\documentclass[reqno]{amsart}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\AtBeginDocument{{\noindent\small
\emph{Electronic Journal of Differential Equations},
Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 224, pp. 1--10.\newline
ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu}
\thanks{\copyright 2016 Texas State University.}
\vspace{8mm}}

\begin{document}
\title[\hfilneg EJDE-2016/224\hfil Infinitely many solutions]
{Infinitely many solutions for Kirchhoff-type problems depending on
a parameter}

\author[J. Sun, Y. Ji, T.-f. Wu \hfil EJDE-2016/224\hfilneg]
{Juntao Sun, Yongbao Ji, Tsung-fang Wu}

\address{Juntao Sun (corresponding author) \newline
College of Science,
Hohai University,
Nanjing 210098, China,\newline
School of Science, Shandong University of Technology,
Zibo 255049,  China}
\email{sunjuntao2008@163.com}

\address{Yongbao Ji \newline
Institute of Finance and Economics,
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,
 Shanghai 200433, China}
\email{jiyongbao@126.com}

\address{Tsung-fang Wu \newline
Department of Applied Mathematics,
National University of Kaohsiung,
Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan}
\email{tfwu@nuk.edu.tw}

\thanks{Submitted November 11, 2015. Published August 17, 2016.}
\subjclass[2010]{35B09, 35J20}
\keywords{Infinitely many solutions; Kirchhoff type problem;
\hfill\break\indent variational method}

\begin{abstract}
 In this article, we study a Kirchhoff type problem with a positive parameter
 $\lambda$,
 \begin{gather*}
 -K\Big( \int_{\Omega }|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big) \Delta u=\lambda
 f(x,u) ,  \quad \text{in } \Omega , \\
 u=0,  \quad \text{on } \partial \Omega ,
 \end{gather*}
 where $K:[0,+\infty )\to \mathbb{R} $ is a continuous
 function and $f:\Omega \times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is a
 $L^{1}$-Carath\'{e}odory function. Under suitable assumptions
 on $K(t)$ and $f(x,u)$, we obtain the existence of infinitely many
 solutions depending on the real parameter $\lambda$.
 Unlike most other papers, we do not require any symmetric condition
 on the nonlinear term $f(x,u)$. Our proof is based on variational methods. 
\end{abstract}

\maketitle
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\allowdisplaybreaks

\section{Introduction}

Consider the  Kirchhoff type problem
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
-K\Big( \int_{\Omega }|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big) \Delta u=\lambda
f(x,u) ,  \quad \text{in } \Omega , \\
u=0, \quad \text{on } \partial \Omega ,
\end{gathered}  \label{e1}
\end{equation}
where $\lambda >0$ is a real parameter, $K:[0,+\infty )\to
\mathbb{R} $ is a continuous function, $\Omega \subset
\mathbb{R}^{N}$ ($N\geq 1$) is a
nonempty bounded open set with a smooth boundary $\partial \Omega $, 
$f:\Omega \times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is a $L^{1}$-Carath\'{e}odory function.

If $K(t)=a+bt$, then  \eqref{e1} is related to the stationary case of
equations that arise in the study of string or membrane vibrations,
namely,
\begin{equation}
u_{tt}-\Big(a+b\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big)\Delta
u=g(x,u),\label{e2}
\end{equation}
where $u$ denotes the displacement, $g(x,u)$ the external force and
$b$ the initial tension while $a$ is related to the intrinsic
properties of the string, such as Young's modulus. Equations of this
type were suggested by Kirchhoff \cite{K} in 1883 to describe the
transversal oscillations of a stretched string, particularly, taking
into account the subsequent change in string length caused by
oscillations. Equation \eqref{e2} is often referred to as being nonlocal
because of the presence of the integral over the entire domain
$\Omega$.

We wish to point out that similar nonlocal problems also model several
physical and biological systems. For example, a parabolic version of
 \eqref{e2} can be used to describe the growth and movement of a
particular species theoretically. The movement, simulated by the
integral term, is assumed dependent on the energy of the entire
system with $u$ as its population density. Alternatively, the
movement of a particular species may be subject to the total
population density within the domain (for instance, the spreading of
bacteria) which induces equations of the type
\[
u_{t}- a\Big(\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big)\Delta u = g(x,u).
\]
Chipot-Lovat \cite{CL} and Corr\^{e}a \cite{C} studied the existence
of solutions and their uniqueness for such nonlocal problems and
their corresponding elliptic equations.

Since Lions \cite{L} introduced an abstract framework of 
\eqref{e2}, the solvability of \eqref{e2} has been well-studied in
general dimensions and domains by various researchers
\cite{AS,AP,CCS}. More precisely, Arosio-Panizzi \cite{AP} studied
the Cauchy-Dirichlet type problem related to  \eqref{e2} in the
Hadamard sense as a special case of an abstract second-order Cauchy
problem in a Hilbert space. D'Ancona-Spagnolo \cite{AS} obtained the
existence of a global classical periodic solution for the degenerate
Kirchhoff equation with real analytic data.

Compared with \eqref{e2}, its stationary equation, including both
the case of bounded domain and the case of unbounded domain, has
received more attention. We refer to \cite{ACS, ACM, A, ACP, BB,
CKW, CX, CP, GHK, HZ, LLS, LC, LG, MR, R1, SCW, SW1, SW, ZP} and the
references therein. The research of these papers mainly involve the
existence of positive solutions, ground state solutions and
multiplicity of positive solutions under various assumptions on
$K(t)$ and $f(x,u)$. Let us briefly comment some known results
related to our paper.

