\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2015 (2015), No. 08, pp. 1--14.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2015 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2015/08\hfil Superlinear second-order differential equations]
{Existence and uniqueness for superlinear second-order differential equations
on the half-line}

\author[I. Bachar, H. M\^aagli \hfil EJDE-2015/08\hfilneg]
{Imed Bachar, Habib M\^aagli}  % in alphabetical order

\address{Imed Bachar \newline
King Saud University, College of Science, Mathematics
Department, P.O.Box 2455 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia}
\email{abachar@ksu.edu.sa}

\address{Habib M\^aagli \newline
King Abdulaziz University, College of Sciences
and Arts, Rabigh Campus, Department of Mathematics P.O. Box 344,
Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia}
\email{habib.maagli@fst.rnu.tn, abobaker@kau.edu.sa}

\thanks{Submitted October 11, 2014. Published January 5, 2015.}
\subjclass[2000]{34B15, 34B18, 34B27}
\keywords{Second order differential equation; boundary value problem;
\hfill\break\indent half-line; Green's function; positive solution}

\begin{abstract}
 We prove the existence and uniqueness, and study the global behavior of a positive
 continuous solution to the superlinear second-order differential
 equation
 \begin{gather*}
 \frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=u(t)g(t,u(t)),\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
 u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b,
 \end{gather*}
 where $a,b$ are nonnegative constants such that $a+b>0$, $A$ is a
 continuous function on $[0,\infty)$, positive and continuously
 differentiable on $(0,\infty )$ such that $1/A$ is integrable on
 $[0,1]$ and $\int_0^{\infty }1/A(t)\,dt=\infty $.
 Here $\rho (t)=\int_0^t 1/A(s)\,ds$, for $t\geq 0$ and
 $g(t,s)$ is a nonnegative continuous function satisfying suitable
 integrability condition. Our Approach is based on estimates of the Green's
 function and a perturbation argument. Finally two illustrative examples are
 given.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

We are concerned with the existence, uniqueness and global behavior of a
positive continuous solution to the  second-order differential
equation
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=u(t)g(t,u(t)),\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b,
\end{gathered} \label{e1.1}
\end{equation}
 where $a,b$ are nonnegative constants such that $a+b>0$, $A$ is a
continuous function on $[0,\infty )$, positive and continuously
differentiable on $(0,\infty )$ such that $\frac{1}{A}$ is integrable on
$[0,1]$ and $\int_0^{\infty } 1/A(t)\,dt=\infty $.

Here $\rho (t)=\int_0^t 1/A(s)\,ds$, for $t\geq 0$. The
nonnegative nonlinearity $g$ is required to satisfy an appropriate condition
related to the class $\mathcal{K}$, defined next.

\begin{definition}\label{def1.1} \rm
A Borel measurable function $q$ in $(0,\infty )$ belongs to the class
 $\mathcal{K}$ if
\begin{equation}
\| q\| :=\int_0^{\infty }A(r)\rho (r)|q(r)|dr<\infty .  \label{e1.2}
\end{equation}
\end{definition}

 The motivation for the present work stems from both practical and
theoretical aspects. In fact, boundary value problems on the half-line arise
quite naturally in the study of radially symmetric solutions of nonlinear
elliptic equations, see for instance \cite{Ba,KYY}, and various
physical phenomena \cite{GGLO,I}, such as unsteady flow of gas
through a semi-infinite, porous media and the theory of drain flows.

 Note that boundary value problems for second-order differential
equations have been considering widely and there are many results on the
existence of solutions, see for example
\cite{AO,B,CMMZ,gherad,gherad2,R}.

 Zhao \cite{Zh} considered the  second-order differential equation
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'+h(t,u(t))=0,\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \label{e1.2.1}
\end{equation}
subject to the boundary conditions
\begin{equation}
u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b,  \label{e1.2.2}
\end{equation}
where $A(t)\equiv 1$, $a=0$ and $h$ is a measurable function on
$(0,\infty )\times (0,\infty )$, dominated by a convex positive function.
Then he showed that there exists $\mu >0$ such that for each
$b\in (0,\mu ]$, there exists a positive continuous solution $u$ of
 \eqref{e1.2.1}--\eqref{e1.2.2}. This result has been generalized by
 M\^{a}agli and Masmoudi \cite{MM}.
On the other hand, Yan \cite{Y} studied equation
\eqref{e1.2.1} subject to the boundary condition $u(0)=a\geq 0$,
 $\lim_{t\to \infty} A(t)u'(t)=b\geq 0$, where $A$ is a
continuous function satisfying some appropriate conditions and
\[
q_0(t)k(s)\leq h(t,s)\leq q_0(t)\widetilde{k}(s),
\]
 where $q_0,k$ and $\widetilde{k}$ are nonnegative continuous
functions on $(0,\infty )$ such that 
\[
\int_0^{\infty }A(r)|q_0(r)|dr<\infty ,\quad
\lim_{s\to 0^{+}} \frac{k(s)}{s}=\infty 
\]
and $\widetilde{k}$ satisfying some growth condition.
By using fixed-point index theory, the existence of at least one nonnegative
nonzero solution is established.

 Recently, in \cite{BM}, we have studied problem \eqref{e1.2.1}-\eqref{e1.2.2}
 where $A$ is a continuous function satisfying some appropriate
conditions,
 $h(t,s)=q(t)s^{\sigma }$, with $\sigma <1$, $a=b=0$ and $q(t)$ is
a nonnegative continuous function that is required to satisfy some
assumptions related to Karamata regular variation theory. Using monotonicity
methods, we established the existence, uniqueness and the global asymptotic
behavior of a positive continuous solution; see also \cite{ciradulescu}.

 Here, we shall use estimates of the Green's function and a
perturbation argument to address existence, uniqueness and global behavior
of a positive continuous solution to problem \eqref{e1.1}.

