\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 283, pp. 1--12.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2016 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2016/283\hfil Eigenvalues of a nonlocal problem]
{Structure and asymptotic expansion of eigenvalues of an integral-type
nonlocal problem}

\author[Z. Zhou, F. Liao \hfil EJDE-2016/283\hfilneg]
{Zhong-Cheng Zhou, Fang-Fang Liao}

\address{Zhong-Cheng Zhou \newline
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest
University, Chongqing 400715, China}
\email{zhouzc@amss.ac.cn}

\address{Fang-Fang Liao\newline
Department of Mathematics,
Shanghai Normal University,
Shanghai 200234, China.\newline
Department of Mathematics,
Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China}
\email{liaofangfang8178@sina.com}

\thanks{Submitted June 24, 2016. Published October 24, 2016.}
\subjclass[2010]{34C25, 34D20}
\keywords{Eigenvalues; asymptotic expansion; nonlocal problem; Riesz basis}

\begin{abstract}
 We study the structure of eigenvalues of second-order differential equations
 with nonlocal integral boundary conditions. Moreover, we consider the
 asymptotic expansion of the eigenvalues
 and the corresponding eigenfunctions, which shows that the eigenfunctions
 form a Riesz basis for $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

 In recent years, many researchers studied different kinds of nonlocal
boundary-value problems of ordinary differential equations,
and in particular focused on the existence and multiplicity of nontrivial
solutions for nonlinear nonlocal problems, see for example,
\cite{g, gn,  kim, ma, mo, bpr07} for multi-point boundary-value problems
and \cite{cz, fiz, eh, kt, wi} for general nonlocal boundary-value problems.

However, the study on the eigenvalue theory of the corresponding nonlocal
linear problems appears to just start. Ma and O'Regan \cite{mo} constructed
all real eigenvalues of the problem
 \begin{equation} \label{ma-o}
\begin{gathered}
-y''(x)=\lambda y(x),\quad x\in(0,1),\\
y(0)=0, \quad y(1)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}\alpha_ky(\eta_k),
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where $m\in\mathbb{N}$, $\alpha=(\alpha_1,\cdots,\alpha_m)\in\mathbb{R}_+^m$
satisfying the nondegeneracy condition $\sum_{k=1}^{m}|\alpha_k|<1$
and $\eta=(\eta_1,\cdots,\eta_m)\in\Delta^m
 :=\{(\eta_1,\cdots,\eta_m)\in\mathbb{R}^m:0<\eta_1<\cdots<\eta_m<1\}$ are taken as rational.
 We note that the eigenvalues of  \eqref{ma-o}
can be analyzed using elementary method because all solutions of \eqref{ma-o} can
be found explicitly. However, even for \eqref{ma-o},
as far as we know, the first complete eigenvalue theory was proved in \cite{gsz}.
In particular, Gao, Sun and Zhang completely
characterized the structure of eigenvalues of \eqref{ma-o} for all
$\alpha\in\mathbb{R}_+^m$ and $\eta\in\Delta^m$. Moreover, they
gave the complete structure of eigenvalues of general multi-point
boundary-value problem
\begin{equation} \label{gsz-e}
\begin{gathered}
-y''(x)+q(x)y(x)=\lambda y(x), \quad x\in(0,1),\\
y(0)=0,\quad y(1)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}\alpha_ky(\eta_k),
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
 where $q\in L^1([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ and $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}_+^m,\eta\in\Delta^m$.
Note that problems \eqref{ma-o} and \eqref{gsz-e} are non-symmetry problems.
It was proved in \cite{gsz} that \eqref{gsz-e} may admit complex eigenvalues
and has always a sequence of real eigenvalues tending to infinity.

We will extend the above results to the general nonlocal integral
boundary-value problem
\begin{equation} \label{os}
\begin{gathered}
-y''(x)+q(x)y(x)=\lambda y(x),\quad x\in(0,1),\\
y(0)=0,\quad y(1)= \int_0^{1}k(x)y(x)dx,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
 where $q\in L^1([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ and $k\in C^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$. We will show that
the eigenvalues of the problem \eqref{os} have the similar structure
to those of  \eqref{gsz-e}.
In fact,  problem \eqref{os} can be considered as a version of \eqref{gsz-e}
 with continuous boundary condition of \eqref{gsz-e}.

The set of all eigenvalues of \eqref{os} is denoted by
$\Sigma_{k}^{q}\in \mathcal{C}$,  which is called the spectrum of operator
$\mathcal{A}$,
where the linear operator
$\mathcal{A}: D(\mathcal{A})(\subset L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R}))\to L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ is defined by
$$
 \mathcal{A}(y)=-y''(x)+q(x)y(x)
$$
with
$$
D(\mathcal{A})=\big\{y\in H^2(0,1):  y(0)=0,\;
y(1)= \int_0^{1}k(x)y(x)dx\big\}.
$$
When $q\equiv0$, Equation \eqref{os} becomes
\begin{equation} \label{be}
\begin{gathered}
-y''(x)=\lambda y(x),\quad x\in(0,1),\\
y(0)=0,\quad y(1)= \int_0^{1}k(x)y(x)dx.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
We can define a linear operator
$\mathcal{A}_0: D(\mathcal{A}_0)(\subset L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R}))\to L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ by
\begin{align}\label{A0}
 \mathcal{A}_0(y)=-y''(x),
\end{align}
with
$$
D(\mathcal{A}_0)=\big\{y\in H^2([0,1],\mathbb{R}): y(0)=0,\;
y(1)= \int_0^{1}k(x)y(x)dx\big\}
$$
and a bounded perturbation linear operator
\begin{align}\label{B}
(\mathcal{B}_0y)(x)=q(x)y(x),
\end{align}
on $L^1([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
The eigenvalues of \eqref{be} are exact the eigenvalues of the operator
$\mathcal{A}_0$, which can be
analyzed using elementary method. However, as far as we know,
even for this simple case, the spectrum theory is incomplete in the literature.

