\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 69, pp. 1--15.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2012 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2012/69\hfil Infinitely many solutions]
{Infinitely many solutions for nonlocal elliptic systems of
 $(p_1,\dots ,p_n)$-Kirchhoff type}

\author[S. Heidarkhani, J. Henderson \hfil EJDE-2012/69\hfilneg]
{Shapour Heidarkhani, Johnny Henderson}  % in alphabetical order

\address{Shapour Heidarkhani \newline
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences \\
Razi University, 67149 Kermanshah, Iran \newline
School of Mathematics,
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) \\
P.O. Box 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran}
\email{s.heidarkhani@razi.ac.ir}

\address{Johnny Henderson \newline
Department of Mathematics,
Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7328, USA}
\email{Johnny\_Henderson@baylor.edu}

\thanks{Submitted April 17, 2012. Published May 2, 2012.}
\subjclass[2000]{35A05, 35A15}
\keywords{Infinitely many solutions; Kirchhoff type system;
\hfill\break\indent 
 critical point theory; variational methods}

\begin{abstract}
 We establish the existence of infinitely many solutions for a
 class of nonlocal elliptic systems of $(p_1,\dots ,p_n)$-Kirchhoff
 type. Our approach is based on variational methods.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corllary}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\allowdisplaybreaks

%\newcommand{\To}{\rightarrow}
%\newcommand{\epsi}{\varepsilon}

\section{Introduction}

 Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^N$ ($N\geq 1$) be a non-empty bounded open set 
with a smooth boundary $\partial\Omega$, 
$K_i:[0,+\infty[\to \mathbb{R}$, for $1\leq i \leq n$, be continuous
functions such that there exist positive numbers $m_i$ and $M_i$, with
$m_i\leq K_i(t)\leq M_i$, for all $t\geq 0$ and for $1\leq i \leq n$,
$a_i\in L^{\infty}(\Omega)$ with
$\operatorname{ess\,inf}_{\Omega}a_i(x)\geq 0$, and $p_i>N$, for
 $1\leq i \leq n$.

Consider the nonlocal elliptic Kirchhoff type system
\begin{equation}\label{1}
\begin{gathered}
\begin{aligned}
& -\Big[K_i(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u_i(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|u_i(x)|^{p_i})dx)\Big]^{p_i-1}\\
&\times \Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla
u_i|^{p_i-2}\nabla u_i)+a_i(x)|u_i|^{p_i-2}u\Big)\\
&=\lambda F_{u_i}(x,u_1,\dots ,u_{n})
\quad \text{in } \Omega,
\end{aligned}\\
u_i=0 \quad\text{on }  \partial\Omega,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
for $1\leq i\leq n$, where $\lambda$ is a positive parameter and
 $F:\Omega\times \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$ is a function such that the
 mapping $(t_1, t_2, \dots , t_n) \to F(x, t_1, t_2, \ldots, t_n)$ is in
 $C^1$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$  for all $x\in \Omega$, $F_{t_i}$ is continuous in
$\Omega\times\mathbb{R}^n$, for $i = 1, \dots, n$, and 
$F(x, 0, \dots , 0) = 0$ for all $x\in \Omega$. Here, $F_{t_i}$ denotes the partial
derivative of $F$ with respect to $t_i$.

 We use Ricceri's Variational Principle \cite{R1},
 to ensure the existence of infinitely many weak solutions for 
\eqref{1} in $\prod_{i=1}^{n}W^{1,p_i}_0(\Omega)$.
System \eqref{1} is related to a model given by the equation of
elastic strings
\begin{equation}\label{E1}
\rho\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial t^2}-
\Big(\frac{P_0}{h}+\frac{E}{2L}\int_0^{L}|\frac{\partial
u}{\partial x}|^2dx\Big)\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial^2 x}=0
\end{equation}
where $\rho$ is the mass density, $P_0$ is the initial tension,
$h$ is the area of the cross-section, $E$ is the Young modulus of
the material, and $L$ is the length of the string, was proposed by
Kirchhoff \cite{K} as a extension of the classical D'Alembert's
wave equation for free vibrations of elastic strings. Kirchhoff’s
model takes into account the changes in length of the string
produced by transverse vibrations. Similar nonlocal problems also
model several physical and biological systems where $u$ describes
a process that depends on the average of itself, for example, the
population density. Later, the equation \eqref{E1} was extended to
the equation 
$$
\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial t^2}-K\Big(\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u(x)|^2dx\Big)\Delta u
=f(x,u)\quad \text{in }  \Omega
$$ 
where $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^N$ ($N\geq1$) is a non-empty bounded open 
set with a given $\partial\Omega$
and $K:[0,+\infty[\to \mathbb{R}$ is a continuous function. Some
early classical investigations of Kirchhoff equations can be seen
in the papers \cite{ACM,CWL,GHK2,HZ,HAO,HT,M,MZ,PZ,R2,ZP} and the
references therein. In particular, these papers discuss the
historical development of the problem as well as describe
situations that can be realistically modelled by \eqref{1} with a
nonconstant $K$.

 For a discussion about the existence of infinitely many solutions
for boundary value problems, using Ricceri's Variational Principle
\cite{R1}, we refer the reader to \cite{D,FJ,GHK1,K,R2}. 
Applying a smooth version of \cite[Theorem 2.1]{BM1}, 
which is a more precise version of Ricceri's
Variational Principle \cite{R1}, we refer the reader to 
\cite{BA,BD,BM2,BMO,BMR1,BMR2,BMR3,CLi}, and employing a
non-smooth version of Ricceri's Variational Principle \cite{R1}
due to Marano and Motreanu \cite{MM}, we refer the reader to
\cite{C}. Here, our motivation comes from the recent article by
Bonanno, et al. \cite{BMO}.

\section{Preliminaries}

 First we recall the celebrated Ricceri's Variational
Principle \cite[Theorem 2.5]{R1} which is our primary tool in proving
our main result.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm1}
 Let $X$ be a reflexive real Banach
space, let $ \Phi, \Psi:X \to \mathbb{R}$ be two
G\^ateaux differentiable functionals such that $\Phi$ is
sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, strongly continuous, and
coercive, and $\Psi$ is sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous.
For every $r > \inf_X \Phi$, let us put
$$
\varphi(r):=\inf_{u\in\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r[)}\frac{\sup_{v\in\Phi^{-1}
(]-\infty,r])}\Psi(v) -\Psi(u)}{r-\Phi(u)}
$$
and 
$$
\gamma:=\liminf _{r\to+\infty}\varphi(r), \quad
\delta:=\liminf _{r\to(\inf_X \Phi)^{+}}\varphi(r).
$$ 
Then, one has
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] for every $r > \inf_X \Phi$ and every 
$\lambda\in]0,\frac{1}{\varphi(r)}[$, the
restriction of the functional $I_\lambda=\Phi-\lambda\Psi$ to
$\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r[)$ admits a global minimum, which is a
critical
point (local minimum) of $I_\lambda$ in $X$. 

