\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 09, pp. 1--7.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2016 Texas State University.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2016/09\hfil Non-local elliptic systems]
{Non-local elliptic systems on the \\ Heisenberg group}

\author[N. Al-Salti, S.  Kerbal \hfil EJDE-2016/09\hfilneg]
{Nasser Al-Salti, Sebti  Kerbal}

\address{Nasser Al-Salti \newline
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, Al-Khodh 123, Muscat, Oman}
\email{nalsalti@squ.edu.om}

\address{Sebti  Kerbal \newline
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, Al-Khodh 123, Muscat, Oman}
\email{skerbal@squ.edu.om}

\thanks{Submitted September 13, 2015. Published January 6, 2016.}
\subjclass[2010]{35R03, 35J60, 35D02}
\keywords{Fractional diffusion operator; nonlinear elliptic systems;
\hfill\break\indent convexity inequality}

\begin{abstract}
 We present Liouville type results for certain systems of nonlinear
 elliptic equations containing fractional powers of the Laplacian
 on the Heisenberg group. Our method of proof is based on the test
 function method and a recent inequality proved by Alsaedi, Ahmad,
 and Kirane, leading to the derivation of sufficient conditions in
 terms of space dimension and systems parameters.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\allowdisplaybreaks

 \section{Introduction} \label{intro}

This article  concerns Liouville type results for two nonlinear systems 
of elliptic equations with nonlocal diffusions posed on the Heisenberg group. 
We  start with the system
\begin{equation}\label{System1}
\begin{gathered}
(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu/2} u  =  | v |^q ,\quad  q>1, \\
(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2} v  = | u |^p ,\quad p>1,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
posed in ${\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}$, and where the fractional power of the 
Laplacian on the Heisenberg group
$(- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\delta/2}$
($0 < \delta < 2$) accounts for anomalous diffusion and is to be defined later.
Using the test function method and
a variant of Cordoba-Cordoba's inequality \cite{CC} for the Heisenberg group 
proved in \cite{AAK}, we find a relation relating $N, \mu, \nu, p$ and $q$ 
leading to Liouville type results.
Let us point out that we overcome a difficulty raised by the test function 
by using the inequality proved in \cite{AAK} for 
$(- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\frac{\mu}{2}}$.
Then we consider the system
\begin{equation}\label{System3}
\begin{gathered}
 (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu_1/2} |u|
  +  (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu_2/2} |v| = |v|^q, \quad q>1,  \\
  (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu_1/2} |v| 
  +  (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu_2/2} |u| = |u|^p, \quad p>1,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where  $0<\mu_{i},\nu_{i}\leq 2$  ($i=1,2$) are constants. 
Here the positivity condition on the solutions is omitted and replaced 
by the absolute value of $u$ and $v$.

\section{Preliminaries}
 For the reader's convenience, let us briefly recall the definition and 
basic properties of the Heisenberg group and the inequality in \cite{AAK}.

\subsection{Heisenberg group}

The Heisenberg group  $\mathbb{H}$, whose points will be denoted by 
$\eta = (x, y, \tau)$, is the Lie group 
$(\mathbb{R}^{2N+1}, \circ)$ with the  non-commutative group operation 
$ \circ$ defined by
\[ 
\eta \circ \tilde \eta =( x + \tilde x, y + \tilde y, 
\tau + \tilde \tau + 2(x\cdot\tilde y -  \tilde x\cdot y)),
\]
where ``$\cdot$'' is the usual inner product in $\mathbb{R}^{N}$. 
The Laplacian $\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}$ over $\mathbb{H}$ is obtained from the 
vector fields
$X_{i}= \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i}} 
+ 2 y_{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial \tau}$ and
$Y_{i}=  \frac{\partial}{\partial y_{i}} - 2 x_{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial \tau} $, 
by
\begin{equation}\label{Lapformula}
\Delta_{\mathbb{H}} = \sum_{i=1}^{N}(X_{i}^{2} + Y_{i}^{2}).
\end{equation}
Explicit computation gives the expression
\begin{equation}\label{explicitexpression}
\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}=  \sum_{i=1}^{N} 
\Big(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{i}^{2}} 
+ \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial y_{i}^{2}}
 +4 y_{i}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{i}\partial \tau}
- 4 x_{i}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial y_{i}\partial \tau} 
+ 4 (x_{i}^{2}+ y_{i}^{2}) \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \tau^{2}} \Big).
\end{equation}
A natural group of dilations on $\mathbb{H}$ is given by
\[ 
\delta_{\lambda}(\eta)=(\lambda x,\lambda y,\lambda ^{2} \tau), \quad \lambda >0,
\]
whose Jacobian determinant is $\lambda^{Q}$, where
\begin{equation}\label{dimenssion}
Q=2N+2
\end{equation}
is the homogeneous dimension of $\mathbb{H}$.

