\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2008(2008), No. 58, pp. 1--15.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
\newline ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu  (login: ftp)}
\thanks{\copyright 2008 Texas State University - San Marcos.}
\vspace{9mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2008/58\hfil Existence and uniqueness of solutions]
{Existence and uniqueness of nontrivial solutions for nonlinear
 higher-order three-point eigenvalue problems on time scales}

\author[W. Han, Y. Kao\hfil EJDE-2008/58\hfilneg]
{Wei Han, Yonggui Kao}  % in alphabetical order

\address{Wei Han \newline
Department of Mathematics, North University of China, Taiyuan
Shanxi, 030051, China}
\email{qd\_hanweiwei1@126.com}

\address{Yonggui Kao \newline
Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of  Technology, Weihai
Shandong 264209, China} 
\email{kaoyonggui@sina.com}

\thanks{Submitted November 6, 2007. Published April 17, 2008.}
\thanks{Supported by grant 10371066 from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China.}
\subjclass[2000]{39A10, 34B15, 34B18}
\keywords{Time scale; nontrivial solutions; eigenvalue problem;
\hfill\break\indent
 fixed point theorem; Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative}

\begin{abstract}
 In this paper, we study a nonlinear higher-order three-point
 eigenvalue problems with first-order derivative on time scales.
 Under certain growth conditions on the nonlinearity, sufficient
 conditions for  existence and uniqueness of nontrivial solutions,
 which are easily verifiable, are obtained by using the
 Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative.
 The conditions used in the paper are different from those
 in \cite{a4,e1,s3}.  To show  applications of our main results,
 we present some examples.
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

 In recent years, there has been much attention paid to the existence
of positive solution for second-order three-point and higher-order
two-point boundary value problem on time scales. On the other
hand, $p$-Laplacian problems on time scales have also been studied
extensively, for details, see \cite{a3,b1,d1,h1,h2,h3,k1,l2,s1,s2,s3,s4,s5}
and references
therein. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are not many
results concerning three-point eigenvalue problems of higher-order
on time scales.

A time scale ${\bf T}$ is a nonempty closed subset of $\mathbb{R}$. We make
the blanket assumption that $0, T$ are points in ${\bf T}$. By an
interval $(0,T)$, we always mean the intersection of the real
interval $(0,T)$ with the given time scale; that is
$(0,T)\cap{\bf T}$.

Anderson \cite{a3}  studied the following dynamic equation on time
scales:
\begin{gather}
u^{\Delta\nabla}(t)+a(t)f(u(t))=0,\quad  t\in(0, T), \label{e1.1}\\
u(0)=0,  \quad    \alpha u(\eta)=u(T).\label{e1.2}
\end{gather}
He obtained  one positive solution based on the limits
$f_{0}=\lim_{u\to 0^{+}}\frac{f(u)}{u}$ and
$f_{\infty}=\lim_{u\to \infty}\frac{f(u)}{u}$. He also obtained
at least three positive solutions.
Kaufmann \cite{k1} also studied  \eqref{e1.1}--\eqref{e1.2}
and obtained finitely many positive solutions and
then countably many positive solutions.
 Luo and Ma \cite{l2}, discussed the following dynamic equation on
time scales:
\begin{gather}
u^{\Delta\nabla}(t)+a(t)f(u(t))=0, \quad t\in(0, T), \label{e1.3}\\
u(0)=\beta u(\eta),  \quad u(T)=\alpha u(\eta).\label{e1.4}
\end{gather}
They obtained  results for the existence of one positive
solution and for the existence of at least three positive solutions
by using a fixed point theorem and the
Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem, respectively.


We would also like to mention the results of Boey and Wong \cite{b1},
Zhao-Cai Hao \cite{h1}  and Sun \cite{s5}.
Boey and Wong \cite{b1} studied the
following two-point right focal boundary-value problems on time
scales:
\begin{gather}
(-1)^{n-1}y^{\Delta^{n}}(t)=(-1)^{p+1}F(t,y,(\sigma^{n-1}(t))), \quad
t\in[a, b] \cap{\bf T}.\label{e1.5}\\
y^{\Delta^{i}}(a)=0,\quad  0\leq i\leq p-1, \label{e1.6}\\
y^{\Delta^{i}}(\sigma(b))=0, \quad p\leq i \leq n-1, \label{e1.7}
\end{gather}
where $n\geq 2$, $1\leq p\leq n-1$ is fixed and $\bf T$ is a time
scale. Existence criteria are developed for triple positive
solutions for the problem \eqref{e1.5}--\eqref{e1.7} by applying fixed
point theorems for operators on a cone.  Zhao-Cai Hao \cite{h1}
considered the following fourth-order singular boundary value
problems:
\begin{gather}
x^{(4)}(t)=\lambda f(t,x(t)), \quad   t\in (0,1), \label{e1.8}  \\
x(0)=x(1)=0,\quad  x''(0)=x''(1)=0, \label{e1.9}
\end{gather}
 where $f\in C((0,1)\times (0,\infty)\times [0,\infty))$,
 $\lambda >0$ is a parameter. He determined values of
$\lambda$ for which there exist positive solutions of the above
boundary value problems, and for $\lambda =1$, he gave criteria
for the existence of eigenfunctions.

The present work is motivated by a recent paper Sun \cite{s5},
where the following third-order two-point boundary-value problem
on time scales is considered:
\begin{gather}
u^{\Delta\Delta\Delta}(t)+f(t,u(t),u^{\Delta\Delta}(t))=0,
\quad t\in[a,\sigma(b)], \label{e1.10}\\
u(a)=A,\quad u(\sigma (b))=B,\ \ u^{\Delta\Delta}(a)=C,\label{e1.11}
\end{gather}
where $a,b\in {\bf T}$ and $a<b$. Existence of
solutions and positive solutions is established by using
the Leray-Schauder fixed point theorem.
However, in the existing literature, very few people have considered
the case where the nonlinear term contains the first-order
derivative.

