\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2008(2008), No. 86, pp. 1--11.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu  (login: ftp)}
\thanks{\copyright 2008 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2008/86\hfil Travelling wave solutions for coupled kdv equations]
{Travelling wave solutions for the Painlev\'e-integrable  coupled
KdV equations}

\author[J. Li, X.-B. Lin\hfil EJDE-2008/86\hfilneg]
{Jibin Li, Xiao-Biao Lin}  % in alphabetical order

\address{Jibin Li \newline
Department of Mathematics,  Kunming University of Science and Technology\\
Kunming, Yunnan, 650093, China}
\email{jibinli@gmail.com}

\address{Xiao-Biao Lin \newline
Department of Mathematics,  
North Carolina State University\\
Raleigh, NC 27695, USA}
\email{xblin@math.ncsu.edu}
\urladdr{http://www4.ncsu.edu/$\sim$xblin}

\thanks{Submitted February 15, 2008. Published June 10, 2008.}
\thanks{Supported by grants 10671179 from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China, \hfill\break\indent
and DMS-0708386 from the US National Science Foundation}
\subjclass[2000]{34A05, 34B99, 34C20, 34C25, 34C37, 35B99, 35C15}
\keywords{Coupled KdV equations; Paileve integrable systems; 
\hfill\break\indent  bounded solutions; solitary waves; periodic waves}

\begin{abstract}
 We study the travelling wave solutions for a system of coupled KdV
 equations derived by Lou et al \cite{lou}. In that paper,
 they found 5 types of Painlev\'e integrable systems for the
 coupled KdV system.
 We show that each of them can be reduced to a partially or
 completely uncoupled system, through which the dynamical
 behavior of travelling wave solutions can be determined.
 In some parameter regions, exact formulas for periodic and
 solitary waves can be obtained while in other cases, bounded
 travelling wave solution are discussed.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}

\section{Introduction}

The KdV equation is an important model for dispersive waves
\cite{bonasmith,strauss}. There has been some interest in coupled
KdV systems \cite{drinfeld,foursov,gurses,karasu,sakovich,sakovich2}.
In this paper we consider the coupled KdV system
\begin{equation}\label{e1.0}
\begin{gathered}
A_{1T}+\alpha_1 A_2 A_{1X} +(\alpha_2 A_2^2+\alpha_3 A_1A_2+ \alpha_4 A_{1XX} + \alpha_5 A_1^2)_X  =0,\\
A_{2T}+ \delta_1A_2 A_{1X}+(\delta_2 A_1^2+\delta_3 A_1A_2+ \delta_4 A_{2XX}+ \delta_5 A_2^2)_X  =0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
where the ten constants $\alpha_i, \delta_i$, $i=1,2,3,4,5$ are
arbitrary. This system is derived  by
Lou et al  \cite{lou} from a two-layer fluid model which is used to
describe the atmospheric and oceanic phenomena such as the atmospheric
blocking, the interactions between the atmosphere and ocean.
Under the condition $\alpha_4=\delta_4=1$, they
obtained five types of Painlev\'e-integrable coupled  KdV systems:

\noindent\textbf{P-integrable model 1}
\begin{equation}\label{e1.1}
\begin{aligned}
&A_{1T}+[A_{1XX}-(c_0+3)(c_0+6)A_1^2-c_0^2A_2^2]_X\\
&+2c_0[(c_0+6)A_{1X}A_2+(c_0+3)A_1A_{2X}]=0, \\
&A_{2T}+[A_{2XX}-c_0(c_0-3)A_2^2-(c_0+3)^2A_1^2]_X\\
&+2(c_0+3)[c_0A_2A_{1X} +(c_0-3)A_1A_{2X}]=0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

\noindent\textbf{P-integrable model 2}
\begin{equation}\label{e1.2}
\begin{gathered}
A_{1T}+(A_{1XX}+\frac12(c_2-c_1-c_1c_2)A_1^2+c_1A_1A_2-\frac12A_2^2)_X=0, \\
A_{2T}+(A_{2XX}+\frac12(c_1-c_2-1)A_2^2+c_2A_1A_2-\frac12c_1c_2A_1^2)_X=0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}

\noindent\textbf{P-integrable model 3}
\begin{equation}\label{e1.3}
A_{1T}+(A_{1XX}+A_1^2+A_1A_2)_X=0, \quad A_{2T}+(A_{2XX}+A_2^2+A_1A_2)_X=0.
\end{equation}

\noindent\textbf{P-integrable model 4}
\begin{equation}\label{e1.4}
A_{1T}+[A_{1XX}+(A_1+A_2)^2]_X=0, \quad A_{2T}+[A_{2XX}+(A_1+A_2)^2]_X=0.
\end{equation}


\noindent\textbf{P-integrable model 5}
\begin{equation}\label{e1.5}
A_{1T}+[A_{1XX}+A_1^2]_X+2A_2A_{1X}=0, \quad A_{2T}+[A_{2XX}+A_2^2]_X
+2A_1A_{2X}=0.
\end{equation}

In this paper we are interested in the existence and exact expression
of  the travelling wave solutions of \eqref{e1.1} and some dynamical behavior
of these solutions such as whether the solutions are solitary, periodic
or bounded solutions.