 The operator $\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}$ is a degenerate elliptic operator. 
It is invariant with respect to the left translation of $\mathbb{H}$ 
and homogeneous with respect to the dilations
$\delta_{\lambda}$. More precisely, we have
\begin{equation}\label{dilation}
\begin{gathered}
\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}(u ( \eta \circ \tilde \eta))
 = (\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}u)(\eta \circ \tilde \eta),\\ 
\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}(u  \circ \delta_{\lambda})
 = \lambda^{2}(\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}u  ) \circ \delta_{\lambda}, 
 \quad \eta, \tilde \eta \in \mathbb{H}.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
The natural distance from $\eta $ to the origin is
\begin{equation}\label{distance}
| \eta |_{\mathbb{H}}= \Big( \tau^{2} + \Big(\sum_{i=1}^{N} 
(x_{i}^{2}+ y_{i}^{2})\Big)^{2}  \Big)^{1/4}.
\end{equation}

\subsection{Fractional powers of sub-elliptic Laplacians}

The representation of the fractional power of $ (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{s} $ 
is given by the following theorem.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm2.1}
The operator $\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}$ is a positive self-adjoint operator
 with domain $W_{\mathbb{H}}^{2,2}(\mathbb{H})$. Denote now by $\{E(\lambda)\}$ 
the spectral resolution of $\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}$ in $L^{2}(\mathbb{H})$.
If $\alpha>0$, then
$$
(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\alpha/2}
=\int_0^{+\infty}\lambda^{\alpha/2}\,dE(\lambda),
$$
with domain
$$
W_{\mathbb{H}}^{\alpha,2}(\mathbb{H}):=\{v\in L^{2}(\mathbb{H}); 
\int_0^{+\infty}\lambda^{\alpha}\,d\langle E(\lambda)v,v\rangle  <\infty\},$$
endowed with graph norm.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proposition}[\cite{AAK}] \label{Prop1}
 Assume that the function $\varphi \in C^{\infty}_0({\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1})$. Then
\begin{equation}\label{AAKinequality}
\sigma \varphi^{\sigma-1} (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\sigma/2}\varphi
\geq (- \Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\sigma/2}\varphi^{\sigma}
\end{equation}
holds point-wise.
\end{proposition}

A proof of the above proposition can be found in \cite{AAK}.

\section{Main results}

The definition of solutions we adopt for system \eqref{System1} is as follows.

\begin{definition}  \label{DefSol} \rm
We say that the pair $(u,v)$ is a weak solution of \eqref{System1}, if
\begin{gather}
 (u,v)\in L^p_{\rm loc}({\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1})
 \times L^q_{\rm loc}({\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}), \nonumber \\
\label{weaksoleqn1}
 \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} u   {(-\Delta)^{\mu/2} \psi}\,d x
= \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  | v |^q \psi \,d x , \\
\label{weaksoleqn2}
 \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  v   {(-\Delta)^{\nu/2} \psi} \,d x
= \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  | u |^p \psi \,d x ,
\end{gather}
for any nonnegative test function $ \psi \in
\mathcal{C}^{\infty}_0 ({\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1})$.
\end{definition}

 Before we present our results, let us mention some important works 
on Liouville type theorems for the classical  nonlinear elliptic equations/systems 
on the Heisenberg group.
 V\'{e}ron and Pohozaev \cite{VP} improved the study of 
 Birindelli, Capuzzo Dolcetta and Cutri \cite{BirCapCut} concerning the equation
\begin{equation}\label{BirCapCutinequality}
 \Delta_{\mathbb{H}}(a u) +  | u|^p\leq  0
\end{equation}
with a bounded function $a$ and $1<p $; they proved that 
\eqref{BirCapCutinequality} admits  only trivial solution whenever 
$ 1< p\leq  \frac{Q}{Q-2}$. Their work has been improved recently 
by Xu \cite{Xu} who proved that $u\equiv 0$ provided 
$ 1< p< \frac{Q(Q+2)}{(Q-1)^{2}}$.