For some special functions $q$ and $k$, we can adopt the backstepping
method (which comes from Krstic) to obtain the existence and explicit
expression of eigenvalues via transferring it into well-known eigenvalue
 problem, see \cite{ks} and related references.
Such similar method can be used
to prove Theorem \ref{main theorem} for some special functions $q$ and $k$.
However, for general function pair $q$ and $k$, this method does not work.
One motivation of this paper is to develop a method for general functions
$q$ and $k$.
The results of \eqref{os} can be used to study the existence of nonlinear
differential equations with integral boundary condition. Besides, the stabilization
controller design of heat equation by backstepping method strongly depends on the
complete spectrum analysis for the problem \eqref{os}, which is another
important motivation of this paper.

Basically, eigenvalues of \eqref{os} are zeros of some entire functions.
To study the distributions of eigenvalues, we will consider  \eqref{os}
as a perturbation of \eqref{be}.
To obtain the existence of infinitely many real eigenvalues as
in Theorem \ref{submain}, some
properties of almost periodic functions \cite{mo,pt} will be used.
To pass the results of \eqref{be} to those with general potentials $q$, many
techniques will be exploited. Moreover, some basic estimates for
fundamental solutions of \eqref{be} play an important role.

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we will give some
detailed analysis on problem \eqref{be}.
In Section 3, after developing some basic estimates, we will prove Theorems
\ref{main theorem} and \ref{submain}.
In Section 4, we will give the asymptotic expansion for the eigenvalues and
eigenfunctions of \eqref{be}.
In Section 5, we will prove the existence of eigenvalues for \eqref{os}
and corresponding eigenfunctions forming Riesz basis for $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.

\section{Structure of eigenvalues of the zero potential}

In this section, we first consider the spectrum for \eqref{be},
 which has the zero potential. Let us
use $\Sigma_{k}^{0}$ to denote the set of all eigenvalues of \eqref{be}.

Let $\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$, the complex solutions of \eqref{be}
satisfying $y(0)=0$ are $y(x)=cS_{\lambda}(x)$, where $c\in\mathbb{C}$  and
\[
S_{\lambda}(x):=\frac{\sin\sqrt{\lambda}x}{\sqrt{\lambda}}
=\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!}\lambda^{k}x^{2k+1},~x\in[0,1].
\]
Notice that $S_{\lambda}(x)$ is an entire function of $\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$.
Define $C_\lambda(x):=\cos(\sqrt{\lambda}x)$ and
\begin{align}
M_0(\lambda):=S_{\lambda}(1)-\int_0^{1}k(x)S_{\lambda}(x)dx
=\frac{\sin\sqrt{\lambda}}{\sqrt{\lambda}}-\int_0^{1}k(x)
\frac{\sin\sqrt{\lambda}x}{\sqrt{\lambda}}dx.
\end{align}
Then $\lambda\in \Sigma_{k}^{0}$  if and only if $\lambda$ satisfies
 $$
M_0(\lambda)=0 .
$$
We recall some properties of almost periodic functions which will be used later.
We refer the readers to \cite{F} for more information on almost periodic functions.
Suppose that $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is a bounded continuous function.
We say that $f$ is almost periodic if for any $\varepsilon>0$,
there exists $l_{\varepsilon}>0$ such that for any $a\in \mathbb{R}$,
there exists $b\in[a, a+l_{\varepsilon}]$ such that
$\|f(\cdot+b)-f(\cdot)\|_{L^{\infty}}<\varepsilon$.
If $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is an almost periodic function, then for
any $A\in \mathbb{R}$, we have
\[
\inf_{u\in[A,\infty)}f(u)=\inf_{u\in\mathbb{R}}f(u),\quad
\sup_{u\in[A,\infty)}f(u)=\sup_{u\in\mathbb{R}}f(u).
\]
Moreover, if $f$ is non-zero and
$\bar{f}=\lim_{T\to +\infty}\frac{1}{T}\int_0^{T}f(u)du=0$, then
$f$ is oscillatory as $u\to +\infty$.
In particular, $f(u)$ has a sequence of positive zeros tending to $+\infty$.

\begin{lemma} \label{real eigenvaluea}
If $k\in C^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$, then $\Sigma_{k}^{0}\cap \mathbb{R}
=\{\overline{\lambda}_n\}$ which satisfies
$$
\overline{\lambda}_1 \leq \overline{\lambda}_2 \leq\cdots
\overline{\lambda}_n \leq \cdots,\quad
 \lim_{n\to +\infty} \overline{\lambda}_n=+\infty.
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let us first consider possible positive eigenvalues $\lambda=\alpha^2$
of \eqref{be},  where $\alpha>0$. By equation \eqref{be},  we have
\[
F(\alpha):=\sin \alpha-\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin (\alpha x) dx=0
\]
It is easy to check the function $F(\alpha)$ is a non-zero, almost periodic
function and has mean value zero. Therefore, $F(\alpha)$ has many positive zeros
tending to $+\infty$, and hence $\Sigma_{k}^{0} $ contains a sequence
of positive eigenvalues tending to $+\infty$.