Note that the way to write \eqref{e1.0} is not unique.
Instead of $A_2A_{1X}$, one can leave  $A_1A_{2X}$ terms outside of the
divergence forms. With $\alpha_4 = \delta_4 =1$, we will use an
equivalent form to \eqref{e1.0}:
\begin{equation}\label{CKdV}
\begin{gathered}
A_{1T} + A_{1XXX} + a_1 A_1 A_{1X} + a_2 A_1A_{2X} + a_3 A_2A_{1X}
 + a_4 A_2A_{2X} =0, \\
A_{2T} + A_{2XXX} + b_1 A_1 A_{1X} + b_2 A_1 A_{2X} + b_3 A_2A_{1X}
 + b_4A_2A_{2X}=0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
 If we set
$$
U=(A_1,A_2)^\tau, \quad Q_1=\begin{pmatrix} a_1 & a_2 \\ a_3 & a_4 \end{pmatrix},
\quad
Q_2=\begin{pmatrix} b_1 & b_2 \\ b_3 &b_4 \end{pmatrix},
$$
 where $\tau$ denotes the transpose of a vector, then the nonlinear terms
of the equations can be written as bilinear forms,
$$
 U^\tau Q_1 U_X, \quad  U^\tau Q_2 U_X.
$$
In the case that the matrices $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ are symmetric, we can
express the bilinear forms as divergence of quadratic forms:
$$
 \frac12 (U^\tau Q_1 U)_X, \quad \frac12 (U^\tau Q_2 U)_X.
$$
There are many results concerning simultaneously co-diagonalize symmetric
matrices, see \cite{hornjohnson},  that will be used in this paper
to further simplify the quadratic forms.

If the coupled system of KdVs $U_T + U_{XXX} +F(U, U_X)$,
$U=(A_1,A_2)^\tau $ has a travelling wave solution with the wave
speed $c$, then in the travelling coordinate $\xi=X-cT$, $U = U(\xi)$
 and satisfies a system of ODEs:
\begin{equation}\label{ODE}
  -c U'(\xi) + U'''(\xi) + F(U, U') = 0.
\end{equation}
If $U$ is a travelling periodic or solitary wave of the PDE system,
then $U(\xi)$ is a periodic or homoclinic solution of the corresponding
ODE system.
Throughout this paper, the higher order  system \eqref{ODE} is associated
to a first order system by introducing auxiliary variables $(U,U',U'')$
in the standard way.
We say $U_0$ is an equilibrium for \eqref{ODE} if $(U_0, 0, 0)$
is an equilibrium for the associated first order system.
We say $U(\xi)$ is a homoclinic solution to \eqref{ODE} if
$(U(\xi),U'(\xi),U''(\xi))$ is a homoclinic solution to the associated
first order system, etc. This convention also applies to any coupled
second order system of equations.

In Section 2, we treat the general coupled KdV system \eqref{CKdV} and
P-integrable model 1. Following Lou et al \cite{lou}, we identify an
invariant subspace on which the system reduces to a single KDV equation.
For the P-integrable mode 1, we show that the system can be partially
decoupled. The reduced system is equivalent to the reduced system of
the P-integrable models 3 and 5. Detailed description of the travelling
waves are deferred to section 4 where the P-integrable models 3 and 5
are discussed.

In section 3, we treat the P-integrable mode 2 which is in the divergence
form. The corresponding bilinear forms are symmetric. Using standard
matrix algorithms, we introduce a method that can remove the non-diagonal
terms of the quadratic forms. For the P-integrable model 2,
the reduced system consists of two uncoupled equations.
The method may be used on non-P-integrable system as long as the original
system \eqref{e1.0} is in divergence form.

The P-integrable models 3, 4 and 5  can be simplified by some change
of variables and  are treated in section 4. We show that the P-integrable
model 4 can be completely decoupled while the models 3 and 5 can be
partially decoupled. In some cases, we find bounded travelling wave
solutions rather than travelling periodic or solitary waves.

In $(u,u')$-phase plane, the second order equation
\begin{equation}\label{2ndorder}
u''= c u + \beta u^2, \quad c\neq 0,\quad \beta\neq 0,
\end{equation}
has a Hamiltonian $H(u,u')$ of which each orbit corresponds to a
unique level curve
\begin{equation*} %\label{H}
H(u,u^{\prime})=\frac{(u')^2}{2} - c \frac{u^2}{2} - \frac{\beta}{3}
u^3 = h, \quad  h\in\mathbb{R}.
\end{equation*}
Bounded solutions of \eqref{2ndorder} can be classified by the
following lemma.

\begin{lemma}\label{classify}
Assume that $c\neq 0,\beta \neq 0$. In the phase plane $(u,u')$,
\eqref{2ndorder} has two equilibrium points $O(0,0)$ and $E(-c/\beta,0)$.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(I)] If $c>0$  then $O$ is a saddle and $E$ is a center.
If $c<0$ then $O$ is a center and $E$ a saddle.

\item[(II)] There is a unique homoclinic orbit $\Gamma$ asymptotic
to the saddle and encircling the center. There is also a family of
periodic orbits encircling the center and filling up the interior
of the homoclinic loop $\Gamma$.