For nonlinear equations we refer to the paper of  Garofalo and 
Lanconelli \cite{GarLan} as well as the one of  Uguzzoni \cite{Ugu}.
 Recently, Quas and Xi \cite{QuaXia}  emphasis that, the condition  
$1<p,q\leq \frac{N}{N-\alpha}$ covered by  Dahmani-Karami-Kerbal 
\cite[theorem 2]{DaKaKe} was not considered in  \cite[Theorem 1.3]{QuaXia}.
 Here, we are considering the first system  \ref{System1} for fractional
 Laplacian operators on Heisenberg Group, while in \cite{QuaXia} and \cite{DaKaKe}
the authors  treated the system in $ {\mathbb{R}}^{N}$ for classical 
Laplacian with the same fractional exponents and classical Laplacian 
with different fractional exponents respectively.
The main result  for system \eqref{System1} is
as follows.

\begin{theorem} \label{tabs0}
Let ${ (u,v)}$ be a weak solution of system \eqref{System1}. 
If $Q$, the homogeneous dimension of $\mathbb{H}$, satisfies the inequality
 \begin{equation}\label{hyp1}
  Q < \big(\frac{pq}{pq-1}\big)\max 
\big\{\frac{\nu}{p}+\mu , \frac{\mu}{q}+\nu \big\},
  \end{equation}
then $(u,v)$ is trivial.
   \end{theorem}

Our second main results concerns system \eqref{System3}.

\begin{theorem}\label{tabsS30}
Let ${ (u,v)}$ be a weak solution to system \eqref{System3}. If
 \begin{equation}\label{hypS31}
  Q <\max \big\{ \gamma , \theta \big\}
  \end{equation}
where
\begin{gather*}
\gamma= \min \Big\{ \frac{\nu_{2}p}{p-1},  \nu_{1}+
  \frac{\mu_{2}}{q-1},  (\frac{\mu_{1}}{q}+\nu_{1}) \frac{pq}{pq-1}\Big\}, \\
\theta=  \min \Big\{ \frac{\mu_{2}q}{q-1},  \mu_{1}+
  \frac{\nu_{2}}{p-1},  (\frac{\nu_{1}}{p}+\mu_{1}) \frac{pq}{pq-1}\Big\},
\end{gather*}
then $(u,v)$ is trivial.
\end{theorem}

\section{Proofs of main results}

 Note that for a function 
$\psi\in\mathcal{C}^{\infty}_0 ({\mathbb{R}}^N),  { \delta \in (0,2]}$ and 
$\beta>p' $ (${(\beta-1)p'-\beta \frac{p'}{p}>0})$ we have
$$
     \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  \psi^{(\beta-1)p'-\beta \frac{p'}{p}}
  |{(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\delta/2} \psi}|^{p'} \,d \eta =
\int_{K}  \psi^{(\beta-1)p'-\beta \frac{p'}{p}}
  |{(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\delta/2} \psi}|^{p'} \,d \eta <\infty,\\
$$
where $K:= \operatorname{supp}(\psi) $ stands for support of $\psi$, 
 and  $p+p'=pp'$.
For the proof of our main results, we consider a cut-off function
 $\varphi\in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}_0 ({\mathbb{R}})$  such that
$0 \leq \varphi \leq 1$, $|\varphi'(r)| \leq \frac{C}{r}$,  and for any $r > 0 $,
\[
\varphi(r)=\begin{cases}
 1  & \text{if }   r\leq 1,\\
 0  & \text{if }   r\geq 2.
\end{cases}
\]

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{tabs0}]
From \eqref{weaksoleqn1} and \eqref{weaksoleqn2} we have
\begin{gather*}
 \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} u   {(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu/2} \psi^{\beta}} d \eta
= \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  | v |^q \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta , \\ 
 \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  v   {(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2} \psi^{\beta}} d \eta
= \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta ,
\end{gather*} 
for any  nonnegative test function  
$ \psi^{\beta}   \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}_0 ({\mathbb{R}}^{N})$ with 
$\beta >\max{(p',q')}$.

