\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2015 (2015), No. 137, pp. 1--14.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2015 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2015/137\hfil
 Unilateral problems for the Klein-Gordon operator]
{Unilateral problems for the Klein-Gordon operator with nonlinearity of \\
 Kirchhoff-Carrier type}

\author[C. Raposo, D. Pereira, G. Araujo, A. Baena \hfil EJDE-2015/137\hfilneg]
{Carlos Raposo, Ducival Pereira, Geraldo Araujo, Antonio Baena}

\address{Carlos Raposo \newline
Department of Mathematics, Federal University of S\~ao Jo\~ao Del-Rei\\
S\~ao Jo\~ao Del-Rei - MG 36307-352, Brazil}
\email{raposo@ufsj.edu.br}

\address{Ducival Pereira \newline
Department of Mathematics, State University of Par\'a\\
Bel\'em - PA 66113-200, Brazil}
\email{ducival@oi.com.br}

\address{Geraldo Araujo \newline
Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Par\'{a}\\
Bel\'em - PA 66075-110, Brazil}
\email{gera@ufpa.br}

\address{Antonio Baena \newline
Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Par\'{a}\\
Bel\'em - PA 66075-110, Brazil}
\email{baena@ufpa.br}

\thanks{Submitted July 29, 2014. Published May 20, 2015.}
\subjclass[2010]{35K60, 35F30}
\keywords{Unilateral problem; Kirchhoff-Carrier; Klein-Gordon equation;
\hfill\break\indent weak solution; uniqueness of solutions}

\begin{abstract}
  This work concerns the unilateral problem for the Klein-Gordon operator
  $$
  \mathbb{L}=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}-M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u+M_1(|u|^2)u-f.
  $$
  Using an appropriate penalization, we obtain a variational inequality for a
  perturbed equation, and then show the existence and uniqueness of solutions.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\allowdisplaybreaks


\section{Introduction}

The one-dimensional nonlinear equation of motion of an elastic string of the
length $L$ \eqref{eq01} was proposed by Kirchhoff \cite{kirch}, in connection
with some problems in nonlinear elasticity, and  later rediscovered by
Carrier \cite{car},
\begin{equation}
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}-\Big(\frac{\tau_0}{m}+\frac{k}{2mL}
\int_0^L\big(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\big)^2dx\Big)
\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}=0,
\label{eq01}
\end{equation}
where $\tau_0$ is the initial tension, $m$ the mass of the string and $k$
the Young's modulus of the material of the string.
This model describes small vibrations of a stretched string when only
the transverse component of the tension is considered, and for mathematical
aspects of \eqref{eq01} see Bernstein \cite{bern} and Dickey \cite{dickey}.

Model \eqref{eq01} is a generalization of the linearized  problem
$$
\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial t^2}-\frac{\tau_0}{m}
\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}=0,
$$
obtained by d'Alembert  and Euler. A particular case of \eqref{eq01} can
 be written, in general, as
\begin{equation}
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}-M\Big(\int_\Omega|\nabla u(x,t)|^2dx\Big)
\Delta u=0,
\label{eq02}
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}+M\left(\|u(t)\|^2\right)Au=0,
\label{eq03}
\end{equation}
in  operator notation, where we consider the Hilbert spaces
 $V\hookrightarrow H\hookrightarrow V'$, where $V'$ is the dual of
 $V$ with the immersions continuous and dense. By $\|\cdot\|$
 we denote the norm in $V$ and $A:V\to V'$ a bounded linear operator.

Problem \eqref{eq03} is called nonlocal because of the presence of the term
$$
M(\|u(t)\|^2)=M\Big(\int_\Omega|\nabla u(x,t)|^2dx\Big),
$$
which implies that the equation is no longer a pointwise identity.
The nonlocal term  provokes some mathematical
difficulties which makes the study of such a problem particulary interesting.
On this subject, see a interesting work of Arosio-Panizzi \cite{Arosio},
where was proved that  \eqref{eq03} is well-posedness in
the Hadamard sense (existence, uniqueness and continuous dependence of the
local solution upon the initial data) in Sobolev spaces.

Nonlocal initial boundary value problems are
important from the point of view of their practical application to modeling
and investigation of various phenomena. For the last several decades,
various types of equations have been employed as some
mathematical model describing physical, chemical, biological and ecological systems.
See for example the nonlocal reaction-diffusion system given in Raposo
et all \cite{Raposo}.

When we assume that $M : [0,\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ real function,
$M(\lambda)\geq m_0>0$, $M\in C^1(0,\infty)$,  Pohozhaev \cite{pohozhaev}
proved that the mixed problem for \eqref{eq02} has global solution in $t$
when the initial data $u(x,0), u_t(x,0)$ are restricted the class of
functions called Pohozhaev's Class. This result can also be found in
Lions \cite{lions} to the operator given in \eqref{eq03}, that was also
analyzed by Arosio-Spagnolo \cite{aro} and Hazoya-Yamada \cite{hazoya}
when $M(\lambda)\geq0$ and many other authors, for example, Arosio-Espagnolo
\cite{aro}, Dickey \cite{dickey}, Hazoya-Yamada \cite{hazoya}
and Medeiros-L\'{i}maco-Menezes \cite{medeiros}.

Let $\Omega $  be a bounded and open set of $\mathbb{R}^n$, with smooth boundary
$\Gamma$, and let $T$ be a positive real number.
Let $ Q =\Omega \times ]0, T[ $ be the cylinder with lateral
boundary $\Sigma = \Gamma \times ]0, T[$.
A  unilateral mixed problem associated with a nonlinear perturbation
 \begin{gather*}
 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}-M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u
 + \theta \geq f, \quad\text{in } Q,\\
 \theta_t - \Delta \theta + u' \geq g,\quad \text{in } Q, \\
 u = \theta = 0  \quad \text{in } \Sigma, \\
 u(0) = u_0; \quad u_t(0) = u_1; \quad \theta(0) =\theta_0,
\end{gather*}
where $f, g, M$ are given real-valued functions with M positive,
was studied by Clark-Lima in \cite{clark}, where was proved
existence  and  uniqueness of solution.