\item[(b)] If $\gamma<+\infty$, then, for each $\lambda\in]0,\frac{1}{\gamma}[$, 
the following alternative holds: eithre
\begin{itemize}
\item[(b1)] $I_\lambda$ possesses a global minimum, or

\item[(b2)] there is a sequence $\{u_n\}$ of critical points (local
minima) of $I_\lambda$ such that
$\lim_{n\to+\infty}\Phi(u_n)=+\infty$.
\end{itemize}

\item[(c)] If $\delta<+\infty$, then,
for each $\lambda\in]0,1/\delta[$, the following
alternative holds: either
\begin{itemize}
   \item[[(c1)] there is a global minimum of
$\Phi$ which is a local minimum of $I_\lambda$, or

\item[(c2)] there is a sequence of pairwise distinct critical points 
(local minima) of $I_\lambda$ which weakly converges to a global minimum of
$\Phi$.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

 Denote by $W_0^{1,p_i}(\Omega)$ the closure of
$C_0^{\infty}(\Omega)$ with respect to the norm
$$
\|u_i\|_{p_i}=\Big(\int_{\Omega}|\nabla
u_i(x)|^{p_i}dx\Big)^{1/{p_i}}\quad \text{for }  1 \leq i\leq n.
$$ 
Put 
$$
c_i:=\max\Big\{\sup_{u_i\in W_0^{1,p_i}(\Omega)\setminus
 \{0\}}\frac{\max_{x\in\overline{\Omega}}|u_i(x)|}{\|u_i\|_{p_i}},\; 1\leq i\leq n
\Big\}.
$$
 Since $p_i>N$ for $1\leq i\leq n$, one has $c_i<+\infty$. 
Moreover, from \cite[formula (6b)]{T} one has
$$ 
\sup_{u\in W_0^{1,p_i}(\Omega)\setminus
 \{0\}}\frac{\max_{x\in\overline{\Omega}}|u_i(x)|}{\|u_i\|_{p_i}}
\leq\frac{N^{-1/{p_i}}}
 {\sqrt{\pi}}[\Gamma(1+\frac{N}{2})]^{1/N}(\frac{p_i-1}{p_i-N})^{1-1/{p_i}}
|\Omega|^{1/N-1/{p_i}}
$$
for $1\leq i\leq n$,   where $|\Omega|$ is the Lebesgue
measure of the set $\Omega$, and equality occurs when $\Omega$ is a ball. 

Let $X$ be the Cartesian product  of the $n$ Sobolev spaces
$W_0^{1,p_1}(\Omega)$,\ldots, $W_0^{1,p_n}(\Omega)$; i.e.,
$X=\prod_{i=1}^{n}W^{1,p_i}_0(\Omega)$ equipped with the norm
$$
\| (u_1,u_2,\dots ,u_{n})\| =\sum_{i=1}^n\|u_i\|_{\ast}
$$
where
$$
\|u_i\|_{\ast}=\Big(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla u_i(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|u_i(x)|^{p_i})
dx\Big)^{1/{p_i}}
$$
is a norm in $W_0^{1,p_i}(\Omega)$ that is equivalent to the usual norm.
 Put
\begin{equation}\label{2}
C:=\max\big\{\sup_{u_i\in W_0^{1,p_i}(\Omega)\setminus
 \{0\}}\frac{\max_{x\in\overline{\Omega}}|u_i(x)|^{p_i}}{\|u_i\|_{p_i}^{p_i}},\;
1\leq i\leq n \big\}.
\end{equation}
Let
$\underline{p}:=\min\{p_i;\ 1\leq i\leq n\}$,
$\overline{p}:=\max\{p_i;\ 1\leq i\leq n\}$ and
$\underline{m}:=\min\{m_i;\ 1\leq i\leq n\}$.
 Following the construction given in \cite{BMO}, define
$$
\sigma(p_i,N):=\inf_{\mu\in ]0,1[}\frac{1-\mu^{N}}{\mu^N(1-\mu)^{p_i}},
$$
and consider $\overline{\mu}_i\in]0,1[$ such that
$\sigma(p_i,N):=\frac{1-\overline{\mu}_i^{N}}{\overline{\mu}_i^N(1-\overline{\mu}_i)^{p_i}}$.
 Put 
$$
\overline{\mu}:=\max\overline{\mu}_i, \quad 
\underline{\mu}:=\min \overline{\mu}_i, \quad
\tau:=\sup \operatorname{dist}(x,\partial\Omega).
$$ 
Simple calculations show that there is an $x_0\in \Omega$ such that 
$B(x_0,\tau)\subseteq\Omega$, where $B(x_0, s)$ denotes the ball with 
center at $x_0$ and radius of $s$. 
Further, put
$$
g_{\overline{\mu}_i}(p_i,N)
:=\overline{\mu_i}^{N}+\frac{1}{(1-\overline{\mu_i})^{p_i}}
NB_{(\overline{\mu_i},1)}(N,p_i+1)
$$
where $B_{(\overline{\mu_i},1)}(N,p_i+1)$ denotes the generalized
incomplete beta function defined as follows:
$$
B_{(\overline{\mu_i},1)}(N,p_i+1):=\int_{\overline{\mu_i}}^{1}
t^{N-1}(1-t)^{(p_i+1)-1}dt.
$$
We also denote by
$\omega_\tau:=\tau^N\frac{\pi^{N/2}}{\Gamma(1+\frac{N}{2})}$
the measure of the $N$-dimensional ball of radius $\tau$.
Set
$$
\upsilon:=\max_{1\leq i\leq n}\big\{\frac{\sigma(p_i,N)}{\tau^{p_i}}+
\|a_i\|_{\infty}\frac{g_{\mu_i}(p_i,N)}{\overline{\mu_i}^{N}}\big\}.
$$
Corresponding to $K_i$ we introduce the functions
$\tilde{K_i}:[0,+\infty[\to\mathbb{R}$ as follows
$$
\tilde{K_i}(t)=\int_0^{t}K_i(s)ds\quad \text{for all } t\geq 0
$$ 
for $1\leq i\leq n$.
For $\gamma>0$ we denote  the set
  \begin{equation}\label{3}
Q(\gamma)=\big\{(t_1,\dots ,t_n)\in \mathbb{R}^n:
 \sum_{i=1}^{n}|t_i|\leq \gamma\big\}.
\end{equation}
By a (weak) solution of system \eqref{1}, we mean  $u=(u_1,\dots ,u_{n})\in
X$ such that
\begin{align*}
&\sum_{i=1}^{n}\Big(\Big[K_i\Big(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u_i(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|u_i(x)|^{p_i})dx\Big)\Big]^{p_i-1}\\
&\times\int_{\Omega}\Big(
|\nabla u_i(x)|^{p_i-2}\nabla u_i(x)\nabla v_i(x)+|
u_i(x)|^{p_i-2}u_i(x) v_i(x)\Big)dx)\\
&-\lambda\int_{\Omega}\sum_{i=1}^nF_{u_i}(x,u_1(x),\dots ,u_{n}(x))v_i(x)dx=0
\end{align*}
for every $v=(v_1,\dots ,v_{n})\in X$.