 Throughout this paper, and without loss of generality, we assume
that $\rho (1)=1$. We let $a,b\geq 0$ such that $a+b>0$ and we denote by
$\omega (t):=a+b\rho (t)$, $t\geq 0$, the unique solution of the problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=0,\quad t\in (0,\infty ),  \\
u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b.
\end{gathered}  \label{e1.3}
\end{equation}

 We denote by $G(t,s)$ the Green's function of the operator
$u\mapsto -\frac{1}{A}(Au')'$ on $(0,\infty )$ with the
Dirichlet conditions $u(0)=0$ and $\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=0$,
which is given by
\begin{equation}
G(t,s)=A(s)\min (\rho (t),\rho (s)).  \label{e1.3.a}
\end{equation}

The outline of the article is as follows.
In Section 2, we give some sharp
estimates on the Green's function $G(t,s)$, including the following
3G-inequality: for each $t,s,r\in (0,\infty )$,
\[
\frac{G(t,r)G(r,s)}{G(t,s)}\leq A(r)\rho (r).
\]
In particular, we derive from this 3G-inequality that for each
$q\in \mathcal{K}$, we have
\begin{equation}
\alpha _{q}:=\sup_{t,s\in (0,\infty
)}\int_0^{\infty }\frac{G(t,r)G(r,s)}{G(t,s)}|
q(r)| dr=\| q\| <\infty .  \label{e1.4}
\end{equation}
In Section 3, for a given nonnegative function $q$ in
$\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$, we prove that the Green's function
$G_{q}(t,s) $ of the operator $u\mapsto -\frac{1}{A}(Au')'+qu$ on
$(0,\infty )$ with the Dirichlet conditions $u(0)=0$ and
$\lim_{t\to \infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=0$ is given by
\[
G_{q}( t,s) =A(s)\rho (t)\rho (s)\varphi (t)\varphi (s)\int_{\max
(t,s)}^{\infty }\frac{dr}{A(r)\rho ^2(r)\varphi ^2(r)},
\]
 where $\varphi $ is the unique positive solution in $C([0,\infty
))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ of the equation
\[
\frac{1}{A(t)\rho ^2(t)} (A(t)\rho ^2(t)u'(t))'-q(t)u(t)=0
\]
 $\lim_{t\to0} (A\rho ^2\varphi ')(t)=0$ and
$\varphi (0)=1$.

In particular, we deduce the  comparison result,
\[
e^{-2\| q\| }G( t,s) \leq G_{q}( t,s) \leq G( t,s) ,\quad \text{for }t,s\geq 0.
\]
Moreover, we establish the  resolvent equality
\[
Vf=V_{q}f+V_{q}( qVf) =V_{q}f+V( qV_{q}f) ,\quad \text{for }
f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) ,
\]
where $\mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $
is the set of nonnegative Borel measurable functions in
$(0,\infty )$ and the kernels $V$ and $V_{q}$ are defined on
 $\mathcal{B} ^{+}( (0,\infty )) $ by
\[
Vf( t) :=\int_0^{\infty }G( t,s) f(s)ds, \quad
V_{q}f( t) :=\int_0^{\infty }G_{q}( t,s) f(s)ds,
\quad t\geq 0.
\]
To state our existence results, we use the following assumptions:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(H1)]  $g$ is a nonnegative continuous function in
$(0,\infty )\times [ 0,\infty )$.

\item[(H2)]  There exists a nonnegative
function $q\in \mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ such that for each
$t\in (0,\infty )$, the map $s\to s( q(t) -g( t,s\omega ( t) ) ) $ is
nondecreasing on $[0,1]$.

\item[(H3)]  For each $t\in (0,\infty )$, the function $s\to sg( t,s) $ is
nondecreasing on $[0,\infty )$.

\end{itemize}
Using properties of the Green's function $G_{q}(t,s) $ and using a
perturbation argument, we prove the following result.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm1.2}
Assume {\rm (H1)--(H3)}. Then  \eqref{e1.1} has a unique positive
solution $u\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ satisfying
\begin{equation}
c\omega (t)\leq u( t) \leq \omega (t),  \label{e1.7}
\end{equation}
where $c$ is a constant in $(0,1]$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{corollary} \label{coro1.3}
Let $f$ be a nonnegative function in $C^{1}([0,\infty ))$
such that the map $s\to \theta (s)=sf(s)$ is nondecreasing on
$[0,\infty )$. Let $p$ be a nonnegative continuous function on
$(0,\infty )$ such that the function
$t\to q(t):=p(t)\max_{0\leq \xi \leq \omega ( t) }\theta '(\xi )$
belongs to the class $\mathcal{K}$. Then the  problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=p(t)u(t)f(u(t)),\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b,
\end{gathered}  \label{e1.8}
\end{equation}
 has a unique positive solution $u\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$
satisfying
\begin{equation}
e^{-2\| q\| }\omega (t)\leq u( t) \leq \omega (t),\quad t\geq 0.  \label{e1.9}
\end{equation}
\end{corollary}

 Observe that in Theorem \ref{thm1.2} we obtain a positive
continuous solution $u$, to  \eqref{e1.1}, which  behavior is not
affected by the perturbed term. That is, it behaves like the solution
$\omega $ of the homogeneous problem \eqref{e1.3}.