\item[(III)] Up to a shift in $\xi$, the homoclinic orbit $\Gamma$
is parametrized by a homoclinic solution $u=q(\xi,c,\beta)$
to \eqref{2ndorder}.
\begin{equation}\label{homoclinic}
q(\xi,c,\beta):= \begin{cases} -\frac{3c}{2\beta} \mathop{\rm sech}{}^2
\big(\frac{\sqrt{c}}{2}\xi\big), \quad c>0, \\
\frac{|c|}{\beta}\Big(1-\frac32\mathop{\rm sech}{}^2
\big(\frac{\sqrt{|c|}}{2}\xi\big)\Big),
\quad c<0. \end{cases}
\end{equation}

\item[(IV)] Each periodic orbit corresponds to a unique
$h\in(-\frac{c^3}{6\beta^2},0$, $c>0$ or
$h\in(0,-\frac{c^3}{6\beta^2})$, $c<0$.
Up to a shift in $\xi$, the family of periodic orbits is parametrized by
periodic solutions $p(\xi,c,\beta,h)$ of \eqref{2ndorder}.
Depending on $\beta<0$ or $\beta>0$, using elliptic functions,
the periodic solution can be expressed as
\begin{equation}\label{Periodic}
p(\xi,c,\beta,h):=
\begin{cases} r_1-(r_1-r_2)\textmd{sn}^2\left(\Omega\xi,k_1\right),
& \beta<0, \\
r_3+(r_2-r_3)\textmd{sn}^2\left(\Omega\xi,k_2\right),& \beta>0.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
The parameters $(r_1, r_2, r_3, k_1, k_2)$, with $r_1 > r_2 > r_3$, are
defined by
$$
(u')^2=2h+cu^2+\frac23\beta u^3=\frac23|\beta|(r_1-u)(u-r_2)(u-r_3),
$$
$k_1^2=\frac{r_1-r_2}{r_1-r_3}$ if $\beta<0$. While for $\beta>0$,
they are defined by
$$
(u')^2=2h+cu^2+\frac23\beta u^3=\frac23\beta(r_1-u)(r_2-u)(u-r_3),
$$
$k_2^2=\frac{r_2-r_3}{r_1-r_3}$. $\Omega=\frac{\sqrt{|\beta|(r_1-r_3)}}{6}$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

\section{General coupled KDV and the P-integrable mode 1}

To find travelling wave wave solutions, let $\xi=X-cT$  be the travelling coordinate. From \eqref{CKdV} we obtain  the travelling wave system
\begin{equation}\label{E2.1}
\begin{gathered}
-cA_1' +A_{1}'''+ a_1 A_1 A_1' + a_2 A_1 A_2' + a_3 A_2 A_1' + a_4 A_2 A_2' =0
,\\
-cA_2' +A_{2}'''+ b_1 A_1 A_1' + b_2 A_1 A_2' + b_3 A_2 A_1' + b_4 A_2 A_2' =0.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Following Lou et al \cite{lou},  we look for solutions that satisfy
$A_1=\omega A_2, \omega\neq 0$. Substituting $A_1=\omega A_2$ into
\eqref{E2.1},  integrating \eqref{E2.1} and
taking the integral constants as zero, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{E2.2}
\begin{gathered}
A_2''=cA_2 - \frac12 \left(a_1 \omega + (a_2 + a_3)
 + \frac{a_4}{\omega}\right)A_2^2,\\
A_2''=cA_2 -\frac12 \left(b_1 \omega^2 + (b_2+b_3)\omega
 + b_4\right) A_2^2.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
The two equations of system \eqref{E2.2} are the same if and only if
 $\omega$ is a  non-zero real root of the  cubic algebraic
equation
\begin{equation}\label{E2.3}
b_1\omega^3 + (b_2+b_3-a_1)\omega^2 +(b_4-a_2-a_3)\omega -a_4=0.
\end{equation}
We now assume that $\omega$ satisfies \eqref{E2.3} and denote
\begin{equation}\label{littleb}
B=\frac12(b_1\omega^2+(b_2+b_3)\omega+ b_4).
\end{equation}
 System  \eqref{E2.2}  is reduced to
\begin{equation}\label{E2.4}
A_2 '' = c A_2- B A_2^2.
\end{equation}
This is the same as \eqref{2ndorder} with $\beta= -B$. In the phase
plane $(A_2,A_2')$, \eqref{E2.4} has two equilibrium points $O(0,0)$ and
$E(c/B,0)$. It is easy to see that
when $c>0$ ($<0$), $O$ is a saddle point (a center);
$E$ is a center (a saddle point).

Using Lemma \ref{classify}, we obtain the following results.

\begin{theorem}\label{T2.1}
Let $\omega$ be a real root of \eqref{E2.3} and $B$ be as in \eqref{littleb}.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] If $c>0$, then the origin $O$ is a saddle and $E$ a center.
If $c<0$, then $O$ is a center and $E$ a saddle.

\item[(2)] \eqref{CKdV} has a family of periodic wave solutions encircling the
center  parameterized by $h\in (-\frac{c^3}{6 B^2}, 0)$ if $c>0$ or
$h\in (0, -\frac{c^3}{6B^2})$ if $c<0$:
\begin{equation}\label{E2.6}
A_2(\xi)=p(\xi,c,-B,h), \quad A_1(\xi)=\omega A_2(\xi).
\end{equation}
System \eqref{CKdV} also has a solitary wave solutions  of
peak type asymptotic to the saddle point
\begin{equation}\label{E2.7}
A_2(\xi)=q(\xi,c,-B),\ \ A_1(\xi)=\omega A_2(\xi).
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

To find travelling wave solutions for the P-integrable model 1, let
$\xi=X-cT$, $u=A_1(\xi)$, $v=A_2(\xi)$. From \eqref{e1.1},
\begin{equation}\label{E2.7b}
\begin{gathered}
-cu'+u'''-[(c_0+3)(c_0+6)u^2+c_0^2v^2]_{\xi}
 +2c_0[(c_0+6)u_{\xi}v+(c_0+3)uv_{\xi}]=0, \\
-cv'+v'''-[(c_0+3)^2u^2+ c_0(c_0-3)v^2]_{\xi}
 +2(c_0+3)[c_0vu_{\xi}+(c_0-3)uv_{\xi}]=0,
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}