In this paper, we are concerned with the existence of nontrivial
solutions of the following higher-order three-point eigenvalue
problems with the first-order derivative on time scales:
\begin{gather}
u^{\Delta^{n}}(t)+\lambda f(t,u(t),u^{\Delta}(t))=0,\quad
 t\in (0,T), \label{e1.12}\\
u(0)=\alpha u(\eta),\quad u(T)=\beta u(\eta),\label{e1.13}\\
u^{\Delta^{i}}(0)=0\quad\text{for } i=1,2,\dots,n-2,\label{e1.14}
\end{gather}
where $\lambda >0$ is a parameter, $\eta\in (0,\rho(T))$ is a
constant, $\alpha, \beta\in \mathbb{R}$,
$f\in C_{ld}([0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$,
 $\mathbb{R}=(-\infty,+\infty)$, $n\geq 2$.

 We want to point out that when ${\bf T}=\mathbb{R}$ and
$\lambda=1$, \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} becomes
a boundary-value problem of differential equations and has been
considered in \cite{l1}.

The aim of this paper is to establish  simple criteria for the
existence of nontrivial solutions of the problem \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}.
Our results are new and different from those of
\cite{a3,d1,k1,l2}.
Particularly, we do not require any monotonicity and
nonnegative on $f$, which was essential for the technique used in
\cite{a3,d1,k1,l2}.

\section{Preliminaries}

For convenience, we list the following definitions which can be
found in \cite{a2,a4,b2,b3}.

\begin{definition} \label{def2.1} \rm
 A time scale ${\bf T}$ is a nonempty closed subset of real
numbers $\mathbb{R}$.
 For $t<\sup{\bf T}$ and $r>\inf{\bf T}$, define the forward jump
operator $\sigma$ and
backward jump operator $\rho$, respectively, by
\begin{gather*}
\sigma(t)=\inf\{\tau\in{\bf T}\mid\tau> t\}\in{\bf T}, \\
\rho(r)=\sup\{\tau\in{\bf T}\mid\tau< r\}\in{\bf T}.
\end{gather*}
for all $t, r\in{\bf T}$. If $\sigma(t)>t$,  $t$ is said to be
right scattered,  and if $\rho(r)<r$,  $r$ is said to be left
scattered; if $\sigma(t)=t$,  $t$ is said to be right dense, and
if $\rho(r)=r$, $r$ is said to be left dense.
\end{definition}

\begin{definition} \label{def2.2} \rm
Fix $t\in  {\bf T}$. Let $f: {\bf T}\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
The delta derivative of $f$ at the point $t$
is defined to be the number $f^{\Delta}(t)$ (provided it exists),
with the property that, for each $\epsilon>0$, there is a
neighborhood $U$ of $t$ such that
$$
|f(\sigma(t))-f(s)-f^{\Delta}(t)(\sigma(t)-s)|\leq\epsilon|\sigma(t)-s|,
$$
for all $s\in U$. Define $f^{\Delta^{n}}(t)$ to be the delta
derivative of $f^{\Delta^{n-1}}(t)$; i.e.,
$f^{\Delta^{n}}(t)=(f^{\Delta^{n-1}}(t))^{\Delta}$.
\end{definition}

\begin{definition} \label{def2.3} \rm
A function $f$ is left-dense continuous
(i.e. $ld$-continuous),  if $f$ is continuous at each left-dense
point in ${\bf T}$ and its right-sided limit exists at each
right-dense point in ${\bf T}$. If $F^{\Delta}(t)=f(t)$, then
define the delta integral by
$$
\int_{a}^{t}f(s)\Delta s=F(t)-F(a).
$$
\end{definition}

For the rest of this article, we denote the set of left-dense
continuous functions from $[0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}$
to $\mathbb{R}$ and from $[0,T]$ to $\mathbb{R}$ by
$C_{ld}([0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ and
$C_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$, respectively.

Let  $X=C_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ be endowed with the ordering $x\leq y$
if\ $x(t)\leq y(t)$ for all $t\in [0,T]$, and
$\|u\|=\max_{t\in [0,T]}|u(t)|$. Now we introduce the norm
in $Y=C_{ld}^{1}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$ by
$$
\|u\|_{1}=\|u\|+\|u^{\Delta}\|=\max_{t\in [0,T]}|u(t)|+
\max_{t\in [0,T]}|u^{\Delta}(t)|.
$$
 Clearly, it follows that $(Y,\|u\|_{1})$ is a Banach space.


\begin{lemma} \label{lem2.1}
Suppose that $d=(1-\alpha)T^{n-1}-(\beta-\alpha)\eta^{n-1}\neq 0$.
Then for $y\in C_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$, the problem
\begin{gather}
u^{\Delta^{n}}(t)+ y(t)=0,\quad  t\in (0,T), \label{e2.1} \\
u(0)=\alpha u(\eta),\ \ u(T)=\beta u(\eta),\label{e2.2} \\
u^{\Delta^{i}}(0)=0\ \ for \ \ i=1,2,\dots,n-2,\label{e2.3}
\end{gather}
has a unique solution
\begin{equation} \label{e2.4}
\begin{aligned}
u(t)=&\frac{1}{d}\left[\alpha\eta^{n-1}+t^{n-1}
(1-\alpha)\right]\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta
s - \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s\\
&\quad +\frac{1}{d}\left[-\alpha
T^{n-1}+(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-1}\right]\int_{0}^{\eta}
\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
 From \eqref{e2.1}, we have
\begin{equation}
u(t)=- \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s
+\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}A_{i}t^{i}+B.\label{e2.5}
\end{equation}
Since $u^{\Delta^{i}}(0)=0$ for  $i=1,2,\dots,n-2$, one gets
$A_{i}=0$  for  $i=1,2,\dots,n-2$. Now, we solve for $A_{n-1}$
and $B$. By $u(0)=\alpha u(\eta)$ and $u(T)=\beta u(\eta)$, it
follows that
\begin{equation}
B=- \alpha \int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta
s+\alpha A_{n-1}\eta^{n-1}+\alpha B, \label{e2.6}
\end{equation}
 and
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned}
&- \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s+
A_{n-1}T^{n-1}+ B \\
 &=- \beta
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s+\beta
A_{n-1}\eta^{n-1}+ \beta B.
\end{aligned}\label{e2.7}
\end{equation}
 Solving the above equations \eqref{e2.6} and \eqref{e2.7}, we get
\begin{gather}
A_{n-1}=\frac{1}{d}\Big[(\alpha-\beta)
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta
s+(1-\alpha)\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s
\Big] , \label{e2.8}
\\
B=\frac{\alpha}{d}\Big[\eta^{n-1}
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta
s-T^{n-1}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta
s \Big]. \label{e2.9}
\end{gather}
Substituting \eqref{e2.8} and \eqref{e2.9} in \eqref{e2.5}, one
has
\begin{align*}
u(t)=&\frac{1}{d}[\alpha\eta^{n-1}+t^{n-1}(1-\alpha)]
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta
s - \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s\\
&\quad+\frac{1}{d}[-\alpha T^{n-1}+(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-1}]
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}y(s)\Delta s.
\end{align*}