 As a typical example of nonlinearity satisfying (H1)--(H3), we have
 $g( t,s) =p(t)s^{\sigma }$, for $\sigma \geq 0$, where $p$
is a positive continuous function on $(0,\infty )$ such
that
\[
\int_0^{\infty }A(r)\rho (r)(a+b\rho (r))^{\sigma }p(r)dr<\infty .
\]

\section{Estimates on the Green's function}

 In this section, we prove some estimates on the Green's function $G(t,s)$.

\begin{proposition} \label{prop2.1}
(i) For each $t,s\in [ 0,\infty )$, we have
\begin{equation}
A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))\min (1,\rho (t))\leq G(t,s)\leq A(s)\min (1,\rho
(s))\max (1,\rho (t)).  \label{e2.1}
\end{equation}
(ii) For $f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $, the function $t\to Vf(t)$
is continuous on $[0,\infty )$ if and only if the integral
$\int_0^{\infty }A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)ds$ converges.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
(i) The inequalities in \eqref{e2.1} follow from \eqref{e1.3.a}
and the fact that for $\alpha ,\beta \geq 0$,
\[
\min (1,\alpha )\min (1,\beta )\leq \min (\alpha ,\beta )\leq \min (1,\alpha
)\max (1,\beta ).
\]

 (ii) Using \eqref{e1.3.a}, \eqref{e2.1} and the dominated
convergence theorem,
 we obtain the required assertion.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary} \label{coro2.3}
Let $f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $ such that 
 $s\mapsto A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)$ is continuous and
integrable on $(0,\infty )$. Then $Vf$ is the unique continuous solution of
the boundary-value problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=-f,\quad \text{in }(0,\infty ), \\
u(0)=0,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)} =0.
\end{gathered}  \label{e2.2}
\end{equation}
\end{corollary}

 We have the following 3G-inequality.

\begin{proposition} \label{prop2.4}
 For each $t,s,r\in (0,\infty )$, we have
\begin{equation}
\frac{G(t,r)G(r,s)}{G(t,s)}\leq A(r)\rho (r).  \label{e2.3}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
 Using \eqref{e1.3.a}, for each $t,s,r\in (0,\infty )$, we deduce
that
\[
\frac{G(t,r)G(r,s)}{G(t,s)}=\frac{A(r)\min (\rho (t),\rho (r))\min (\rho
(r),\rho (s))}{\min (\rho (t),\rho (s))}.
\]
We claim that
\[
\frac{\min (\rho (t),\rho (r))\min (\rho (r),\rho (s))}{\min (\rho (t),\rho
(s))}\leq \rho (r).
\]
 Indeed, by symmetry, we may assume that $t\leq s$. Therefore, we
obtain
\begin{align*}
\frac{\min (\rho (t),\rho (r))\min (\rho (r),\rho (s))}{\min (\rho (t),\rho
(s))}
&= \frac{\min (\rho (t),\rho (r))\min (\rho (r),\rho (s))}{\rho (t)} \\
&\leq  \frac{\rho (t)\rho (r)}{\rho (t)}=\rho (r).
\end{align*}
This completes the proof.
\end{proof}

 In the sequel, we denote
\[
\alpha _{q}=\sup_{t,s\in (0,\infty
)}\int_0^{\infty }\frac{G(t,r)G(r,s)}{G(t,s)}|q(r)|\ dr,\quad
\| q\| =\int_0^{\infty }A(r)\rho (r)| q(r)| dr.
\]

\begin{proposition} \label{prop2.5}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}$, then:
 $(i)$ For $t\in [ 0,\infty )$, we have
\begin{equation}
V(q)(t)\leq \alpha _{q}.  \label{e2.4}
\end{equation}
 In particular,
\begin{equation}
\alpha _{q}=\| q\| <\infty .  \label{e2.5}
\end{equation}

 $(ii)$ For $t\in [ 0,\infty )$, we have
\begin{equation}
V(q\rho )(t)\leq \alpha _{q}\rho (t).  \label{e2.6}
\end{equation}
In particular for $t\in [ 0,\infty )$, we obtain
\begin{equation}
V(q\omega )(t)\leq \alpha _{q}\omega (t).  \label{e2.7}
\end{equation}

 $(iii)$ Let $f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}(0,\infty )$, then
\begin{equation}
V(qV(f))(t)\leq \alpha _{q}V(f)(t).  \label{e2.8}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}$.

 (i) Since for each $t,s\in (0,\infty )$, we have
$\lim_{r\to 0} \frac{G(s,r)}{G(t,r)}=1$, then  by Fatou's
lemma and \eqref{e1.4}, we deduce that
\[
V(q)(t)=\int_0^{\infty }G(t,s)q(s)ds\leq \underset{r\to 0}{\lim
\inf }\int_0^{\infty }G(t,s)\frac{G(s,r)}{G(t,r)}q(s)ds\leq \alpha _{q}.
\]
This proves \eqref{e2.4}.

 To prove \eqref{e2.5}, observe that $\| q\|
=\| V(q)\| _{\infty }:=\sup_{t>0}|V(q)(t)| $.
So it follows from \eqref{e2.4} that
$\| q\| =\| V(q)\| _{\infty }\leq \alpha _{q}$.
On the other hand, by using \eqref{e2.3}, for $t,s\in (0,\infty )$,
we have
\[
\int_0^{\infty }\frac{G(t,r)G(r,s)}{G(t,s)}q(r)dr\leq
\int_0^{\infty }A(r)\rho (r)q(r)dr=\| q\| .
\]
Hence
$\alpha _{q}\leq \| q\| <\infty$.
Therefore $\alpha _{q}=\| q\| <\infty $.

(ii) Since for each $t,s\in (0,\infty )$, we have
$\lim_{r\to \infty } \frac{G(s,r)}{G(t,r)}=\frac{\rho (s)}{\rho (t)}$,
then we deduce by Fatou's lemma and \eqref{e1.4}, that
\[
\int_0^{\infty }\frac{G(t,s)}{\rho (t)}\rho (s)q(s)dr
\leq \liminf_{r\to \infty } \int_0^{\infty }G(t,s)\frac{
G(s,r)}{G(t,r)}q(s)ds\leq \alpha _{q}.
\]
This proves \eqref{e2.6}.
Inequality \eqref{e2.7} follows from inequalities \eqref{e2.4},
\eqref{e2.6} and the fact that $\omega (t)=a+b\rho (t)$.

