\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{amssymb}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 131, pp. 1--14.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2016 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2016/131\hfil Asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues]
{Asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for a
 multi-point discontinuous Sturm-Liouville problem}

\author[K. Aydemir, O. Sh. Mukhtarov \hfil EJDE-2016/131\hfilneg]
{Kadriye Aydemir, Oktay Sh. Mukhtarov}

\address{Kadriye Aydemir \newline
Faculty of Education, Giresun University,
28100 Giresun, Turkey}
\email{kadriyeaydemr@gmail.com}

\address{Oktay Sh. Mukhtarov \newline
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Science,
Gaziosmanpa\c{s}a University,
60250 Tokat, Turkey. \newline
Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics,
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences,
Baku, Azerbaijan}
\email{omukhtarov@yahoo.com}

\thanks{Submitted February 20, 2016. Published June 6, 2016.}
\subjclass[2010]{34B24, 34L20}
\keywords{Sturm-Liouville problems; eigenvalue; eigenfunction;
\hfill\break\indent  asymptotic distribution}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article we study a  class of generalized  BVP' s
 consisting of discontinuous Sturm-Liouville equation on finite
 number disjoint intervals, with usual boundary conditions and
 supplementary transmission conditions at finite number interior
 points. The asymptotic behaviors of the eigenvalues and
 eigenfunctions are discussed.  By modifying some techniques of
 classical Sturm-Liouville theory  and  suggesting own approaches
 we find asymptotic formulas for the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\allowdisplaybreaks


\section{Introduction}

The study of eigenvalue problems  for  boundary-value problems
(BVPs) is a topic of great interest. The problem of finding
eigenvalues and eigenfunctions and studying their behavior plays a
crucial role in modern mathematics. These investigations are of
utmost importance for theoretical and applied problems in mechanics,
physics, physical chemistry, biophysics, mathematical economics,
theory of systems and their optimization, theory of random
processes, and many other branches of natural science. In many cases
eigenvalue problems model important physical processes. For example,
the bound state energies of the hydrogen atom can be computed as the
eigenvalues of a singular eigenvalue problem. Eigenvalues appear in
many other places. Electric fields in cyclotrons, a special form of
particle accelerators, have to oscillate in a precise manner, in
order to accelerate the charged particles that circle around its
center. The solutions of the Schr\"{o}dinger equation from quantum
physics and quantum chemistry have solutions that correspond to
vibrations of the, say, molecule it models. The eigenvalues
correspond to energy levels that molecule can occupy. Many
characteristic quantities in science are eigenvalues: decay factors,
frequencies, norms of operators (or matrices), singular values,
condition numbers.  Very often those problems arise due to the use
of the method of separation of variables for the solution of
classical partial differential equations. For instance, let us
consider the one-dimensional wave equation
\begin{equation}\label{shr}
\rho_0u_{tt}=(ku_x)_x
\end{equation}
with boundary conditions
\begin{equation}\label{shr1}
u(0,t)=0, \quad u(L,t)=0
\end{equation}
 for the longitudinal displacement $u(x;t)$ of a string of length
$L$ with mass-density $\rho_0(x)$ and
stiffness $k(x)$, both of which we assume are smooth, strictly
positive functions on $0 \leq x \leq L$. Looking for separable
time-periodic solutions of \eqref{shr}-\eqref{shr1} we get the
Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem
\begin{equation}\label{shr2}
-(k\varphi')'=\lambda\rho_0\varphi, \quad \varphi(0)=0, \quad
\varphi(L)=0,
\end{equation}
where  $\lambda=\omega^{2}$ is a constant frequency and $\varphi(x)$
is a function of the spatial variable only. In recent years,
boundary value problems various nonstandard for Sturm-Liouville
equations have attracted extensive attention due to their intrinsic
mathematical challenges and their applications in physics,
engineering,  biology, medicine and so on. For example,
Sturm-Liouville equations with boundary conditions linearly or
nonlinearly dependent on the spectral parameter were addressed by
many authors (see \cite{aali,fu,mam,oks, oks1, oks2} and the
references therein.). Such problems often arise from physical
problems, for example, vibration of a string, quantum mechanics and
geophysics. Because of its significance, a great deal of work has been
done in the theory of Sturm-Liouville equations \cite{lev,titc,zet}.
However, apart from classical Sturm-Liouville problems, also
discontinuous Sturm-Liouville equations occur in applications, with
or without the eigenvalue parameter in the boundary conditions. In
this study we shall investigate a new class of BVP's which consist
of the Sturm-Liouville equation
\begin{equation}\label{1}
\tau(u):=-a(x)u''(x)+ q(x)u(x)=\lambda u(x)
\end{equation}
on finite number disjoint intervals
$\Omega=\cup_{i=1}^{n+1}(\xi_{i-1}, \xi_i)$,
where $0=\xi_0<\xi_1<\dots <\xi_{n+1}=\pi$, together with
 boundary conditions (BCs) at end points
$x=0, \pi$,
\begin{gather}\label{2}
\tau_{\alpha}(u):=\cos\alpha u(0)+\sin\alpha u'(0)=0, \\
\label{3}
\tau_{\beta}(u):=\cos\beta u(\pi)+\sin\beta u'(\pi)=0,
\end{gather}
and  the transmission conditions at interior points
$\xi_k \in (0,\pi)$, $k=1,2,\dots n$
\begin{gather}\label{4}
\begin{aligned}
\tau_{2k-1}(u)&=\delta'_{2k-1}u'(\xi_k+0)+\delta_{2k-1}u(\xi_k+0) \\
&\quad +\gamma'_{2k-1}u'(\xi_k-0)+\gamma_{2k-1}u(\xi_k-0)=0,
\end{aligned}\\
\label{5}
\tau_{2k}(u)=\delta'_{2k}u'(\xi_k+0)+\delta_{2k}u(\xi_k+0)
+\gamma'_{2k}u'(\xi_k-0)+\gamma_{2k}u(\xi_k-0)=0,
\end{gather}
where  $a(x)=a_i^{2}>0$  for $x \in \Omega_i:=(\xi_{i-1}, \xi_i)$,
$i=1,2,\dots n+1 $, the potential $q(x)$ is
real-valued function which continuous in each of the intervals
$(\xi_{i-1}, \xi_i)$, and has a finite limits $q( \xi_i\mp0)$,
$\lambda$  is a complex spectral parameter,
$\delta_k$, $\delta'_k$,  $\gamma_k$ and $\gamma'_k$
$(k=1,2,\dots 2n)$ are real numbers. The problems with transmission
conditions has become an important area of research in recent years
because of the needs of modern technology, engineering and physics.
Many of the mathematical problems encountered in the study of
boundary-value-transmission problem cannot be treated with the usual
techniques within the standard framework of  boundary value problem
(see \cite{ji}). Note that some special cases of this problem arise
after an application of the method of separation of variables to a
varied assortment of physical problems. For example, some boundary
value problems with transmission conditions arise in heat and mass
transfer problems \cite{lik}, in vibrating string problems when the
string loaded additionally with point masses \cite{tik}, in
diffraction problems \cite{voito}. Also some problems with
transmission conditions which arise in mechanics (thermal conduction
problems for a thin laminated plate) were studied in \cite{tite}.
 Although the boundary value problems of Sturm-Liouville
equation with spectral parameter have been studied in many
literature, only few papers can be found in the literature on  the
Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems with transmission
conditions. The spectral analysis and some properties of the regular
symmetric (self-adjoint) boundary value transmission problems
(BVTPs) have been studied in \cite{ugk, ug, ay,
ji,hira,osh3,osh6,kun,ka,ug1,zet1,zet2}. In these direct problems
there are at most two transmission points \cite{osh6,zet1,zet2}. In
\cite{osh6} Kadakal et al. gived an operator-theoretic formulation
for considered problem.  In \cite{zet1} and \cite{zet2}, Wang et al.
studied such self-adjoint BCs when the definition of the maximum
operator involves positive multiples, for the case of $k = 2$, and
obtained some non-obvious examples. M. Shahriari et al. have
investigated the inverse problem with a finite number of
transmission points \cite{ms}. Hence, there is a gap in the regular
and singular (selfadjoint and nonselfadjoint) multi-interval
problems. Some of those approaches can be satisfactory in the case
where only the first few eigenvalues are desired. But their
usefulness becomes questionable and the accurate computation of
eigenvalues tends to be a challenging problem in the cases where one
wishes to compute a large number of eigenvalues. Since many
applications in quantum physics, quantum chemistry, science and
industry are connected to Sturm-Liouville problems (SLPs), their
solution has drummed up interest of several researches. Many codes
have been developed to solve regular and singular problems.