\section{Main results} 

We begin by formulating our main result under the assumptions:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A1)] $F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\geq 0$, for each
$(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in\Omega\times  \mathbb{R}_{+}^n$,
where \\
$\mathbb{R}_{+}^n=\{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in \mathbb{R}^{n}:\ t_i\geq 0,
\text{ for } i=1,\dots ,n\}$;

\item[(A2)] 
\begin{align*}
&\liminf_{\xi\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi^{\underline{p}}}\\
&<\frac{1}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})^{\frac{1}{p_i}}
\Big)^{\underline{p}}}
\limsup_{{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}_{(t_1,
\dots ,t_{n})\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^n} }
\frac{\int_{ B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}.
\end{align*}
\end{itemize}

\begin{theorem}\label{thm2}
 Assume {\rm (A1)--(A2)}, and let $\Lambda$ the interval
\begin{align*}
&\Big]\frac{1}{\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})
 \to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}},\\
& \frac{\frac{1}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})
^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}}{\liminf_{\xi\to
+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi^{\underline{p}}}}\Big[\,.
\end{align*}
If $\lambda\in\Lambda$, then  \eqref{1} has an unbounded sequence of weak
 solutions in $X$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
To apply Theorem \ref{thm1} to our problem, we introduce the functionals
 $\Phi,  \Psi:X \to \mathbb{R}$,
for each $u=(u_1,\dots ,u_n) \in X$, defined as follows
$$
\Phi(u)=\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\|u_i\|_{\ast}^{p_i})}{p_i},\quad
\Psi(u)=\int_{\Omega}F(x,u_1(x),\dots ,u_n(x))dx.
$$ 
Let us prove that the functionals $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ satisfy the required
conditions. It is well known that $\Psi$ is a differentiable
functional whose differential at the point $u\in X$ is
$$
\Psi'(u)(v)=\int_{\Omega}\sum_{i=1}^nF_{u_i}(x,u_1(x),\dots ,u_{n}(x))v_i(x)dx,
$$
for every $v=(v_1,\dots ,v_n)\in X$, as well as is sequentially weakly
upper semicontinuous. Furthermore, $\Psi':X \to X^{*}$ is a
compact operator. Indeed, it is enough to show that $\Psi'$ is
strongly continuous on $X$. For this, for fixed 
$(u_1,\dots ,u_n)\in X$, let $(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\to(u_1,\dots ,u_n)$ 
weakly in $X$ as $k\to +\infty$.  
Then we have $(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})$ converges
uniformly to $(u_1,\dots ,u_n)$ on $\Omega$ as $k\to +\infty$(see
\cite{Z}). Since $F(x,\cdot,\dots ,\cdot)$ is $C^1$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ for
every $x\in \Omega$, the derivatives of $F$ are continuous in
$\mathbb{R}^n$ for every $x\in \Omega$, so for $1\leq i\leq n$,
$F_{u_i}(x,u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\to F_{u_i}(x,u_1,\dots ,u_n)$ strongly
as $k\to +\infty$, from which follows $\Psi'(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\to
\Psi'(u_1,\dots ,u_n)$ strongly as $k\to +\infty$. Thus we have
that $\Psi'$ is strongly continuous on $X$, which implies that
$\Psi'$ is a compact operator by Proposition 26.2 of \cite{Z}.
Moreover, bearing in mind the conditions $0<m_i\leq K_i(t)\leq M_i$ for
all $t\geq 0$ for $1\leq i \leq n$, we see that $\Phi$ is
continuously differentiable and whose differential at the point 
$u\in X$ is
\begin{align*}
\Phi'(u)(v)
&=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\Big(\Big[K_i\Big(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u_i(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|u_i(x)|^{p_i})dx\Big)\Big]^{p_i-1}\\
&\quad \times\int_{\Omega}\Big(
|\nabla u_i(x)|^{p_i-2}\nabla u_i(x)\nabla v_i(x)+|
u_i(x)|^{p_i-2}u_i(x) v_i(x)\Big)dx\Big)
\end{align*}
for every $v\in X$, and $\Phi'$ admits a continuous inverse on $X^{*}$.
 Furthermore, $\Phi$ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. 
Indeed, for any $(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\in X$ with
$(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\to(u_1,\dots ,u_n)$ weakly in $X$, then 
$u_{ik}\to u_i$ in $W^{1,p_i}_0(\Omega)$ for $1\leq i\leq n$. Therefore,
taking the norm of weakly lower semicontinuity, we have
$$
\liminf_{k\to \infty}\|u_{ik}\|_{\ast}\geq \|u_i\|_{\ast} \quad
 \text{for } i=1,\dots ,n.
$$
Hence, since $\tilde{K_i}$
is continuous and monotone for $1\leq i\leq n$, we obtain
$$
\tilde{K_i}(\|u_i\|^{p_i}_{\ast})\leq\tilde{K_i}
(\liminf_{k\to \infty}\|u_{ik}\|^{p_i}_{\ast})
\leq\liminf_{k\to \infty}\tilde{K_i}(\|u_{ik}\|^{p_i}_{\ast})
$$
for $1\leq i\leq n$, from which it follows that $\Phi$ is sequentially weakly
lower semicontinuous. Put $I_\lambda:=\Phi-\lambda\Psi$. Clearly,
the weak solutions of the system \eqref{1} are exactly the
solutions of the equation $I'_{\lambda}(u_1,\dots ,u_n)=0$. Moreover,
since for $1\leq i\leq n$, $m_i\leq K_i(s)$ for all 
$s\in [0,+\infty[$, from the definition of $\Phi$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{4} 
\Phi(u)\geq\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{m_i\|u_i\|_\ast^{p_i}}{p_i}
\geq \underline{m}\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\|u_i\|_\ast^{p_i}}{p_i}
\quad \forall u=(u_1,\dots ,u_n)\in X.
\end{equation}
Now, let us verify that
$\gamma<+\infty$.
 Let $\{\xi_k\}$ be a real sequence such that $\xi_k\to+\infty$ as $k\to\infty$ and
\begin{equation}\label{5}
\begin{split}
&\lim_{k\to \infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi_k^{\underline{p}}}\\
&=\liminf_{\xi\to
+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi^{\underline{p}}}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Put
$r_k=\frac{\xi_{k}^{\underline{p}}}
{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}
$
for all $k\in \mathbb{N}$. Since 
$$
\sup_{x\in \overline{\Omega}}|u_i(x)|^{p_i}\leq C\|u_i\|_{p_i}^{p_i}\quad
\text{for all }  u_i\in W_0^{1,p_i}(\Omega)
$$
for 
$1 \leq i\leq n$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{6} 
\sup_{x\in \overline{\Omega}}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{|u_i(x)|^{p_i}}{p_i}
\leq
C\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\|u_i\|_\ast^{p_i}}{p_i}
\end{equation}
for each $u=(u_1,\dots ,u_{n})\in X$. So, from \eqref{4} and \eqref{6}
we have
\begin{align*}
 \Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_k])
&= \{u=(u_1,u_2,\dots ,u_{n})\in X; \Phi(u)\leq r_k\} \\
&\subseteq \big\{u\in X; \underline{m}\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\|u_i\|_\ast^{p_i}}{p_i}
\leq r_k\big\}\\
&\subseteq \big\{ u\in X;  \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{|u_i(x)|^{p_i}}{p_i}\leq
 \frac{C r_k}{\underline{m}}\text{ for each }  x\in \Omega\big\}\\
&\subseteq \big\{ u\in X;  \sum_{i=1}^{n}|u_i(x)|\leq
 \xi_k \text{ for each }  x\in \Omega\big\}.
\end{align*} 
Hence, taking into account that $\Phi(0,\dots ,0)=\Psi(0,\dots ,0)=0$,
we have for every $k$ large enough,
\begin{align*}
\varphi(r_k)
&= \inf_{u\in\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_k[)}\frac{(\sup_{v\in\Phi^{-1}
(]-\infty,r_k])}\Psi(v))-\Psi(u)}{r_k-\Phi(u)}\\
&\leq \frac{\sup_{v\in\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_k])}\Psi(v)}{r_k}\\
&\leq \Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})
^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}
\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi_{k}^{\underline{p}}}.
\end{align*}
Moreover, from Assumption (A2), we also have 
 $$
\lim_{k\to \infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi_k^{\underline{p}}}<+\infty.
$$
Therefore,
\begin{equation}\label{7}
\begin{split}
\gamma&\leq \liminf_{k\to+\infty}\varphi(r_k)\\
&\leq \Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})
^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}} 
\lim_{k\to \infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi_k^{\underline{p}}}<+\infty.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Assumption (A2) in conjunction with \eqref{7} implies
$\Lambda\subseteq ]0,1/\gamma[$.
 Fix $\lambda\in \Lambda$. The inequality \eqref{7} yields that the
condition (b) of Theorem \ref{thm1} can be applied, and either
$I_\lambda$ has a global minimum or there exists a sequence
$\{u_k=(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\}$ of weak solutions of the system
\eqref{1} such that 
$\lim_{k\to\infty}\| (u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk}) \|=+\infty$.