(iii) Using \eqref{e1.4} and Fubini-Tonelli's theorem, we obtain
\begin{align*}
V(qV(f))(t)
&= \int_0^{\infty }[\int_0^{\infty }G(t,r)G(r,s)q(r)dr]f(s)ds\\
&\leq \int_0^{\infty }\alpha _{q}G(t,s)f(s)ds=\alpha _{q}V(f)(t).
\end{align*}
This completes the proof.
\end{proof}

\section{Proofs of main results}

 In this section, we prove Theorem \ref{thm1.2} and
Corollary \ref{coro1.3}.
 First, for a given nonnegative function $q$ in $\mathcal{K}\cap
C((0,\infty ))$, we aim at determining the Green's function $G_{q}(t,s)$ of
the linear problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'-q(t)u(t)=-f(t),\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
u(0)=0,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=0.
\end{gathered} \label{e3.0.3}
\end{equation}
 Put $u(t):=\rho (t)v(t)$. It is easy to check that $u$ is a
solution of  \eqref{e3.0.3} if and only if $v$ is a solution of the
 problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)\rho ^2(t)}(A(t)\rho ^2(t)v'(t))'-q(t)v(t)
=\frac{-f(t)}{\rho (t)},\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
\lim_{t\to0} (A\rho ^2v')(t)=0,\quad  \lim_{t\to\infty} v(t)=0.
\end{gathered}  \label{e3.0.4}
\end{equation}
Therefore, to obtain $G_{q}(t,s)$ it is sufficient to determine
the Green's function $H_{q}(t,s)$ of the operator $u\mapsto \frac{-1}{A\rho
^2}(A\rho ^2v')'+qv$ on $(0,\infty )$ with the
Dirichlet conditions $\lim_{t\to0} (A\rho ^2v')(t)=0$,
$\lim_{t\to\infty} v(t)=0$.
To this end, we need the following results.

\begin{proposition}\label{prop3.0}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$,
then the  problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)\rho ^2(t)}(A(t)\rho ^2(t)u'(t))'-q(t)u(t)=0, \quad
 t\in (0,\infty ), \\
\lim_{t\to0} (A\rho ^2u')(t)=0,\quad u(0)=1,
\end{gathered}  \label{e3.0}
\end{equation}
 has a unique positive solution $\varphi \in C([0,\infty ))\cap
C^2((0,\infty ))$.
 Moreover, $\varphi $ is nondecreasing and for $t\geq 0$ satisfies
\begin{equation}
1\leq \varphi (t)\leq \exp \Big(\int_0^t \frac{1}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}
(\int_0^{s}A(r)\rho ^2(r)q(r)dr)ds\Big)\leq \exp (\| q\| ).
\label{e3.0.1}
\end{equation}
In particular, $\varphi (\infty ):=\lim_{t\to \infty}\varphi (t)$
exists and $1\leq \varphi (\infty )\leq \exp (\|q\| )$.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
(see \cite{Yaz}). Let $K$ be the operator defined on $C([0,\infty ))$
 by
\[
Kf(t):=\int_0^t \frac{1}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}\Big( \int_0^{s}A(r)\rho
^2(r)q(r)f(r)dr\Big) ds,\quad t\in [ 0,\infty ).
\]
We put $K^{j}=K^{j-1}\circ K$ for any integer $j\geq 2$.
Then we claim that for each $t\geq 0$ and $m\in \mathbb{N}$, we have
\begin{equation}
0\leq K^{m}\mathbf{1}(t)\leq \frac{(K\mathbf{1)}^{m}(t)}{m!}.  \label{e3.0.2}
\end{equation}
 Indeed, if $m=0$ or $1$, \eqref{e3.0.2} is valid. Now for a given
$m\in \mathbb{N}$, suppose \eqref{e3.0.2}, then we have
\begin{align*}
K^{m+1}\mathbf{1}(t)
&= K(K^{m}\mathbf{1})(t) \\
&\leq \frac{1}{m!}K((K\mathbf{1})^{m})(t) \\
&= \frac{1}{m!}\int_0^t \frac{1}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}\Big(
\int_0^{s}A(r)\rho ^2(r)q(r)(K\mathbf{1})^{m}(r)\,dr\Big) ds.
\end{align*}
Since the function $K\mathbf{1}$ is nondecreasing, it follows that
\begin{align*}
K^{m+1}\mathbf{1}(t)
&\leq \frac{1}{m!}\int_0^t (K\mathbf{1}
)^{m}(s)\Big( \frac{1}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}\int_0^{s}A(r)\rho
^2(r)q(r)\,dr\Big) \,ds \\
&= \frac{1}{m!}\int_0^t (K\mathbf{1})^{m}(s)(K\mathbf{1})'(s)\,ds\\
&=\frac{1}{(m+1)!}(K\mathbf{1})^{m+1}(t).
\end{align*}
 Therefore, the series $\sum_{m=0}^\infty (K^{m}\mathbf{1})(t)$
converges locally uniformly to a function
$\varphi \in C([0,\infty ))$ satisfying for each $t\geq 0$,
\[
\varphi (t)=1+\int_0^t {\frac{1}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}\Big(
\int_0^{s}A(r)\rho ^2(r)q(r)\varphi (r)dr\Big) ds}.
\]
Hence $\varphi \in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ and
$\varphi $ is a positive solution of \eqref{e3.0}.

Now, we  show the uniqueness.
Let $u,v\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ be two positive
solutions of \eqref{e3.0}. Then for each $R\in (0,\infty )$ and $t\in [ 0,R]$ we
have
\[
| u(t)-v(t)| \leq K(| u-v| )(t).
\]
Since $K$ is a nondecreasing operator, we deduce by induction that
for each $m\geq 0$,
\begin{align*}
| u(t)-v(t)|
&\leq K^{m}(| u-v| )(t) \\
&\leq \sup_{r\in [ 0,R]} | u(r)-v(r)| K^{m}\mathbf{1}(R) \\
&\leq \sup_{r\in [ 0,R]} | u(r)-v(r)| \frac{(K\mathbf{1)}^{m}(R)}{m!}.
\end{align*}
Letting $m$ tend to infinity, we obtain $|u(t)-v(t)| =0$ for all
$t\in [ 0,R]$. So $u=v$ on $[0,\infty )$.
 Finally \eqref{e3.0.1} follows from the fact that
\begin{gather*}
1\leq \varphi (t)=\underset{m=0}{\overset{\infty }{\sum }}(K^{m}\mathbf{1}
)(t)\leq \underset{m=0}{\overset{\infty }{\sum }}\frac{(K\mathbf{1)}^{m}(t)}{
m!}=\exp (K\mathbf{1}(t))\quad \forall t\geq 0,
\\
K\mathbf{1}(t)\leq \int_0^{\infty } \frac{1}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}\Big(
\int_0^{s}A(r)\rho ^2(r)q(rdr)\Big) ds=\| q\| .
\end{gather*}
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}\label{rem3.1} \rm
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ and
$\varphi $ be the solution of \eqref{e3.0}. It follows
that the function $\psi $ defined on $(0,\infty )$ by
\[
\psi (t):=\varphi (t)\int_{t}^{\infty }\frac{ds}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)\varphi
^2(s)},
\]
 is a second solution of the equation
\[
\frac{1}{A(t)\rho ^2(t)}(A(t)\rho ^2(t)u'(t))'-q(t)u(t)=0,
\quad \text{ on }(0,\infty ),
\]
such that $\varphi $ and $\psi $ are linearly independent.