In this subject,  we consider $\Omega$ a bounded open set of $\mathbb{R}^n$.
A nonlinear perturbation of the problem \eqref{eq03}, is given by
$$
\rho \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}+M(\|u(t)\|^2)Au \geq f,
$$
where $\rho : \overline{\Omega}\times (0,T) \to \mathbb{R}$ and
$f : \Omega \times (0,T) \to \mathbb{R}$ are real functions.
The unilateral problem associated with this nonlinear perturbation was
 studied in Frota-Lar'kin \cite{cicero} without geometrical restrictions
 and $\rho$ a positive function.

In the case  where $\rho$ is a constant function equal to one,
Medeiros-Milla \cite{MedeirosM} proved the local existence and
 uniqueness theorem in non-degenerated  case.
 Lar'kin-Medeiros \cite{LarkinM}  under condition $ M(\lambda) \geq  m_0 > 0$
for all $ \lambda \geq 0$ under $ \Omega$ being a square
 $(0,1)\times(0,1) \subset \mathbb{R}^2$, showed the existence and
uniqueness of a global solution theorem.

Unilateral problem is very interesting too, because in general, dynamic
contact problems are characterized by nonlinear hyperbolic variational inequalities.
 For contact problem in elasticity and finite element method see
Kikuchi-Oden \cite{kikuchi} and reference there in. For Contact Problem
 Viscoelastic Materials see Rivera-Oquendo \cite{rivera}.
For dynamic contact problems with friction, for example problems involving
unilateral contact with dry friction of Coulomb,
 see Ballard-Basseville \cite{Coulomb}.

For $\Omega $  be a bounded and open set of $\mathbb{R}^n$, with smooth
boundary $\Gamma$, consider the Cauchy problem associated with the
Klein-Gordon operator
\[
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}-M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u+M_1(|u|^2)u = f,
\]
with initial data
\begin{equation} \label{g1}
\begin{gathered}
u(t) = u_0 \in  H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega) \\
u'(t) = u_1 \in   H_0^1(\Omega), \\
u=0 \quad \text{on } \Gamma,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
and $f \in L^2( 0,T; H_0^1(\Omega))$,
where
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
M, M_1\in C^1([0,\infty);\mathbb{R}), \\
M(s)\geq m_0>0,\quad \forall s\in[0,\infty), \\
M_1(s)\geq m_1>0,\quad \forall s\in[0,\infty).
\end{gathered}  \label{g2}
\end{equation}
For the problem above, the existence and uniqueness of solution was
proved in \cite{lima} where the abstract model was considered.

Motivated by the problem \eqref{g1}-\eqref{g2} this work deals with
a unilateral problem associated with the perturbed operator type
 Klein-Gordon
$$
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}-M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u+M_1(|u|^2)u \geq f.
$$
More precisely, here we study a unilateral problem,
i.e. a variational inequality, see Lions \cite{lions}, for the operator
$\mathbb{L}$ under standard hypothesis on $f, f', u_0$ and $u_1$.
Making use of the penalty method and Galerkin's approximations, we prove
the existence and uniqueness of solution.

This work is organized as follows. In the section 2 we introduce the
notation and functional spaces, we use the classical theory of Sobolev
 spaces as in Adams \cite{adams}. In the section 3 we present the main Theorem.
In the section 4 prove the theorem of existence of solution and finally
in the section 5 we prove the uniqueness of solution.

\section{Notation and functional spaces}

 Let $T>0$ be a real number, $\Omega$ a bounded open set of $\mathbb{R}^n$
with boundary $\Gamma$  regular and the cylinder $Q=\Omega\times]0,T[$
with lateral boundary $\Sigma=\Gamma\times]0,T[$.

We propose the variational inequality
\begin{equation}
u''-M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u+M_1(|u|^2)u\geq f \quad \text{in } Q.
\label{eq1}
\end{equation}
This  inequality is satisfied by the unknown; that is, we
 formulate our problem as follows.
Let $K=\{v\in L^2(\Omega); v\geq0\text{ a. e. in }\Omega\}$
be a closed and convex subset of
$H_0^1(\Omega)\cap L^2(\Omega)$,
the variational problem consists in find the solution  $u =u(x,t)$ satisfying
$$
\int_{Q}( u''-M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u+M_1(|u|^2)u - f)\,(v- u')\, dx\,dt \geq 0,
\quad  \forall v \in K,
$$
with $ u'(x,t) \in K$, a. e. on $[0,T]$
and taking the  initial and boundary values
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
u=0 \text{ on }\Sigma,\\
u'=0 \text{ on }\Sigma,\\
u(x,0)=u_0(x), u'(x,0)=u_1(x) \quad \text{in }\Omega.
\end{gathered} \label{eq1.1}
\end{equation}
To study the existence an uniqueness of solutions for the Problem
\eqref{eq1}-\eqref{eq1.1}, we consider the following hypothesis
\begin{itemize}

\item[(H1)] $M, M_1\in C^1([0,\infty);\mathbb{R})$,

\item[(H2)] $ M(s)\geq m_0>0$ for all $s\in[0,\infty)$,

\item[(H3)] $M_1(s)\geq m_1>0$ for all $s\in[0,\infty)$.
\end{itemize}

The notation for the functional spaces are contained in Lions
\cite{lions}. We denote the inner product and norm in
$H_0^1(\Omega)$  and $L^2(\Omega)$ , respectively, by
\begin{gather*}
((u,v))=\sum^{n}_{i=1}\int_{\Omega}
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i}(x)\frac{\partial v}{\partial
x_i}(x)\, dx,\quad
\|u\|^2=\sum^{n}_{i=1}\int_{\Omega}\big(\frac{\partial
u} {\partial x_i}(x)\big)^2 dx,
\\
(u,v)_=\int_{\Omega}{u(x)v(x)}\,dx, \quad
|u|^2=\int_{\Omega}{|u(x)|}^2\,dx.
\end{gather*}
We introduce the  bilinear form
\begin{equation}
 a(u,v)=\sum_{i=1}^n\int_{\Omega}\frac{\partial
u}{\partial x_i}(x)\frac{\partial v}{\partial
x_i}(x)\,dx=((u,v))\quad \forall v\in H_0^1(\Omega).\label{eq1.2}
\end{equation}
By $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$ we denote the duality  $V$ and $V'$,
 where $V'$ is the topological dual of the space $V$.