It is easy to see that BVP $u^{\Delta^{n}}(t)=0$,
$u(0)=\alpha u(\eta)$, $u(T)=\beta u(\eta)$,
$u^{\Delta^{i}}(0)=0$, for
$i=1,2,\dots,n-2$, has only the trivial solution. Thus $u$ in
\eqref{e2.4} is the unique solution of \eqref{e2.1}, \eqref{e2.2}
and \eqref{e2.3}. The proof is complete.
\end{proof}

To prove our main result, we need  a useful lemma which can
be found in \cite{g1}.

\begin{lemma}[\cite{g1}] \label{lem2.2}
Let $X$ be a real Banach space and $\Omega$ be a bounded open
subset of $X$, $0\in \Omega$, $F:\overline{\Omega}\longrightarrow X$
be a completely continuous operator. Then either there exist
$x\in \partial \Omega$, $\lambda >1$ such that $F(x)=\lambda x$,
or there exists a fixed point $x^{*}\in \overline{\Omega}$.
\end{lemma}

 \section{Main results}

For convenience, we introduce the following notation. Let
$$
\varphi (t,s)=\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s)),\quad
\psi (t,s)=\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}r(s),
$$
\begin{align*}
M&=\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\big]
\int_{0}^{T}\varphi(T,s)\Delta
s +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
\varphi(\eta,s)\Delta s \\
 &\quad + \frac{(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}(n-1)\varphi(T,s)\Delta
s+\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\varphi(T,s)\Delta s
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\varphi(\eta,s)\Delta s ,
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
N&=\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\big]
\int_{0}^{T}\psi(T,s)\Delta s +\frac{(2|\alpha|
 +|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta} \psi(\eta,s)\Delta s \\
 &\quad + \frac{(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}(n-1)\psi(T,s)\Delta
s+\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\psi(T,s)\Delta s
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\psi(\eta,s)\Delta s .
\end{align*}

Our main result is stated as follows.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm3.1}
 Suppose that $f(t,0,0)\not\equiv 0$, $t\in  [0,T]$, $d\neq 0$
and there exist nonnegative functions  $p,q,  r\in L^{1}[0,T]$
such that
\begin{equation}
|f(t,u,v)|\leq p(t)|u|+q(t)|v|+r(t),\quad
\text{a. e.} (t,u,v)\in [0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R},
\label{e3.1}
\end{equation}
 and there exists  $t_{0}\in [0,T]$  such that  $p(t_{0})\neq 0$ or
$q(t_{0})\neq 0$.   Then there exists a constant
$\lambda^{*}>0$ such that for any
$0<\lambda \leq \lambda^{*}$,
the problem  \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}
 has at least one nontrivial solution
$u^{*}\in C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{theorem}


\begin{proof}   By Lemma \ref{lem2.1}, the problem \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} has a solution  $u=u(t)$ if and only if $u$
is a solution of the operator equation
\begin{align*}
  u(t)&=\frac{\lambda}{d}\left[\alpha\eta^{n-1}+t^{n-1}(1-\alpha)\right]
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}   f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))\Delta s \\
&\quad -\lambda \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))\Delta
s\\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda}{d}\left[-\alpha
T^{n-1}+(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-1}\right]
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))\Delta
s\\
&=:Fu(t)\,.
\end{align*}
in $Y$.  So we  need only to seek for a fixed point of $F$ in $Y$.
 Applying Arzela-Ascoli theorem on time scales \cite{a1} and the
Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem on time scales \cite{a5}, we
can conclude that this operator  $F:Y\to Y$ is a
completely continuous operator \cite{s4}.