Corresponding to \eqref{E2.7b}, the parameters of
\eqref{E2.1} hasve the special values:
\begin{gather*}
a_1=-2(c_0+3)(c_0+6),\quad a_2=2c_0(c_0+3),\quad
a_3=2c_0(c_0+6),\quad a_4=-2c_0^2,\\
b_1=-2(c_0+3)^2,\quad b_2=2(c_0+3)(c_0-3),\quad
b_3=2c_0(c_0+3), \quad\! b_4=-2c_0(c_0-3).
\end{gather*}
The cubic equation \eqref{E2.3} becomes
 \begin{equation}\label{cubforc0}
 \begin{aligned}
&(c_0+3)^2\omega^3-3(c_0+3)(c_0+1)\omega^2+3c_0(c_0+2)\omega-c_0^2\\
&= ((c_0+3)\omega - c_0)^2(\omega -1)=0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

The roots of \eqref{cubforc0} are $\omega=c_0/(c_0+3)$ and $\omega=1$.
This suggests the change of variables $X=(c_0+3)u - c_0 v$,
$Y= u-v$, or $u=\frac13X- \frac{c_0}{3}Y$,
$v=\frac13 X -\frac{c_0+3}{3}Y$. The result is a partially uncoupled
system of equations,
\begin{gather}\label{model1X}
X''' =c X'+12 X X', \\
Y''' =c Y'+ 6 X Y' \label{model1Y}.
\end{gather}
We can recover $(u,v)$ by
\begin{equation}\label{recover}
\begin{pmatrix} u \\v \end{pmatrix}
=M \begin{pmatrix} X \\ Y\end{pmatrix},\quad
M= \frac13 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -c_0 \\ 1 & -(c_0+3) \end{pmatrix}.
\end{equation}
Integrating once and taking the integration constant to be zero, we have
\begin{gather*}
X'' = c X + 6 X^2,\\
Z'' = c Z + 6 X Z,
\end{gather*}
where $Z= Y'$ and $Y=\int Z d\xi$.

\begin{theorem}\label{Pint1} For the P-integrable model 1, we have
\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] on the plane $(c_0+3)u -c_0v=0$, or $X=0$,
the P-integrable model 1 reduces to $Y''' =c Y'$.
The only bounded solutions are harmonic periodic waves  oscillating
around the mean value $A_1 = K/c,\; A_2= (c_0+3)K/(c c_0)$.
They occur only if $c<0$.

\item[(2)] On the plane $u-v =0$ or $Y=0$,  model 1 reduces to
$X'' =cX + 6X^2$, the same as \eqref{2ndorder} with $\beta=6$.
The only bounded solutions are solitary waves $X=q(\xi,c,6)$ and
periodic waves $X=p(\xi,c,6,h)$.
The travelling waves  in $(A_1,A_2)$ can  be expressed as
$(A_1,A_2)^\tau = M (X, 0)^\tau$.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

Apart from the particular solutions described in Theorem \ref{Pint1},
much richer dynamical behavior of the system can be found if we
 consider bounded travelling wave solutions of $X$ from \eqref{model1X}
first then plug them into \eqref{model1Y} for $Y$. Discussion of such
solutions will be deferred to Section 4 while similar cases from
P-integrable models 3 and 5 are considered.


\section{Travelling wave solutions of the P-integrable model 2}

The travelling wave solutions of \eqref{e1.2} in travelling coordinate
satisfy
\begin{equation}\label{E1.8}
\begin{gathered}
A_{1\xi\xi}=cA_1+\frac12(c_1-c_2+c_1c_2)A_1^2-c_1A_1A_2+\frac12A_2^2,\\
A_{2\xi\xi}=cA_2+\frac12c_1c_2A_1^2-c_2A_1A_2+\frac12(c_2-c_1+1)A_2^2.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
The quadratic forms in \eqref{E1.8} can be expressed as
$$
(A_1,A_2)Q_1(c_1,c_2) (A_1,A_2)^\tau, \quad
(A_1,A_2)Q_2(c_1,c_2) (A_1,A_2)^\tau,
$$
where
\begin{gather*}
Q_1(c_1,c_2)=\begin{pmatrix} (c_1-c_2 + c_1 c_2)/2 & -c_1/2 \\
                  -c_1/2 &  1/2 \end{pmatrix}, \\
Q_2(c_1,c_2)=\begin{pmatrix} c_1c_2 /2 & -c_2/2 \\
                     -c_2/2    & (c_2-c_1 + 1)/2  \end{pmatrix}.
\end{gather*}
Under the conditions $c_1\neq 1, c_2 \neq 1$ and $c_2 \neq c_1$,
the matrices $A$ and $B$ satisfies a condition of simultaneous
diagonilization by nonsingular real matrices \cite{hornjohnson}.
Our calculation shows that only $c_2 \neq 1$ is required in the
co-diagonalization.
  Setting
$$
M = \frac{1}{1-c_2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ 1 & -c_2 \end{pmatrix},
\quad M^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix} -c_2 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix},\quad
c_2 \neq 1
$$
we have
\begin{gather*}
M^\tau Q_1 M = \frac{1}{2(1-c_2)}
\begin{pmatrix} 1-c_1 & 0 \\ 0 &  c_1-c_2 \end{pmatrix}, \\
M^\tau Q_2 M = \frac{1}{2(1-c_2)}
\begin{pmatrix} 1-c_1 & 0 \\  0 & c_2 (c_1 - c_2)\end{pmatrix}.
\end{gather*}
By the  change of variables
\begin{equation}\label{xtou}
(A_1,A_2)^\tau = M\cdot (u,v)^\tau,
\end{equation}
the non-diagonal terms in the quadratic forms of \eqref{E1.8} can removed.
This leads to
\begin{equation}\label{nondiagonal}
\begin{gathered}
A_1'' = cA_1 + \frac{1-c_1}{2(1-c_2)} u^2 +\frac{c_1-c_2}{2(1-c_2)}v^2, \\
A_2'' = cA_2 + \frac{1-c_1}{2(1-c_2)} u^2+\frac{c_2(c_1-c_2)}{2(1-c_2)}v^2.
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
Applying the inverse transform of \eqref{xtou},
$u=A_2-c_2 A_1$, $v=A_2-A_1$ to
\eqref{nondiagonal}, the reduced system should have no $uv$ term.
What unexpected is that the result  is a completely uncoupled system
of two equations.
\begin{align}\label{E1.8xya}
u_{\xi\xi}=cu+ \frac{1-c_1}{2} u^2 ,\\
v_{\xi\xi}=cv+ \frac{c_2-c_1}{2} v^2. \label{E1.8xyb}
\end{align}