\section{Existence and uniqueness of weak solution}

For the rest of this article,  $C$  denotes various positive constants.
 Next,  we present the main results of this paper.

\begin{theorem} \label{teo1}
If
\begin{gather}
 f\in L^2(0,T;H_0^1(\Omega)),\quad f'\in L^2(0,T;L^2(\Omega)),\label{eq2}\\
 u_0\in H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega), \quad u_1\in H_0^1(\Omega)\cap K,\label{eq3}
\end{gather}
and hypothesis {\rm (H1)--(H3)} hold, then there exists
$T_0<T$ and a unique function $u$ such that
\begin{gather}
u\in L^{\infty}(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)),\label{eq4}\\
u'\in L^{\infty}(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)), \quad u'(t) \in K\;
 \forall t\in[0,T],\label{eq5}\\
u'' \in L^{\infty}(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)),\label{eq6}
\end{gather}
satisfying
\begin{gather}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^T(u'',v-u')dt+\int_0^Ta\left(M(|\nabla u|^2)u,v-u'\right)dt\\
&+\int_0^T(M_1(| u|^2)u,v-u')dt\\
&\geq \int^T_0(f,v-u')dt\quad \forall v\in K, \text{ a.e. in } t,
\end{aligned}\label{eq7}
\\
u(0)=u_0, \quad u'(0)=u_1, \label{eq8}
\end{gather}
where $a(M(|\nabla u|^2)u,v-u')=((M(|\nabla u|^2)u,v-u'))
=-(M(|\nabla u|^2)\Delta u,v-u')$.
\end{theorem}

The proof of Theorem \ref{teo1} is made by the penalty method.
The method consists in to consider a perturbation of the operator
$\mathbb{L}$ with adding singular term, called penalization,
depending on a parameter $\epsilon>0$. We solve the mixed problem
in $Q$ for the penalized operator and the estimates obtained for the
local solution of the penalized equation that allow to pass to the limit,
 when $\epsilon>0$, in order to obtain a function $u$ which
is the solution of our problem.

First of all, let us consider the penalty operators
$\beta:L^2(\Omega)\to L^{2}(\Omega)$  associated to the closed
convex sets $K$, cf. Lions \cite[p. 370]{lions}.
  The operator $\beta$ is monotonous, hemicontinuous, takes bounded
sets of $L^2(\Omega)$ into bounded sets of
$L^{2}(\Omega)$, its kernel is $K$ and
$\beta:L^2(0,T;L^2(\Omega))\to L^{2}(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega))$
is equally monotone and hemicontinous.

 The penalized problem associated with the variational inequality
\eqref{eq1} and \eqref{eq1.1} consists in given $0<\epsilon<1$,
find $u_\epsilon$ solution in $Q$ of the mixed problem:
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
u_{\epsilon}''-M(|\nabla u_\epsilon|^2)\Delta u_\epsilon
+M_1(|u_\epsilon|^2)u_\epsilon+\frac{1}{\epsilon}\beta (u_\epsilon')=f
\quad\text{in }Q,\\
u_{\epsilon}=0 \quad \text{on }\Sigma,\\
u'_{\epsilon}=0 \quad \text{on } \Sigma,\\
u_{\epsilon}(x,0)=u_{\epsilon0}(x) \quad
u'_{\epsilon}(x,0)=u_{\epsilon1}(x) \quad \text{in }\Omega.
\end{gathered} \label{eq9}
\end{equation}

\begin{definition} \label{mydef1} \rm
We suppose that  $f\in L^2(0,T;H^1_0(\Omega)),f'\in L^2(0,T;L^2(\Omega))$,
$u_{\epsilon_0}\in H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)$,
$u_{\epsilon_1}\in H_0^1(\Omega)$ and hypothesis $(H_1)-(H_3)$ hold.
A weak solution to the boundary value problem\eqref{eq9} is a functions
$u_{\epsilon}$, such that for each $0<\epsilon<1$,
$u_{\epsilon}\in L^{\infty}(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)),
u_{\epsilon}'\in L^{\infty}(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega))$,
$u_{\epsilon}''\in L^{\infty}(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)))$, for $T_0>0$,
satisfying
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\begin{aligned}
&(u_{\epsilon}'',\varphi)+
a(M(|\nabla u_{\epsilon}|^2u_{\epsilon},\varphi)
+(M_1|u_{\epsilon}|^2u_{\epsilon},\varphi)
+\frac{1}{\epsilon}(\beta (u'_{\epsilon}),\varphi)\\
&=(f,\varphi) ,\quad \forall\varphi\in L^2(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)),
\end{aligned}\\
u_{\epsilon}(0)=u_{\epsilon_0},\;u_{\epsilon}'(0)=u_{\epsilon_1}.
\end{gathered}  \label{eq3b}
\end{equation}
\end{definition}

The solution of  \eqref{eq9} is given by the following theorem.

\begin{theorem} \label{teo2}
Assume that
\begin{gather}
f\in L^2(0,T;H_0^1(\Omega)),\quad f'\in L^2(0,T;L^2(\Omega)),\label{eq3.1}\\
u_{\epsilon_0}\in H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega),\label{eq3.2} \\
u_{\epsilon_1}\in H_0^1(\Omega),\label{eq3.3}
\end{gather}
and hypothesis {\rm (H1)--(H3)} hold.
Then for each $0<\epsilon<1$ there exists a unique  weak solution of
 \eqref{eq9}.
\end{theorem}

In the next section, we prove the Theorem \ref{teo1}.
 Our  goal is first  prove the penalized Theorem \ref{teo2},
applying Faedo-Galerkin method.