Since $|f(t,0,0)|\leq r(t)$,  a.e.  $t \in [0,T]$,   we know
$\int_{0}^{T}\psi(T,s)\Delta s>0$, from $p(t_{0})\neq 0$ or
$q(t_{0})\neq 0$, we easily obtain
$\int_{0}^{T}\varphi(T,s)\Delta s >0$, so $M>0$, $ N>0$.
  Let
$$
m=\frac{N}{M},\quad  \Omega=\{ u\in C^{1}_{ld}[0,T]: \|u\|_{1}< m \}.
$$
Suppose  $u\in \partial \Omega$, $\mu >1$ are such that
$Fu=\mu u$. Then
$$
\mu m=\mu \|u\|_{1}=\|Fu\|_{1}=\|Fu\|+\|(Fu)^{\Delta}\|.
$$
 Since
\begin{align*}
\|Fu\| &=\max_{t\in [0,T]}|Fu(t)|\\
&\leq  \bigl|\frac{\lambda
}{d}\left[\alpha\eta^{n-1}+t^{n-1}(1-\alpha)\right]\bigr|
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} |f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
 &\quad +\max_{0\leq t \leq
T}\Big\{ \lambda
\int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
&\quad +\big|\frac{\lambda}{d}[-\alpha
T^{n-1}+(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-1}]\big|
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta
s  \Big\}  \\
&\leq \frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
 &\quad +\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
 &=\lambda \big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|} \big]\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s
\\
&\leq \lambda \big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|} \big] \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}[
p(s)|u(s)|+q(s)|u^{\Delta}(s)|+r(s)]\Delta s
\\
&\quad + \frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}[
p(s)|u(s)|+q(s)|u^{\Delta}(s)|+r(s)]\Delta s
\\
 &\leq \lambda \|u\|_{1} \Big\{\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|} \big]
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta s \\
&\quad +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta
s \Big\}\\
&\quad +\lambda \Big\{\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\big]\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} r(s) \Delta s \\
&\quad +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} r(s) \Delta s
\Big\} \\
& \leq \lambda \|u\|_{1} \Big\{\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|} \big] \int_{0}^{T} \varphi(T,s)\Delta s\\
&\quad +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
\varphi(\eta,s)\Delta s \Big\} \\
 &\quad + \lambda \Big\{\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\big]\int_{0}^{T} \psi(T,s)\Delta s\\
&\quad +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
\psi(\eta,s)\Delta s  \Big\}
\end{align*}
 and
\begin{align*}
&\|(Fu)^{\Delta}\| \\
&=\max_{t\in [0,T]}|(Fu)^{\Delta}(t)|\\
&=\max_{t\in
[0,T]}\Big|\frac{\lambda
}{d}(1-\alpha)t^{n-2}\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}
f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))\Delta s  \\
&\quad -\lambda \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}
f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))\Delta s\\
&\quad + \frac{\lambda }{d}(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-2}
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}
f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))\Delta s \Big|\\
&\leq \frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}
}{|d|} \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
 &\quad +\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}
|f(s,u(s),u^{\Delta}(s))|\Delta s \\
&\leq \frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}
}{|d|} \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!} \left[
p(s)|u(s)|+q(s)|u^{\Delta}(s)|+r(s)\right]\Delta s
\\
&\quad +\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}\left[
p(s)|u(s)|+q(s)|u^{\Delta}(s)|+r(s)\right]\Delta s
\\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}\left[
p(s)|u(s)|+q(s)|u^{\Delta}(s)|+r(s)\right]\Delta s
\\
 &\leq \lambda \|u\|_{1} \Big\{ \frac{ (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2} }{|d|}
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta s
 \\
&\quad  +\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!} (p(s)+q(s))\Delta s\\
&\quad  +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta
s \Big\}\\
&\quad +\lambda \Big\{ \frac{
(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2} }{|d|}
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}r(s)\Delta s
+\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!} r(s)\Delta s
\\
&\quad  +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}r(s)\Delta s
\Big\}\\
 & = \lambda \|u\|_{1} \Big\{ \frac{
(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2} }{|d|} \int_{0}^{T} (n-1)\varphi(T,s)\Delta
s+\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\varphi(T,s)\Delta s
\\
 &\quad  +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\varphi(\eta,s)\Delta s \Big\}\\
 &\quad + \lambda \Big\{ \frac{
(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2} }{|d|} \int_{0}^{T} (n-1)\psi(T,s)\Delta
s+\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\psi(T,s)\Delta s
\\
 & \quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\psi(\eta,s)\Delta s \Big\},
\end{align*}
then
 $$
\|Fu\|_{1}\leq \lambda \|u\|_{1} M+\lambda N .
$$
Choose $\lambda^{*}=\frac{1}{2M}$. Then when
$0<\lambda \leq  \lambda^{*}$, we have
 $$
\mu m=\mu \|u\|_{1}= \|Fu\|_{1}\leq \frac{1}{2M}M
 \|u\|_{1}+\frac{N}{2M}.
$$
Consequently,
 $$
\mu \leq \frac{1}{2}+ \frac{N}{2mM}=1.
$$
This contradicts $\mu >1$. By Lemma \ref{lem2.2}, $F$ has a fixed point
$u^{*}\in \overline{\Omega}$.
Since $f(t,0,0)\not\equiv 0$, then when $0<\lambda \leq  \lambda^{*}$,
the problem  \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} has a
nontrivial solution $u^{*}\in  C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
This completes the proof.
\end{proof}

  If we use the following stronger condition than \eqref{e3.1} to
  substitute \eqref{e3.1}, we  obtain the following Theorem.