 Using the convexity inequality in Proposition \ref{Prop1} and 
the H\"older inequality, we estimate the
first integral over $K$ as follows,
\begin{align*}
&\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} u   (-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu/2} \psi^{\beta}
\,d \eta \\
&\leq  \beta \int_{K} u  \psi^{\beta/p} \psi^{-\beta/p}  \psi^{\beta-1}
  {(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu/2} \psi}   \,d \eta\\
& \leq  \beta    \Big(\int_{K}| u |^p \psi^{\beta}
\,d \eta \Big)^{1/p}
 \Big(\int_{K}  \psi^{(\beta-1)p'-\beta \frac{p'}{p}}    
|{(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu/2} \psi}|^{p'}   \,d \eta \Big)^{1/p'},
\end{align*}
where $K:= \operatorname{supp}( \psi)$ and ${{p+p'=pp'}}$.

Similarly, we obtain the estimate for the second integral
\begin{align*}
&\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}  v  {(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2}
\psi^{\beta}} \,d \eta \\
&\leq \beta \int_{K} v  \psi^{\beta/q} \psi^{-\beta/q}    \psi^{\beta-1}
   {(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2} \psi}
  \,d \eta \\
&\leq \beta \Big(\int_{K}| v |^q \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta \Big)^{1/q}
 \Big(\int_{K}  \psi^{(\beta-1)q'-\beta \frac{q'}{q}}
   |{(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2} \psi}|^{q'} \,d \eta \Big)^{1/q'},
\end{align*}
where  $q+q'=qq'$.
 If we set
$$   
\mathcal{A}( r,  \delta) :=  \Big(\int_{K}
  \psi^{(\beta-1)r'-\beta \frac{r'}{r}}  |{(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})
^{\delta/2} \psi}|^{r'} \,d \eta \Big)^{1/r'},
$$
then we can write
\begin{gather}\label{Ineg1}
 \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta}  d \eta
  \leq  \beta \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu) \Big(  \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q
   \psi^{\beta}  d\eta  \Big)^{1/q}, \\
\label{Ineg2}
\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta}  d\eta
\leq \beta\mathcal{A}( p,  \mu) \Big( \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p
 \psi^{\beta}  d\eta \Big)^{1/p}. 
\end{gather}
Therefore,
\begin{equation}\label{Ineg3}
\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta \Big)^{1/q}
   \leq \beta^{1/q}\Big( \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta \Big)^{1/pq}
    \Big( \mathcal{A}( p,  \mu)  \Big)^{1/q}.
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{Ineg1} and \eqref{Ineg3}, we obtain
$$
   \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta    
\leq  \beta^{1+ 1/q}\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p 
 \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta  \Big)^{1/pq}
    \Big( \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu)  \Big)  \Big( \mathcal{A}
( p,  \mu)  \Big)^{1/q},
$$
and consequently,
$$ 
\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta
 \Big)^{1- 1/(pq)}   \leq \beta^{1+ 1/q} \Big( \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu)  \Big)
  \Big( \mathcal{A}( p,  \mu) \Big)^{1/q}. 
$$
Similarly, we obtain
$$   
 \Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta}\,d \eta
  \Big)^{1- 1/(pq)}    \leq \beta^{1+ 1/p}\Big( \mathcal{A}( p,  \mu) \Big)
   \Big( \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu)  \Big)^{1/p}. 
$$
Now, we take 
\[
\psi(\eta)=\varphi\Big( \frac{\tau^{2}+|x|^{4}+|y|^{4}}{R^{4}}\Big),
\]
  and change  variables from $\eta=(x,y,\tau)$
  to $\tilde \eta=( \tilde x , \tilde y  , \tilde\tau) $ as follows:
  $$ 
\tau=R^{2}\tilde \tau,\quad x=R\tilde x, \quad y=R\tilde y.
$$
 Using
 $$
{|(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2} \psi|}^{p'}
=R^{-p'\mu} {|(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\nu/2}\varphi( \tilde{\eta})|}^{p'}
$$
    and  $d\eta=R^{Q} d\tilde\eta$, we obtain
 \begin{equation}\label{Ineg3A}
    \mathcal{A}( p,  \mu)\leq C R^{-\mu +\frac{Q}{p'}}
  \end{equation}
where
\begin{gather*}  
C= \beta^{1+ 1/p} \Big(\int_{\Omega}
  \varphi^{(\beta-1)p'-\beta \frac{p'}{p}}  |{(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu/2} 
\varphi}|^{p'} \,d \tilde{\eta} \Big)^{1/p'}, \\
\Omega=\Big\{(\tilde x,\tilde y,\tilde\tau)\in{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}:
{\tilde\tau}^{2}+|\tilde x|^{4}+|\tilde y|^{4}\leq 2 \Big\}.
\end{gather*}
So, we have
\begin{gather*}
\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta}
 \,d \eta  \Big)^{1- 1/(pq)}   \leq \; CR^{{\theta}_{1}}, 
\\
\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta}
  \,d \eta  \Big)^{1- 1/(pq)}   \leq \; C R^{{\theta}_{2}}, 
\end{gather*}
where
\begin{gather*}
 {\theta}_{1}  =(-\mu p' +Q)\frac{1}{p'q} 
+(-\nu q'+Q)\frac{1}{q'}, \\
  {\theta}_{2}  =(-\nu q' +Q)\frac{1}{pq'}
+(-\mu p'+Q)\frac{1}{p'} .
\end{gather*}