 Furthermore, since for $t>0$,
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{\varphi ^2(\infty )\rho (t)}\leq \psi (t)\leq \frac{1}{\varphi
(t)}\int_{t}^{\infty }\frac{ds}{A(s)\rho ^2(s)}=\frac{1}{\varphi (t)\rho
(t)},  \label{e3.0.6}
\end{equation}
it follows that $\lim_{t\to\infty} \psi (t)=0$ and also
we have
\[
\psi (t) \sim \int_{t}^{\infty }\frac{ds}{A(s)\rho
^2(s)}=\frac{1}{\rho (t)}\quad\text{as } t\to 0.
\]
Hence $\lim_{t\to0} \rho (t)\psi (t)=1$.
\end{remark}

 Now, following \cite[Section 2, p.294]{MM1},  we deduce that
$H_{q}(t,s)$ is given by
\[
H_{q}(t,s)=\begin{cases}
A(s)\rho ^2(s)\varphi (s)\psi (t), & \text{if }0<s\leq t<\infty ,
\\
A(s)\rho ^2(s)\varphi (t)\psi (s), & \text{if }0<t\leq s<\infty .
\end{cases}
\]
On the other hand, we deduce that $\{\rho \varphi ,\rho \psi \}$
is a fundamental system of solutions of the equation $\frac{1}{A}(Au')'-qu=0$
on $(0,\infty )$ satisfying
\begin{equation}
A(t)[(\rho \psi )(t)(\rho \varphi )'(t)-(\rho \varphi )(t)(\rho
\psi )'(t)]=1\quad \text{for }t\in (0,\infty ).  \label{e3.0.5}
\end{equation}
Furthermore, the Green's function $G_{q}(t,s)$ of problem \eqref{e3.0.3}
is given by
\[
G_{q}(t,s)=\frac{\rho (t)}{\rho (s)}H_{q}(t,s)
=\begin{cases}
A(s)\rho (t)\rho (s)\varphi (s)\psi (t), & \text{if }0<s\leq t<\infty,
\\
A(s)\rho (t)\rho (s)\varphi (t)\psi (s), & \text{if }0<t\leq s<\infty .
\end{cases}
\]
That is,
\begin{align}
G_{q}(t,s)
&= A(s)\rho (t)\rho (s)\varphi (t)\varphi (s)\int_{t\vee
s}^{\infty }\frac{dr}{A(r)\rho ^2(r)\varphi ^2(r)}  \label{e3.1} \\
&= A(s)\rho (t\wedge s)\rho (t\vee s)\varphi (t\wedge s)\psi (t\vee s),
\label{e3.1a}
\end{align}
where $t\wedge s=\min (t,s)$ and $t\vee s=\max (t,s)$.

 Next, we recall that the kernels $V$ and $V_{q}$ are defined on
$\mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $ by
\[
Vf( t) :=\int_0^{\infty }G( t,s) f(s)ds, \quad
V_{q}f( t) :=\int_0^{\infty }G_{q}( t,s) f(s)ds, \quad
t\geq 0.
\]

\begin{proposition} \label{prop3.2}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$,
then we have
\begin{equation}
e^{-2\| q\| }G(t,s)\leq G_{q}(t,s)\leq G(t,s).  \label{e3.2}
\end{equation}
 In particular for $f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty)) $, we obtain
\begin{equation}
e^{-2\| q\| }Vf\leq V_{q}f\leq Vf.  \label{e3.3}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
 Using \eqref{e3.1a}, \eqref{e3.0.6} and that the function
$\varphi $ is nondecreasing, we obtain inequalities \eqref{e3.2}.
Integrating inequalities \eqref{e3.2}, we obtain \eqref{e3.3}.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary} \label{coro3.0}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in
$\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ and let $f$ in $\mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $,
then the following two statements are equivalent.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] The function $t\to V_{q}f(t)$ is continuous on $[0,\infty )$.

\item[(ii)] The integral $\int_0^{\infty }A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)ds$ converges.
\end{itemize}
\end{corollary}