Equation \eqref{E1.8xya} has two equilibria
$U_0=0, U_1 = 2c/(c_1-1)$ while  \eqref{E1.8xyb} has two equilibria
$V_0=0, V_1=2c/(c_1-c_2)$.

\begin{lemma}\label{L3.1}
 Assume that $c_1 \neq 1, c_2 \neq 1$ and $c_1 \neq c_2$. Then
\begin{itemize}
\item[(I)] If $c>0$, then for \eqref{E1.8xya}, $U_0$ is a saddle with
eigenvalues $\pm \sqrt{|c|}$, and $U_1$ is a center with eigenvalues
$\pm\sqrt{|c|} i$. For
\eqref{E1.8xyb}, $V_0$ is a saddle with eigenvalues $\pm \sqrt{|c|}$,
and $V_1$ is a center with eigenvalues $\pm\sqrt{|c|} i$.

\item[(II)] If $c<0$, then similar properties for \eqref{E1.8xya})
(or \eqref{E1.8xyb}) still hold if we switch $U_0$ with $U_1$
(or $V_0$ with $V_1$).
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}

Define
$$
e_1=-\frac{2c}{1-c_1-c_2+c_1c_2},\quad
e_2=\frac{2c}{c_2-c_1-c_2^2+c_1c_2},\quad
e_3=-\frac{2c}{c_1-c_2-c_1^2+c_1c_2}.
$$
It is now clear that \eqref{E1.8} has four equilibrium points
corresponding to the combinations of equilibrium points of \eqref{E1.8xya}
and \eqref{E1.8xyb}:
\begin{gather*}
(U_0,V_0) \Leftrightarrow E_0: \{(A_1,A_2) = (0,0)\}, \\
\quad (U_1,V_0) \Leftrightarrow E_1:\{(A_1,A_2)=(e_1,e_1)\},\\
(U_0,V_1) \Leftrightarrow E_2:\{(A_1,A_2)=(e_2, c_2 e_2)\}, \\
\quad (U_1,V_1) \Leftrightarrow E_3: \{(A_1,A_2) = (e_3, c_1 e_3)\}.
\end{gather*}
 From Lemma \ref{L3.1}, we have the following results about equilibria
$E_0$ to $E_3$ of \eqref{E1.8}.

\begin{lemma}\label{L3.2}
Assume that $c_1\neq 1, c_2 \neq 1$ and $c_1 \neq c_2$.
Then for \eqref{E1.8},
\begin{itemize}
\item[(I)] if $c>0$, $E_0$ is a saddle with eigenvalues $\pm \sqrt{|c|}$
while $E_3$ is a center with eigenvalues $\pm\sqrt{|c|} i$.
Both the algebraic and geometric multiplicities of these eigenvalues
are equal to $2$. (semi-simple eigenvalues). $E_1$ and $E_2$ are
center-saddle points with eigenvalues
$\pm \sqrt{|c|}$ and $\pm\sqrt{|c|} i$.

\item[(II)] If $c<0$, then the properties on $E_1$ and $E_2$ remain
unchanged but properties on $E_0$ and $E_3$ must be switched.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}


Define
\begin{gather*}
W_u(E_0):=\{(A_1,A_2):A_2- A_1=0\}, \quad
W_v(E_0):=\{(A_1,A_2):A_2 -c_2 A_1=0\}. \\
W_u(E_1):=\{(A_1,A_2): A_2 - A_1 = 0\} ,\quad
W_v(E_1):= \{(A_1,A_2):A_2-c_2 A_1 = U_1\}.\\
W_u(E_2):=\{(A_1,A_2): A_2-A_1= V_1\}, \quad
W_v(E_2):=\{(A_1,A_2): A_2-c_2 A_1=0\}.\\
W_u(E_3):=\{(A_1,A_2):A_2-A_1=V_1\}, \quad
W_v(E_3):=\{(A_1,A_2):A_2-c_2 A_1 = U_1\}.
\end{gather*}

 From \eqref{E1.8xya} and \eqref{E1.8xyb}, $W_u(E_j)$ and $W_v(_j)$
are  invariant under the flow of \eqref{E1.8} and
$E_j \in  W_u(E_j)\cap W_v(E_j)$. Using Lemma \ref{2ndorder},
we find all the travelling waves for the P-integrable model 2.

\begin{theorem}\label{aboutE1E2}
Assume that $c_1 \neq 1, c_2 \neq 1$ and
$c_1 \neq c_2$. Then
\begin{itemize}
\item[(I)] if $c>0$,  then on $W_u(E_1)$ there is a family of travelling
periodic solutions encircling  $E_1$: $u=p(\xi,c,(1-c_1)/2,h)$.
On $W_v(E_1)$,  exists a unique  solitary wave solution
$v=q(\xi,c,(c_2-c_1)/2)$.
On $W_u(E2)$, there exists a unique solitary wave $u=q(\xi,c, (1-c_1)/2$
asymptotic to $E_2$. On $W_v(E_2)$ there is a family of travelling
periodic solutions encircling $E_2$: $v=p(\xi,c,(c_2-c_1)/2,h)$.