Next, we consider possible negative eigenvalues $\lambda=-\alpha^2$ of \eqref{be},
where $\alpha>0$. By the first equality of \eqref{identity} and \eqref{be}, we have
\begin{align}
\bar{F}(\alpha):=\sinh \alpha-\int_0^{1}k(x)\sinh (\alpha x)dx=0.
\end{align}
One has
$$
\lim_{\alpha\to +\infty} \frac{\bar{F}(\alpha)}{\sinh \alpha}=1,
$$
notice that $\bar{F}(\alpha)$ is analytic in $\alpha$, thus $\bar{F}(\alpha)=0$
 has at most finitely many positive solutions. Hence
$\Sigma_{k}^{0} $ contains at most finitely many negative eigenvalues.

Because both $F(\alpha)=0$ and $\bar{F}(\alpha)=0$ have only isolated solutions,
the above two cases show that the result holds.
\end{proof}

Next we show that  $\Sigma_{k}^{0}$ contains only real eigenvalues
if $ \int_0^1k^2(x)dx\leq 1$.

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2.2}
Assume $k\in C^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ satisfying $ \int_0^1k^2(x)dx\leq 1$.
Then $\Sigma_{k}^{0}$ contains only real eigenvalues. Moreover,
$ \Sigma_{k}^{0}\subset ( \frac{\pi^2}{4}, +\infty)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Suppose that $\lambda=w^2\in \Sigma_{k}^{0}  $, where $w=u+iv$,
$u,v \in \mathbb{R}$.
We would assert that  $v=0$ under the assumption. Otherwise, assume that
 $v\neq 0$. We have
\[
\sin w-\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin (wx) dx=0.
\]
Note that the following elementary equalities hold for
any $u,v\in\mathbb{R}$,
\begin{equation} \label{identity}
\sin(u+iv)=\sin u\cosh v+i \cos u\sinh v,\quad
|\sin(u+iv)|^2=\sin^2 u+ \sinh^2 v.
\end{equation}
Then
\begin{gather*}
\sin u\cosh v=\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin (ux)\cosh(vx) dx, \\
\cos u\sinh v=\int_0^{1}k(x)\cos (ux)\sinh(vx) dx.
\end{gather*}
It follows from H\"{o}lder inequality that
\begin{align}
1&=\sin^2 u+\cos^2 u\\
 &=\Big(\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin(ux)\frac{\cosh (vx)}{\cosh v} dx\Big)^2
  +\Big(\int_0^{1}k(x)\cos(ux)\frac{\sinh (vx)}{\sinh v} dx\Big)^2\\
 &< \int_0^{1}k^2(x)dx\int_0^{1}\cos^2 (ux) dx
 +\int_0^{1}k^2(x)dx\int_0^{1}\sin^2 (ux) dx\\
 &=\int_0^{1}k^2(x)dx,
\end{align}
which is a contradiction.
Thus $v=0$. On the other hand,
\begin{align}
M_0(0)=1-\int_0^{1}xk(x)dx
\geq 1-\Big(\int_0^{1}k^2(x)dx\Big)^{1/2}>0,
\end{align}
hence we have $\Sigma_{k}^{0}\in (0,+\infty)$.
Finally, for any $u\in (0, \frac{\pi}{2}]$, by the H\"{o}lder inequality,
we know function $F(u)$ satisfies
\begin{align*}
F(u)&=\sin u-\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin(ux) dx\\
    &\geq \sin u-\int_0^{1}|k(x)|\sin(ux) dx\\
&> \sin u-\int_0^{1}|k(x)| dx\sin u
\geq 0.
\end{align*}
Therefore,  we obtain that $\Sigma_{k}^{0}\in (\frac{\pi^2}{4},+\infty)$.
\end{proof}

\section{Structure of eigenvalues of non-zero potentials}

Given $q\in L^1((0,1),\mathbb{R})$ and complex parameter $\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$, the
fundamental solutions of  \eqref{os} are denoted by $y_{m}(x, \lambda, q), m=1,2$,
which are solutions satisfying the initial values
\begin{align}
y_1(0, \lambda, q)=y'_2(0, \lambda, q)=1,\quad
y'_1(0, \lambda, q)=y_2(0, \lambda, q)=0.
\end{align}
Notice that $y_{m}(x, \lambda, q)$ are entire functions of
$\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$, To study \eqref{os}, we introduce
\begin{align}
M_q(\lambda):=y_2(1, \lambda, q)-\int_0^{1}k(x) y_2(x, \lambda, q)dx ,
\quad \lambda\in \mathbb{C}.
\end{align}
We use $\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ to denote the set of all eigenvalues of \eqref{os}.
Then $\lambda\in \Sigma_{k}^{q}$ if and only if  $M_q(\lambda)=0$.