Now, using \eqref{hyp1}, we can see that if
\[
{\theta}_{1} <  0\quad \Longleftrightarrow\quad 
Q< (\frac{pq}{pq-1})(\frac{\mu}{q}+\nu)
\]
or
\[   {\theta}_{2} < 0\quad \Longleftrightarrow\quad
 Q< (\frac{pq}{pq-1})(\frac{\nu}{p}+\mu);
\]
that is,
\[
Q < (\frac{pq}{pq-1})\max \Big\{\frac{\nu}{p}+\mu , 
\frac{\mu}{q}+\nu \Big\},
\]
then, we have 
$$  
\lim_{R \to \infty}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}
| u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d \eta =\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}
| u |^p\,d \eta=0 
$$ 
or 
$$
\lim_{R \to \infty}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta}
\,d \eta =\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}}
| v |^q\,d \eta=0;
$$
 therefore  $ (u,v) \equiv (0,0)$. This completes the proof.
 \end{proof}

In the case of a single equation
$$
 { (-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}})^{\mu /2}   u  = | u |^p, \quad  u \geq 0 \quad 
\text{in } \mathbb{R}}^{N} 
$$
using the scaled variables as in the proof of Theorem \ref{tabs0}, 
one can verify that if $ 1< p<  \frac{Q}{Q-\mu}$ then the solution is trivial.

\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{tabsS30}]
 Let $(u,v)$ be a weak solution of  system \eqref{System3}. 
Following the same method as in the proof of
Theorem \ref{tabs0} for system \eqref{System1}, one obtains
$$     
\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta
  \leq  \beta \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu_1) \Big(  \int_{K} | v |^q
   \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta \Big)^{1/q}   +\beta \mathcal{A}( p,  \nu_2)
    \Big(  \int_{K} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta \Big)^{1/p}, 
$$
and
$$  
\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta
\leq \beta\mathcal{A}( p,  \mu_1) \Big( \int_{K} | u |^p
 \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta \Big)^{1/p}+ \beta\mathcal{A}( q,  \mu_2)
 \Big( \int_{K} | v |^q \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta\Big)^{1/q}.
$$
Similarly, we have
\begin{align*}
 \Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,d\eta\Big)^{pq} 
& \leq C
 \Big\{\Big(\mathcal{A}( p,  \nu_2)\Big)^{\frac{pq}{p-1}} +
\Big(\mathcal{A}( q,  \nu_1)\Big)^q
\Big(\mathcal{A}( q,  \mu_2)\Big)^{\frac{q}{q-1}}\\
 &\quad +\Big(\big( \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu_1) \big)^q
\mathcal{A}_{{\beta}}( p,  \mu_1)\Big)^{\frac{pq}{pq-1}}\Big\},
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
    \Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta} \,dx\Big)^{pq}
 &   \leq C
 \Big\{\Big(\mathcal{A}( q,  \mu_2)\Big)^{\frac{pq}{q-1}} +
\Big(\mathcal{A}( p,  \mu_1)\Big)^p
\Big(\mathcal{A}( p,  \nu_2)\Big)^{\frac{p}{p-1}}\\
&\quad + \Big(\big( \mathcal{A}( p,  \mu_1)\big)^p
  \mathcal{A}( q,  \nu_1)\Big)^{\frac{pq}{pq-1}} \Big\}.
\end{align*}
Also, using the arguments of the previous theorem, we obtain
$$  
\Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | u |^p \psi^{\beta} \,dx\Big)^{pq}  
\leq C ( R^{\gamma'_{1}}  +R^{\gamma'_{2}}+R^{\gamma'_{3}}), 
$$
 where
\begin{gather*}
{ \gamma'_1 } = { \big(-\nu_2   +  \frac{Q}{p'} \big) \frac{pq}{p-1}}, \\ 
{ \gamma'_2 } = { \big(-\nu_1   +  \frac{Q}{q'}\big)q  
+\big( -\mu_2   +  \frac{Q}{q'}\big)\frac{q}{q-1}}, \\ 
{ \gamma'_3 } = { \Big(\big(-\nu_1   +  \frac{Q}{q'}\big)q 
 + \big( -\mu_1  +  \frac{Q}{p'}\big)\Big)\frac{pq}{pq-1}}, \\
 \Big(\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^{2N+1}} | v |^q \psi^{\beta}
 \,d\eta\Big)^{pq}  \leq C ( R^{\theta'_{1}}
 +R^{\theta'_{2}}+R^{\theta'_{3}}),  
\end{gather*}
where
\begin{gather*}
 {\theta'_1}  = { (-\mu_2   +  \frac{Q}{q'} ) \frac{pq}{q-1}}, \\ 
 {\theta'_2} = {(-\mu_1   + \frac{Q}{p'})p  +( -\nu_2
 +  \frac{Q}{p'})\frac{p}{p-1}}, \\ 
 {\theta'_3}  = \Big((-\mu_1  
 + \frac{Q}{p'})p  +( -\nu_1   + \frac{Q}{q'})\Big)\frac{pq}{pq-1}.
\end{gather*}
Taking either $\max(\gamma'_{1}, \gamma'_{2}, \gamma'_{3}) < 0$ or
$ \max( \theta'_{1},  \theta'_{2},  \theta'_{3}) <0$,
 and using the same arguments as in the previous proofs one can show 
that $u =v=0$.
\end{proof}