We want emphasize that the boundary value problem studied here
differs from the standard boundary value problems in that it
contains transmission conditions in a finite number interior point.
Moreover the coefficient functions may have discontinuity at finite
interior point. Naturally, eigenfunctions of this problem may have
discontinuity at the finite inner point of the considered interval.

\section{Notation and prerequisite results}

For further consideration we need the next Lemma.

\begin{lemma}\label{lem1}
Let $q(x)$  be continuous in each of $ (\xi_{i-1}, \xi_i)$
and $f(\lambda), g(\lambda)$ be given entire functions.
Then the initial value problem
\begin{gather}\label{1rt}
-a(x)u''+q(x)u=\lambda u, \quad  x \in \Omega_i= (\xi_{i-1},\xi_i), \\
\label{2tr}
 u(\xi_{i-1}+0,\lambda)=f_i(\lambda) , \quad
\frac{\partial u(\xi_{i-1}+0,\lambda)}{\partial x}=g_i(\lambda)
\end{gather}
has a unique solution $u(x)=u_i(x,\lambda)$. For each
$x \in  (\xi_{i-1}, \xi_i)$, $u_i(x,\lambda)$ is an entire function of
$\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$(i=1,2,\dots n).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
It is sufficiend to transform the initial value
problem \eqref{1rt}--\eqref{2tr} to the equivalent integral equation
\begin{align*} % \label{2try}
 u(x)
&= f(\lambda)\cos(\sqrt{\lambda}(x-a_1))
 +\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}}g(\lambda)\sin(\sqrt{\lambda}(x-a_1))\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\int_{a_i}^{x}\sin(\sqrt{\lambda}(x-a_1))q(y)u(y)dy,
\end{align*}
and then employ the analogue technique as in proof of
\cite[Theorem 5.1]{titc}.
\end{proof}

 With a view to constructing the
characteristic function $\omega(\lambda )$  we shall define  two
fundamental solutions
\[
 \phi (x,\lambda)=\begin{cases}
\phi _1(x,\lambda ), & x\in \lbrack 0,\xi_1) \\
\phi _2(x,\lambda ), & x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2)\\
\phi _{3}(x,\lambda ), & x\in (\xi_2,\xi_3) \\\dots \\
\phi _{n+1}(x,\lambda ), & x\in (\xi_n,\pi],
\end{cases}
\quad \chi(x,\lambda)=\begin{cases}
\chi _1(x,\lambda ), & x\in \lbrack 0,\xi_1) \\
\chi _2(x,\lambda ), & x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2)\\
\chi _{3}(x,\lambda ), & x\in (\xi_2,\xi_3) \\
 \dots \\
\chi _{n+1}(x,\lambda ), & x\in (\xi_n,\pi],
\end{cases}
\]
 by a special process.
Let $\phi_1(x,\lambda )$ and $\chi _{n+1}(x,\lambda )$ be
solutions of \eqref{1} on $(0,\xi_1)$
and $ (\xi_n,\pi)$ satisfy the initial conditions
\begin{gather}\label{7}
u(0,\lambda)=\sin\alpha, \quad u'(0,\lambda )=-\cos\alpha, \\
\label{10}
u(\pi,\lambda)=-\sin\beta, \quad  u'(\pi,\lambda )=\cos\beta
\end{gather}
respectively. In terms of these solution we shall define the other
solutions $\phi _i(x,\lambda )$  and
$ \chi _i(x,\lambda )$  by the initial conditions
\begin{gather}\label{8}
\phi _{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda)
=\frac{1}{\Delta_{i12}}(\Delta_{i23}\phi
_i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)+\Delta_{i24}\frac{\partial\phi
_i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)}{\partial x})\\
\label{9}
\frac{\partial\phi _{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda)}{\partial x}
=\frac{-1}{\Delta_{i12}}(\Delta_{i13}\phi
_i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)+\Delta_{i14}\frac{\partial\phi
_i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)}{\partial x})
\end{gather}
and
\begin{gather}
\label{11}
\chi _i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)
=\frac{-1}{\Delta_{i34}}(\Delta_{i14}\chi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda)+\Delta_{i24}\frac{\partial\chi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda)}{\partial x}) \\
 \label{12} \frac{\partial\chi _i(\xi_i-,\lambda)}{\partial x})
=\frac{1}{\Delta_{i34}}(\Delta_{i13}\chi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda)+\Delta_{i23}\frac{\partial\chi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda)}{\partial x})
\end{gather}
respectively, where  $\Delta_{ijk}$ $(1\leq j< k \leq 4)$ denotes
the determinant of the j-th
 and k-th columns of the matrix
 $$
\begin{bmatrix}
  \delta'_{2i-1} &  \delta_{2i-1}  &  \gamma'_{2i-1} &  \gamma_{2i-1}\\
  \delta'_{2i} &  \delta_{2i}  &  \gamma'_{2i} &  \gamma_{2i}
\end{bmatrix}
$$
where $i=1,2,\dots n$. Everywhere in below we shall assume that
$\Delta_{ijk}>0$ for all i,j,k. The existence and uniqueness of
these solutions are follows from the by Lemma
\eqref{lem1}. Moreover by applying the method of \cite{ka} we can
prove that each of these solutions are entire functions of parameter
$\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$ for each fixed $x$. Taking into account
\eqref{8}--\eqref{12} and the fact that the Wronskians
$\omega_i(\lambda):=W[\phi_i(x,\lambda ),\chi_i(x,\lambda )]$
($i=1,2,\dots n+1$) are independent of the variable $x$, we have
\begin{align*}
\omega_{i+1}(\lambda )&= \phi_i(\xi_i+,\lambda
)\frac{\partial\chi_i(\xi_i+,\lambda )}{\partial x}
-\frac{\partial\phi_i(\xi_i+,\lambda )}{\partial x}\chi_i(\xi_i+,\lambda ) \\
&=\frac{\Delta_{i34}}{\Delta_{i12}}(\phi_i(\xi_i-,\lambda )
 \frac{\partial\chi_i(\xi_i-,\lambda )}{\partial x}
 -\frac{\partial\phi_i(\xi_i-,\lambda )}{\partial x}\chi_i(\xi_i-,\lambda )) \\
&=\frac{\Delta_{i34}}{\Delta_{i12}} \omega_i(\lambda)
=\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j34}}{ \Delta_{j12}}\omega_1(\lambda) \quad
 (i=1,2,\dots n).
\end{align*}
It is convenient to define  the characteristic function
$\omega(\lambda)$ for problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5} as
$$
\omega(\lambda):=\omega_1(\lambda)
=\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j12}}{
\Delta_{i34}}\omega_{i+1}(\lambda ) \quad (i=1,2,\dots n).
$$
Obviously, $\omega(\lambda)$ is an entire function. By applying the
technique of \cite{osh6} we can prove that there are infinitely many
eigenvalues $\lambda_n, \ n=1,2,\dots $ of the problem
\eqref{1}--\eqref{5} which  coincide with the zeros of
characteristic function $\omega(\lambda)$.