\section{Proof of main results}\label{secres}

\subsection*{Proof of Theorem \ref{teo2}}  \label{secdem}
To prove Theorem \ref{teo1}, we first prove the penalized Theorem \ref{teo2}.
We apply the Faedo-Galerkin method, noting that the immersions
$$
H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)\hookrightarrow H_0^1(\Omega)
\hookrightarrow L^2(\Omega)\hookrightarrow H^{-1}(\Omega)
$$
are continuous  and dense and that $H_0^1(\Omega)$ is compact  $L^2(\Omega)$.
Let $\{w_\nu,\lambda_\nu\}$ eigenvectors and eigenfunctions of $-\Delta$.
We consider
$(w_\nu)\subset H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)$
a Hilbertian basis for Faedo-Galerkin method and $V_m=[w_1,w_2,\dots, w_m]$
the subspace generated by the vectors  $w_1,w_2,\dots ,w_m$. Let us consider
$$
u_{\epsilon m}=\sum^{m}_{j=1}g_{\epsilon jm}(t)w_j
$$
solution of the approximate problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\begin{aligned}
&(u_{\epsilon_m}'',w_j)+M(|\nabla u_{\epsilon_m}|^2((u_{\epsilon_m},w_j))
 +M_1(|u_{\epsilon_m}|^2)(u_{\epsilon_m},w_j)\\
&+ \frac{1}{\epsilon}\left(\beta (u_{\epsilon_m}'),w_j\right)=(f,w_j),\quad
j=1,2,\dots m,
\end{aligned}\\
u_{\epsilon_m}(x,0)\to u_{\epsilon}(x,0) \quad \text{strongly in }
 H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega),\\
u_{\epsilon_m}'(x,0)\to u_{\epsilon}'(x,0) \quad \text{strongly in }H_0^1(\Omega).
\end{gathered} \label{eq10}
\end{equation}
The system of ordinary differential equation \eqref{eq10}  has
a solution $u_{\epsilon_m}(t)$ defined in $[0,t_m[$, $0< t_m\leq T$. The next
estimate implies that $u_{\epsilon_m}(t)$ is defined in the whole $[0,T]$.

To obtain a shorter notation, in the calculation of the following three estimates,
we omit the parameter $\epsilon$ in the approximate problem \label{obs2}.
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{First estimate.}
We consider $w_j=2u_m'$ in \eqref{eq10} to obtain
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d}{dt}\left|u_m'(t)\right|^2+ M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)
\frac{d}{dt}\|u_m(t)\|^2\\
&+M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\frac{d}{dt}|u_m(t)|^2
 +\frac{2}{\epsilon}(\beta (u_m'),u_m')=2(f(t),u_m'(t)).
\end{aligned}\label{eq11}
\end{equation}
Now, if we consider
\begin{gather}
\widehat{M}(\lambda)=\int_0^{\lambda} M(s)\,ds \;\;\;\;\text{ and }\label{eq12}\\
\widehat{M_1}(\lambda)=\int_0^{\lambda} M_1(s) \,ds, \label{eq13}
\end{gather}
from \eqref{eq11}, \eqref{eq12} and \eqref{eq13} it follows that
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\big[ |u_m'(t)|^2
+ \widehat{M}(\|u_m(t)\|^2)+\widehat{M}_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\big]
\leq (f(t),u_m'(t)),
\label{eq14}
\end{equation}
because $(\beta u_m'(t),u_m'(t))\geq0$.


Integrating \eqref{eq14} from $0$ to $t$, we obtain
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{1}{2}[|u_m'(t)|^2+ \widehat{M}(\|u_m(t)\|^2)
+ \widehat{M}_1(|u_m(t)|^2)]\\
&\leq \int_0^t(f(t),u_m'(t))+\frac{1}{2}[|u_m'(0)|^2
+\widehat{M}(\|u_m(0)\|^2)+\widehat{M}_1(|u_m(0)|^2)].
\end{aligned}\label{eq15}
\end{equation}
From \eqref{eq15}, \eqref{eq10}, \eqref{eq3.1} and Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality
it follows that
\begin{equation}
|u_m'(t)|^2+ \|u_m(t)\|^2+ |u_m(t)|^2
\leq C+C \int_0^t|u_m'(t)|^2ds .\label{eq16}
\end{equation}
Then Gronwall's inequality implies
\begin{gather}
(u_m)\text{ is bounded in  }L^\infty(0,T;H_0^1(\Omega)),\label{eq17}\\
(u_m')\text{ is bounded  }L^{\infty}(0,T;L^2(\Omega)).\label{eq18}
\end{gather}
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Second estimate.}
Considering $w_j=-\Delta u_m'$ in \eqref{eq10}, we obtain
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d}{dt}\|u_m'(t)\|^2+ M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)\frac{d}{dt}|\Delta u_m(t)|^2\\
&+M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\frac{d}{dt}\| u_m(t)\|^2
+\frac{2}{\epsilon}(\beta u_m',-\Delta u_m')\\
& =2((f(t),u_m'(t))).
\end{aligned} \label{eq19}
\end{equation}
Observe that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)\frac{d}{dt}|\Delta u_m(t)|^2+M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)
\frac{d}{dt}\| u_m(t)\|^2\\
&=\frac{d}{dt}\big[ M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\Delta u_m(t)|^2
 +M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\| u_m(t)\|^2\big]\\
&\quad -\frac{d}{dt}M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\Delta u_m(t)|^2
 -\frac{d}{dt}M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\| u_m(t)\|^2.
\end{aligned} \label{eq20}
\end{equation}
On the other hand
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d}{dt}M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\Delta u_m(t)|^2
 +\frac{d}{dt}M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\| u_m(t)\|^2\\
&=2M'(\|u_m(t)\|^2)((u_m(t),u_m'(t)))|\Delta u_m(t)|^2\\
&\quad +2M'_1(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),u_m'(t))\| u_m(t)\|^2.
\end{aligned} \label{eq21}
\end{equation}
Using $(\beta u_m',-\Delta u_m')\geq0$ and
$H_0^1(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^2(\Omega)$, follows from
\eqref{eq19}, \eqref{eq20} and \eqref{eq21} that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d}{dt}\big[ \|u_m'(t)\|^2+ M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\Delta u_m(t)|^2
+M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\| u_m(t)\|^2 \big] \\
&\leq 2|M'(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\|u_m(t)\|\|u_m'(t)\||\Delta u_m(t)|^2\\
&\quad +2|M_1'(|u_m(t)|^2)|\,|u_m(t)|C\|u_m'(t)\|\| u_m(t)\|^2\\
&\quad +\|f(t)\|^2+C\|u_m'(t)\|^2.
\end{aligned} \label{eq22}
\end{equation}
Note that \eqref{eq17} implies $\|u_m(t)\|\leq C$, therefore
$\|u_m(t)\|\in[0, C]$, for each $m$ and $t\in[0,t_m[$.
Since $M\in C^1([0,\infty);\mathbb{R})$, this implies that
\begin{equation}
  |M'(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\leq C, \quad \forall m, \forall t\in[0,t_m[, \label{eq23}
\end{equation}
and analogously for $M_1$. Therefore, using
\eqref{eq23}, \eqref{eq17}, \eqref{eq18} and \eqref{eq3.1} we can write
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&2|M'(\|u_m(t)\|^2)|\,\|u_m(t)\|\|u_m'(t)\||\Delta u_m(t)|^2\\
&+2|M_1'(|u_m(t)|^2)|\,|u_m(t)|C\|u_m'(t)\|\| u_m(t)\|^2+\|f(t)\|^2
+C\|u_m'(t)\|^2\\
&\leq C+C|\Delta u_m(t)|^2
+2C\|u_m'(t)\|^2|\Delta u_m(t)|^2+C\|u_m'(t)\|^2\\
&\leq C+C\left[\|u_m'(t)\|^2+|\Delta u_m(t)|^2+\left(\|u_m'(t)\|^2
+|\Delta u_m(t)|^2\right)^2\right].
\end{aligned} \label{eq24}
\end{equation}
Making
\begin{equation}
\varphi(t)=\|u_m'(t)\|^2+|\Delta u_m(t)|^2\label{eq25}
\end{equation}
and using \eqref{eq21}, (H2), (H3), \eqref{eq10}, \eqref{eq24}  we can write,
after integration from $0$ to $t$,
\begin{equation}
\varphi(t)\leq C+ C\int_0^t(\varphi(s)+\varphi(s)^2)ds.\label{eq26}
\end{equation}
Observe that $\varphi(t)$ is continuous in $[0,T_0]$, therefore there
exists $T_0<T$ such that $\varphi(t)\leq C$ for all $m$ and all $t\in[0,T_0]$.