We will need the following basic estimates, whose proofs are much similar
to those of \cite[Lemma 3.1, Lemma 3.2, Lemma 3.3, Lemma 3.4]{gsz}.
Here we only state them without their proofs.

\begin{lemma}
If $\beta\in (0,1)$, one has
\begin{equation} \label{basic estimate}
\begin{gathered}
\lim_{v\in \mathbb{R},|v|\to +\infty} \frac{|\sin(u+iv)|}{\exp |v|}=\frac{1}{2},
\\
\lim_{v\in \mathbb{R},|v|\to +\infty} \frac{|\sin\beta(u+iv)|}{\exp |v|}=0
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
uniformly in $u\in\mathbb{R}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{almost function solution}
There exists a constant $c(k)>0$ and a sequence $a_{n}$ of increasing
positive numbers such that $a_n\to +\infty$ and $(-1)^n F(a_n)>c(k)$,
 where $F(u):=\sin u-\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin (ux)dx$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}
Given $q\in L^1((0,1),\mathbb{R})$ and complex parameter $\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$.
Then the following inequalities hold for all $x\in[0,1]$,
\begin{gather*}
|y_1(x, \lambda, q)-C_{\lambda}(x)|
\leq \frac{1}{|\sqrt{\lambda}|}\exp (|\operatorname{Im}\sqrt{\lambda}
|x+ \|q\|_{L^1[0,x]}).\\
|y_2(x, \lambda, q)-S_{\lambda}(x)|
\leq \frac{1}{|\lambda|}\exp (|\operatorname{Im}\sqrt{\lambda}
|x+ \|q\|_{L^1[0,x]}).\\
|y'_1(x, \lambda, q)-C'_{\lambda}(x)|
\leq \|q\|\exp (|\operatorname{Im}\sqrt{\lambda}|x+ \|q\|_{L^1[0,x]}).\\
|y'_2(x, \lambda, q)-S'_{\lambda}(x)|
\leq \frac{\|q\|}{|\sqrt{\lambda}|}\exp (|\operatorname{Im}\sqrt{\lambda}
|x+ \|q\|_{L^1[0,x]}).
\end{gather*}
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{estimate of eigenvalue}
The following estimate holds for $M_q(\lambda)$,
\begin{align}
|M_q(\lambda)-M_0(\lambda)|\leq \frac{B}{|w|^2}\exp (|\operatorname{Im} w|),
\quad w:=\sqrt{\lambda}\in\mathbb{C}.
\end{align}
where
$$
B=\exp (\|q\|_{L^1[0,1]})+\exp (\|q\|_{L^1[0,1]})\int_0^{1}|k(x)|dx.
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{lemma}\label{non eigenvalue}
One has $M_q(\lambda)\neq 0$ on $\mathbb{R}$. Consequently, there exists
$\lambda_0\in \mathbb{R}$ such that $\lambda_0$ does not belong to
 $\Sigma_{k}^{q}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Otherwise, we have $M_q(\lambda)\equiv 0$, Notice that
\begin{equation} \label{M0}
 M_0(u^2)\equiv \frac{F(u)}{u}, \quad u>0.
\end{equation}
Let $\lambda=a_n^2$ in Lemma \ref{almost function solution}, we have
$$
\Big|\frac{F(a_n)}{a_n}\Big|= |M_0(a_n^2)|\leq \frac{B}{a_n^2}.
$$
Hence, $\lim_{n\to +\infty} |F(a_n)|\leq\lim_{n\to +\infty}\frac{B}{ a_n} =0$,
 which  contradicts Lemma \ref{almost function solution}.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}\label{main theorem}
If $q\in L^{1}([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ and $k\in C^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$, then
 $\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ is composed of a
sequence $\lambda_n=\{\lambda_{n}(q)\}\in\mathbb{C}$ which satisfies
$$ \operatorname{Re}\lambda_1 \leq \operatorname{Re}\lambda_2 \leq\cdots
\operatorname{Re}\lambda_n \leq \cdots,~~~~ \lim_{n\to +\infty} \operatorname{Re}\lambda_n=+\infty.$$
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
By Lemma \ref{non eigenvalue}, there exists $\lambda_0\in\mathbb{R}$
such that $\lambda_0 \not\in \Sigma_{k}^{q}$, which implies that
the problem
 \begin{equation}\label{yqy}
\begin{gathered}
-y''(x)+q(x)y(x)-\lambda_0 y(x)=0,\quad x\in(0,1),\\
y(0)=0,\quad y(1)= \int_0^{1}k(x)y(x)dx
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
has only the trivial solution $y=0$.

Let $G_0(x,u)$ be the Green function of \eqref{yqy}.
Then $\lambda\in\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ if and only if $\lambda\neq\lambda_0$ and
 \begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
-y''(x)+(q(x)-\lambda_0 )y(x)=(\lambda-\lambda_0)y(x),\\
y(0)=0,\quad y(1)= \int_0^{1}k(x)y(x)\,dx,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
has  a nontrivial solution $y$.
In other words,  $\lambda\in\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ if and only if the equation
\[
y=(\lambda-\lambda_0)L_q y
\]
has a non-trivial solution $y$, where
$$
L_q y(x):=\int_0^1G_0(x,z)(q(z)-\lambda_0 )y(z)dz.
$$
Since $L_q$ is a compact linear operator, one sees that this happens when
and only when
\[
\frac{1}{\lambda-\lambda_0}\in \sigma(L_q)\subset \mathbb{C},
\]
where $\sigma(L_q)$ is the spectrum of $L_q$. Hence $\Sigma_{k}^{q}$
consists of a sequence of eigenvalues which can accumulate only at infinity.