The other step is to show that the functional $I_\lambda$ has no
global minimum. For the fixed $\lambda$, let us verify that the
functional $I_\lambda$ is unbounded from below. Arguing as in
\cite{BMO}, consider $n$ positive real sequences $\{d_{i,k}\}_{i=1}^n$ such
that $\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{n}d_{i,k}^2}\to +\infty$ as
 $k\to \infty$ and
\begin{equation}\label{8}
\lim_{k\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{
\Omega}F(x,d_{1,k},\dots ,d_{n,k})dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i}}=\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}.
\end{equation}
Let $\{w_k=(w_{1k},\dots ,w_{nk})\}$ be a sequence in $X$ defined by
 \begin{equation}\label{9}
w_{ik}(x)= \begin{cases}
0 &\text{if } x \in \Omega\setminus B(x_0,\tau)\\
\frac{d_{i,k}}{\tau(1-\overline{\mu}_i)}(\tau-|x-x_0|)
  &\text{if }  x\in B(x_0,\tau)\setminus
B(x_0,\overline{\mu}_i\tau)
\\d_{i,k}  &\text{if } x\in B(x_0,\overline{\mu}_i\tau)
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
for $1 \leq i\leq n$. For any fixed $k\in \mathbb{N}$, it is easy 
to see that $w_{k}\in X$ and, in particular, one has
\begin{align*}
\|w_{ik}\|_\ast^{p_i}
&= \int_{\Omega}(|\nabla w_{ik}(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|w_{ik}(x)|^{p_i}) dx\\
&\leq |d_{i,k}|^{p_i}\omega_{\tau}
 \Big[\frac{1-\overline{\mu}_i^{N}}{\tau^{p_i}(1-\overline{\mu}_i)^{p_i}}
+\|a_i\|_{\infty}g_{\overline{\mu}_i}(p_i,N)\Big]\\
&\leq \overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon |d_{i,k}|^{p_i}
\end{align*}
for $1\leq i\leq n$. Taking into account $\inf_{t\geq 0}K(t)>0$, it follows that
\begin{equation}\label{10}
\Phi(w_{k})=\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\|w_{ik}\|_{\ast}^{p_i})}{p_i}
\leq \sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i} .
\end{equation} 
On the other hand, bearing in mind Assumption (A1) from the definition of $\Psi$,
 we infer
\begin{equation}\label{11}
\Psi(w_k)\geq\int_{B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,d_{1,k},\dots ,d_{n,k})dx.
\end{equation}
So, according to \eqref{10} and \eqref{11} we obtain
$$
I_\lambda(w_k)\leq\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i} -\lambda\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,d_{1,k},\dots ,d_{n,k})dx
$$
for every $k\in \mathbb{N}$. Now, if
$$
\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}<\infty,
$$ 
we fix
$\epsilon\in\Big]1\big/{\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}},1\Big[$. 
From \eqref{8} there exists
$\vartheta_{\epsilon}$ such that
\begin{align*}
&\int_{ B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,d_{1,k},\dots ,d_{n,k})dx\\
&>\epsilon\Big(\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}\Big)\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i}
\end{align*}
for all $k>\vartheta_{\epsilon}$;
therefore,
\begin{align*}
&I_\lambda(w_k)\\
&\leq \Big(1-\lambda\epsilon \limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,
t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}\Big)\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i} 
\end{align*}
for all $k>\vartheta_{\epsilon}$, and
by the choice of $\epsilon$, one then has 
$$
\lim_{m\to +\infty}[\Phi(w_k)-\lambda \Psi(w_k)]=-\infty.
$$
If
$$
\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}=\infty,
$$ 
let us consider
$M>1/\lambda$. From \eqref{8} there exists $\vartheta_{M}$
such that
$$
\int_{B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,d_{1,k},\dots ,d_{n,k})dx>M\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i} \ \ \ \forall \ k>\vartheta_{M},
$$ 
and therefore
$$
I_\lambda(w_k)\leq (1-\lambda M)\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|d_{i,k}|^{p_i})}{p_i} \quad  \forall k>\vartheta_{M},
$$ 
and by the choice of $M$, one then has
$$
\lim_{k\to +\infty}[\Phi(w_k)-\lambda \Psi(w_k)]=-\infty.
$$
 Hence, our claim is proved. Since all assumptions of
Theorem \ref{thm1} are satisfied, the functional $I_\lambda$ admits
a sequence $\{u_k=(u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\}\subset X$ of critical
points such that 
$$
\lim_{k\to\infty}\| (u_{1k},\dots ,u_{nk})\|=+\infty,
$$ 
and we have the desired conclusion.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk3.1}\rm
We point out that if $K_i(t)=1$ for each $t\geq 0$ for 
$1\leq i\leq n$, Theorem \ref{thm2} gives \cite[Theorem 3.1]{BMO}.
\end{remark}