\begin{theorem}\label{bag}
Let $\lambda_0$  be zero of $w(\lambda)$. Then the solutions
$\phi(x,\lambda_0)$ and $\chi(x,\lambda_0)$ are
linearly dependent.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
From  $w_i(\lambda_0)=0$ it follows that
\begin{equation} \label{bag1}
\chi_i(x,\lambda_0)=k_i \phi_i(x,\lambda_0)
\end{equation}
for some  $k_i\neq 0$  ($i=1, 2,\dots n+1$). Next we show that
$k_i=k_{i+1}$ $(i=1, 2,\dots n)$. Suppose that $k_i\neq
k_{i+1}$. Using \eqref{5} and \eqref{bag1} we
have
\begin{equation} \label{bag2}
\begin{aligned}
\chi _i(\xi_i-0,\lambda_0)
&= \frac{-1}{\Delta_{i34}}(\Delta_{i14}\chi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda_0)+\Delta_{i24}\frac{\partial\chi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda_0)}{\partial x})
  \\
&=  \frac{-k_{i+1}}{\Delta_{i34}}(\Delta_{i14}\phi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda_0)+\Delta_{i24}\frac{\partial\phi
_{i+1}(\xi_i+0,\lambda_0)}{\partial x})  \\
&= \frac{k_{i+1}(\Delta_{i14}\Delta_{i23}
 -\Delta_{i24}\Delta_{i13})}{k_i\Delta_{i12}\Delta_{i34}}\chi_i
(\xi_i-0,\lambda_0)
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The direct calculations gives
$\Delta_{i14}\Delta_{i23}-\Delta_{i24}\Delta_{i13}=\Delta_{i12}\Delta_{i34}$.
Consequently
\begin{equation} \label{bag3}
\chi_i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)=\frac{k_{i+1}}{k_i}\chi_i(\xi_i-0,\lambda)
\end{equation}
Hence $\chi _i(\xi_i-0,\lambda_0)=0$. Similarly from
\eqref{12} and \eqref{bag1} we derive that
\begin{equation} \label{bag4}
\chi _i'(\xi_i-0,\lambda_0)=0.
\end{equation}
Thus we have $\chi_i(x,\lambda_0)=0$  for any
$x\in \Omega_i=(\xi_i, \xi_{i+1})$, $i=1,2,\dots n-1 $ \eqref{bag3} and
 \eqref{bag4}.
 But this is contradict with \eqref{11}-\eqref{12}.
 Consequently, $k_i=k_{i+1}$ $(i=1, 2,\dots n)$, so
$\phi(x,\lambda_0)$ and $\chi(x,\lambda_0)$
are linearly dependent.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}\label{care}
If  $w(\lambda_0)=0$, then $\lambda_0$ is eigenvalue and
$\phi(x,\lambda_0)$, $\chi(x,\lambda_0)$ are corresponding
eigenfunctions.
\end{corollary}

\begin{lemma} \label{lem2}
The set of eigenvalues of problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5}
coincide with the set of zeros of the function $w(\lambda )$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Corollary \ref{care} each zero $w(\lambda )$ is eigenvalue.
Now let  $\lambda_0$ be eigenvalue. We must show that
$w(\lambda_0)=0$ Suppose , it possible, that $w(\lambda_0 )\neq0$.
 Let $u_0$ be eigenfunction corresponding to this eigenvalue. Since
$w_i(\lambda_0 )\neq0$ ($i=1,2,\dots n+1$) the eigenfunction $u_0(x )$ can
be represent in the form
\[
 u_0(x)=\begin{cases}
 \hslash_{11}\phi _1(x,\lambda_0 )+\hslash_{12}\chi _1(x,\lambda_0 ),
& x\in \lbrack 0,\xi_1) \\
 \hslash_{21}\phi _2(x,\lambda_0 )+\hslash_{22}\chi _2(x,\lambda_0 ),
& x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2)\\
\hslash_{31}\phi _{3}(x,\lambda_0 )+\hslash_{32}\chi _{3}(x,\lambda_0 ),
& x\in (\xi_2,\xi_3) \\
\dots \\
\hslash_{(n+1)1}\phi _{n+1}(x,\lambda )+\hslash_{(n+1)2}\chi _{n+1}(x,\lambda ),
& x\in (\xi_n,\pi]
\end{cases}
\]
where at least one of the constants $\hslash_{ij}$ ($i=1,2\dots n+1$;
$j=1,2$) is not zero. Putting in conditions \eqref{2}--\eqref{5} we
obtain homogenous linear simultaneous equation of the variables
$\hslash_{ij}$ ($i=1,2\dots n+1$; $j=1,2$). By direct calculations it is
easy to show that the determinant of this system has the form
$cw(\lambda_0$, where $c\neq0$ is an constant. Consequently this
linear simultaneous equation has the only trivial solution
$\hslash_{ij}$ ($i=1,2\dots n+1$; $j=1,2$), and so we reach a
contraction, which completes the proof.
\end{proof}