For $\lambda\in \mathbb{C}$, denote
$$
\lambda=w^2, \quad w=\sqrt{\lambda}=u+iv, \quad u,v\in \mathbb{R}.
$$
Suppose that $\lambda\in\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ and $\lambda\neq 0$.
Then $M_q(\lambda)=0$ and Lemma \ref{estimate of eigenvalue} imply that
\begin{align*}
\frac{B}{|w|^2}\exp (|v|)
&\geq |M_q(\lambda)-M_0(\lambda)|=|M_0(\lambda)|\\
&=\Big|\frac{\sin w-\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin(wx) dx}{w}\Big|\\
&\geq\frac{|\sin (u+iv)|-\int_0^{1}|k(x)\sin (u+iv)x| dx}{|w|}.
\end{align*}
We conclude that all non-zero eigenvalues $\lambda\in\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ satisfy
\begin{align}\label{inequality}
|w|\frac{|\sin (u+iv)|-\int_0^{1}|k(x)\sin (u+iv)x| dx}{\exp |v|}\leq B.
\end{align}
Let us derive  some sequences from estimate \eqref{inequality} for
$\lambda\in\Sigma_{k}^{q}$.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Case 1:} Since $|w|\geq |v|$, it follows from the uniform
limits in \eqref{basic estimate} that
\begin{align}
 \lim_{|v|=|\operatorname{Im} w|\to +\infty}|w|
\frac{|\sin (u+iv)|-\int_0^{1}|k(x)\sin (u+iv)x | dx}{\exp |v|}=+\infty.
\end{align}
Thus, there exists a constant $h>0$ such that
\begin{align}
\lambda\in\Sigma_{k}^{q} \Longrightarrow
 w=\sqrt{\lambda}\in H_{h}:=\{w\in \mathbb{C} :|\operatorname{Im} w|<h \}.
\end{align}
The horizontal strip $H_h$ of it in the $w$-plane is transformed to the
 half-plane $P_r$, in  the $\lambda$-plane:
\[
\Sigma_{k}^{q} \subset P_r:=\{\lambda\in \mathbb{C} :\operatorname{Re} \lambda >r\},
\]
where $r:=-h^2$.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Case 2:} Let $\bar{r}>-h^2$, next we assert  that
\[
\Sigma_{k}^{q}\cap\{\lambda\in \mathbb{C} :\operatorname{Re}
\lambda \leq\bar{r}\}=\Sigma_{k}^{q}
\cap\{\lambda\in \mathbb{C} :-h^2<Re \lambda \leq\bar{r}\}
\]
contains at most finitely many eigenvalues. Otherwise, suppose that
\begin{align}
\Sigma_{k}^{q}\cap\{\lambda\in \mathbb{C} :-h^2<\operatorname{Re}
 \lambda \leq\bar{r}\}
\end{align}
contains infinitely many $\lambda_n$, $n\in \mathbb{N}$.
Since $M_{q}(\lambda)=0$ has only isolated solutions, we have  necessarily
$ |\operatorname{Im} \lambda_n|\to +\infty$.
by denoting $\sqrt{\lambda_n}=u_n+iv_n$, one has
$$
-h^2<u^2_n-v^2_n \leq\bar{r}, ~~2|u_n||v_n|\to +\infty.
$$
In particular, $|v_n|\to +\infty$, Now estimate \eqref{inequality} reads
\[
\frac{|\sin (u_n+iv_n)|}{\exp |v_n|}
\leq\frac{\int_0^{1}|k(x)\sin (u_n+iv_n)x| dx}{\exp |v_n|}+o(1),
\quad\text{as }n\to\infty.
\]
This is impossible because  the estimate in \eqref{basic estimate}.
Combining Cases 1 and  2, we know that $\Sigma_{k}^{q}$ can be listed
as in Theorem \ref{main theorem}.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}\label{submain}
If $q\in L^{1}([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ and $k\in C^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$, then
$\Sigma_{k}^{q}\cap \mathbb{R}=\{\overline{\lambda}_n=\overline{\lambda}_{n}(q)\}$
which satisfies
$$
 \overline{\lambda}_1 \leq \overline{\lambda}_2 \leq\cdots \overline{
\lambda}_n \leq \cdots,\quad
 \lim_{n\to +\infty} \overline{\lambda}_n=+\infty.
$$
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
 We need to only consider the positive eigenvalues of \eqref{os}.
Let $\lambda=a^2_n$  in  Lemma \ref{estimate of eigenvalue}, according to
\eqref{M0}, we have
 \begin{align}
 |M_q(a^2_n)-M_0(a^2_n)|=\Big|M_q(a^2_n)-\frac{F(a_n)}{a_n}\Big|
\leq \frac{B}{a_n^2},~~ \forall n\in \mathbb{N}.
\end{align}
Since $a_n\to +\infty$, w.l.o,g, we can assume that
$a_n\geq \frac{2B}{c(k)}$ for all $n\in \mathbb{N}$; therefore,
\[
 |a_nM_q(a^2_n)-F(a_n)|\leq \frac{B}{a_n} \leq \frac{c(k)}{2},\quad
\forall n\in \mathbb{N}.
\]
by using Lemma \ref{almost function solution}, we conclude that
$(-1)^nM_q(a^2_n)>0, \forall n\in\mathbb{N}$.
Hence $M_{q}(\lambda)=0 $ has at least one positive solution $\bar{\lambda}_n$ in
each interval $(a^2_n,a^2_{n+1}), n\in \mathbb{N}$.
Combining with Theorem \ref{main theorem},
we have $\Sigma_{k}^{q}\cap \mathbb{R}$ consists of a sequence of real
eigenvalues tending to $+\infty$, hence $\Sigma_{k}^{q}\cap \mathbb{R}$
can be listed as in Theorem \ref{submain}.
\end{proof}