 Now we want to point out the following existence result, in which instead 
of Assumption (A2) in Theorem \ref{thm2} a more general
 condition is assumed.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A3)]   there exist a sequence $\{a_k\}$ and $n$ positive real sequence
 $\{b_{i,k}\}$ with
$$
\frac{a_k^{\underline{p}}}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}>\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|b_{ik}|^{p_i})}{p_i}
$$ 
and $\lim _{k\to \infty}a_k= +\infty$ such that
\begin{align*}
&\lim_{k\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(a_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx-\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,b_{1k},\dots ,b_{nk})dx}
{\frac{a_k^{\underline{p}}}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}
(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}-\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|b_{ik}|^{p_i})}{p_i}}\\
&<\limsup_{{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}_{(t_1,\dots ,
t_{n})\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^n} }\frac{\int_{B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}
F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}.
\end{align*}
\end{itemize}

 \begin{theorem}\label{thm3}
Assume  {\rm (A1), (A3)} and let $\Lambda'$ be the interval
\begin{align*}
&\Big]\frac{1}{\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}},\\
&\frac{\frac{a_k^{\underline{p}}}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}}
)^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}}
{\lim_{k\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(a_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx-\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,b_{1k},\dots ,b_{nk})dx}
{\frac{a_k^{\underline{p}}}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}})^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}-\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|b_{ik}|^{p_i})}{p_i}}}\Big[\,.
\end{align*}
If $\lambda\in \Lambda'$, then \eqref{1} has an
unbounded sequence of weak solutions in $X$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Clearly, from (A3) we obtain (A2), by choosing $b_{i,k}=0$ for
all $k\in\mathbb{N}$ and for $1\leq i\leq n$. Moreover, if we assume
(A3) instead of (A2) and set
\[
r_k=\frac{a_k^{\underline{p}}}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}}
)^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}
\]
for all $k\in \mathbb{N}$, by the same argument as in
Theorem \ref{thm2}, we obtain
\begin{align*}
\varphi(r_k)
&= \inf_{u\in\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_k[)}
 \frac{(\sup_{v\in\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_k])}\Psi(v))-\Psi(u)}{r_k-\Phi(u)}\\
&\leq \frac{\sup_{v\in\Phi^{-1}(]-\infty,r_k])}\Psi(v)-\int_{a}^{b}F(x,w_{1k}(x),
 \dots ,w_{nk}(x))dx}
{r_k-\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\|w_{ik}\|_\ast^{p_i})}{p_i}}\\
&\leq \frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(a_k)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx-\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,b_{1k},\dots ,b_{nk})dx}
{\frac{a_k^{\underline{p}}}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i
 \frac{C}{\underline{m}})^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}-\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|b_{ik}|^{p_i})}{p_i}}
\end{align*}
where $w_k= (w_{1k},\dots ,w_{nk})$, with $w_{ik}$ for $1\leq i\leq n$,
as given in \eqref{9} with $b_{i,k}$ instead of $d_{i,k}$. So, we
have the desired conclusion.
\end{proof}

Now we point out a consequence of Theorem \ref{thm2}, under the assumptions
\begin{itemize}
\item[(B1)]
\[
\liminf_{\xi\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi^{\underline{p}}}
<\frac{1}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{m}}
)^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}};
\]
\item[(B2)] 
\[
\limsup_{{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}_{(t_1,\dots ,
t_{n})\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^n} }\frac{\int_{ B(x_0,
\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\tilde{K_i}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})}{p_i}}>1.
\]
\end{itemize}

 \begin{corollary}\label{coro1}
Assume {\rm (A1), (B1), (B2)}.
Then the system
\begin{gather*}
\begin{aligned} 
&-\Big[K_i(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u_i(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|u_i(x)|^{p_i})dx)\Big]^{p_i-1}\\
&\times \Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla u_i|^{p_i-2}\nabla u_i)+a_i(x)|u_i|^{p_i-2}u\Big)\\
&= F_{u_i}(x,u_1,\dots ,u_{n}) \quad \text{in } \Omega,
\end{aligned} \\
 u_i=0\quad \text{on }  \partial\Omega,
\end{gather*}
for $1\leq i\leq n$, has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions
in $X$.
\end{corollary}