\begin{theorem} \label{thm3.2}
Suppose that  $f(t,0,0)\not\equiv 0$, $t\in  [0,T]$, $d\neq 0$
 and there exist nonnegative functions $p, q \in L^{1}[0,T]$ such that
\begin{equation}  \label{e3.2}
|f(t,u_{1},v_{1})-f(t,u_{2},v_{2})|\leq
p(t)|u_{1}-u_{2}|+q(t)|v_{1}-v_{2}|,
\end{equation}
a.e. $(t,u_{i},v_{i})\in [0,T]\times \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}$
($i=1, 2$),
 and there exists  $t_{0}\in [0,T]$ such that $p(t_{0})\neq 0$ or
$q(t_{0})\neq 0$.
  Then there exists a constant $\lambda^{*}>0$
such that for any $0<\lambda \leq \lambda^{*}$, the problem
\eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} has unique nontrivial
solution $u^{*}\in C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof} In fact,  if $u_{2}=v_{2}=0$, then we
have $$|f(t,u_{1},v_{1})|\leq p(t)|u_{1}|+q(t)|v_{1}|+|f(t,0,0)|,\quad
\text{a. e. } (t,u_{1},v_{1})\in [0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}.
$$
 From Theorem \ref{thm3.1}, we know the problem  \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} has a nontrivial solution
$u^{*}\in C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
But in this case, we prefer to concentrate on the uniqueness of
the nontrivial solution for the problem \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}.
Let $F$ be given in Theorem \ref{thm3.1}. We shall show that $F$ is a
contraction. On the one hand,
\begin{align*}
& \|Fu_{1}-Fu_{2}\|\\
&=\max_{t\in [0,T]}|Fu_{1}(t)-Fu_{2}(t)| \\
& =\max_{t\in
[0,T]}\Big|\frac{\lambda}{d}\left[\alpha\eta^{n-1}+t^{n-1}(1-\alpha)\right]
\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
 \big[ f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)) \\
 &\quad -f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\big]\Delta s \\
 &\quad -\lambda \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
 \left[ f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right]
 \Delta s \\
&\quad + \frac{\lambda}{d}\left[-\alpha
T^{n-1}+(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-1}\right]
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\Big[
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)) \\
 & \quad-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\Big\}\Delta s \Big|\\
&\leq \frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\left|
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right|\Delta
s \\
 &\quad +\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\left|
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right|\Delta
s \\
 &\quad  +\frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\left|
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right|\Delta
s \\
&\leq \frac{\lambda
(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\left[
p(s)|u_{1}(s)-u_{2}(s)|+q(s)|u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)
-u_{2}^{\Delta}(s)|\right]\Delta s \\
 &\quad +\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\left[
p(s)|u_{1}(s)-u_{2}(s)|+q(s)|u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)
-u_{2}^{\Delta}(s)|\right]\Delta s
\\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda (2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}\big[
p(s)|u_{1}(s)-u_{2}(s)| \\
&\quad +q(s)|u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)
-u_{2}^{\Delta}(s)|\big]\Delta s \\
&\leq \lambda \|u_{1}-u_{2}\|_{1} \Big\{ \big[\frac{
(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}+1\big]\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}
(p(s)+q(s))\Delta s   \\
 & \quad +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta
 s \Big\} \\
& =  \lambda \|u_{1}-u_{2}\|_{1} \Big\{ \big[\frac{
(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}+1\big]\int_{0}^{T}
\varphi(T,s)\Delta s \\
&\quad +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
\varphi(\eta,s)\Delta s  \Big\} .
\end{align*}
On the other hand,
\begin{align*}
&\|(Fu_{1})^{\Delta}-(Fu_{2})^{\Delta}\|\\
& =\max_{t\in [0,T]}|(Fu_{1})^{\Delta}(t)-(Fu_{2})^{\Delta}(t)| \\
& =\max_{t\in [0,T]}\Big|\frac{\lambda
}{d}(1-\alpha)t^{n-2}\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}\big[
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))
\\
& \quad -f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\big]\Delta s
\\
&\quad -\lambda \int_{0}^{t}\frac{(t-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}\left[
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right]\Delta
s \\
&\quad +\frac{\lambda }{d}(\alpha-\beta)t^{n-2}
\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}\left[
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right]\Delta
s \Big|  \\
& \leq \frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}
}{|d|} \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!} \left|
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right|\Delta
s \\
&\quad + \lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}\left|
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right|\Delta
s \\
&\quad + \frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}\left|
f(s,u_{1}(s),u_{1}^{\Delta}(s))-f(s,u_{2}(s),u_{2}^{\Delta}(s))\right|\Delta
s \\
& \leq \frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}
}{|d|} \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}\left[
p(s)|u_{1}(s)-u_{2}(s)|+q(s)|u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)
-u_{2}^{\Delta}(s)|\right]\Delta s \\
&\quad  + \lambda \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}\left[
p(s)|u_{1}(s)-u_{2}(s)|+q(s)|u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)
-u_{2}^{\Delta}(s)|\right]\Delta s \\
&\quad  + \frac{\lambda (|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}\big[
p(s)|u_{1}(s)-u_{2}(s)|\\
&\quad +q(s)|u_{1}^{\Delta}(s)
-u_{2}^{\Delta}(s)|\big]\Delta s \\
&\leq \lambda \|u_{1}-u_{2}\|_{1} \Big\{ \frac{ (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}
}{|d|} \int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta s
 \\
&\quad +\int_{0}^{T}\frac{(T-s)^{n-2}}{(n-2)!} (p(s)+q(s))\Delta s
  \\
& \quad  +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}
}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}\frac{(\eta-s)^{n-1}}{(n-2)!}(p(s)+q(s))\Delta
s \Big\}  \\
& = \lambda \|u_{1}-u_{2}\|_{1} \Big\{ \frac{ (|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}
}{|d|} \int_{0}^{T} (n-1)\varphi(T,s)\Delta
s+\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\varphi(T,s)\Delta s
\\
 & \quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\varphi(\eta,s)\Delta s \Big\} .
\end{align*}
Then
$$
\|Fu_{1}-Fu_{2}\|_{1} \leq \lambda \|u_{1}-u_{2}\|_{1} M.
$$
   If we choose $\lambda^{*}=\frac{1}{2M}$.
 Then, when $0<\lambda \leq  \lambda^{*}$, we have
$$
\|Fu_{1}-Fu_{2}\|_{1}\leq  \frac{1}{2}\|u_{1}-u_{2}\|_{1}.
$$
So $F$ is indeed a contraction. Finally, we use the Banach fixed
point theorem to deduce the existence of unique solution to the
problem \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}.
\end{proof}


\begin{corollary} \label{coro3.1}
 Suppose that $f(t,0,0)\not\equiv 0$,
$t\in  [0,T]$, $d\neq 0$  and
\begin{equation}
0\leq L=\limsup _{|u|+|v|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|f(t,u,v)|}{|u|+|v|}<+\infty.  \label{e3.3}
\end{equation}
Then there exists a constant  $\lambda^{*}>0$
such that for any  $0<\lambda \leq \lambda^{*}$,
the problem  \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}
has at least one nontrivial solution
 $u^{*}\in C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
  Let $ \varepsilon >0$ such that $L+1-\varepsilon >0$.
By \eqref{e3.3}, there exists $H>0$ such that
$$
|f(t,u,v)|\leq (L+1-\varepsilon)(|u|+|v|),\quad
   |u|+|v|\geq H,\quad 0\leq t \leq T.
$$
Let $K=\max_{t\in [0,T],\  |u|+|v|\leq H}|f(t,u,v)|$. Then for any
$(t,u,v)\in [0,T]\times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}$, we have
$$
|f(t,u,v)|\leq (L+1-\varepsilon)(|u|+|v|)+K.
$$
 From Theorem \ref{thm3.1}, we know the problem
\eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}
has at least one nontrivial solution
$u^{*}\in C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary} \label{coro3.2}
 Suppose that $f(t,0,0)\not\equiv 0$, $t\in  [0,T]$, $d\neq 0$  and
$$
0 \leq L=\limsup _{|u|+|v|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|f(t,u,v)|}{|u|}<+\infty,
$$
 or
$$
0 \leq L=\limsup _{|u|+|v|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|f(t,u,v)|}{|v|}<+\infty.
 $$
 Then there exists a constant  $\lambda^{*}>0$,
 such that for any  $0<\lambda \leq \lambda^{*}$,
 problem \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} has
at least one nontrivial solution  $u^{*}\in C^{1}_{ld}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$.
\end{corollary}