\item[(II)] If $c<0$ then the conclusions similar to part (I) hold if
$E_1$ and $E_2$ get switched.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem}\label{aboutE0E3}
Assume that $c_1 \neq 1$, $c_2 \neq 1$ and $c_1 \neq c_2$. Then
\begin{itemize}
\item[(I)] if $c>0$, then there exist solitary waves on $W_u(E_0)$:
$u=q(\xi,c,(1-c_1)/2)$  and on $W_v(E_0)$: $v=q(\xi,c,(c_2-c_1)/2)$
asymptotic to $E_0$.
There exist families of travelling periodic waves on both $W_u(E_3)$ and
$W_v(E_3)$ encircling  $E_3$. They are $u=p(\xi,c,(1-c_1)/2,h)$ and
$v=p(\xi,c,(c_2-c_1)/2,h)$.

\item[(II)] If $c<0$ then similar conclusion hold if we switch $E_0$
with $E_3$.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

\begin{corollary}
The travelling wave solutions for P-integrable model 2 are
$$
(A_1(\xi),A_2(\xi))^\tau = M (u(\xi-\xi_1),v(\xi-\xi_2))^\tau
$$
where $(u,v)$ are travelling wave solutions as in Theorem \ref{aboutE1E2}
and Theorem \ref{aboutE0E3} and $\xi_1,\xi_2$ are arbitrarily constants.
\end{corollary}


\begin{remark} \label{rmk3.1} \rm
(1) If $c_1= 1$, $c_2 \neq 1$, then the only equilibria are $E_0$ and $E_2$.
If $c_1 \neq 1$, $c_2=c_1$, then the only equilibria are $E_0$ and $E_1$.
If $c_1=c_2 =1$, the only the equilibrium is $E_0$. In these special cases,
\eqref{E1.8} is much simpler and its travelling waves are easy to analyze.
We will skip the details.

(2) The cubic equation \eqref{E2.3} for P-integrable model 2 is
$$c_1 c_2 \omega^3  - (c_2 + c_1 + c_1 c_2) \omega^2  + (c_1 + c2 + 1) \omega - 1
=(c_2 \omega-1)(c_1 \omega-1)(\omega-1)) =0,
$$
with three distinct roots $\omega=1,c_1,c_2$. Only $\omega=1$ and $c_2$ are
used in our change of variables. We have tried the variable $A2-c_1 A_1$
and found that \eqref{E1.8} does not get simplified.

 We prefer matrices diagonalization since it provides definitive result.
If after eliminating the non-diagonal terms the system does not decouple,
then we can show that there does not exist a linear change of variable
that can further decouple the system, unless the two original quadratic
forms are linearly dependent.
In this case, one of the decoupled equation is linear.
\end{remark}

\section{Travelling wave solutions for the P-integrable mode 3, 4 and 5}

For the P-integrable models 3, 4 and 5,
(see \eqref{e1.3}, \eqref{e1.4} and \eqref{e1.5}), we make the
change of variables
$A_1(\xi)+A_2(\xi)=u(\xi)$, $A_1(\xi)-A_2(\xi)=v(\xi)$, i.e.,
$A_1(\xi)=\frac12(u+v)$, $A_2(\xi)=\frac12(u-v)$. Then, the travelling
wave solutions of \eqref{e1.3} are determined by the system
\begin{equation}\label{E1.9}
u_{\xi\xi}-cu+u^2=0,\quad v_{\xi\xi} +(u- c)v =0.
\end{equation}
The travelling wave solutions of \eqref{e1.4} are given by the system
\begin{equation}\label{E1.10}
u_{\xi\xi}-cu+2u^2=0,\quad  v_{\xi\xi}-cv=0.
\end{equation}
The travelling wave solutions of \eqref{e1.5} are determined by the system
$$
u_{\xi\xi}-cu+u^2=0,\quad  A_{1\xi\xi\xi}+(2u-c) A_{1\xi}=0.
$$
Let $A_{1\xi}=w$. Then
\begin{equation}\label{E1.12} u_{\xi\xi}-cu+u^2=0,\quad
w_{\xi\xi} +(2u- c)w =0.
\end{equation}
Note that the change of variables is invertible:
$A_1(\xi)=\int^{\xi}w(s)ds,\ A_2(\xi)=u(\xi)-A_1(\xi)$.

\subsection{The P-integrable model 4}
We first discuss system \eqref{E1.10} which consists of two
uncoupled equations.
We are interested in the bounded solutions of \eqref{E1.10}.
Therefore, we assume that $c<0$.  Using Lemma 1.1 with $\beta=-2$,
we have the following conclusion.

\begin{theorem}\label{T4.1}
 System \eqref{e1.4} has the  following  bounded exact travelling wave
solutions:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] Asymptotically  periodic solutions:
\begin{equation}\label{E4.8}
\begin{gathered}
A_1(\xi)=\frac12\left[q(\xi,c,-2) +
\gamma\cos\sqrt{|c|}\xi\right],\\
A_2(\xi)=\frac12\left[q(\xi,c,-2) -
\gamma\cos\sqrt{|c|}\xi\right].
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}