 As an example, we state a special case of our main result.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm4}
 Let  $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^2$ be a non-empty bounded open set with 
a smooth boundary $\partial\Omega$. Let $f,g:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$
 be two positive $C^0(\mathbb{R}^2)$-functions such that
 the differential 1-form $w:=f(\xi,\eta)d\xi+g(\xi,\eta)d\eta$ is
 integrable and let $F$ be a primitive of $w$ such that
 $F(0,0)=0$. Fix $p,q>2$, with $p\leq q$, and assume that
\[
\liminf_{\xi\to +\infty}\frac{F(\xi,\xi)}{\xi^{p}}=0,\quad
\limsup_{\xi\to+\infty}\frac{F(\xi,\xi)}{\frac{\tilde{K_1}(\overline{\mu}^2
\tau^2\pi\upsilon |t_1|^{p})}{p}+\frac{\tilde{K_2}(\overline{\mu}
^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon |t_2|^q)}{q}}=+\infty
\]
where
$$
\upsilon:=\max\big\{\frac{\sigma(p,2)}{\tau^{p}}+
\|a_1\|_{\infty}\frac{g_{\mu_1}(p,2)}{\overline{\mu_1}^2},\
\frac{\sigma(q,2)}{\tau^q}+
\|a_2\|_{\infty}\frac{g_{\mu_2}(q,2)}{\overline{\mu_2}^2}
\big\}.
$$
 Then, the system 
\begin{gather*} 
\begin{split}
&-\Big[K_1(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u(x)|^{p}+a_1(x)|u(x)|^{p})dx)\Big]^{p-1}\Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla
u|^{p-2}\nabla u)+a_1(x)|u|^{p-2}u\Big)\\
&= f(u,v) \quad\text{in } \Omega,\\
&-\Big[K_2(\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
v(x)|^q+a_2(x)|v(x)|^q)dx)\Big]^{q-1}\Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla
v|^{q-2}\nabla v)+a_2(x)|v|^{q-2}v\Big)\\
&= g(u,v) \quad \text{in } \Omega,
\end{split}
\\
u=v=0\quad \text{on }  \partial\Omega
\end{gather*}
admits a sequence of pairwise distinct
positive weak solutions in $W^{1,p}_0(\Omega)\times W^{1,q}_0(\Omega)$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Take $n=2$ and set $F(x,t_1,t_2)=F(t_1,t_2)$ for all $x\in\Omega$ and
$t_1,t_2\in\mathbb{R}$. From the conditions 
$$
\liminf_{\xi\to +\infty}\frac{F(\xi,\xi)}{\xi^{p}}=0, \quad
\limsup_{\xi\to+\infty}\frac{F(\xi,\xi)}{\frac{\tilde{K_1}
(\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
|t_1|^{p})}{p}+\frac{\tilde{K_2}(\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
|t_2|^q)}{q}}=+\infty,
$$
 we see that the assumptions (B1) and (B2), respectively, are satisfied.
 So, taking into account that
$F_{t_1}(t_1,t_2)=f(t_1,t_2)$, $F_{t_2}(t_1,t_2)=g(t_1,t_2)$ for
all $(t_1,t_2)\in \mathbb{R}^2$, and $f,g:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$
 are positive, the conclusion follows from
Corollary \ref{coro1}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk1} \rm
We observe in Theorem \ref{thm2} we can replace $\xi\to+\infty$ with
 $\xi\to 0^+$, that by the same way as in the proof of Theorem \ref{thm2} but
using conclusion (c) of Theorem \ref{thm1} instead of (b), the
system \eqref{1} has a sequence of weak solutions, which strongly
converges to 0 in $X$.
\end{remark}

 Now, we want to point out a remarkable particular situation of
Theorem  \ref{thm2}, using the assumption
\begin{itemize}
\item[(C1)]
\begin{align*}
&\liminf_{\xi\to
+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi^{\underline{p}}}
\\
&<\frac{1}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{\alpha}}
)^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}\\
&\quad\times 
\limsup_{{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}_{(t_1,\dots ,
t_{n})\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^n} }\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\alpha_i\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i}+\frac{\beta_i}{2}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})^2}{p_i}}.
\end{align*}
\end{itemize}

 \begin{corollary}\label{coro2}
Fix $\alpha_i, \beta_i>0$ for
 $1\leq i \leq n$, and denote $\underline{\alpha}=\min\{\alpha_i;\ 1\leq i\leq n\}$.
 Suppose that Assumptions {\rm (A1), (C1)} hold, and let
$\lambda$ belong to the interval 
\begin{align*}
&\Big]\frac{1}{\limsup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\to(+\infty,\dots ,+\infty)}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_n)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^n
\frac{\alpha_i\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i}+\frac{\beta_i}{2}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t_i|^{p_i})^2}{p_i}}},\\
&\frac{\frac{1}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(p_i\frac{C}{\underline{\alpha}}
 )^{\frac{1}{p_i}}\Big)^{\underline{p}}}}{\liminf_{\xi\to
+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{(t_1,\dots ,t_{n})\in
Q(\xi)}F(x,t_1,\dots ,t_{n})dx}{\xi^{\underline{p}}}}\Big[\,.
\end{align*}
Then the system 
\begin{gather*}
\begin{aligned}
&-\Big[\alpha_i+\beta_i\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u_i(x)|^{p_i}+a_i(x)|u_i(x)|^{p_i})dx\Big]^{p_i-1}\\
&\times \Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla u_i|^{p_i-2}\nabla
u_i)+a_i(x)|u_i|^{p_i-2}u\Big)\\
&=\lambda F_{u_i}(x,u_1,\dots ,u_{n}) \quad \text{in } \Omega,
\end{aligned}\\
u_i=0 \quad \text{on }  \partial\Omega
\end{gather*}
has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions in $X$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
For fixed $\alpha_i,\beta_i>0$ and 
 $1\leq i \leq n$, set $K_i(t)=\alpha_i+\beta_it$
 for all $t\geq 0$. Bearing in mind that $m_i=\alpha_i$ for
 $1\leq i \leq n$, the conclusion follows immediately from
Theorem \ref{thm2}.
\end{proof}

We illustrate our results by giving the following example whose
construction is motivated by \cite[Example 3.1]{BMO}.