\section{Asymptotic expansion and Riesz basis}

Above we have discussed the structure of eigenvalues of \eqref{os}.
In this section, we  give the quantity asymptotic estimate for eigenvalues
and eigenfunctions of \eqref{be} and \eqref{os}. Moreover, we will show
the eigenfunctions forms Resis basis of $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
We first make some preparations for the main theory.

\begin{definition} \label{def4.1} \rm
A sequence $\{e_n\}_1^{\infty}\subset L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$
is called a basis in $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ if for any $g\in L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$
there exists a unique sequence $\{a_n\}_1^{\infty}$ of real numbers such that
$g=\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n e_n$ in $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
A basis $\{e_n\}_1^{\infty}$ in $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ is called a Riesz basis
when  the series
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n e_n$, with real coefficients $a_n$, converges
in $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ if and only if  $\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n^2<\infty $.
\end{definition}

The following Theorem is very useful in checking the Riesz basis for
the generalized eigenfunctions of $\mathcal{A}_0$.

\begin{theorem}[\cite{guo02, guo01}] \label{generaliezd basis}
Let $\mathcal{T}$ be a densely defined discrete operator, that is
$(\lambda I-\mathcal{T})^{-1}$ is compact for some $\lambda$ in
a Hilbert space $H$ with $\{z_n\}_1^{+\infty}$
being a Riesz basis for $H$. If there are an $N>0$ and a sequence of
generalized eigenvector $\{x_n\}_{N+1}^{+\infty}$
of $\mathcal{T}$ such that
$$
\sum_{n=N+1}^{\infty}\|x_{n}-z_{n}\|^2<\infty,
$$
then
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] There are an $M>N$ and generalized eigenvectors
$\{x_{n0}\}_1^{M}$ of $\mathcal{T}$ such that
$\{x_{n0}\}_1^{M}\cup  \{x_n\}_{N+1}^{+\infty} $
forms a Riesz basis for $H$.

\item[(ii)] Let $\{x_{n0}\}_1^{M}\cup  \{x_n\}_{N+1}^{+\infty} $
be eigenvalues $\{\sigma_{n}\}_1^{+\infty}$ of $\mathcal{T}$. Then
$\sigma(\mathcal{T})=\{\sigma_{n}\}_1^{+\infty}$,
in which $\sigma_{n}$ is counted according to its algebraic multiplicity.

\item[(iii)] If there is an $C_0>0$ such that $\sigma_{n}\neq\sigma_{m}$ for all
$n,m>C_0$, then there is an $N_0>C_0$ such that all $\sigma_{n}, n>N_0$
are algebraically simple.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

\begin{lemma}\label{eigenvalue asymptotic}
The eigenvalues of \eqref{be} have the  asymptotic expansion
$$
\lambda_n=n^2\pi^2 +2(k(0)-k(1))+O(\frac{1}{n}).
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
According to Theorems \ref{main theorem} and  \ref{submain}, we know
that \eqref{be} has a sequence of eigenvalues. In fact,
 the eigenvalues $\lambda_{n}$ of \eqref{be} satisfy
\begin{align}\label{equality}
\sin\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}&=\int_0^{1}k(x)\sin\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}x\,dx\\
 &= -\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}}\Big(k(1)\cos\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}-k(0)
-\int_0^{1}k'(x)\cos\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}xdx\Big).
\end{align}
Therefore,
\begin{equation} \label{sqrexpres}
\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}=n\pi+O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}} ).
\end{equation}
At the same time, we know that
\begin{gather*}
\sin\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}=O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}} ), \\
\cos\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}=1-O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}} ).
\end{gather*}
Taking them into \eqref{equality}, we have
\begin{align}
O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}})
= \frac{k(0)}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}}-\frac{k(1)}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}}
+O(\frac{1}{\lambda_{n}}).
\end{align}
Hence, by \eqref{sqrexpres}, we have
\begin{align}
\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}-n\pi= \frac{k(0)-k(1)}{\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}}
+O(\frac{1}{\lambda_{n}}),
\end{align}
we can obtain
\begin{align}
\lambda_n=n^2\pi^2 +2(k(0)-k(1))+O(\frac{1}{n}),
\end{align}
 which completes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}\label{eigenfunction asymptotic}
Let $\{\lambda_n\}_1^{\infty}$ be the eigenvalues of operator $\mathcal{A}_0$.
Then the corresponding eigenfunctions  $\{y_n\}_1^{\infty}$ have the
asymptotic expressions
$$
y_n(x)=\sin  n\pi x+O(\frac{1}{n}).
$$
Moreover, the generalized eigenfunctions of $\mathcal{A}_0$ forms a Riesz
basis of $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
According to \eqref{be} and Lemma \ref{eigenvalue asymptotic} for $\lambda_n$,
its corresponding eigenfunction has the asymptotic form
\begin{align}
y_n(x)=\sin \sqrt{\lambda_n}x=\sin  n\pi x+O(\frac{1}{n}).
\end{align}
Next, we show that
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\int_0^{1}|\sin(\sqrt{\lambda_n}x)-\sin(n\pi x)|^2 dx<+\infty $.
 In fact,
$$
\int_0^{1}|\sin(\sqrt{\lambda_n}x)-\sin(n\pi x)|^2 dx
\leq C \cdot O(\frac{1}{n^2})
$$
by the eigenvalue  expansion, where $C$ is a constant number large enough.
Therefore,
$$
\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}\int_0^{1}|\sin(\sqrt{\lambda_n}x)-\sin(n\pi x)|^2 dx
<+\infty .
$$
By Theorem \ref{generaliezd basis}, we know that the generalized eigenfunctions
of $\mathcal{A}_0$ forms a Riesz basis of $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$,  which completes the proof.
\end{proof}