\item[(ii)] Quasi-periodic solutions, with $h\in(0,-c^3/24)$:
\begin{equation}\label{E4.9}
\begin{gathered}
A_1(\xi)=\frac12\left[p(\xi,c,-2,h)+
\gamma\cos\sqrt{|c|}\xi\right],\\
A_2(\xi)=\frac12\left[p(\xi,c,-2,h)-
\gamma\cos\sqrt{|c|}\xi\right].
\end{gathered}
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}


\subsection{The P-integrable model 3 and 5}
We now consider systems \eqref{E1.9} and \eqref{E1.12}.
The first equations for the two systems are the same:
\begin{equation}\label{E4.10}
u''=cu-u^2
\end{equation}
Assume that $c<0$. Equation \eqref{E4.10} has two equilibrium points:
center $O(0,0)$ and saddle point $E(c,0)$. By Lemma 1.1, with $\beta=-1$,
we find that

(1) Equation \eqref{E4.10} has a family of periodic orbits encircling $O$,
parametrized by the periodic solutions
\begin{equation}\label{E4.12}
u = p(\xi,c,-1,h),\quad h\in (0,-c^3/6).
\end{equation}

(2) Equation \eqref{E4.10} also has a unique homoclinic orbit asymptotic
to $E$ defined by the homoclinic solution:
\begin{equation}\label{E4.13}
u(\xi)=q(\xi,c,-1).
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{E4.12} and \eqref{E4.13} into \eqref{E1.9}, we find two
 possible  equations for $v$:
\begin{gather}\label{E4.14}
v_{\xi\xi}+\left(|c|+r_1-(r_1-r_2)\textmd{sn}^2(\Omega\xi,k)\right)v=0,\\
\label{E4.15}
v_{\xi\xi}+\Big(\frac{3|c|}{2}\mathop{\rm sech}{}^2\big(\frac{\sqrt{|c|}}{2}\xi\big)\Big)v=0
\end{gather}
Substituting \eqref{E4.12} and \eqref{E4.13} into \eqref{E1.12},
we find two possible equations for $w$:
\begin{gather}\label{E4.16}
w_{\xi\xi}+\left(2r_1+|c|-2(r_1-r_2)\textmd{sn}^2(\Omega\xi,k)\right)w=0, \\
\label{E4.17}
w_{\xi\xi}+\Big(c+3|c|\mathop{\rm sech}{}^2\big(\frac{\sqrt{|c|}}{2}\xi\big)\Big)w=0.
\end{gather}

Equations \eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16} are special forms of the
Hill equation
$x''+(a+\phi(t))x=x''+p(t)x=0$ (see Cesari \cite{cesari}). Denote
$p_1(\xi)=|c|+r_1-(r_1-r_2)\textmd{sn}^2(\Omega\xi,k)$ and
$p_2(\xi)=2r_1+|c|-2(r_1-r_2)\textmd{sn}^2(\Omega\xi,k)$. It is easy
to show that for $h\in\left(0,-\frac{1}{6}c^3\right)$, we have
$p_1(\xi)>0$,
$$
p_{1m}\equiv\frac{\Omega}{2K(k)}\int_0^{\frac{2K(k)}{\Omega}}
p_1(\xi)d\xi=|c|+r_3+\frac{(r_1-r_3)}{2}\frac{E(k)}{K(k)}
$$
and when $2r_2+|c|>0$, $p_2(\xi)>0$,
$$
p_{2m}\equiv\frac{\Omega}{2K(k)}\int_0^{\frac{2K(k)}{\Omega}}
p_2(\xi)d\xi=|c|+2r_3+(r_1-r_3)\frac{E(k)}{K(k)}.
$$
We can show that the condition of Borg's theorem \cite{borg}
\begin{equation}\label{E4.18}
T\int_0^T|p_j(\xi)|d\xi=\big(\frac{2K(k)}{\Omega}\big)^2|p_{jm}|\leq
4,\quad j=1,2
\end{equation}
cannot be satisfied. So we cannot use it to   conclude
that any solution of \eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16} is bounded
or stable.

However conditions  \eqref{E4.18} are only sufficient
conditions for the existence of bounded  solutions of
\eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16}. By using Theorem 8.1 in  Hale
\cite{hale},  there exist two real sequences of the
number $|c|$: $\{c_0<c_1\leq c_2\leq\dots\}$ and
$\{c_1^*\leq c_2^*\leq c_3^*\leq\dots\}$, when
 $k\to\infty$, $c_k, c_k^*\to\infty$,
$$
c_0<c_1^*\leq c_2^*<c_1\leq c_2<c_3^*\leq c_4^*<c_3\leq
c_4<\dots
$$
such that \eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16} have periodic
solutions with period $\frac{2K(k)}{\Omega}$ (or
$\frac{4K(k)}{\Omega}$), if and only if for some $k=0,1,2,\dots$,
we have $|c|=c_k$ (or for some $k=0,1,2,\dots$, we have
$|c|=c_k^*$). The solutions of \eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16} are
stable in the intervals
\begin{equation}\label{stable}
(c_0,c_1^*), \quad (c_2^*,c_1), \quad (c_2,c_3^*), \quad (c_4^*,c_3), \dots.
\end{equation}
 And the solutions
of \eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16} are unstable in the intervals
$$
(-\infty,c_0], \quad (c_1^*,c_2^*), \quad
(c_1,c_2), \quad (c_3^*,c_4^*), \quad (c_3,c_4), \dots.
$$
Therefore, \eqref{E4.14} and \eqref{E4.16} have bounded solutions when the
parameter $|c|$ belongs to a stable interval in \eqref{stable}.
We summarize our results in the following theorem.

\begin{theorem}\label{T4.2}
Assume that $c<0$ in \eqref{E1.9} and \eqref{E1.12}. Then there
are infinitely  many pairs $(c,h)$ where $h\in(0,-\frac16c^3)$,
$|c|=c_k, c_k^*$ or $|c|$ is in one of the intervals of \eqref{stable}.
For such $(c,h)$,  \eqref{E1.9} and \eqref{E1.12} have solutions
$(u,v)$ and $(u,w)$ where $u=p(\xi,c,-1,h)$ is periodic and  $v(\xi)$
and $w(\xi)$ are bounded.