From \eqref{eq26} it follows that
\begin{gather}
\|u'_m(t)\|\leq C,\quad \forall m,\,\forall t\in [0,T_0],\label{eq28} \\
|\Delta u_m(t)|\leq C,\quad \forall m,\,\forall t\in [0,T_0].\label{eq28b}
\end{gather}
That is,
\begin{gather}
(u_m') \text{ is bounded in }L^{\infty}(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)),\label{eq29}\\
(\Delta u_m) \text{ is bounded in }L^{\infty}(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)) .  \label{eq30}
\end{gather}
Statements \eqref{eq17} and \eqref{eq30} imply that
\begin{equation}
  u_m \text{ is bounded in }L^{\infty}(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)).
  \label{eq31}
\end{equation}
\smallskip

\noindent\textbf{Third estimate.}
 Taking  derivatives in the distribution sense in \eqref{eq10}, we obtain
\begin{align*}
&(u_m'''(t),w_j)+\frac{d}{dt}M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)a(u_m(t),w_j)
+M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)a(u_m'(t),w_j) \\
&+\frac{d}{dt}M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),w_j)+M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m'(t),w_j)
+\frac{1}{\epsilon}((\beta u_m'(t))',w_j)\\
&=(f'(t),w_j) .
\end{align*} %\label{eq32}
Considering $w_j=2u_m''(t)$ in the above equation, we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
& \frac{d}{dt}|u_m''(t)|^2+2\frac{d}{dt}M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)a(u_m(t),u_m''(t))
 +M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)\frac{d}{dt}\|u_m'(t)\|^2 \\
&+2\frac{d}{dt}M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),u_m''(t))
 +M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\frac{d}{dt}|u_m'(t)|^2\\
& +\frac{2}{\epsilon}((\beta u_m'(t))',u_m''(t))\\
&=2(f'(t),u_m''(t)) .
\end{aligned} \label{eq33}
\end{equation}
Since
$$
((\beta u_m'(t))', u_m''(t))
=\lim_{h\to0}\Big(\frac{\beta (u_m'(t+h))-\beta(u_m'(t))}{h},
\frac{u_m'(t+h)-u_m'(t)}{h}\Big)\geq0,
$$
and because $\beta$ is monotone, we have
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\frac{d}{dt}|u_m''(t)|^2+M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)\frac{d}{dt}\|u_m'(t)\|^2
+M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)\frac{d}{dt}|u_m'(t)|^2\\
&\leq2|(f'(t),u_m''(t))|+2\big|\frac{d}{dt}M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)a(u_m(t),u_m''(t))\big|
\\
&\quad +2\big|\frac{d}{dt}M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),u_m''(t))\big| .
\end{aligned}\label{eq34}
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{eq23}, \eqref{eq17}, \eqref{eq18} and \eqref{eq30}, we conclude that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\big|\frac{d}{dt}M(\|u_m(t)\|^2)a(u_m(t),u_m''(t))\big|\\
&=2\left|M'(\|u_m(t)\|^2)(u_m(t),u_m'(t))(-\Delta u_m(t),u_m''(t))\right|\\
&\leq\left|M'(\|u_m(t)\|^2)(u_m(t),u_m'(t))\right|
 \left\{|\Delta u_m(t)|^2+|u_m''(t)|^2\right\}\\
&\leq C+C\left|u_m''(t)\right|^2.
\end{aligned}\label{eq35}
\end{equation}
Analogously,
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\big|\frac{d}{dt}M_1(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),u_m''(t))\big|\\
&=2\left|M_1'\left(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),u_m'(t)\right)(u_m(t),u_m''(t))\right|\\
&\leq \left|M_1'\left(|u_m(t)|^2)(u_m(t),u_m'(t)\right)\right|
\left\{ |u_m(t)|^2+|u_m''(t)|^2 \right\}\\
&\leq C+C\left|u_m''(t)\right|^2.
\end{aligned}\label{eq36}
\end{equation}
By Young's inequality,
\begin{equation}
 2|(f'(t),u_m''(t))|\leq |f'(t)|^2+ |u_m''(t)|^2.\label{eq37}
\end{equation}
We observe that \eqref{eq12}, \eqref{eq13}, \eqref{eq34}, \eqref{eq35},
\eqref{eq36} and \eqref{eq37} lead to
\begin{equation}
  \frac{d}{dt}\big\{ |u_m''(t)|^2+\widehat{M}(\|u_m'(t)\|^2)
+\widehat{M}_1(|u_m'(t)|^2) \big\}
\leq C+|f'(t)|^2+C |u_m''(t)|^2.\label{eq38}
\end{equation}
Integrating \eqref{eq38} from $0$ to $t<T_0$, using (H2), (H3), \eqref{eq2},
\eqref{eq10}  we have
\begin{equation}
|u_m''(t)|^2+\|u_m'(t)\|^2+|u_m'(t)|^2
\leq C+C \int_0^t|u_m''(s)|^2ds+|u_m''(0)|^2.\label{eq39}
\end{equation}
We observe that, making $t=0$ and $w_j=u_m''(0)$ in approximate
 problem \eqref{eq10} we obtain
\[
|u_m''(0)|^2\leq\big\{ M(\|u_{0m}\|^2)|\Delta u_{0m}|+M_1(|u_{0m}|^2)|u_{0m}|
+\frac{1}{\epsilon}|\beta(u_{1m})|+|f(0)|\big\}|u_m''(0)|; 
\] % \label{eq40}
that is,
\begin{equation}
|u_m''(0)|\leq C,\label{eq41}
\end{equation}
because $u_{1m}\to u_1$ in $H_0^1(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^2(\Omega)$
and $\beta:L^2(\Omega)\to L^2(\Omega)$ is continuous.