Now by modifying the standard method we  prove that all eigenvalues
of  problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5} are real.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm2}
All the eigenvalues of the boundary value transmission problem
\eqref{1}--\eqref{5} are real.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $\lambda_0$ be eigenvalue and $u_0$ be eigenfunction
corresponding to this eigenvalue. Then integrating by parts we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{2.2}
\begin{aligned}
&\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{1}{a_{k+1}^{2}}\prod_{i=0}^{k}\Delta_{i12}
\prod_{i=k+1}^{n+1}\Delta_{i34}\int_{\xi_k+}^{\xi_{k+1}-}\tau
u_0(x)\overline{u_0(x)}dx\\
&-\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{1}{a_{k+1}^{2}}\prod_{i=0}^{k}\Delta_{i12}
\prod_{i=k+1}^{n+1}\Delta_{i34}\int_{\xi_k+}^{\xi_{k+1}-}
u_0(x)\overline{\lambda u_0(x)}dx\\
&= \Delta_{134}\Delta_{234}\dots \Delta_{n34}(W(u_0,
\overline{u_0};\xi_1-)- W(u_0,
\overline{u_0};0)) \\
&\quad + \Delta_{112}\Delta_{234}\dots \Delta_{n34}( W(u_0,
\overline{u_0};\xi_2-) -  W(u_0,
\overline{u_0};\xi_1+))\\
&\quad +\dots
+\Delta_{112}\Delta_{212}\dots \Delta_{n12}(W(u_0,\overline{u_0};\pi)-
W(u_0,\overline{u_0};\xi_n+))
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where, as usual, $W(u_0, \overline{u_0};x)$ denotes the
Wronskians of the functions $u_0$ and $\overline{u_0}$.
From the definitions of transmission functionals
we have
\begin{equation}\label{c3}
\Delta_{i34}W(u_0, \overline{u_0};\xi_i-)
=\Delta_{i12} W(u_0, \overline{u_0};\xi_i+) \  i=1,2\dots n
\end{equation}
Finally, substituting   \eqref{c3} in \eqref{2.2} we have
\begin{align*}
&(\lambda_0-\overline{\lambda_0})[\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{1}{a_{k+1}^{2}}\prod_{i=0}^{k}\Delta_{i12}
\prod_{i=k+1}^{n+1}\Delta_{i34}\int_{\xi_k+}^{\xi_{k+1}-}(
u_0(x))^{2}dx\\
&-\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{1}{a_{k+1}^{2}}\prod_{i=0}^{k}\Delta_{i12}
\prod_{i=k+1}^{n+1}\Delta_{i34}\int_{\xi_k+}^{\xi_{k+1}-}
( u_0(x))^{2}dx] =0
\end{align*}
Since $\Delta_{ijk}>0$ we obtain $\lambda_0=\overline{\lambda_0}$.
Consequently all eigenvalues of the problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5}
are real. The proof is complete.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem} \label{thm3}
For each  eigenvalue $\lambda_0$ of  problem
\eqref{1}--\eqref{5} there is at least one real valued
eigenfunction $u_0(x)$ corresponding to this eigenvalue.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $\lambda_0$ be any eigenvalue of the problem and let
 $\phi_0(x)=\varphi_0(x)+i\psi_0(x) $ be an eigenfunction
corresponding to  this eigenvalue.
 This implies $\varphi_0(x)$, $\psi_0(x)$ are not both
zero. It is easy to see that
$\overline{\phi_0}(x)=\varphi_0(x)-i\psi_0(x)$ is also an
eigenfunction, corresponding to same  eigenvalue $\lambda_0$. Since
$\phi_0(x)$ and $\overline{\phi_0}(x)$ are eigenfunctions of the
problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5}, at least one of the real valued
functions $\frac{\phi_0(x)+\overline{\phi_0}(x)}{2}=\varphi_0(x)$
and $\frac{\phi_0(x)-\overline{\phi_0}(x)}{2i}=\psi_0(x)$ is not
zero and therefore also is eigenfunction of the problem
\eqref{1}--\eqref{5}. Thus, there is at least one real valued
eigenfunction, corresponding to the eigenvalue $\lambda_0$.
\end{proof}

\section{Asymptotic behavior of the functions $\phi (x,\lambda)$ and
$\chi(x,\lambda)$}

To abbreviate notation we use the  notation
$\phi_{i\lambda}(x):=\phi_i(x,\lambda )$,
$\chi_{i\lambda}(x):=\chi_i(x,\lambda )$  $(i=1,2,\dots n+1)$.
 We can prove that the next integral and
integro-differential equations hold for $k=0$ and $k=1$.
\begin{gather} \label{(4.2)}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi_{1\lambda}(x )
&= \sin\alpha\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\cos \big(\frac{s x}{a_1}\big)+
\frac{a_1\cos\alpha}{s}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin \big(\frac{s
x}{a_1}\big)  \\
&\quad + \frac{1}{a_1s}\int_0^{x}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big(\frac{s(x-y)}{a_1}\big) q(y)\phi_{1\lambda}(y )dy,
\end{aligned} \\
\label{(4.a)}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi_{(i+1)\lambda}(x )
&= \frac{1}{\Delta_{i12}}(\Delta_{i23}\phi_{i\lambda}(\xi_i
)+\Delta_{i24}\phi'_{i\lambda}(\xi_i )) \frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\cos
\big(\frac{s(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}}\big)    \\
&\quad -\frac{a_{i+1}}{s \Delta_{i12}}(\Delta_{i13}\phi_{i\lambda}(\xi_i
)+\Delta_{i14}\phi'_{i\lambda}(\xi_i ))\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big( \frac{s(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}}\big)   \\
&\quad +\frac{1}{a_{i+1}s}\int_{\xi_i}^{x}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big( \frac{s(x-y)}{a_{i+1}} \big)
q(y)\phi_{(i+1)\lambda}(y )dy
\end{aligned}
\end{gather}
for $x \in (a,\xi_1)$  and for $x \in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1})$, $i=1,2,\dots n$
 respectively.
Also
\begin{gather*}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi_{(n+1)\lambda}(x)
&= -\sin\beta\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}
\cos \big(\frac{s(\pi-x)}{a_{n+1}} \big) +
\frac{a_{n+1}}{s}\cos\beta\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big(\frac{s(\pi-x)}{a_{n+1}} \big)
\\
&\quad+ \frac{1}{a_{n+1}s}\int_{x}^{\pi}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big(\frac{s(x-y)}{a_{n+1}} \big)
q(y)\chi_{(n+1)\lambda}(y)dy
\end{aligned}
\\
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi_{i\lambda}(x )\\
&= -\frac{1}{\Delta_{i34}}(\Delta_{i14}\chi_{(i+1)\lambda}(\xi_i
)+\Delta_{i24}\chi'_{(i+1)\lambda}(\xi_i ) )\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\cos
\big(\frac{s(x-\xi_i)}{a_i}\big)    \\
&\quad + \frac{a_i}{s \Delta_{i34}}(\Delta_{i13}\chi_{(i+1)\lambda}(\xi_i
)+\Delta_{i23}\chi'_{(i+1)\lambda}(\xi_i ))\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big( \frac{s(x-\xi_i)}{a_i}\big)   \\
&\quad + \frac{1}{a_is}\int_{x}^{\xi_i}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\sin
\big( \frac{s(x-y)}{a_i} \big)
q(y)\chi_{i\lambda}(y )dy
\end{aligned} %\label{(4.22)}
\end{gather*}
for $x \in (\xi_n,b)$ and $(\xi_i,\xi_{i+1})$ $(i=1,2,\dots n)$,
respectively.