\begin{example}\label{examp1}\rm
Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^2$ be a non-empty open set with a
smooth boundary $\partial\Omega$ and consider the increasing
sequence of positive real numbers given by 
$$
a_1=2, \quad
a_{n+1}=n!(a_n)^{7/3}+2 \quad \text{for }n\geq 1.
$$ 
Define the function $F:\Omega\times\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}$ by
$$
F(x,y,t_1,t_2)
=\begin{cases}
(a_{n+1})^7e^{x^2+y^2-\frac{1}{1-(t_1-a_{n+1})^2-(t_2-a_{n+1})^2}+1}\\
\quad \text{if } (x,y,t_1,t_2)\in\Omega\times\cup_{n\geq 1}S((a_{n+1},a_{n+1}),1),
\\[4pt]
0  &\text{otherwise},
\end{cases}
$$
where $S((a_{n+1},a_{n+1}),1)$ denotes the
open unit ball with center at $(a_{n+1},a_{n+1})$. It is clear
that $F:\Omega\times \mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$ is a non-negative
function such that the mapping $(t_1, t_2) \to F(x, t_1, t_2)$ is
in $C^1$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ for all $x\in \Omega$, $F_{t_i}$ is
continuous in $\Omega\times\mathbb{R}^2$, for $i = 1,2$, and
$F(x,y,0,0)=0$ for all $(x,y)\in \Omega$. Now, for every
$n\in\mathbb{N}$, one has
\begin{align*}
&\int_{B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}\sup_{(t_1,t_2)\in
S((a_{n+1},a_{n+1}),1)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)\,dx\,dy\\
&=\int_{ B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,y,a_{n+1},a_{n+1})\,dx\,dy\\
&=(a_{n+1})^7\int_{B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}e^{x^2+y^2}\,dx\,dy.
\end{align*}
We will denote by $f$
and $g$ the partial derivative of $F$ respect to $t_1$ and $t_2$,
respectively. Since
$$
\lim_{n\to +\infty}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,y,a_{n+1},a_{n+1})\,dx\,dy}{\sum_{i=1}^2
\frac{\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
a_{n+1}^{3}+\frac{1}{2}(\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
a_{n+1}^{3})^2}{3}}=+\infty,
$$
where
$$
\upsilon:=\max\Big\{\frac{\sigma(3,2)}{\tau^{3}}+
\|a_1\|_{\infty}\frac{g_{\mu_1}(3,2)}{\overline{\mu_1}^2},\;
\frac{\sigma(3,2)}{\tau^{3}}+
\|a_2\|_{\infty}\frac{g_{\mu_2}(3,2)}{\overline{\mu_2}^2}
\Big\},
$$ 
we see that
$$
\limsup_{{(t_1,t_2)\to(+\infty,+\infty)}_{(t_1,t_2)\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^2}
 }\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^2
\frac{\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
|t_i|^{3}+\frac{1}{2}(\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
|t_i|^{3})^2}{3}}=+\infty.
$$ 
Moreover, by choosing
$\xi_n=a_{n+1}-1$, for every $n\in\mathbb{N}$, one has
$$
\int_{ B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}\sup_{(t_1,t_2)\in
K(\xi)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)\,dx\,dy=(a_{n})^7\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}e^{x^2+y^2}\,dx\,dy, 
$$
Then
 $$
\lim_{n\to +\infty}\frac{\int_{ B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}\sup_{(t_1,t_2)\in
K(\xi)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)\,dx\,dy}{(a_{n+1}-1)^{3}}=0,
$$
and so
$$
\liminf_{\xi\to +\infty}\frac{\int_{ B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}\sup_{(t_1,t_2)\in
K(\xi)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)\,dx\,dy}{\xi^{3}}=0.
$$
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
0&=\liminf_{\xi\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}\sup_{(t_1,t_2)\in
K(\xi)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)\,dx\,dy}{\xi^{3}}\\
&<\frac{1}{24C} \limsup_{{(t_1,t_2)\to(+\infty,+\infty)}_{(t_1,t_2)
\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^2} }\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,y,t_1,t_2)dx}{\sum_{i=1}^2
\frac{\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
|t_i|^{3}+\frac{1}{2}(\overline{\mu}^2\tau^2\pi\upsilon
|t_i|^{3})^2}{3}}=+\infty.
\end{align*}
Hence, all the assumptions of Corollary \ref{coro2} are satisfied,
and it is applicable to the system
\begin{gather*}
\begin{aligned}
&-\Big[1+\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u(x)|^{3}+a_1(x)|u(x)|^{3})dx\Big]^2\Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla
u|\nabla u)+a_1(x)|u|u\Big)\\
&=\lambda f(x,y,u,v) \quad \text{in }\Omega,\\
&-\Big[1+\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla v(x)|^{3}+a_2(x)|v(x)|^{3})dx\Big]^2
\Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla v|\nabla v)+a_2(x)|v|v\Big)\\
&=\lambda g(x,y,u,v) \quad \text{in } \Omega,
\end{aligned}\\
u=v=0\quad \text{on } \partial\Omega
\end{gather*}
for every $\lambda\in]0,+\infty[$.
\end{example}

 As an application of our results, we consider the problem
 \begin{equation}\label{12}
\begin{gathered} 
\begin{aligned}
&-\Big[\alpha+\beta\int_{\Omega}(|\nabla
u(x)|^{p}+a(x)|u(x)|^{p})dx\Big]^{p-1}\Big(\operatorname{div}(|\nabla
u|^{p-2}\nabla u)+a(x)|u|^{p-2}u\Big)\\
&=\lambda f(x,u) \quad \text{in } \Omega,
\end{aligned}\\
u=0\quad \text{on } \partial\Omega
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
 where $p>N$, $\lambda>0$, $\alpha, \beta>0$, 
$f:\Omega\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is an
$L^1$-Carat$\acute{e}$odory function and $a\in L^{\infty}(\Omega)$
with $\operatorname{ess\,inf}_{\Omega}a(x)\geq 0$. Put
$$
F(x,t)=\int^{t}_0f(x,\xi)d\xi\quad \text{for all } (x,t)\in
\Omega\times\mathbb{R}.
$$
 The following existence result is an
immediate consequence of Theorem \ref{thm2}.

\begin{theorem}\label{thm5}
 Assume that
\begin{itemize}
\item[(D1)] $F(x,t)\geq 0$ for each $(x,t)\in\Omega\times
\mathbb{R}_{+}$;
\item[(D2)] 
$$\liminf_{\xi\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}
 \sup_{|t|\leq\xi}F(x,t)dx}{\xi^{p}}
<\frac{\alpha}{C^{p}}\limsup_{{t\to +\infty}_{t\in\mathbb{R}_{+}}}
\frac{\int_{B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t)dx}
{\alpha\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t|^{p}+\frac{\beta}{2}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t|^{p})^2},
$$
 where 
$$
C:=\sup_{u\in W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)\setminus
 \{0\}}\frac{\max_{x\in\overline{\Omega}}|u(x)|}{\Big(\int_{\Omega}|\nabla
u(x)|^{p}dx\Big)^{1/p}}.
$$
\end{itemize}
Then, for each $\lambda$ in the interval
$$\Big]\frac{\frac{1}{p}}{\limsup_{{t\to +\infty}_{\ t\in\mathbb{R}_{+}}
 }\frac{\int_{
B(x_0,\underline{\mu}\tau)}F(x,t)dx}{
\alpha\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t|^{p}+\frac{\beta}{2}(\overline{\mu}^{N}\omega_{\tau}\upsilon
|t|^{p})^2}},\ \frac{\frac{\alpha}{pC^{p}}}{\liminf_{\xi\to
+\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega}\sup_{|t|\leq\xi}F(x,t)dx}{\xi^{p}}}\Big[
$$
the problem \eqref{12} has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions
in $W_0^{1,p}(\Omega)$.
\end{theorem} 

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous referee for
the valuable suggestions concerning improvement of the manuscript.
 Shapour Heidarkhani was supported by  grant 90470020 
from IPM.