From \eqref{eq39} and  \eqref{eq41} it follows that
\begin{equation}
|u_m''(t)|^2\leq C+C \int_0^T|u_m''(s)|^2ds.\label{eq42}
\end{equation}
Using Gronwall's inequality we conclude that
\begin{equation}
(u_m'')\text{ is bounded in } L^{\infty}(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)).\label{eq43}
\end{equation}

Now we return to the notation $u_{\epsilon_m}$. The estimates above and
Aubin-Lions compactness Theorem implies that the existence of a subsequence of
 $(u_{\epsilon_m})$, still denoted by $(u_{\epsilon_m})$, such that
\begin{gather}
u_{\epsilon_m}\to u_{\epsilon}\text{ weak star }\text{  in  }
 L^\infty(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)),\label{eq44}\\
u_{\epsilon_m}'\to u_{\epsilon}'\text{ weak star in  }
 L^\infty(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)),\label{eq45}\\
u_{\epsilon_m}''\to u_{\epsilon}''\text{ weak star in  }
 L^\infty(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)),\label{eq46} \\
u_{\epsilon_m}\to u_{\epsilon}\text{ strong in }
 L^2(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega))\text{ and a.e in Q},\label{eq47}\\
u_{\epsilon_m}'\to u_{\epsilon}'\text{ strong in }
L^2(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega))\text{ and a.e in Q}.\label{eq48}
\end{gather}
Statements \eqref{eq47} and  \eqref{eq48}, the continuity of de norm and
of $\beta$ imply
\begin{gather}
\|u_{\epsilon_m}\|\to \|u_{\epsilon}\|\text{ a.e in }Q,\label{eq49}\\
\beta(u_{\epsilon_m}')\to \beta(u_{\epsilon}')\text{ a.e in }Q.\label{eq50}
\end{gather}
Using (H1) in \eqref{eq49} it follows that
\begin{equation}
M(\|u_{\epsilon_m}\|^2)\to M(\|u_{\epsilon}\|)^2\quad \text{a.e in }Q,\label{eq51}
\end{equation}
analogously,
\begin{equation}
M_1(|u_{\epsilon_m}|^2)\to M_1(|u_{\epsilon}|)^2\text{ a.e in }Q.\label{eq52}
\end{equation}
The convergences above are sufficient to pass to the limit with $m\to\infty$
and then we prove the Theorem \ref{teo2}.

\subsection*{Proof of Theorem \ref{teo1}}
Finally, we  prove the main Theorem of this work.
Let $v\in L^2(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega))$ be $v(t)\in K$ a. e. for
$t\in(0,T_0)$. From \eqref{eq9}$_1$ it follows that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^{T_0}(u_{\epsilon}'',v-u_\epsilon')dt
 +\int_0^{T_0}M(|\nabla u_{\epsilon}|)^2a(u_{\epsilon},v-u_\epsilon')dt\\
&+\int_0^{T_0}M_1(|u_{\epsilon}|^2)(u_{\epsilon},v-u_\epsilon')dt
 -\int_0^{T_0}(f,v-u_\epsilon')dt \\
&=\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int_0^{T_0}\left(\beta (u_{\epsilon}'),u_\epsilon'-v\right)dt\\
&=\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int_0^{T_0}\left(\beta (u_{\epsilon}')
 -\beta v,u_\epsilon'-v\right)dt\geq0,
\end{aligned} \label{eq53}
\end{equation}
because $v\in K$  ($\beta(v)=0$) and $\beta$ is monotone.

From \eqref{eq44}-\eqref{eq48} and the
Banach-Steinhauss Theorem, it follows that there exists a subnet
$ (u_{\epsilon})_{0<\epsilon <1}$, such that it
converges to $u$ as $\epsilon \to 0$, in the sense of
\eqref{eq44}-\eqref{eq48}; that is,
\begin{gather}
u_{\epsilon}\to u\text{ weak star   in  }
 L^\infty(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)\cap H^2(\Omega)),\label{eq56}\\
u_{\epsilon}'\to u'\text{ weak star in  }
 L^\infty(0,T_0;H_0^1(\Omega)),\label{eq57}\\
u_{\epsilon}''\to u''\text{ weak star in  }
 L^\infty(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega)),\label{eq58}\\
u_{\epsilon}\to u\text{ strong in }L^2(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega))
 \text{ and a.e in Q},\label{eq59}\\
u_{\epsilon}'\to u'\text{ strong in }L^2(0,T_0;L^2(\Omega))
 \text{ and a.e in Q}.\label{eq60}
\end{gather}

The convergences above are sufficient to pass to the limit in
\eqref{eq53} with $\epsilon\to 0$ to conclude that \eqref{eq7} is valid.
To complete the proof of Theorem \ref{teo1}, it remains to show
that $u'(t)\in K$. a. e..