\begin{proposition} \label{prop3.3}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ and let
$f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $ such that $s\to A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)$
 is continuous and integrable on $(0,\infty )$. Then $V_{q}f$ is the unique
nonnegative continuous solution of problem \eqref{e3.0.3}.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ and
$ f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $. By
Corollary \ref{coro3.0}, the function $t\to V_{q}f( t) $
is continuous on $[0,\infty )$.
 On the other hand, for $t>0$, we have
\begin{align*}
V_{q}f( t)
&= \int_0^{\infty }G_{q}( t,s) f(s)ds \\
&= (\rho \psi )(t)\int_0^t A(s)\rho (s)\varphi (s)f(s)ds+(\rho \varphi
)(t)\int_{t}^{\infty }A(s)\rho (s)\psi (s)f(s)ds.
\end{align*}
So $V_{q}f$ is differentiable on $(0,\infty )$ and we have for $t>0$,
\[
(V_{q}f)'( t) =(\rho \psi )'(t)\int_0^t A(s)\rho (s)\varphi (s)f(s)ds
+(\rho \varphi )'(t)\int_{t}^{\infty }A(s)\rho (s)\psi (s)f(s)ds.
\]
 Therefore by using the fact that $\rho \varphi $ and $\rho \psi $
are solutions of the equation $\frac{1}{A}(Au')'-qu=0$ on
$(0,\infty )$ and \eqref{e3.0.5}, we obtain
\begin{align*}
(A(V_{q}f)')'( t)
&= (A(\rho \psi )')'(t)\int_0^t A(s)\rho (s)\varphi (s)f(s)ds \\
&\quad +(A(\rho \varphi )')'(t)\int_{t}^{\infty }A(s)\rho (s)\psi (s)f(s)ds \\
&\quad +A(t)f(t)[A(\rho \varphi )(\rho \psi )'-A(\rho \psi )(\rho \varphi )'](t) \\
&= A(t)q(t)V_{q}f( t) -A(t)f(t).
\end{align*}
So $V_{q}f$ is a solution of the equation
$\frac{1}{A(t)} (A(t)u'(t))'-q(t)u(t)=-f(t)$.
Now since $0\leq V_{q}f\leq Vf$, it follows by Corollary
\ref{coro2.3}, that $V_{q}f(0)=0$ and
 $\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{V_{q}f( t) }{\rho (t)}=0$.

It remains to prove the uniqueness. Assume that there exist two
positive solutions $u,v\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ to problem
\eqref{e3.0.3}. Let $\theta :=u-v$, then
$\theta \in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ and satisfies
\begin{gather*}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)\theta '(t))'-q(t)\theta (t)=0\quad
\text{on }(0,\infty ), \\
\theta (0)=0,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{\theta(t)}{\rho (t)}=0.
\end{gather*}
 Hence, there exists $\lambda ,\mu \in \mathbb{R}$, such that
\[
\theta (t)=\lambda \rho (t)\varphi (t)+\mu \rho (t)\psi (t),\text{ for }
t\geq 0.
\]
So using this fact, Proposition \ref{prop3.0}, Remark \ref{rem3.1}
and that
\[
\theta (0)=\lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{\theta (t)
}{\rho (t)}=0,
\]
 we deduce that $\lambda =\mu =0$.
That is, $u=v$. This completes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}\label{coro3.2}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ 
and let $f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $
such that $s\to A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)$ is continuous and
integrable on $(0,\infty )$. Then $V_{q}f$ satisfies the  resolvent
equation
\begin{equation}
Vf=V_{q}f+V_{q}( qVf) =V_{q}f+V( qV_{q}f) .
\label{e3.5}
\end{equation}
In particular, if $V(qf)<\infty $, we have
\begin{equation}
(I-V_{q}(q\cdot) )(I+V(q\cdot) )f=(I+V(q\cdot)
)(I-V_{q}(q\cdot) )f=f.  \label{e3.5.1}
\end{equation}
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$ and
let $f\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $ such that 
$s\to A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)$ is continuous and integrable on $(0,\infty )$.

By Proposition \ref{prop2.1} it is clear that the function 
$t\mapsto q(t)Vf( t) $ is continuous on $(0,\infty )$ and there exists a
nonnegative constant $c$ such that
\begin{equation}
Vf(t)\leq (1+\rho (t))\int_0^{\infty }A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))f(s)ds\leq
c(1+\rho (t)).  \label{e3.5.3}
\end{equation}
So we deduce by Proposition \ref{prop2.5} that
\begin{align*}
\int_0^{\infty }A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))q(s)Vf(s)ds 
&\leq c\int_0^{\infty}G(1,s)(1+\rho (s))q(s)ds \\
&\leq 2c\alpha _{q}<\infty .
\end{align*}
Let $\theta :=Vf-V_{q}f-V_{q}( qVf) $. By using
Corollary \ref{coro2.3} and Proposition \ref{prop3.3}, the function $\theta $
is a solution of the problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)\theta '(t))'-q(t)\theta (t)=0,\quad t\in (0,\infty ),  \\
\theta (0)=0,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{\theta (t)}{\rho (t)}=0.
\end{gathered}   \label{e3.5.4}
\end{equation}
From the uniqueness in Proposition \ref{prop3.3}, we deduce that $
\theta =0$.

 Now, by using Corollary \ref{coro3.0} and \eqref{e3.3}, we deduce
that the function $t\mapsto q(t)V_{q}f( t) $ is continuous on
$(0,\infty )$ and that
\[
\int_0^{\infty }A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))q(s)V_{q}f(s)ds\leq \int_0^{\infty
}A(s)\min (1,\rho (s))q(s)Vf(s)ds<\infty .
\]
So by similar arguments as above, we obtain $Vf-V_{q}f-V(qV_{q}f) =0$.
This completes the proof.
\end{proof}

 We recall that for $a,b\geq 0$ such that $a+b>0$, we have
\[
\omega (t)=a+b\rho (t),\text{ }t\in [ 0,\infty ).
\]
 The next Lemma will be useful for the proof of Theorem \ref{thm1.2}.

\begin{lemma}\label{lem3.4}
Let $q$ be a nonnegative function in $\mathcal{K}\cap C((0,\infty ))$, then we have
\[
e^{-2\| q\| }\omega \leq \omega -V_{q}( q\omega
) \leq \omega .
\]
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 Let $\theta :=\omega -V_{q}( q\omega ) $. It is clear
that $\theta \leq \omega $.
 Now since $\{\rho \varphi ,\rho \psi \}$ is a fundamental system
of solutions of the equation
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'-q(t)u(t)=0,  \label{e3.5.5}
\end{equation}
and the function $\theta $ is also a solution of this equation
with $\theta (0)=a$ and $\lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{\theta
(t)}{\rho (t)}=b$, we deduce by using Proposition \ref{prop3.0} and Remark
\ref{rem3.1} that
\[
\theta (t)=\frac{b}{\varphi (\infty )}\rho (t)\varphi (t)+a\rho (t)\psi (t),
\quad t>0.
\]
Using Proposition \ref{prop3.0} and \eqref{e3.0.6}, this implies
that
\[
\theta =\omega -V_{q}( q\omega ) \geq \frac{b}{\varphi (\infty )}
\rho +\frac{a}{\varphi ^2(\infty )}\geq \frac{1}{\varphi ^2(\infty )}
\omega \geq e^{-2\| q\| }\omega .
\]
The proof is complete.
\end{proof}