For obtaining the asymptotic expansion for the eigenvalue of $\Sigma_k^q$,
we  show the relationship between $\Sigma_k^q$ and $\Sigma_k^0$.
Intuitively, for the problem \eqref{be} and \eqref{os}, if $q$ is a constant,
 we know $\Sigma_k^q$ is a constant translation of $\Sigma_k^0$, In fact,
if $q$ is not a constant, we also know the asymptotic expansion for $\Sigma_k^q$
in terms of $\Sigma_k^0$, which is borrowed from the paper \cite{guo01}.

\begin{definition}\label{d calss} \rm
A linear operator $\mathcal{A}_0$ in a Hilbert space $H$ is called
discrete-type(or $[D]$-class for short), if there are Riesz basis
$\{\phi_{n}\}_1^{\infty} $ of $H$,
complex series $\{\lambda_n\}_1^{\infty} $ and an integer $N>0$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]  $\lim_{n\to +\infty}| \lambda_n|=\infty$,
 $\lambda_n \neq \lambda_m$ as $n,m>N$.

\item[(ii)] $\mathcal{A}_0\phi_{n}= \lambda_n \phi_{n}$, $n>N$.

\item[(iii)] $\mathcal{A}_0[\phi_1,\phi_2, \cdots,\phi_N]
\subset[\phi_1,\phi_2, \cdots,\phi_N]$ and
$\mathcal{A}_0$ has spectrum
$\{\lambda_n\}_1^N$  in \\
 $[\phi_1,\phi_2, \cdots,\phi_N]$,
 where
$[\phi_1,\phi_2, \cdots,\phi_N]$ is the linear subspace
spanned by $\{\phi_{n}\}_1^N$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}

Lemma \ref{eigenfunction asymptotic} show that $\mathcal{A}_0$ defined in
\eqref{A0} is a $[D]$-class. The following result can be concluded from
the proof of a more general result in \cite{li}
(see also \cite{kato} and \cite{ramm}).

\begin{theorem}[\cite{li}] \label{perbation}
Suppose that $\mathcal{A}_0$ is of $[D]$-class satisfying conditions of
definition \ref{d calss} in a Hilbert space $H$.
Let $d_n:=\min_{n\neq m}|\lambda_n-\lambda_m|$ and assume that
$ \sum_{n>N}^{\infty}d_n^{-2}<\infty$. Then for any linear bounded
perturbation operator $\mathcal{B}_0$ on $H$, there are constants $C, L >0$, an
integer $M>0$, and eigenpairs $\{\mu_n, \psi_{n}\}_{M}^{\infty} $ of
$\mathcal{A}_0+\mathcal{B}_0$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]   $|\mu_n-\lambda_n|\leq C, \forall n\geq M$.
\item[(ii)]  $\|\psi_{n}-\phi_{n}\|\leq L d_n^{-1}$, $n>M$,
and hence $\sum_{M}^{\infty}\|\psi_{n}-\phi_{n}\|^2<\infty$.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

We use Theorem \ref{perbation} for $\mathcal{A}_0, \mathcal{B}_0$, where
 $\mathcal{A}_0$ is defined by \eqref{A0}, and  operator $\mathcal{B}_0$ is a
perturbation of $\mathcal{A}_0$, such that $\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{A}_0+\mathcal{B}_0$,
we can obtain the following result for $\mathcal{A}$.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm4.7}
Suppose that $k\in C^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$, $q\in L^1([0,1],\mathbb{R})$,
$\{\mu_n, \psi_{n}\}_1^{\infty}$
are eigenpairs of operator $\mathcal{A}$,
$\{\lambda_n, y_{n}\}_1^{\infty}$  are eigenpairs of operator $\mathcal{A}_0$.
Then the following results hold.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]  $\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{A}_0+\mathcal{B}_0$ is $[D]$-class.