\begin{theorem} \label{(4.n)}
Let $Im \mu=t$. If $\sin\alpha \neq 0$, then
\begin{gather}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi _{1\lambda}(x) = \sin\alpha\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}%
\cos [ \frac{sx}{a_1} ] +O\Big( |s|^{k-1}e^{|t|\frac{x}{a_1}}\Big)
\label{(lo2)}
\\
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi _{(i+1)\lambda}(x)\\
&= (-1)^{i}\sin\alpha s^{i} \Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{%
\Delta_{j12}a_j}\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j} \big]\Big)
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\cos
\big[ \frac{s( x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}} \big]
\\
&\quad +O\Big(|s| ^{i-1} e^{|t|((\sum_{j=1}^{i}\frac{(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j})
+\frac{(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}})}\Big),
\quad  i=1,2,\dots n \label{(4.p)}
\end{aligned}
\end{gather}
as $| s | \to \infty $, while if $\sin\alpha=0$,
\begin{gather}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi _{1\lambda}(x)
= \frac{a_1\cos \alpha}{s} \frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}%
\sin [ \frac{sx}{a_1}] +O\Big( |s|^{k-2}e^{|t| \frac{x}{a_1}}\Big)
\label{(lol)}\\
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi _{2\lambda}(x)
&= -\cos \alpha \frac{\Delta_{124}}{\Delta_{112}}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}
\cos \big[ \frac{s\xi_1}{a_1} \big]\cos \big[
\frac{s(x-\xi_1)}{a_2} \big]\\
 &\quad +O\Big(|s|^{k-1}e^{|t|
(\frac{\xi_1}{a_1}+\frac{(x-\xi_1)}{a_2})}\Big)
\end{aligned}\label{(lok)}
\\
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\phi _{(i+1)\lambda}(x)\\
&= (-1)^{i}\cos \alpha
s^{i-1}\frac{\Delta_{124}}{\Delta_{112}}
\cos \big[ \frac{s\xi_1}{a_1} \big]
\Big(\prod_{j=2}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{%
\Delta_{j12}a_{j}}\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_{j}-\xi_{j-1})}{a_{j}} \big]\Big)
\\
&\quad \times \frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}
\cos \big[ \frac{s(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}} \big]
+O\Big(|s| ^{i-2} e^{|t|((\sum_{j=1}^{i}\frac{(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j})
+\frac{(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}})}\Big)
\end{aligned} \label{(c4ky)}
\end{gather}
$ i=2,\dots n$  as $| s | \to \infty $, ($k=0,1)$.
Each of this asymptotic equalities hold uniformly for $x$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem} \label{(c1)}
Let $Im s=t$. If $\sin\beta\neq 0$, then
\begin{gather}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi _{(n+1)\lambda}(x)
 = -\sin\beta \frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}
\cos \big[ \frac{s(\pi-x)}{a_{n+1}} \big] +O\Big(
|s| ^{k-1}e^{|t| \frac{(\pi-x)}{a_{n+1}}}\Big)
\label{(c2)} \\
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi _{(n-i)\lambda}(x) \\
&= (-1)^{i+1}\sin\beta s^{i+1} \Big(\prod_{j=0}^{i}
\frac{\Delta_{(n-j)24}}{\Delta_{(n-j)34}a_{n+1-j}}
\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_{n+1-j}-\xi_{n-j})}{\rho_{n+1-j}}
\big]\Big)\\
&\quad \times \frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\cos \big[
\frac{s(x-\xi_{n-i})}{a_{n-i}} \big]+O\Big(|s| ^{i}
e^{|t|((\sum_{j=0}^{i}\frac{(\xi_{n+1-j}-\xi_{n-j})}{a_{n+1-j}})
+\frac{(x-\xi_{n-i})}{a_{n-i}})}\Big),
\end{aligned}\label{(4.n1)}
\end{gather}
for $i=0,1,2,\dots n-1$ as $|s| \to \infty $, while if $\sin\beta=0$,
\begin{gather}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi _{(n+1)\lambda}(x)
= -\frac{a_{n+1}\cos\beta}{s}\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}
\sin \big[ \frac{s(\pi-x)}{a_{n+1}} \big] +O\Big(
|s| ^{k-2}e^{|t|\frac{(\pi-x)}{a_{n+1}}}\Big) \label{(c3)}
\\
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi _{n\lambda}(x)
&= -cos\beta \frac{\Delta_{n24}s}{a_{n+1}\Delta_{n34} }
\cos \big[ \frac{s(\pi-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}} \big]
\cos \big[ \frac{s(x-\xi_n)}{a_n} \big]\\
&\quad + O\Big( |s| ^{k-1}e^{|t|(\frac{(\pi-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}}
+\frac{(x-\xi_n)}{a_n})}\Big)
\end{aligned} \label{(hm)}
\\
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\chi _{(n-i)\lambda}(x) \\
&= (-1)^{i+1}\sin\beta
s^{i+1} \frac{\Delta_{n24}}{a_{n+1}\Delta_{n34}}
\cos \big[\frac{s(\pi-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}} \big]
\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}\cos \big[ \frac{s(x-\xi_{n-i})}{a_{n-i}} \big]\\
&\quad \times \Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}
\frac{\Delta_{(n-j)24}}{\Delta_{(n-j)34}a_{n+1-j}}
\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_{n-1-j}-\xi_{n-j})}{a_{n-j}} \big]\Big)\\
&\quad +O\Big(|s| ^{i-1} e^{|t|((\sum_{j=0}^{i}
\frac{(\xi_{n+1-j}-\xi_{n-j})}{a_{n+1-j}})+\frac{(x-\xi_{n-i})}{a_{n-i}})}\Big)
\end{aligned} \label{(c4)}
\end{gather}
as $|s| \to \infty $  $ i=1,\dots n-1 $
($k=0,1)$. Each of this asymptotic equalities hold uniformly for $x$.
\end{theorem}

\section{Asymptotic behaviour  of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions}

Since the Wronskians of $\phi _{\lambda}(x )$ and
$\chi _{\lambda}(x)$ are independent of $x$ in each
 $\Omega_i$ $(i=0,1,\dots ,n+1)$, in
particular, by putting $x=\pi$ we have
\begin{equation}\label{(ko)}
\begin{aligned}
 \omega(\lambda)
&=  \prod_{j=1}^{n}\frac{\Delta_{j12}}{
\Delta_{j34}}\omega_{n+1}(\lambda )|_{x=\pi}
=\prod_{j=1}^{n}\frac{\Delta_{j12}}{\Delta_{j34}}
\omega(\phi_{n+1}(\pi,\lambda ),\chi_{n+1}(\pi,\lambda)) \\
&=  \prod_{j=1}^{n}\frac{\Delta_{j12}}{ \Delta_{j34}}
\{\cos\beta\phi_{(n+1)}(\pi,\lambda
)-\sin\beta\phi'_{(n+1)}(\pi,\lambda )\}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
 Let  $Im \mu=t$. By substituting \eqref{(c2)} and
\eqref{(c4)} in \eqref{(ko)} we obtain the following asymptotic
representations:

 (i) If $\sin\alpha\neq 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$, then
\begin{equation}\label{(4.15)}
\begin{aligned}
w(\lambda )
&= (-1)^{n+1}\sin\alpha \sin\beta \frac{s^{n+1}}{a_{n+1}}
\Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{%
\Delta_{j34}a_j}\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j} \big]\Big)
\\
&\quad \times\sin \big[ \frac{s(\pi-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}}
\big] +O\Big(|s| ^{n} e^{|t|(\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}\frac{(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j})}\Big),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

(ii) If $\sin\alpha\neq  0$ and $\sin\beta= 0$, then
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
w(\lambda )
&= (-1)^{n}\sin\alpha \cos\beta s^{n}
\Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{\Delta_{j34}a_j}
\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j} \big]\Big)\\
&\quad \times\cos \big[\frac{s( x-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}} \big]
 +O\Big(|s| ^{n-1} e^{|t|\big(\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}\frac{(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j}\Big)}\Big)
\end{aligned} \label{(4.16)}
\end{equation}