 \begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm1.2}]
Since $g$ satisfies (H2), there exists a
nonnegative continuous function $q$ in $\mathcal{K}$ such for each 
$t\in (0,\infty )$, the map $s\to s( q( t) -g(t,s\omega ( t) ) ) $ 
is nondecreasing on $[0,1]$.
 Let
\[
\Lambda :=\big\{ u\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty ))
:e^{-2\| q\| }\omega \leq u\leq \omega \big\} ,
\]
and define the operator $T$ on $\Lambda $ by
\[
Tu=\omega -V_{q}( q\omega ) +V_{q}(( q-g(\cdot,u)) u).
\]
By (H2), we have
\begin{equation}
0\leq g(.,u)\leq q,\quad \text{for all }u\in \Lambda .  \label{e3.7}
\end{equation}
 We claim that $\Lambda $ is invariant under $T$. Indeed, since $g$
is nonnegative, we have for $u\in \Lambda $
\[
Tu\leq \omega -V_{q}( q\omega ) +V_{q}(qu)\leq \omega
\]
 and by \eqref{e3.7} and Lemma \ref{lem3.4},
\[
Tu\geq \omega -V_{q}( q\omega ) \geq e^{-2\| q\|
}\omega .
\]
 Next, we will prove that the operator $T$ is nondecreasing on $
\Lambda $. Indeed, let $u,v\in \Lambda $ be such that $u\leq v$.
Since for $t\in (0,\infty )$, the map
 $s\to s( q( t) -g( t,s\omega (t) ) ) $ is nondecreasing on $[0,1]$,
then we obtain
\[
Tv-Tu=V_{q}([ v( q-g(\cdot,v) ) -u(q-g(\cdot,u) )] ) \geq 0.
\]

 Now, we consider the sequence $\{ u_{n}\} $ defined by 
$u_0=e^{-2\| q\| }\omega $ and $u_{n+1}=Tu_{n}$, for 
$n\in \mathbb{N}$. Since $\Lambda $ is invariant under $T$, we have 
$u_1=Tu_0\geq $ $u_0$ and by the monotonicity of $T$, we deduce that
\[
e^{-2\| q\| }\omega =u_0\leq u_1\leq \dots \leq u_{n}\leq
u_{n+1}\leq \omega .
\]
 So the sequence $\{ u_{n}\} $ converges to a function
$u\in \Lambda $. Using hypotheses (H1)--(H2)
and the monotone convergence theorem, we deduce that
\[
u=( I-V_{q}(q\cdot) ) \omega +V_{q}(( q-g(.,u) ) u).
\]
That is,
\[
( I-V_{q}(q\cdot) ) u=( I-V_{q}( q\cdot)) \omega -V_{q}( ug( \cdot,u) ) .
\]
On the other hand, since $u\leq \omega $, then by \eqref{e2.7}, we obtain
 $V( qu) \leq V( q\omega ) \leq \alpha_{q}\omega <\infty $.
So by applying the operator $( I+V(q\cdot) ) $ on both sides of the above
equality and using \eqref{e3.5} and \eqref{e3.5.1}, we conclude that $u$ satisfies
\begin{equation}
u=\omega -V( ug( \cdot,u) ).  \label{e3.8}
\end{equation}

 Next we aim at proving that $u$ is a solution of problem 
\eqref{e1.1}. To this end, we remark by \eqref{e3.7} that
\begin{equation}
ug(\cdot,u) \leq q\omega .  \label{e3.9}
\end{equation}
By Proposition \ref{prop2.1} (ii) and \eqref{e2.7}, this implies 
that the function $t\to V( ug(\cdot,u) ) (t)$ is
continuous on $[0,\infty )$ and so by \eqref{e3.8}, $u$ is continuous on 
$[0,\infty )$. Now, since by $(H_1)$ and \eqref{e3.9}, the function
$s\to A(s)\min ( 1,\rho (s)) u(s)g(s,u(s)) $ is continuous and integrable
on $(0,\infty )$, we conclude by Corollary \ref{coro2.3} that $u$ is the 
required solution.

 It remains to prove that $u$ is the unique solution to 
\eqref{e1.1}. Assume that $v\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$ is
another nonnegative solution to problem \eqref{e1.1}. Then we have
\begin{equation}
v=\omega -V( vg(\cdot,v) ) .  \label{e3.10}
\end{equation}
Now let $h$ be the function defined on $(0,\infty )$ by
\[
h(t)=\begin{cases}
\frac{v(t)g( t,v(t)) -u(t)g( t,u(t)) }{v(t)-u(t)} &
\text{if }v(t)\neq u(t), \\
0 & \text{if }v(t)=u(t).
\end{cases}
\]
From (H3), we have $h\in \mathcal{B}^{+}( (0,\infty )) $ and by using
\eqref{e3.8} and \eqref{e3.10}, we obtain
\[
(I+V(h.))(v-u)=0.
\]
 On the other hand, since by (H2), we have $h\leq q$, then by
using \eqref{e2.7} we deduce that
\[
V(h| v-u| )\leq 2V(q\omega )\leq 2\alpha _{q}\omega <\infty .
\]
 Hence by \eqref{e3.5.1}, we conclude that $u=v$. This completes the
proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Proof of Corollary \ref{coro1.3}]
Let $g( t,s) =p(t)f(s)$ and $\theta (s)=sf(s)$, and let
$q(t)=p(t)\max_{0\leq \xi \leq \omega ( t) } \theta'(\xi )\in \mathcal{K}$. 
It is clear that hypotheses (H1) and (H3) are satisfied.
Moreover, by a simple computation, we obtain
\[
\frac{d}{ds}[s( q( t) -g( t,s\omega ( t)
) ) ]=q(t)-p(t)\theta '(s\omega ( t) )\geq 0 \quad
\text{for }s\in [ 0,1]\text{ and }t>0.
\]
This implies that the function $g$ satisfies hypothesis (H2).
So the result follows by Theorem \ref{thm1.2}.
\end{proof}