\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{ACM} C. O. Alves, F. S. J. A. Corr\^ea, T. F. Ma;
\emph{Positive solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equations of Kirchhoff type,} 
Comput. Math. Appl. 49 (2005) 85-93.

\bibitem{BA} G. Bonanno, G. D'Agu\`{i};
\emph{On the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the $p$-Laplacian,} 
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 358 (2009) 223-228.

\bibitem{BD} G. Bonanno, B. Di Bella;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions for a fourth-order elastic beam
equation,} Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications
NoDEA, 18(3) (2011) 357-368.

\bibitem{BM1} G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions for a boundary value problem with discontinuous
nonlinearities,} Bound. Value Probl. 2009 (2009) 1-20.

\bibitem{BM2} G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci;
 \emph{Infinitely many solutions for a Dirichlet problem
involving the p-Laplacian,} Proceedings of the Royal Society of
Edinburgh 140A (2010) 737-752.

\bibitem{BMO} G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, D. O'Regan;
\emph{Infinitely many weak solutions for a class of
quasilinear elliptic systems,} Math. Comput. Modelling 52 (2010)
152-160.

\bibitem{BMR1} G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Arbitrarily small weak solutions for a nonlinear eigenvalue
problem in Orlicz-Sobolev spaces,} Monatsh Math. 165 (2012)
305-318.

\bibitem{BMR2} G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Variational analysis for a nonlinear elliptic problem on the
Sierpi\'{n}ski gasket,} ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus
of Variations, DOI: 10.1051/cocv/2011199.

\bibitem{BMR3} G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, V. R\u{a}dulescu;
\emph{Quasilinear elliptic non-homogeneous Di\-richlet problems through
 Orlicz-Sobolev spaces,}
Nonlinear Anal. (2012); doi: 10.1016 /j.na.2011.12.016.

\bibitem{C} P. Candito;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions to the Neumann problem for elliptic equations 
involving the $p$-Laplacian and with discontinuous nonlinearities,} Proc. Edin.
Math. Soc. 45 (2002) 397-409.

\bibitem{CLi} P. Candito, R. Livrea;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions
for a nonlinear Navier boundary value problem involving the
$p$-biharmonic,} Studia Univ. ``Babe\c{s}-Bolyai", Mathematica,
Volume {\bf LV}, Number 4, December 2010.

\bibitem{CWL} B. Cheng, X. Wu, J. Liu;
\emph{Multiplicity of solutions for nonlocal
elliptic system of $(p,q)$-Kirchhoff type,} Abstract and Applied
Analysis 2011 (2011), doi:10.1155/2011/526026.

\bibitem{CL} M. Chipot, B. Lovat;
\emph{Some remarks on non local elliptic and parabolic
problems,} Nonlinear Anal. 30 (1997) 4619-4627.

\bibitem{D}G. Dai;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions for a Neumann-type differential
inclusion problem involving the $p(x)$-Laplacian,} Nonlinear Anal.
70 (2009) 2297-2305.

\bibitem{FJ} X. Fan, C. Ji;
\emph{Existence of infinitely many solutions for a Neumann problem involving the
p(x)-Laplacian,} J. Math. Anal. Appl. 334 (2007) 248-260.

\bibitem{GHK1}J. R. Graef, S. Heidarkhani, L. Kong;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions for systems of
multi-point boundary value equations,} Topological Methods in
Nonlinear Analysis, to appear.

\bibitem{GHK2}J. R. Graef, S. Heidarkhani, L. Kong;
\emph{A variational approach to a Kirchhoff-type
problem involving two parameters,} Results. Math., (2012)
DOI:10.1007/s00025-012-0238-x.

\bibitem{HZ}X. He, W. Zou;
\emph{Infinitely many positive solutions for Kirchhoff-type
problems,} Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009) 1407-1414.

\bibitem{HAO}S. Heidarkhani, G. A. Afrouzi, D. O'Regan;
\emph{Existence of three solutions for a Kirchhoff-type boundary value problem,} 
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations Vol. 2011 (2011) No. 91, pp.
1-11.

\bibitem{HT} S. Heidarkhani, Y. Tian;
\emph{Three solutions for a class of gradient Kirchhoff-type
systems depending on two parameters,} Dynamic Systems and
Applications 20 (2011) 551-562.

\bibitem{K} A. Krist\'{a}ly;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion
problem in $\mathbb{R}^N$,} J. Differential Equations 220 (2006)
511-530.

\bibitem{M}T. F. Ma;
\emph{Remarks on an elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type,} Nonlinear Anal. 63
(2005) e1957-e1977.

\bibitem{MM} S. A. Marano, D. Motreanu;
\emph{Infinitely many critical points of non-differentiable functions and 
applications to a Neumann type problem involving the p-Laplacian,} J. Differential
Equations 182 (2002) 108-120.

\bibitem{MZ} A. Mao, Z. Zhang;
\emph{Sign-changing and multiple solutions of Kirchhoff type problems without 
the P.S. condition,} Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009) 1275-1287.

\bibitem{PZ} K. Perera, Z. T. Zhang;
\emph{Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff-type problems via
the Yang index,} J. Differential Equations 221 (2006) 246-255.

\bibitem{R1} B. Ricceri;
\emph{A general variational principle and some of its
applications,} J. Comput. Appl. Math. 113 (2000) 401-410.

\bibitem{R2} B. Ricceri;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions of the Neumann problem for
elliptic equations involving the p-Laplacian,} Bull. London Math.
Soc. 33 (3) (2001) 331-340.

\bibitem{R3} B. Ricceri;
\emph{On an elliptic Kirchhoff-type problem depending on two parameters,} 
J. Global Optimization 46 (2010) 543-549.

\bibitem{S} J. Simon;
 \emph{Regularit\`{e} de la solution d'une equation non lineaire dans 
$\text{R}^{N}$,} in:
Journ\'ees d'Analyse Non Lin\'eaire (Proc. Conf., Besançon, 1977), (P.
B\'enilan, J. Robert, eds.), Lecture Notes in Math., 665, pp.
205-227, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1978.

\bibitem{T} G. Talenti;
\emph{Some inequalities of Sobolev type on
two-dimensional spheres,} in: W. Walter (Ed.), General
Inequalities, Vol. 5, Internat. Ser Numer. Math. 8 (1987) 401-408.
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 282 (2003) 531-552.

\bibitem{ZP} Z. T. Zhang, K. Perera;
\emph{Sign changing solutions of Kirchhoff type problems
via invariant sets of descent flow,} J. Math. Anal. Appl. 317

\bibitem{Z} E. Zeidler;
\emph{Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications,}
 Vol. II. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1985.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}