(iii) If $\sin\alpha= 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$, then
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&w(\lambda )\\
&= (-1)^{n+2}\sin\beta\cos\alpha \frac{s^{n}}{a_{n+1}}
\frac{\Delta_{124}}{\Delta_{134}} \cos \big[ \frac{s
\xi_1}{a_1} \big]\Big(\prod_{j=2}^{n}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{%
\Delta_{j34}a_j}\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j} \big]\Big)
\\
&\quad  \times\sin \big[ \frac{s(\pi-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}}
\big] +O\Big(|s| ^{n-1} e^{|t|(\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}\frac{(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j})}\Big),
\end{aligned}\label{(4.54)}
\end{equation}

(iv) If $\sin\alpha=0$ and $\sin\beta=0 $, then
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&w(\lambda )\\
&= (-1)^{n}\cos\beta\cos\alpha s^{n-1}\frac{\Delta_{124}}{\Delta_{134}}
\cos \big[ \frac{s\xi_1}{a_1} \big] \Big(\prod_{j=2}^{n}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{%
\Delta_{j34}a_j}\sin  \big[ \frac{s(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j} \big]\Big)
\\
&\quad \times\cos \big[ \frac{s(\pi-\xi_n)}{a_{n+1}}\big]
+O\Big(|s| ^{n-2} e^{|t|\big(\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}\frac{(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})}{a_j}\big)}\Big),
\end{aligned}\label{(4.54p)}
\end{equation}

\begin{corollary} \label{coro2}
The eigenvalues of  problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5}  are bounded
below, and they are countably infinite and can cluster only at
$\infty$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Indeed, putting $s=it(t>0)$ in
\eqref{(4.15)}--\eqref{(4.54p)} it follows that
$\omega(\lambda)\to\infty$ as $t\to\infty$, so
$\omega(\lambda)\neq0$ for $\lambda$ negative and sufficiency large.
\end{proof}

Now we are ready to derived the needed asymptotic formulas for
eigenvalues and  eigenfunctions.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm6}
The boundary-value-transmission problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{5} has
an precisely numerable many real eigenvalues, whose behavior may be
expressed by the sequence $\{ s _k^{(t)}\}$ $(t=1,2,\dots,n+1)$ with the
following asymptotic behavior as $n\to \infty $:

(i)  If $\sin\alpha\neq 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$, then
\begin{equation} \label{(5.1)}
s_k^{(t)}=\frac{a_t\pi k}{(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} +O\big(\frac{1}{k}\big), \quad
 (t=1,2,\dots n+1),
\end{equation}

(ii) If $\sin\alpha\neq  0$ and $\sin\beta= 0$, then
\begin{equation}\label{(5.2)}
s_k^{(n+1)}=(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi}{(\pi-\xi_n)} +O\big(
\frac{1}{k}\big), \quad
s_k^{(t)}=\frac{(k+1)a_t\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
+O\big( \frac{1}{k}\big),
\end{equation}
for $t=1,\dots n$,

(iii) If $\sin\alpha= 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$, then
\begin{equation}\label{(5.3)}
s_k^{(1)}=(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi}{\xi_1}+O\big(
\frac{1}{k}\big), \quad
s_k^{(t)}=\frac{(k+1)a_j\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
+O\big( \frac{1}{k}\big),
\end{equation}
for $t=2,\dots n+1$,

(iv) If $\sin\alpha=0$ and $\sin\beta=0 $, then
\begin{equation} \label{(5.4)}
\begin{gathered}
s_k^{(1)}= (k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi}{\xi_1}+O\big(
\frac{1}{k}\big), \quad
s_k^{(n+1)}=(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi}{(\pi-\xi_n)}
+O\big(\frac{1}{k}\big), \\
s_k^{(t)}= \frac{(k+2)a_t\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
+O\big( \frac{1}{k}\big), \quad (t=2,\dots n),
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $\sin\alpha\neq 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$. By applying the
well-known Rouche Theorem which asserts that if $f(z)$
and $g(z)$ are analytic inside and on a closed contour $\Gamma$,
and $|g(z)| < |f(z)|$ on $\Gamma$ then $f(z)$ and
$f(z) + g(z)$ have the same number zeros inside $\Gamma$ provided that the
zeros are counted with multiplicity on a sufficiently large contour,
it follows that $w(\lambda)$ has the same number of zeros inside the
suitable contour as the leading term
\[
w_0(\lambda)=-\sin\alpha \sin\beta s^{r+5}
\Big(\prod_{j=1}^{r+1}\frac{1}{\rho_{j}}\sin \big[
\frac{s(\xi_{j-1}-\xi_{j})}{\rho_{j}} \big]\Big)
\]
 in \eqref{(4.15)}. Hence, if $\lambda_0 < \lambda_1< \lambda_2 \dots$
 are the zeros of $w(\lambda)$, we have the needed asymptotic
formulas \eqref{(5.1)}. Other cases can be proved similarly.
\end{proof}