\item[(ii)] The eigenvalue of $\mathcal{A}_0+\mathcal{B}_0$ have asymptotic
expansion
\[
\mu_n=\lambda_n+O(1),\quad  n\to +\infty.
\]

\item[(iii)] The corresponding eigenfunctions $\{\psi_n(x)\}$ of
$\mathcal{A}$ have the asymptotic expansion
\begin{equation} \label{py}
\psi_{n}(x)=y_{n}(x)+\varepsilon_n(x), \quad n\to +\infty,
\end{equation}
where $\|\varepsilon_n\|_{L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})}=O(\frac{1}{n})$. Moreover,
\begin{equation} \label{approximation of eigenvalue}
\sum_{n=M}^{\infty}\|\psi_{n}-y_{n}\|_{L^{2}(0,1)}^2<\infty.
\end{equation}
where $y_n(\cdot)$ is the eigenfunctions of {\rm\eqref{be}}. Moreover, the
generalized eigenfunctions of $\mathcal{A}$ forms a Riesz basis of
$L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Obviously, (ii), \eqref{py} and  \eqref{approximation of eigenvalue} can
be obtained according to Theorem \ref{perbation}.
Next, we prove that the generalized eigenfunctions of $\mathcal{A}$ form
a Riesz basis  of $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$.
Combined \eqref{approximation of eigenvalue} with Theorem \ref{generaliezd basis},
we know that the generalized eigenfunctions of $\mathcal{A}$ forms a Riesz
basis of $L^2([0,1],\mathbb{R})$. Meanwhile, in terms of the definition \ref{d calss}
and Theorem \ref{main theorem}, we know (i) also holds, which completes the proof.
\end{proof}

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
We would like to thank Professor Jifeng Chu for his careful
reading of the manuscript and valuable suggestions.
Zhongcheng Zhou was supported by National Nature Science
Foundation under Grant 11301427 and Fundamental Research Funds
for the Central Universities under No. XDJK2014B021. Fangfang Liao was
supported by QingLan project of Jiangsu Province.


\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{cz} J. Chu, Z. Zhou;
\emph{Positive solutions and eigenvalues of nonlocal
boundary-value problems}, Electron. J. Differential Equations, 
vol. 2005 (2005), no. 86, 1-9.

\bibitem{F} A. M. Fink;
 \emph{ Almost Periodic Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics},
 Vol. 377, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1974.

\bibitem{fiz} D. Franco, G. Infante, M. Zima;
\emph{Second order nonlocal boundary value problems at resonance},
Math. Nachr. 284 (2011), 875-884.

\bibitem{gsz} J. Gao, D. Sun, M. Zhang;
\emph{Structure of Eigenvalues of Multi-Point Boundary Value Problems},
Adv. Difference Equations, Article ID: 381932, 1-24, 2010.

\bibitem{g} J. R. Graef, S. Heidarkhani, L. J. Kong;
\emph{Existence of nontrivial solutions to systems of multi-point boundary
value problems},  Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Suppl., 2013, 273-281.

\bibitem{guo02} B. Guo;
\emph{Riesz basis approach to the stabilization of a flexible beam with a tip mass},
 SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 (2001), 1736-1747.

\bibitem{guo01} B. Guo;
\emph{Riesz basis property and exponential stability of controlled Euler-Bernoulli
beam equation with variable coefficients}, SIAM J. Control Optim. 40 (2002), 1905-1923.

\bibitem{gn} C. P. Gupta, S. K. Ntouyas, P. Ch. Tsamatos;
\emph{On an m-point boundary-value problem for second order ordinary differential
equations},  Nonlinear Anal. 23 (1994), 1427-1436.

\bibitem{eh} E. Hernandez;
\emph{Existence of solutions for an abstract second-order differential
equation with nonlocal conditions}, Electron. J. Differential Equations, 
vol. 2009 (2009), no. 96, 1-10.

\bibitem{kt} G. L. Karakostas, P. Ch. Tsamatos;
\emph{Positive solutions for a nonlocal boundary-value problem with
increasing response}, Electron. J. Differential Equations, vol. 2000
(2000), no. 73, 1-8.

\bibitem{kato} T. Kato;
 \emph{Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators}, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1966.

\bibitem{kim} C. G. Kim, E. K. Lee;
\emph{Multiple positive solutions for singular multi-point
boundary-value problems with a positive parameter},
Electron. J. Differential Equations, vol. 2014 (2014), no. 38,  1-13.

\bibitem{ks} M. Krstic, A. Smyshlyaev;
\emph{Boundary control of PDEs: A course on backstepping designs},
Advances in Design and Control, 16. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2008.

\bibitem{li} B. Li;
\emph{The perturbation theory of a class of linear operators with applications},
 Acta Math. Sinica, 21 (1978), 206-222 (in Chinese).

\bibitem{ma} R. Ma;
 \emph{Nodal solutions for a second-order $m$-point boundary value problem},
Czech. Math. J. 56 (2006), 1243-1263.

\bibitem{mo} R. Ma, D. O'Regan;
\emph{Nodal solutions for second-order $m$-point boundary value
problems with nonlinearities across several eigenvalues},
Nonlinear Anal. 64 (2006), 1562-1577.

\bibitem{pt} J. P\"{o}schel, E. Trubowitz;
\emph{The Inverse Spectrum Theory},  Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.

\bibitem{ramm} A. Ramm;
\emph{On the basis property for the root vectors of some nonselfadjoint operators},
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 80 (1981), 57-66.

\bibitem{bpr07} B. P. Rynne;
\emph{Spectral properties and nodal solutions for second-order, $m$-point
boundary value problems},  Nonlinear Anal. 67 (2007), 3318-3327.

\bibitem{wi} J. R. L. Webb, G. Infante;
\emph{Nonlocal boundary value problems of arbitrary order},
J. London Math. Soc. 79 (2009), 238-258.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