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
 Authors acknowledge financial support from The Research Council (TRC), 
Oman. This work is funded by TRC under the research agreement 
no. ORG/SQU/CBS/13/030.

  \begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{AAK} A. Alsaedi, B. Ahmad, M. Kirane; 
\emph{Nonexistence of global solutions of nonlinear space-fractional 
equations on the Heisenberg group}, Electronic Journal of Differential 
Equations, 2015, 227,2015, 1-10.

\bibitem{BirCapCut} I. Birindelli, I. Capuzzo Dolcetta, A. Cutri; 
\emph{Liouville theorems for semilinear equations on the Heisenberg group}, 
Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare, 14, 1997, 295-308.

\bibitem{CC} A. C\'{o}rdoba, D. C\'{o}rdoba; 
\emph{A maximum principle applied to quasi-geostrophic equations}, 
Comunn. Math. Phys. 249, 2004, 511-528.

\bibitem{DaKaKe}Z. Dahmani, F. Karami, S. Kerbal;
\emph{Nonexistence of positive solutions to nonlinear nonlocal elliptic systems}, 
J. Math. Anal. Appl., 346, 2008, 22-29.

\bibitem{GarLan} N. Garofalo, E. Lanconelli;
\emph{Existence and nonexistence results for semilinear equations on the 
Heisenberg group}, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 41, 1992, 71-98.

\bibitem{KiQua} M. Kirane, M. Qafsaoui;
\emph{Global nonexistence for the Cauchy problem of some nonlinear 
reaction-diffusion systems}, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 268, 2002, 217-243.

 \bibitem{QuaXia} A. Quaas, A. Xia; 
\emph{Liouville type theorems for nonlinear elliptic equations and
systems involving fractional Laplacian in the half space}, 
Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 526, 2014, 1-19.

 \bibitem{Ugu} F. Uguzzoni; 
\emph{A non-existence theorem for a semilinear Dirichlet problem involving 
critical exponent on halfspaces of the Heisenberg group}, 
Nonlinear differ. equ. appl., 6, 1999, 191-206.

\bibitem{VP} L. V\'{e}ron, S. I. Pohozaev; 
\emph{Nonexistence results of solutions of semilinear differential 
inequalities on the Heisenberg group}, Manuscripta Math., 102, 2000, 85-99.

\bibitem{Xu} L. Xu; 
\emph{Semi-linear Liouville theorems in the Heisenberg group via vector
 field methods}, Journal of Differential Equations, 247, 2009, 2799-2820.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}