Using this asymptotic expressions of eigenvalues we can obtain the
corresponding asymptotic expressions for eigenfunctions of the
problem \eqref{1}--\eqref{4}.
 Recalling that $\phi_{\lambda _n}(x)$ is an eigenfunction
 according to the eigenvalue $\lambda_n,$ and by putting \eqref{(5.1)} in the \eqref{(lo2)}-\eqref{(4.p)} for $k=0,1$
 and denoting the corresponding  eigenfunction as
 $\phi_k^{(t)}(x) \ (t=1,2,\dots n+1)$
we get the following asymptotic representation for the
eigenfunctions if $\sin\alpha\neq 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$, then
\[
\phi_k^{(t)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
\sin\alpha \cos \big[ \frac{a_t\pi k x}{a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
\big]+O(\frac{1}{k}), \quad\text{for } x\in ( a,\xi_1)
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\sin\alpha\big[\frac{a_t\pi k }{(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]^{i}
\Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{
\Delta_{j12}a_j}\sin  \big[ \frac{a_t\pi (\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})k
}{a_j(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]\Big)
\\
\times \cos\big[\frac{a_t\pi k(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]
+O(k^{i-1}),  \\
\quad \text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1}), \; i=1,2,\dots n,
\end{cases}
\]
where $t=1,2,\dots n+1$.
If $\sin\alpha\neq  0$ and $\sin\beta= 0$, then
\[
\phi_k^{(n+1)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
\sin\alpha \cos \big[ (k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi
x}{(\pi-\xi_n)} \big]+O(1), \quad\text{for }  x\in ( a,\xi_1)
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\sin\alpha\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi
x}{(\pi-\xi_n)}  \big]^{i} \\
\times \Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{\Delta_{j12}a_j}
\sin\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}(\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})\pi}{a_j(\pi-\xi_n)}\big]
\Big)\\
\times \cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi\left(
x-\xi_i\right)}{a_{i+1}(\pi-\xi_n)} \big] +O(k^{i-1}),  \\
\quad\text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1})\quad i=1,2,\dots n\,;
\end{cases}
\]
and
\[
\phi_k^{(t)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
\sin\alpha \cos \big[ \frac{a_t\pi (k+1) x}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
\big]+O(\frac{1}{k}), \quad\text{for } x\in ( a,\xi_1),
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\sin\alpha\big[\frac{a_t\pi (k+1) }{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]^{i}\\
\times\Big(\prod_{j=1}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{j24}}{
\Delta_{j12}a_j}\sin  \big[ \frac{a_t\pi (\xi_j-\xi_{j-1})(k+1)
}{2a_j(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]\Big)
\\
\times \cos \big[\frac{a_t\pi (k+1)(x-\xi_i)}{2a_{i+1}(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]
+O(k^{i-1}) \\
\quad\text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1})\quad  i=1,2,\dots n\,,
\end{cases}
\]
where t=1,2,\dots n. If $\sin\alpha= 0$ and $\sin\beta \neq 0$, then
\[
\phi_k^{(1)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
-a_1\cos\alpha\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi}{\xi_1} \big]^{-1}
\sin [(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{\pi x}{\xi_1}] +O(\frac{1}{k^{2}}),
\quad\text{for } x\in ( a,\xi_1)
\\[4pt]
-\cos\alpha\frac{\Delta_{124}}{ \Delta_{112}} \cos
\big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{\pi \xi_1}{\xi_1}\big]
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi(x-\xi_1)}{a_2\xi_1}
\big]+ O(\frac{1}{k})\\
\quad \text{ for }x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2)
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\cos\alpha\big[
(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi}{\xi_1}\big]^{i-1}
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{a_1\pi \xi_1}{a_1\xi_1}\big]
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}\xi_1}\big]\\
\times
\Big(\prod_{j=2}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{(j-1)24}}{%
\Delta_{(j-1)12}a_{j}}\sin \big[ (k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi(
\xi_{j}-\xi_{j-1})}{a_{j}\xi_1} \big]\Big)
 +O(k^{i-2}) \\
\quad\text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1})\quad i=2,\dots n,
\end{cases}
\]
and
\[
\phi_k^{(t)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
-a_1\cos\alpha\big[(k+1)\frac{a_{t}\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]^{-1}
\sin \big[(k+1) \frac{a_{t}\pi x}{2a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
 \big] +O(\frac{1}{k^{2}}) \\
\quad\text{for }x\in ( a,\xi_1),
\\
-\cos\alpha\frac{\Delta_{124}}{ \Delta_{112}}
\cos \big[(k+1)\frac{a_{t}\pi \xi_1}{2a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]
\cos \big[(k+1)\frac{a_{t}\pi(x-\xi_1)}{2a_2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
\big]+ O(\frac{1}{k})\\
\quad \text{for }x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2),
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\cos\alpha\big[
(k+1)\frac{a_{t}\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]^{i-1}
\cos\big[(k+1) \frac{a_{t}\pi \xi_1}{a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]\\
\times\cos\big[(k+1)\frac{a_{t}\pi(x-\xi_i)}{2a_{i+1}(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big] \\
\Big(\prod_{j=2}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{(j-1)24}}{%
\Delta_{(j-1)12}a_{j}}\sin \big[ (k+1)\frac{a_{t}\pi(
\xi_{j}-\xi_{j-1})}{2a_{j}(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]\Big)\\
+O(k^{i-2}) \\
\quad\text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1}),\; i=2,\dots n
\end{cases}
\]
where $t=2,\dots n+1$. If  $\sin\alpha=0$ and $\sin\beta=0 $, then
\[
\phi_k^{(1)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
-a_1\cos\alpha\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi}{\xi_1} \big]^{-1}
\sin [(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{\pi x}{\xi_1}] +O(\frac{1}{k^{2}})\\
\quad\text{for } x\in ( a,\xi_1),
\\
-\cos\alpha\frac{\Delta_{124}}{ \Delta_{112}}
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{\pi \xi_1}{\xi_1}\big]
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi(x-\xi_1)}{a_2\xi_1}
\big]+ O(\frac{1}{k})\\
\quad\text{for }x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2),
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\cos\alpha\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi}{\xi_1}\big]^{i-1}
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{a_1\pi \xi_1}{a_1\xi_1}\big]
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}\xi_1}\big]\\
\times \Big(\prod_{j=2}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{(j-1)24}}{%
\Delta_{(j-1)12}a_{j}}\sin \big[ (k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_1\pi(
\xi_{j}-\xi_{j-1})}{a_{j}\xi_1} \big]\Big)
 +O(k^{i-2}) \\
\quad\text{for }   x\in(\xi_i,\xi_{i+1})\; i=2,\dots n \,;
\end{cases}
\]
\[
\phi_k^{(n+1)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
-a_1\cos\alpha\big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi}{(\pi-\xi_n)} \big]^{-1}
\sin \big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{a_{n+1}\pi x}{a_1(\pi-\xi_n)}
 \big] +O(\frac{1}{k^{2}}) \\
\quad\text{for }x\in ( a,\xi_1),
\\[4pt]
-\cos\alpha\frac{\Delta_{124}}{ \Delta_{112}} \cos
\big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{a_{n+1}\pi
\xi_1}{a_1(\pi-\xi_n)}\big]
\cos \big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi(x-\xi_1)}{a_2(\pi-\xi_n)}
\big]+ O(\frac{1}{k})\\
\quad \text{for }x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2),
\\
(-1)^{i}\cos\alpha\big[
(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi}{(\pi-\xi_n)}\big]^{i-1}
\cos\big[(k+\frac{1}{2}) \frac{a_{n+1}\pi \xi_1}{a_1(\pi-\xi_n)}\big]\\
\times\cos \big[(k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi(x-\xi_i)}{a_{i+1}(\pi-\xi_n)}\big]\\
\times \Big(\prod_{j=2}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{(j-1)24}}{%
\Delta_{(j-1)12}a_{j}}\sin \big[ (k+\frac{1}{2})\frac{a_{n+1}\pi(
\xi_{j}-\xi_{j-1})}{a_{j}(\pi-\xi_n)} \big]\Big)
 \\
+O(k^{i-2}) \\
\quad\text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1}), i=2,\dots n\,;
\end{cases}
\]
and
\[
\phi_k^{(t)}(x)
=\begin{cases}
-a_1\cos\alpha\big[(k+2)\frac{a_{t}\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]^{-1}
\sin \big[(k+2) \frac{a_{t}\pi x}{2a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
 \big] +O(\frac{1}{k^{2}}),\\
\quad\text{for } x\in ( a,\xi_1)
\\
-\cos\alpha\frac{\Delta_{124}}{\Delta_{112}}
\cos \big[(k+2) \frac{a_{t}\pi \xi_1}{2a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]
\cos \big[(k+2)\frac{a_{t}\pi(x-\xi_1)}{2a_2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}
\big]+ O(\frac{1}{k})\\
\quad \text{for }x\in (\xi_1,\xi_2),
\\[4pt]
(-1)^{i}\cos\alpha\big[(k+2)\frac{a_{t}\pi}{2(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]^{i-1}
 \cos\big[(k+2) \frac{a_{t}\pi \xi_1}{2a_1(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]\\
\times\cos\big[(k+2)\frac{2a_{t}\pi(x-\xi_i)}{2a_{i+1}(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})}\big]\\
\Big(\prod_{j=2}^{i}\frac{\Delta_{(j-1)24}}{
\Delta_{(j-1)12}a_{j}}\sin \big[ (k+2)\frac{a_{t}\pi(
\xi_{j}-\xi_{j-1})}{2a_{j}(\xi_{t}-\xi_{t-1})} \big]\Big)
 \\
+O(k^{i-2}) \\
\quad\text{for }  x\in (\xi_i,\xi_{i+1},\; i=2,\dots n \,.
\end{cases}
\]

\subsection*{Conclusion}
The main results  of this study  are derived  under the simple condition
$\Delta_{ijk}>0$. We can show that this condition  cannot be omitted.
Indeed, let us consider the next simple special case of the problem
\eqref{1}--\eqref{5},
\begin{gather}\label{m1}
-y''(x)=\lambda y(x) \quad  x \in [-1, 0)\cup(0,1],\\
\label{m2}
y(-1)=0, \quad  (\lambda-1)y'(-1)+\lambda y(1)=0,\\
\label{m3}
y(0-)=y(0+), \quad y'(0-)=-y'(0+).
\end{gather}
for which the condition $\Delta_{112}>0$ is not valid
($\Delta_{112}<0$). It is well known that the standard
Sturm-liouville problems has infinitely many real eigenvalues. But
it can be shown by direct calculation that the problem
\eqref{m1}--\eqref{m3} has only one eigenvalue $\lambda=1$.