In this position we observe that using convergences  \eqref{eq44}-\eqref{eq48},
leting $m\to\infty$ in \eqref{eq10}, we can find $u_\epsilon$ such that
\begin{equation}
 u''_\epsilon-M(|\nabla u_\epsilon|^2)\Delta u_\epsilon
+M_1(|u_\epsilon|^2)u_\epsilon+\frac{1}{\epsilon}\beta(u_\epsilon')
= f \quad\text{in } L^2(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega)).
\label{eq61}
\end{equation}
 On the other hand,  from \eqref{eq61} we have
\begin{equation}
\beta (u'_{\epsilon})
=\epsilon[f- u''_\epsilon+M(|\nabla u_\epsilon|^2)\Delta u_\epsilon
-M_1(|u_\epsilon|^2)u_\epsilon]. \label{eq62}
\end{equation}
 Then
\begin{equation}
\beta (u'_{\epsilon})\to0\quad \text{in  }\mathcal{D}'(0,T;H^{-1}(\Omega)). \label{eq63}
\end{equation}
From \eqref{eq61} It follows that
\begin{equation}
\beta (u'_{\epsilon})\text{ is bounded in  }L^{2}(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega)).
\label{eq64}
\end{equation}
Therefore,
\begin{equation}
\beta (u'_{\epsilon})\to0\quad \text{weak in }L^{2}(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega)). \label{eq65}
\end{equation}
On the other hand we deduce from \eqref{eq62} that
\begin{equation}
 0\leq \int^T_0(\beta
(u'_{\epsilon}),u'_{\epsilon})\,dt\leq\epsilon\; C.
\label{eq66}
\end{equation}
Thus
\begin{equation}
\int^T_0(\beta (u'_{\epsilon}),u'_{\epsilon})
dt\to0. \label{eq67}
\end{equation}
We have
$$
\int^T_0(\beta (u'_{\epsilon})-\beta(\varphi),u'_{\epsilon}-\varphi)\,dt
\geq0,\quad \forall\varphi\text{  in  } L^2(0,T;L^2(\Omega)),
$$
because $\beta$ is a monotonous operator. Thus,
\begin{equation}
\int^T_0(\beta (u'_{\epsilon}),u'_{\epsilon})\,dt-\int^T_0(\beta
(u'_{\epsilon}),\varphi)\,dt
-\int^T_0(\beta(\varphi),u'_{\epsilon}-\varphi)\,dt\geq0.
\label{eq68}
\end{equation}
From \eqref{eq65} \eqref{eq67} and \eqref{eq68} we have
\begin{equation}
\int^T_0(\beta(\varphi),u'(t)-\varphi)\,dt\leq0. \label{eq69}
\end{equation}
Taking $\varphi=u'-\lambda v$, with $v\in L^2(0,T;L^2(\Omega))$ and
$\lambda>0$,  using the hemicontinuity of $\beta$ we deduce that
\begin{equation}
\beta (u'(t))=0, \label{eq69b}
\end{equation}
and this implies that $u'(t)\in K$ a. e.
and the proof of the existence of solution is complete.
\smallskip

In the next section we prove the uniqueness of solution to achieve our goal.

\section{Uniqueness of solution}\label{secuni}

Suppose that $u_1,u_2$ are two solutions of \eqref{eq7} and set $w=u_2-u_1$
and $t \in [0,T_0]$. Taking $v=u'_1$ (resp. $u'_2$) in  \eqref{eq7}
relative to $v_2$ (resp. $v_1$) and adding up the results we
obtain
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&-\int_0^t(w'',w')dt+\int_0^tM(\| u_2\|^2\Delta u_2,w')dt
-\int_0^tM(\| u_1\|^2\Delta u_1,w')dt\\
&-\int_0^t(M_1(| u_2|^2)u_2,w')dt
 +\int_0^t(M_1(| u_1|^2)u_1,w')dt\geq0,
\end{aligned}\label{eq70}
\end{equation}
or equivalently
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&-\int_0^t(w'',w')ds+\int_0^t(M(\| u_2\|^2\Delta u_2,w')ds
 -\int_0^t(M(\| u_2\|^2\Delta u_1,w')ds\\
&+\int_0^t(M(\| u_2\|^2\Delta u_1,w')ds
 -\int_0^t(M(\|u_1\|^2\Delta u_1,w')ds\\
&-\int_0^t(M_1(| u_2|^2)u_2,w')ds
 +\int_0^t(M_1(| u_1|^2)u_1,w')ds\\
&-\int_0^t(M_1(| u_2|^2)u_1,w')ds
 +\int_0^t(M_1(| u_2|^2)u_1,w')ds\\
&=-\int_0^t(w'',w')ds+\int_0^t(M(\|u_2\|^2\Delta w,w')ds
 -\int_0^t(M_1(| u_2|^2)w,w')ds\\
&\quad +\int_0^t([M(\|u_2\|^2-M(\|u_1\|^2)]\Delta u_1,w')ds \\
&\quad -\int_0^t([M_1(|u_2|^2)-M_1(|u_1|^2)] u_1,w')ds\geq0,
\end{aligned}\label{eq71}
\end{equation}
By hypothesis (H1), we can use the Mean Value Theorem to write
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^t(w'',w')ds-\int_0^t(M(\|u_2\|^2\Delta w,w')ds
 +\int_0^t(M_1(| u_2|^2)w,w')ds\\
&-\int_0^t(M'(\epsilon)[\|u_2\|^2-\|u_1\|^2]\Delta u_1,w')ds\\
&+\int_0^t(M'_1(\epsilon_1)[|u_2|^2-|u_1|^2] u_1,w')ds\leq0,
\end{aligned} \label{eq72}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\|u_1\|^2\leq\epsilon\leq\|u_2\|^2, \quad
|u_1|^2\leq\epsilon\leq|u_2|^2.\label{eq73}
\end{equation}
From \eqref{eq72} It follows that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^t\frac{d}{dt}|w'|^2ds+\int_0^tM(\|u_2\|^2)\frac{d}{dt}\| w\|^2ds
 +\int_0^tM_1(|u_2|^2)\frac{d}{dt}| w|^2ds \\
&\leq2\int_0^t|M'(\epsilon)|\left[ \left( \|u_2\|-\|u_1\| \right)
 \left( \|u_2\|+\|u_1\| \right) \right]|\Delta u_1||w'|ds\\
&\quad +2\int_0^t|M'_1(\epsilon_1)|\left[ \left( |u_2|-|u_1| \right)
\left( |u_2|+|u_1| \right) \right]|u_1||w'|ds,
\end{aligned} \label{eq74}
\end{equation}
using an argument similar to that used in \eqref{eq20} and \eqref{eq21},
 from \eqref{eq74} it follows that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^t\frac{d}{dt}\left\{ |w'|^2+M(\|u_2\|^2)\| w\|^2+M_1(|u_2|^2)| w|^2
 \right\}ds \\
& \leq 2\int_0^t|M'(\epsilon)|\left[ \left(\|u_2\|-\|u_1\| \right)
 \left( \|u_2\|+\|u_1\| \right) \right]|\Delta u_1||w'|ds \\
&\quad +2\int_0^t|M'_1(\epsilon_1)|\left[ \left(|u_2|-|u_1| \right)
 \left( |u_2|+|u_1| \right) \right]|u_1||w'|ds \\
&\quad +2\int_0^t(|M'(\|u_2\|^2)|\|u_2\|\|u'_2\|\|w\|^2
 +2|M'_1(|u_2|^2)||u_2||u'_2||w|^2)ds.
\end{aligned} \label{eq75}
\end{equation}
Using  (H2), (H3), \eqref{eq28} \eqref{eq28b} and \eqref{eq75}, we conclude that
\begin{equation}
|w'|^2+\| w\|^2+| w|^2\leq C\int_0^t\|w\||w'|ds
+C\int_0^t|w||w'|ds+C\int_0^t|w|^2ds.\label{eq76}
\end{equation}
This implies
\begin{equation}
 |w'|^2+\| w\|^2+| w|^2\leq C\int_0^t(|w'|^2
+C\|w\|^2+|w|^2)ds.\label{eq77}
\end{equation}
Using Gronwall's inequality in \eqref{eq77}, we conclude that $w(t)=0$;
therefore $u_1=u_2$.


