. Then, by \eqref{eq54}, \eqref{eq55}
 and \eqref{eq56},
$$
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(s_nu_n)dx-\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u_n)dx = o_n(1).
$$
Then
\begin{align*}
&I_p(s_nu_n)-I_p(u_n)\\
& = \frac{(s_n^2-1)}{2}\|u_n\|^2+\frac{(s_n^{4}-1)}{4}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx
- \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(s_nu_n)dx+\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}F(u_n)dx \\
& = o_n(1)
\end{align*}
because $\{u_n\}$ is bounded and
$\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\phi_{u_n}u_n^2dx
= \|\phi_{u_n}\|_{\dot{H}^{t}(\mathbb{R}^3)}^2 \leq C\|u_n\|^{4}$.
By (3),
$$
c_p\leq I_p(s_nu_n)
 = I_p(u_n)+o_n(1)
= I(u_n)+o_n(1)
$$
In the limit as $n \to \infty$ we obtain
$c_p \leq c$
But, this last inequality is false, because we have proved that $c<c_p$.
This contradiction was generated because we assumed that $u = 0$.
It follows that $u$ is nontrivial.
In Particular,
$$
I(u) \geq \inf_{u \in \mathcal{N}}I(u).
$$
As in the periodic case
$$
I(u)\leq c=\inf_{u \in \mathcal{N}}I(u).
$$
Therefore $u$ is a ground state solution for system \eqref{eP}.
\end{proof}

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
Marco A. S. Souto is partially supported by CNPq/Brazil - Proc. 305.384/2014-7.


\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{as} Alves, C.; Souto, M.;
 \emph{On existence of solution for a class of semilinear elliptic equations
wit nonlinearities that lies between two different powers},
Abst. and Appl. Analysis, ID 578417 (2008), 1--7.

\bibitem{amsss} Alves, C.; Souto, M.; Soares, S.;
 \emph{Schr\"odinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition},
J. Math. Anal Appl, \textbf{377}, (2011), 584--592.

\bibitem{ap}  Azzollini, A.; Pomponio, A.;
 \emph{Ground state solutions for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger-Maxwell
 equations}, J. Math. Appl., \textbf{14},  (2008), doi:10.1016/jmaa.2008.03.057.

\bibitem{bf2}  Brasco, L.; Franzina, G.;
\emph{Convexity Properties of Dirichlet Integrals and Picone-Type Inequalities},
Kodai Math. J., \textbf{37}  (2014),  769--799.

\bibitem{dkp} Di Castro, A.;  Kuusi, T.;  Palatucci, G.;
 \emph{Local behavior of fractional p-minimizers},
Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, (2015).

\bibitem{dpv}  Di Nezza, E.; Palatucci, G.;  Valdinoci, E.;
 \emph{Hitchhiker's guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces},
Bull. Sci. Math., \textbf{136}  (2012),  512-573.

\bibitem{Ek}  Ekeland, I.;
 \emph{Convexity Methods in Hamilton Mechanics},
Springer Verlag, 1990.

\bibitem{E}  Evans, L. C.;
\emph{Partial Differential Equations},
American Mathematical Society, 2010.

\bibitem{G}  Gaetano, S.;
 \emph{Multiple positive solutions for a Schr\"odinger-Poisson-Slater system },
J. Math. Analysis and Appl., Issue 1, \textbf{365}  (2010),  288--299,
doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.10.061.

\bibitem{gsd}  Gaetano, S.; Squassina, M.; D'avenia, P.;
 \emph{On Fractional Choquard Equations},
Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., \textbf{25}  (2015) 1447-1476.

\bibitem{bf}  A. R. Giammetta;
 \emph{Fractional Schr\"odinger-Poisson-Slater system in one dimension},
arXiv: 1405.2796v1.

\bibitem{jj}  Jeanjean, L.;
 \emph{On the existence of bounded Palais-Smale sequences and application
to a Landesman-Lazer type problem set on $\mathbb R^3$},
Proc. Roy, Soc. Edinburgh, A,
\textbf{129}  (1999),  787--809.

\bibitem{L1}  Lions, P. L.;
 \emph{The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations.
The locally compact case, part 2},
Analyse Nonlineaire, \textbf{I},  (1984),  223--283.

\bibitem{Ruiz}  Ruiz, D.;
 \emph{The Schr\"odinger-Poisson equation under the effect of a nonlinear local term},
J. Funct. Analysis, \textbf{237},  (2006),  655--674,
 doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2006.04.005.

\bibitem{W}  Willem, M.;
 \emph{Minimax Theorems}, Birkhauser,  1986.

\bibitem{zhang}  Zhang, J.;
 \emph{Existence and Multiplicity results for the Fractional Schr\"odinger-Poisson
Systems}, arXiv:1507.01205v1.

\bibitem{zjs}  Zhang, J.; Do O, J. M,; Squassina, M.;
 \emph{Fractional Schr\"odinger-Poisson Systems with a general subcritical
or critical nonlinearity}, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., \textbf{16}  (2016)  15-30.
\bibitem{zjs2}  Zhang, J.;  Do O, J. M,; Squassina, M.;
 \emph{Schr\"odinger-Poisson systems with a general critical nonlinearity},
Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, 2015.

\bibitem{zz}  Zhao, F.;  Zhao, L.;
 \emph{Positive solutions for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger-Poisson equations
with the critical exponent},
Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Meth. and Appl.,
 (2008)  doi:10.1016/na.2008.02.116.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}