We remark that % \label{rmk3.1} \rm
 Corollaries \ref{coro3.1} and \ref{coro3.2} include the case
 that $f$ is jointly sublinear at $(-\infty,+\infty)$; that is,
\begin{gather*}
\limsup _{|u|+|v|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|f(t,u,v)|}{|u|+|v|}=0\quad\text{or}\quad
 \limsup_{|u|+|v|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|f(t,u,v)|}{|u|}=0 \\
\text{or} \quad
\limsup _{|u|+|v|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|f(t,u,v)|}{|v|}=0.
\end{gather*}

 \section{Some examples}

In the section, we illustrate our results, with some examples.
We only study the case ${\bf T}=\mathbb{R}$ and
$(0,T)=(0,1)$.


\begin{example} \label{exa4.1} \rm
 Consider the  forth-order eigenvalue problem
\begin{gather}
u^{(4)}+\lambda\left(\frac{u t\sin {t}}{t^{2}+1}-t(\cos{u'})^{2}
+t(1+t)\right)=0, \quad   t\in (0,1), \label{e4.1}\\
u(0)=-u(\frac{1}{2}),\quad u(1)=u(\frac{1}{2}),\quad
 u'(0)=0, \quad   u''(0)=0.  \label{e4.2}
\end{gather}
Set $\alpha=-1$, $\beta=1$, $\eta=\frac{1}{2}$, $n=4$,
  $f(t,u,u')= \frac{u t\sin {t}}{t^{2}+1}-t(\cos{u'})^{2}+t(1+t)$,
\begin{gather*}
d=(1-\alpha)T^{n-1}-(\beta-\alpha)\eta^{n-1} = (1+1)\cdot
  1^{4-1}-(1+1)\cdot (\frac{1}{2})^{4-1}=\frac{7}{4}>0 ,\\
 p(t)=\frac{t}{t^{2}+1},\  \  q(t)=t, \ \  r(t)=t^{2}.
\end{gather*}
   Noticing that
$$
\big|\frac{u t\sin t}{t^{2}+1}-t(\cos{u'})^{2}+t(1+t)\big|
\leq p(t)|u|+q(t)|u'|+r(t),
$$
 it follows from a direct calculation that
$$
\varphi (t,s)=\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s))
=\frac{(t-s)^{4-1}}{(4-1)!}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s)
=\frac{(t-s)^{3}}{6}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s),
$$
\begin{align*}
M=&\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\big]
\int_{0}^{T}\varphi(T,s)  ds +\frac{(2|\alpha|
+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
\varphi(\eta,s)ds \\
&\quad + \frac{(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}(n-1)\varphi(T,s)ds
 +\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\varphi(T,s)ds
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\varphi(\eta,s)ds \\
  & = \left[1+\frac{(2\times 1+1)\cdot
1^{4-1}}{\frac{7}{4}}\right]\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1-s)^{3}}{6}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s)
 ds \\
  &\quad  +\frac{(2\times
1+1)\cdot 1^{4-1}}{\frac{7}{4}}\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{2}}
\frac{(\frac{1}{2}-s)^{3}}{6}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s) ds
\\
 &\quad + \frac{(1+1)\cdot 1^{4-2}}{\frac{7}{4} }\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1-s)^{3}}{2}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s) ds
 +\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1-s)^{2}}{2}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s)ds
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(1+1)\cdot 1^{4-2}}{\frac{7}{4}}\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{2}}
\frac{(\frac{1}{2}-s)^{3}}{2}(\frac{s}{s^{2}+1}+s)ds
\\
 & =0.1763 .
\end{align*}
Choose
$\lambda^{*}=\frac{1}{2M}=2.8367$.
 Then by Theorem \ref{thm3.2}, we know the problem \eqref{e4.1}--\eqref{e4.2}
has a  unique nontrivial solution
$u^{*}\in C^{1}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$
 for any $\lambda\in (0,2.8367]$.
\end{example}

\begin{example} \label{exa4.2} \rm
Consider the  third-order eigenvalue problem
\begin{gather}
u'''+\lambda\left(\frac{u }{2}-\cos{u'}\right)=0, \quad
  t\in (0,1), \label{e4.3}\\
u(0)=\frac{1 }{4}u(\frac{1}{2}),\quad
u(1)=\frac{3 }{4}u(\frac{1}{2}),\quad u'(0)=0.
 \label{e4.4}
\end{gather}
Set $\alpha=\frac{1 }{4}$, $\beta=\frac{3 }{4}$,
$\eta=\frac{1}{2}$, $n=3$,
$f(t,u,u')= \frac{u }{2}-\cos{u'}$,
 $$
d=(1-\alpha)T^{n-1}-(\beta-\alpha)\eta^{n-1} = (1-\frac{1 }{4})\cdot
  1^{3-1}-(\frac{3 }{4}-\frac{1 }{4})(\frac{1}{2})^{3-1}=\frac{5}{8}>0 ,
$$
  $p(t)=\frac{1}{2}$, $ q(t)=1$.
Noticing that
$$
\big|\frac{u_{1} }{2}-\cos{u_{1}'}-\frac{u_{2} }{2}+\cos{u_{2}'}\big|
\leq p(t)|u_{1}-u_{2}|+q(t)|u_{1}'-u_{2}'|,
$$
 it follows from a direct calculation that
$$
\varphi (t,s)=\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s))
=\frac{(t-s)^{3-1}}{(3-1)!}(\frac{1}{2}+1)
=\frac{3(t-s)^{2}}{4},
$$
\begin{align*}
M=&\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\big]
 \int_{0}^{T}\varphi(T,s)  ds +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}
 \int_{0}^{\eta} \varphi(\eta,s)ds \\
 &\quad + \frac{(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}(n-1)\varphi(T,s)ds
 +\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\varphi(T,s)ds
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\varphi(\eta,s)ds \\
& =\big[1+\frac{(2\times \frac{1 }{4} +1)\cdot
1^{3-1}}{\frac{5}{8}}\big]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{3(1-s)^{2}}{4}  ds\\
&\quad +\frac{(2\times \frac{1 }{4}+\frac{3 }{4})\cdot 1^{3-1}}{\frac{5}{8}}\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{2}}
\frac{3(\frac{1}{2}-s)^{2}}{4} ds \\
 &\quad + \frac{(\frac{1 }{4}+1)\cdot 1^{3-2}}{\frac{5}{8}}
\int_{0}^{1}\frac{3(1-s)^{2}}{2} ds
 +\int_{0}^{1}\frac{3(1-s)}{2} ds
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(\frac{1 }{4}+\frac{3 }{4})\cdot 1^{3-2}}{\frac{5}{8}}\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{2}}
\frac{3(\frac{1}{2}-s)^{2}}{2} ds  \\
  & = 2.7625 .
\end{align*}
Choose $\lambda^{*}=\frac{1}{2M}=0.1810$.
 Then by Theorem \ref{thm3.2},  problem \eqref{e4.3}-\eqref{e4.4} has a
unique nontrivial solution $u^{*}\in C^{1}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$
for any $\lambda\in (0,0.1810]$.
\end{example}