\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
We would like to express our gratitude to the anonymous referees
 for a number of valuable comments that led to the clarification
of various points.


\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{adams} R. A. Adams;
\emph{Sobolev Spaces}.  Academic Press: New York (1975).

\bibitem{Arosio}  A. Arosio;
\emph{On the well-posedeness of the Kirchhoff string},
Transaction of American Mathematical Society. \textbf{ 348}  (1996), 305-330.

\bibitem{aro}  A. Arosio, S. Spagnolo;
\emph{Global solution to the Cauchy problem for a nonlinear hyperbolic equation},
Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications,
Coll\`{e} de France Seminar. \textbf{16}.

\bibitem{Coulomb} P. Ballard, S. Basseville;
\emph{Existence and uniqueness for dynamical unilateral contact with Coulomb
friction : a model problem}, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis.
 \textbf{39(1)} (2005),  59-77.

\bibitem{bern} S. Bernstein;
\emph{ Sur une class d\'{e}quations fonctionelles aux deriv\'{e}e partielles},
 Isv. Acad. Nauk SSSR Serie Math.  (1940), 17-26.

\bibitem{car}  C. F. Carrier;
\emph{On the vibration problem of elastic string},
Q. J. Appl. Math. \textbf{3}   (1945), 151-165.

\bibitem{clark} M. R. Clark,  O. A. Lima;
\emph{Existence of solutions for a variational unilateral},
 Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, \textbf{22}  (2002), 1-18.

\bibitem{dickey} R. W. Dickey;
\emph{Infinity system of semi linear oscillations equations related to the string},
Proc. of the A. M. S. \textbf{23} (1969),  459-468.

\bibitem{cicero} C. L. Frota, N. A. Lar'kin;
\emph{On global existence and uniqueness for the unilateral problem associated to
the degenerated Kirchhoff equation}, Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods
\& Applications. \textbf{28(3)} (1997), 43-452.

\bibitem{hazoya}  M. Hazoya and Y. Yamada;
\emph{On some nonlinear wave equations II, Global existence and energy
decay of solutions}, J. Fac. Sci. (Univ. Tokyo). \textbf{38(2)}  (1991), 230-250.

\bibitem{kikuchi} N. Kikuchi, J. T. Oden;
\emph{Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities
and Finite Element Methods}, SIAM - Studies in Applied and Numerical Mathematics:
Philadelphia: (1988).

\bibitem{kirch} G. Kirchhoff;
\emph{Vorlesungen $\ddot{u}$ber  Mechanick}, Tauber:Leipzig (1883).

\bibitem{LarkinM}  N. A. Lar'kin,  L. A. Medeiros;
\emph{On a variational inequality for the equations of the theory of
the elasticty}, Well Posed Boundary Value Problem for non Classical Equation,
 Novosibrisk, Moscow.  (1991), 6-11.

\bibitem{lima}  G. J. M. Lima,  M. P. Matos;
\emph{On Klein-Gordon equation with nonlinearity  of Kircchoff-Carrier type},
Proceeding Series of the Brazilian Society of Computational and
Applied Mathematics - XXVIII CNMAC,  S\~ao Paulo: Brazil (2005).

\bibitem{lions}  J. L. Lions;
\emph{Quelques M\'{e}thodes de R\'{e}solution Des Probl\`{e}mes
 Aux Limites Non Lin\'e aires}, Dunod: Paris (1969).

\bibitem{medeiros}  L. A. Medeiros, J. L. L\'{i}maco, S. B. Menezes;
\emph{Vibrations of elastic strings (Mathematical aspects)},
Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, part one,
\textbf{4(2)}  (2002), 91-127.

\bibitem{MedeirosM} L. A. Medeiros, M. M. Milla;
\emph{Local solutions for a nonlinear unilateral problem},
Rev. Roumaine Math. pures Appl. \textbf{XXXI(5)} (1986), 371-382.

\bibitem{pohozhaev} S. I. Pohozhaev;
\emph{Quasilinear hyperbolic equations of Kirchhoff type and conservation law},
Tr. Mosk Energ. Inst. Moscow. \textbf{201}  (1974), 118-126.

\bibitem{Raposo} C. A. Raposo, M. Sep\'ulveda, O. Vera, D. C. Pereira, M. L. Santos;
\emph{Solution and Asymptotic Behavior for a Nonlocal Coupled System of
Reaction-Diffusion.} Acta Appl. Math. \textbf{102}  (2008),  37-56.

\bibitem{rivera} J. E. M. Rivera, H. P. Oquendo;
\emph{Exponential Stability to a Contact Problem
of Partially Viscoelastic Materials},
Journal of Elasticity. \textbf{ 63} (2001), 87-111.






\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