\begin{example} \rm
Let $a\geq 0$ and $b\geq 0$ with $a+b>0$. Let $\sigma \geq 0$, and $p$ be a
positive continuous function on $(0,\infty )$ such that
\[
\int_0^{\infty }A(r)\rho (r)(\omega ( t) )^{\sigma}p(r)dr<\infty .
\]
Since the function $q(t):=(\sigma +1)p(t)(\omega ( t))^{\sigma }$
belongs to the class $\mathcal{K}$,  the  problem
\begin{gather*}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=p(t)u^{\sigma +1}(t),\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b,
\end{gather*}
has a unique positive solution $u\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$
satisfying
\[
e^{-2\| q\| }\omega (t)\leq u( t) \leq \omega (t),\quad t\geq 0.
\]
\end{example}

\begin{example} \rm
Let $a\geq 0$ and $b\geq 0$ with $a+b>0$. Let $\sigma \geq 0$, $\gamma >0$
and $p$ be a positive continuous function on $(0,\infty )$
such that
\[
\int_0^{\infty }A(r)\rho (r)(\omega ( t) )^{\sigma +\gamma }p(r)dr<\infty .
\]
Let $\theta (s)=s^{\sigma +1}\log (1+s^{\gamma })$. Since the
function $q(t):=p(t)\max_{0\leq \xi \leq \omega ( t) }\theta '(\xi )$
 belongs to the class $\mathcal{K}$, then the  problem
\begin{gather*}
\frac{1}{A(t)}(A(t)u'(t))'=p(t)u^{\sigma +1}(t)\log
(1+u^{\gamma }(t)),\quad t\in (0,\infty ), \\
u(0)=a,\quad \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{u(t)}{\rho (t)}=b,
\end{gather*}
 has a unique positive solution $u\in C([0,\infty ))\cap C^2((0,\infty ))$
satisfying
\[
e^{-2\| q\| }\omega (t)\leq u( t) \leq \omega (t),\quad t\geq 0.
\]
\end{example}

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their careful 
reading of the paper. The authors would like to extend their sincere 
appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University 
for its funding this Research group No RG-1435-043.

\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{AO} R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan;
\emph{Infinite Interval Problems for Differential}, 
Difference and Integral Equations, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 2001.

\bibitem{B} I. Bachar;
\emph{Positive solutions blowing up at infinity for
singular nonlinear problem}, Nonlinear Stud. Vol. 12 (4) (2005), 343-359.

\bibitem{BM} I. Bachar, H. M\^{a}agli;
\emph{Existence and global asymptotic behavior of positive solutions 
for nonlinear problems on the half-line}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 416 (2014), 181-194.

\bibitem{Ba} J. V. Baxley;
\emph{Existence and uniqueness for nonlinear boundary value problems
 on infinite intervals}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 147 (1990), 122-133.

\bibitem{CMMZ} R. Chemmam, H. M\^{a}agli, S. Masmoudi, M. Zribi;
\emph{Combined effects in nonlinear singular elliptic problems in a bounded
domain}, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 1 (2012), no. 4, 301--318.

\bibitem{ciradulescu} F. Cirstea, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Uniqueness of the blow-up boundary solution of logistic equations 
with absorbtion}, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 335 (2002), no. 5, 447--452.

\bibitem{gherad} M. Ghergu, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Singular Elliptic Problems: Bifurcation and Asymptotic Analysis}, 
Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications, 37, 
The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.

\bibitem{gherad2} M. Ghergu, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Nonlinear PDEs. Mathematical Models in Biology, Chemistry and Population 
Genetics}, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.

\bibitem{GGLO} A. Granas, R. B. Guerther, J. W. Lee, D. O'Regan;
\emph{Boundary value problems on infinite intervals and semiconductor devices}, 
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 116 1986, 335-348.

\bibitem{I} G. Iffland;
\emph{Positive solutions of a problem Emden-Fowler type with a type free boundary}, 
SIAM J. Math. Anal. 18 (1987), 283--292.

\bibitem{KYY} N. Kawano, E. Yanagida, S. Yotsutani;
\emph{Structure theorems for positive radial solutions to $\Delta u+K(|
x| )u^{p}=0$ in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$}, Funkcial. Ekvac. 36 (1993), 557--579.

\bibitem{MM} H. M\^{a}agli, S. Masmoudi;
\emph{Existence theorem of nonlinear singular boundary value problem}, 
Nonlinear Anal. 46 (2001), 465-473.

\bibitem{MM1} H. M\^{a}agli, S. Masmoudi;
\emph{Sur les solutions d'un op\'{e}rateur diff\'{e}rentiel singulier 
semi-lin\'{e}aire}, Potential Anal. 10 (1999), 289-304.

\bibitem{R} V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Qualitative Analysis of Nonlinear Elliptic Partial Differential Equations:
 Monotonicity, Analytic, and Variational
Methods, Contemporary Mathematics and Its Applications}, 6. Hindawi
Publishing Corporation, New York, 2008.

\bibitem{Y} B. Yan;
\emph{Multiple unbounded solutions of boundary value problems for second-order 
differential equations on the half-line}, Nonlinear Anal. 51 (2002), 1031-1044.

\bibitem{Yaz} N. Yazidi;
\emph{Monotone method for singular Neumann problem}, 
Nonlinear Anal. 49 (2002), 589-602.

\bibitem{Zh} Z. Zhao;
\emph{Positive solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations},
 Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Volume 121 (2) (1994), 465-469.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