\begin{example} \label{exa4.3} \rm
 Consider the  third-order eigenvalue problem
\begin{gather}
u'''+\lambda\left(-u^{\frac{1}{2}}+t^{2}
\sin {\sqrt{u^{4}+{u'}^{2}}}+t^{3}(1-t)e^{\cos t}\right)=0,
\quad t\in (0,1), \label{e4.5} \\
u(0)=2u(\frac{1}{4}),\quad  u(1)=u(\frac{1}{4}), \quad  u'(0)=0.
 \label{e4.6}
\end{gather}
Set, $\alpha=2$, $\beta=1$, $\eta=\frac{1}{4}$, $n=3$,
\begin{gather*}
f(t,u,u')= -u^{\frac{1}{2}}+t^{2}\sin {\sqrt{u^{4}+{u'}^{2}}}
+t^{3}(1-t)e^{\cos t}, \\
d=(1-\alpha)T^{n-1}-(\beta-\alpha)\eta^{n-1} = (1-2)\cdot
  1^{3-1}-(1-2)(\frac{1}{4})^{3-1}=-\frac{15}{16}<0 \,.
\end{gather*}
It is obvious that
 $$
\limsup _{|u|+|u'|\to +\infty } \max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{|-u^{\frac{1}{2}}+t^{2}\sin
\sqrt{u^{4}+{u'}^{2}}+t^{3}(1-t)e^{\cos t}|}{|u|+|u'|}=0.
$$
Choose $\varepsilon =\frac{1}{2}$.
In this case, $p(t)=\frac{1}{2}$,   $q(t)=\frac{1}{2}$. It
follows from a direct calculation that
$$
\varphi (t,s)=\frac{(t-s)^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}(p(s)+q(s))
=\frac{(t-s)^{3-1}}{(3-1)!}(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2})
=\frac{(t-s)^{2}}{2},
$$
\begin{align*}
M=&\big[1+\frac{(2|\alpha|+1)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\big]\int_{0}^{T}\varphi(T,s)
 ds +\frac{(2|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-1}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
\varphi(\eta,s)ds \\
 &\quad + \frac{(|\alpha|+1)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{T}(n-1)\varphi(T,s)ds
 +\int_{0}^{T}\frac{n-1}{T-s}\varphi(T,s)ds
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(|\alpha|+|\beta|)T^{n-2}}{|d|}\int_{0}^{\eta}
(n-1)\varphi(\eta,s)ds \\
 & =\big[1+\frac{(2\times 2 +1)\cdot
1^{3-1}}{\frac{15}{16}}\big]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{(1-s)^{2}}{2}
 ds +\frac{(2\times 2+1)\cdot 1^{3-1}}{\frac{15}{16}}\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{4}}
\frac{(\frac{1}{4}-s)^{2}}{2} ds \\
 &\quad + \frac{(2+1)\cdot 1^{3-2}}{\frac{15}{16}}\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{2} ds
 +\int_{0}^{1}(1-s) ds
\\
 &\quad +\frac{(2+1)\cdot 1^{3-2}}{\frac{15}{16}}\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{4}}
(\frac{1}{4}-s)^{2} ds  \\
 & =2.6528 .
\end{align*}
Choose $\lambda^{*}=\frac{1}{2M}=0.1885$.
 Then by Corollary \ref{coro3.1}, we know the problem
\eqref{e4.5}--\eqref{e4.6} has a  unique nontrivial solution
$u^{*}\in C^{1}([0,T],\mathbb{R})$
  for any $\lambda\in (0,0.1885]$.
\end{example}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk4.1}\rm
The boundary-value problem \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14}
includes (BVP) \eqref{e1.1}-\eqref{e1.2} of \cite{a3,k1},
\eqref{e1.3}-\eqref{e1.4} of \cite{l2}.

 For the case where $\alpha=\beta=0$,  ${\bf T}=\mathbb{R}$, $\lambda=1$,
(BVP) \eqref{e1.12}--\eqref{e1.14} becomes
\begin{gather*}
u^{(n)}+a(t)f(u)=0,\quad t\in (0,1), \label{e4.7}\\
u^{(i)}(0)=u(1)=0, \quad i=0,1,2,\dots,n-2, \label{e4.8}
\end{gather*}
The above problem was studied by Eloe and Henderson \cite{e1}.
\end{remark}

As usual we write
\begin{gather*}
\max f_{\infty}:=\lim_{u\to \infty}\max_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u},\quad
 \min f_{\infty}:=\lim_{u\to \infty}\min_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u},
\\
\max f_{0}:=\lim_{u\to 0^{+}}\max_{t\in
[0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u},\quad
 \min f_{0}:=\lim_{u\to 0^{+}}\min_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u}.
\end{gather*}
Function $f$ in \cite{a3,l2,m1} is assumed to be superlinear
($\max f_{0}=0$ and $\max f_{\infty}=\infty$) or sublinear
($\max f_{\infty}=0$ and $\max f_{0}=\infty$).