(1) For the P-integrable model 3, the bounded travelling waves are
$$ A_1 = \frac12(u + v),\quad A_2 = \frac12 (u-v).
$$

(2) For the P-integrable model 5, if $\int^\xi w(s) ds$ is a bounded
function on $\mathbb{R}$, then The bounded travelling wave solutions are
$$A_1(\xi) = \int^\xi w(s) ds, \quad A_2(\xi) = u(\xi) - A_1(\xi).
$$
In particular, for any constant $\gamma$,  $(A_1,A_2)=(\gamma, u-\gamma)$
is a periodic travelling wave solution.
\end{theorem}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk4.1} \rm
The condition for $\int w(\xi) d\xi$  to be a bounded function is rather
complicated and better left to a separate paper.

If $c>0$, there are periodic solutions $u=p(\xi,c,-1,h)$ oscillating
around the center $E$. It is possible to plug these solutions into the
equations for $v$ and $w$ and look for bounded solutions.
\end{remark}

Finally, we consider equation \eqref{E4.15} and \eqref{E4.17}. Let
$$
p_3(\xi)=\frac{3|c|}{2}\mathop{\rm sech}{}^2\big(\frac{\sqrt{|c|}}{2}\xi\big),\quad
p_4(\xi)=c+3|c|\mathop{\rm sech}{}^2\big(\frac{\sqrt{|c|}}{2}\xi\big).
$$
Because $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}p_3(t)dt$ is convergent and $c<0$,
by using the results mentioned in Cesari \cite{cesari}, we find that
the solutions of \eqref{E4.15} and \eqref{E4.17} are non-oscillating
and unbounded.

\begin{remark}
A general coupled KdV system has been studied in \cite{sakovich} where
the third order coefficients may not be equal.
Apparently \eqref{model1X}--\eqref{model1Y} from model 1 correspond
to the case (ii) in \cite{sakovich}, system \eqref{E1.9} from model
3 corresponds to the case (vii) in \cite{sakovich}, and system \eqref{E1.12}
corresponds to (vi) in \cite{sakovich}. Models 2 and 4 were not studied
in \cite{sakovich}.
\end{remark}

\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
The authors would like to thank Moody Chu and Ilse Ipsen  for
 helpful discussions on methods of co-diagonalizing quadratic forms.
We would also like to thank the anonymous referee for offering several
new references  and pointing out some relation between our results
and that of \cite{sakovich}.

\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{bonasmith}
J. L. Bona and R. Smith;
\emph{The initial-value problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation},
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.
Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, {\bf 278} (1975),   555-601.


\bibitem{borg}  G. Borg;
\emph{On a Liapunov criteria of stability}, Amer. J. Math. {\bf 71} (1949),
67-70.

\bibitem{cesari} L. Cesari;
\emph{Asymptotic behavior and stability
problems  in ordinary differential equations}, Springer-Verlag,
Berlinm, 1959.

\bibitem{drinfeld} V. G. Drinfeld and V. V. Sokolov;
\emph{New evolutionary equations possessing (L-A)-Pair},
Proceedings of the S L Sobolev Seminar, Novosibirsk, 1981, Volume2, 5-9
(in Russian).


\bibitem{foursov}M. V. Foursov;
\emph{Towards the complete classification of homogeneous two-component
integrable equations}, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003), 3088-3096.


\bibitem{gurses} M. Gurses and A. Karasu;
\emph{Integrable coupled KdV systems}, J. Math. Phys. 39 (1998), 2103-2111.


\bibitem{hale} J. K. Hale;
\emph{Ordinary differential equation},
second Edition, Robert E.Krieger Publishing Company: Huntington,
New York, 1980.

\bibitem{hornjohnson} R. Horn, C. Johnson;
\emph{Matrix analysis}, Cambridge, 1985.

\bibitem{jibinhuihui} Jibin Li and Huihui Dai;
\emph{On the study of singular sonlinear
 travelling wave equations: Dynamical system approach}, Science
 Press, Beijing, 2007.

\bibitem{karasu} A. Karasu;
\emph{Painleve classification of coupled Korteweg-de Vries systems},
J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997), 3616-3622.

\bibitem{lou} S. Y. Lou, Bin Tong, Hengchun Hu, Xiaoyan Tang;
\emph{Coupled KdV equation derived from two-layer fluids}, J.
Phys.A:Math.Gen. {\bf 39} (2006), 513-527.

\bibitem{sakovich} S. Yu Sakovich;
\emph{Coupled KdV equations of Hirota-Satsuma type},
J. Nonlin. Math. Phys. 6, (1999), 255-262.

\bibitem{sakovich2} S. Yu Sakovich;
Addendum to ``Coupled kdV equations of Hirota-Satsuma type
 (J. Nonlin. Math. Phys. Vol 6, No. 3 (1999), 255-262)'',
J. Nonlin. Math.Phys. 8, (2001), 311-312.

\bibitem{strauss} W. Strauss;
\emph{Partial differential equations: An introduction},
John Wiley \& Sons, 1992.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