\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{aali} Z. S. Aliyev, N. B. Kerimov;
\emph{Spectral Properties of the Differential Operators of the
Fourth-Order with Eigenvalue Parameter Dependent Boundary
Condition}, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical
Sciences, Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 456517.

\bibitem{ugk} B. P. Allahverdiev, E. U\v{g}urlu;
\emph{ On dilation, scattering and spectraltheory for
two-interval singular di¤erential operators}, Bulletin
Mathématiquede la Société des Sciences Mathématiques de Roumanie,
58(106), No. 4 (2015), 383-392..

\bibitem{ug} B. P. Allahverdiev, E. Bairamov, E. U\v{g}urlu;
\emph{ Eigenparameter depen-dent Sturm-Liouville
problems in boundary conditions with transmission con-ditions}, J.
Math. Anal. Appl. 401(1) (2013), 388-396.

\bibitem{ay}  K. Aydemir, O. Sh. Mukhtarov;
\emph{Second-order differential operators with
interior singularity}, Advances in Difference Equations  (2015)
2015:26 DOI 10.1186/s13662-015-0360-7.


\bibitem{ji} J. Ao, J. Sun, M. Zhang;
\emph{Matrix representations of Sturm-Liouville problems with
transmission conditions}, Comput. Math. Appl., 63 (2012),
1335-1348.

\bibitem{fu} C. T. Fulton;
\emph{Two-point boundary value problems with
eigenvalue parameter contained in the boundary conditions,} Proc.
Roy. Soc. Edin. 77A (1977), 293{-}308.

\bibitem{hira}  F. H{\i}ra,  N. Alt{\i}n{\i}\c{s}{\i}k;
\emph{ Sampling theorems for Sturm-Liouville
problem with moving discontinuity points}, Boundary Value Problems
(2015) 2015:237.

\bibitem{osh3}M. Kandemir;
\emph{Irregular boundary value problems for elliptic
differential-operator equations with discontinuous coefficients and
transmission conditions}, Kuwait J. Sci. Eng. 39 (1A) (2010),71-97.


\bibitem{osh6} M. Kadakal, O. Sh. Mukhtarov;
\emph{ Sturm-Liouville problems with discontinuities at two points},
Computers and Mathematics with Applications 54(2007) 1367{-}1379


\bibitem{kun} L. Kun, Z. Zhaowen;
\emph{ Spectral Properties for Sturm-Liouville Equations with
Transmission Conditions}, Acta Mathematica Scientia,
2015,35A(5):910–926

\bibitem{lev} B. M. Levitan, I. S. Sargsyan;
 \emph{Sturm-Liouville and Dirac Operators}, Springer-Verlag New York, 1991.

\bibitem{lik} A. V. Likov, Yu. A. Mikhailov;
\emph{The theory of Heat and Mass Transfer}, Qosenergaizdat, 1963 (Russian).

\bibitem{mam}  Kh. R. Mamedov, F.A. Cetinkaya;
\emph{Inverse problem for a class of Sturm-Liouville
operator with spectral parameter in boundary condition}, Boundary
Value Problems 2013, 2013:183.

\bibitem{osh2} O. Sh. Mukhtarov,  H. Ol\v{g}ar,  K. Aydemir;
\emph{Resolvent Operator and Spectrum of New Type Boundary Value Problems},
 Filomat, 29:7 , 1671-1680 (2015).

\bibitem{ka} O. Sh. Mukhtarov, M. Kadakal;
\emph{Some spectral properties of one Sturm-Liouville type problem
with discontinuous weight}, Sib. Math. J., Vol. 46 (2005), 681-694.

\bibitem{oks} O. Sh. Mukhtarov,  K. Aydemir;
\emph{New type Sturm-Liouville problems in associated Hilbert spaces},
Journal of Function Spaces and Applications, vol. 2014, Article ID 606815.

\bibitem{oks1} O. Sh. Mukhtarov,  K. Aydemir, H. Ol\v{g}ar;
 \emph{Spectral theory of one perturbed boundary value problem with
interior singularities} IP Conference Proceedings; AIP Conference
Proceedings;  Vol. 1611(2014), p283.

\bibitem{oks2} O. Sh. Mukhtarov,  H. Ol\v{g}ar, K. Aydemir;
\emph{Transmission problems for the Sturm-Liouville equation involving an
abstract linear operator} IP Conference Proceedings;  Vol.
1611 (2014), 325-332.

\bibitem{rasu1} M. L. Rasulov;
\emph{Methods of Contour Integration}, North-Holland Publishing Company,
 Amsterdam, 1967.

\bibitem{ms} M. Shahriari, A. j. Akbarfam, G. Teschl;
\emph{ Uniqueness for inverse Sturm-Liouville problems with a finite number
of transmission conditions}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. Vol. 395(2012),
19-29.

\bibitem{tik} A. N. Tikhonov, A. A. Samarskii;
\emph{Equations of Mathematical Physics},
Oxford and New York, Pergamon, 1963.

\bibitem{titc} E. C. Titchmarsh;
\emph{Eigenfunctions Expansion Associated with Second Order Differential
Equations I}, second edn. Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1962.

\bibitem{tite} I. Titeux, Ya. Yakubov;
\emph{Completeness of root functions for thermal conduction in a
strip with piecewise continuous coefficients}, Math. Models Methods
Appl. Sc., 7(7)(1997), 1035-1050.

\bibitem{ug1} E. U\v{g}urlu, B. P. Allahverdiev;
\emph{On selfadjoint dilation of the dissipative extension
of a direct sum differential operator}, Banach Journal of
Mathematical Analysis, 7(2)(2013), 194-207 .

\bibitem{voito} N. N. Voitovich , B. Z. Katsenelbaum, A. N. Sivov;
\emph{Generalized Method of Eigen-vibration in the theory of
Diffraction}, Nakua, Mockow, 1997 (Russian).

\bibitem{zet1} A. Wang, A. Zettl;
\emph{ Green's Function for Two-Interval Sturm–Liouville problems },
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2013 (2013), No.
76, pp. 1-13.

\bibitem{zet2} A. Wang, J. Sun, A. Zettl;
\emph{Two-interval Sturm–Liouville operators in modified Hilbert
spaces}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 328(2007), 390-399.

\bibitem{zet} A. Zettl;
\emph{Sturm-Liouville Theory}, American Mathematical Society,
Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 121, 2005.

\bibitem{usdn} X. Zhanga, J.Suna;
\emph{The determinants of fourth order dissipative operators with
transmission conditions},
J. Math. Anal. Appl., 410(2014), 55-69.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