The  condition:
\begin{equation}
0\leq \overline{f}_{0}=\limsup_{u\to 0}
 \max_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u}<L,\quad
l<\underline{f}_{\infty}=\liminf_{u\to\infty}
\min_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u}\leq \infty,
\label{e4.9}
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}
0\leq \overline{f}_{\infty}=\limsup_{u\to\infty}
\max_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u}<L,\quad
l<\underline{f}_{0}=\liminf_{u\to0}\min_{t\in [0,T]}\frac{f(t,u)}{u}
\leq \infty,\label{e4.10}
\end{equation}
is required in \cite{s4,y1}, where $L$ and $l$ are
given. In this paper, we do not assume that nonlinear term $f$
satisfy either superlinear (sublinear) conditions, or the
conditions \eqref{e4.9} and \eqref{e4.10}. Consequently, in view of different
aspect, we can say that main results in \cite{a3,e1,l2,m1,s4,y1}
do not apply to  \eqref{e4.1}--\eqref{e4.3}. The sufficient
conditions in this paper ,which are easily verifiable, have a
wider adaptive range. These have an important of leadings
significance in both theory and application of boundary value
problems.

\begin{thebibliography}{00}

\bibitem{a1}   R. P. Agarwal, M. Bohner, P. Rehak;
 { \it Half-linear
dynamic equations, Nonlinear analysis and applications:} to V.
Lakshmikantham on his 80th birthday, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, 2003, 1-57.

\bibitem{a2}  R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan;
Nonlinear boundary value Problems on time scales, { \it Nonlinear
Anal.} {\bf 44} (2001) 527-535.
\bibitem{a3} D. R. Anderson;
Solutions to second-order three-point problems on time scales,
{\it J. Differen. Equ. Appl.} {\bf 8 } (2002) 673-688.

\bibitem{a4}
F. M. Atici, G. Sh. Gnseinov; On Green'n functions and positive
solutions for boundary value problems on time scales,  { \it J.
Comput. Anal. Math.} {\bf 141} (2002) 75-99.

\bibitem{a5} B. Aulbach, L. Neidhart;
 Integration on measure chain, in: { \it
proc. of the Sixth Int. Conf. on Difference Equations,} CRC,
BocaRaton, Fl, 2004, 239-252.

 \bibitem{b1} K. L. Boey, Patricia J. Y. Wong;
 Existence of triple positive solutions of two-point right focal
boundary value problems on time scales, { \it Comput. Math. Appl.} {\bf 50 }
(2005) 1603-1620.

\bibitem{b2}  M. Bohner, A. Peterson;
  { \it Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with
Applications, } Birkh$\ddot{a}$user, Boston, Cambridge,  MA, 2001.

 \bibitem{b3}  M. Bohner, A. Peterson;
{ \it Advances in Dynamic Equations on time scales,}
Birkh$\ddot{a}$user Boston, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

 \bibitem{d1} J. J. Dacunha, J. M. Davis, P. K. Singh;
 Existence results for singular three point boundary value
problems on time scales, { \it
 J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf 295 } (2004) 378-391.

\bibitem{e1}  P. W. Eloe, J. Henderson;
 Positive solutions for $(n-1,1)$ conjugate boundary value Problems,
{ \it Nonlinear Anal.} {\bf 28 } (1997) 1669-1680.

\bibitem{g1}  D. Guo, V. Lakshmikanthan;
 {\it Nonlinear problems in Abstract Cones, }
Academic Press, San Diego, 1988.

\bibitem{h1} Z. C. Hao, L. Debnath;
 On eigenvalue intervals and eigenfunctions of
fourth-order singular boundary value problems, { \it Appl. Math.
Lett.} {\bf 18 } (2005) 543-553.

 \bibitem{h2} Z. M. He;
 Double positive solutions of three-point boundary value problems for
$p$-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales, { \it J. Comput.
Appl. Math.} {\bf 182 } (2005) 304-315.

\bibitem{h3} Z. M. He;
Triple positive solutions of boundary value problems for
$p$-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales, { \it  J. Math.
Anal. Appl.} {\bf 321 } (2006) 911-920.

\bibitem{k1} E. R. Kaufmann;
 Positive solutions of a three-point boundary value
problem on a time scale, { \it Eletron. J. Differen. Equ. }
{\bf 2003} (2003) no. 82, 1-11.

\bibitem{l1} Y. J. Liu, W. G. Ge;
 Positive solutions for (n-1,1) three-point boundary value problems with
coefficient that changes sign, { \it J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf
282 } (2003) 816-825.

\bibitem{l2} H. Luo, Q. Z. Ma;
 Positive solutions to a generalized second-order three-point boundary value
problem on time scales, { \it Eletron. J. Differen. Equ.} {\bf 17}
(2005) 1-14.

\bibitem{m1} R. Ma;
 Positive solutions of nonlinear three-point boundary value problem,
{ \it Eletron. J. Differen. Equ.} {\bf 1998} (1998) no. 34, 1-8.

 \bibitem{s1}  H. Su, B. Wang, Z. Wei;
 Positive solutions of  four-point boundary value problems for
four-order $p$-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales,
{ \it Eletron. J. Differen.  Equ.}   {\bf 2006} (2006) no. 78, 1-13.

\bibitem{s2} H. Su, Z. Wei, F. Xu;
 The existence of positive
solutions for nonlinear singular boundary value system with
$p$-Laplacian, { \it J. Appl. Math. Comp. } {\bf 181} (2006)
826-836.

\bibitem{s3} H. Su, Z. Wei, F. Xu, The existence of
countably many positive solutions For a system of nonlinear
singular boundary value problems with the $p$-Laplacian operator,{
\it J. Math. Anal. Appl.} {\bf 325} (2007) 319-332.

\bibitem{s4} H. R. Sun, W. T. Li;
 Positive solutions for nonlinear $m$-point
boundary value problems on time scales, { \it Acta Mathematica
Sinica } {\bf 49 } (2006) 369-380(in Chinese).

\bibitem{s5} J. P. Sun;
 Existence of solution and positive solution of BVP for
nonlinear third-order dynamic equation, { \it Nonlinear Anal.}
{\bf 64 } (2006) 629-636.

\bibitem{y1} Q. Yao;
 Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for a class of second-order
three-point boundary value problem, (in Chinese)
{ \it Acta Mathematica Sinica} {\bf 45} (2002) 1057-1064.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