Alves-Corr\^{e}a-Ma \cite{ACM} studied  \eqref{e1} with
$\lambda=1$ and found the conditions of $K(t)$ and $f(x,u)$ that
permit the existence of a positive solution. That is, $K(t)$ does
not grow too fast in a suitable interval near zero and $f(x,u)$ is
locally Lipschitz subject to some prescribed criteria.

Chen-Kuo-Wu \cite{CKW} studied the following Kirchhoff type problem
with concave and convex nonlinearities
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
-K\Big( \int_{\Omega }|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big) \Delta u
=\mu f(x)|u|^{q-2}u+g(x)|u|^{p-2}u \quad \text{in }\Omega, \\
u=0 \quad \text{in } \partial\Omega,
\end{gathered} \label{e4}
\end{equation}
where $\Omega$ is a smooth bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^{N}$ with
$1<q<2<p<2^{*}$ ($2^{*}=\frac{2N}{N-2}$ if $N\geq3$, $2^{*}=\infty$
if $N=1,2$), $K(t)=a+bt$, $a,b, \mu>0$ are parameters and the weight
functions $f,g\in C(\bar{\Omega})$ are allowed to be changing-sign.
Using the Nehari manifold method and fibering map, several results
on the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for 
\eqref{e4} are obtained. It is worth noting that they illustrated the
difference in the solution behavior which arises from the
consideration of the nonlocal effect.

Ricceri \cite{R1} investigated the Kirchhoff type problem
with two parameters
\begin{equation}
\begin{gathered}
-K\Big( \int_{\Omega }|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big) \Delta u
=\lambda f(x,u)+\mu g(x,u) ,  \quad \text{in } \Omega , \\
u=0,  \quad \text{on } \partial \Omega ,
\end{gathered}  \label{e3}
\end{equation}
Under rather general assumptions on $K(t)$ and $f(x,u)$, he proved
that for each $\lambda >\lambda ^{\ast }>0$ and for each
Carath\'{e}odory function $g(x,u)$ with a sub-critical growth, 
\eqref{e3} admits at least three weak solutions for every $\mu\geq0$
small enough. Later, using a recent three critical points theorem
due to Ricceri \cite{R}, Graef-Heidarkhani-Kong \cite{GHK} improved
the results in \cite{R1} and also obtained the existence of three
weak solutions for  \eqref{e3} under some appropriate hypotheses,
depending on two real parameters.

Motivated by the above works, in the present paper we shall
establish some results on the existence of infinitely many solutions
for \eqref{e1}. In our results neither symmetric nor monotonic
condition on the nonlinear term is assumed. We require that $f(x,u)$
have a suitable oscillating behavior either at infinity or at zero on
$u$. For the first case, we obtain an unbounded sequence of
solutions; for the second case, we get a sequence of non-zero
solutions strongly converging at zero. It is worth emphasizing that
we extend and improve the results in \cite{HZ}.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. 
In Section 2, some preliminary results are introduced.
The main results and their proofs are presented in Section 3.

\section{Preliminaries}

Let $H_0^{1}(\Omega )$ be the usual Sobolev space endowed with
norm
\[
\| u\| =\Big( \int_{\Omega }|\nabla u|^{2}dx\Big)^{1/2}.
\]
Throughout this paper, we denote the best Sobolev constant by
$S_{r}$ for the imbedding of $H_0^{1}( \Omega ) $ into
$L^{r}( \Omega ) $ with $2\leq r<2^{\ast }$ and define it by
\[
S_{r}=\inf_{u\in H_0^{1}( \Omega ) \backslash \{
0\} }\frac{\| u\| }{| u|
_{r}},
\]
where $|\cdot|_r$ stands for the classical $L^r$ norm. We recall
that $f: \Omega\times \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is an
$L^1$-Carath\'{e}odory function if
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] the mapping $x\mapsto f(x,u)$ is measurable for
every $u\in\mathbb{R}$;

\item[(b)] the mapping $u\mapsto f(x,u)$ is continuous for
almost every $x\in\Omega$;

\item[(c)] for every $\rho> 0$ there exists a function 
$l_{\rho}\in L^{1}(\Omega)$ such that
\[
\sup_{|u|\leq\rho}|f(x,u)|\leq l_{\rho}(x)
\]
for almost every $x\in\Omega$.
\end{itemize}

We shall prove our results by applying the following smooth version
of \cite[Theorem 2.1]{BD2}, which is a more precise version of
Ricceri's Variational Principle \cite[Lemma 2.5]{R2}.

\begin{theorem}\label{the1}
Let $E$ be a reflexive real Banach space, let $\Phi,\Psi :E\to \mathbb{R}$ 
be two G\^{a}teaux differentiable functionals such that $\Phi $ is sequentially 
weakly lower semi-continuous, strongly continuous and coercive, and $\Psi $ is
sequentially weakly upper semi-continuous. For every $r>\inf_{E}\Phi$, let
\begin{gather*}
\varphi (r):=\inf_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\frac{(
\sup_{v\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (v)) -\Psi (u)}{r-\Phi
(u)}, \\
\gamma :=\liminf_{r\to +\infty }\varphi (r),\quad
 \delta :=\liminf_{r\to (\inf_{E}\Phi
)^{+}}\varphi (r).
\end{gather*}
Then the following properties hold:

(a) For every $r>inf_{E}\Phi $ and every $\lambda \in (0,1/\varphi (r))$; the
restriction of the functional
\[
I_{\lambda }:=\Phi -\lambda \Psi
\]
to $\Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)$ admits a global minimum, which is a
critical point (local minimum) of $I_{\lambda }$ in $E$.

(b) If $\gamma <+\infty $; then for each $\lambda \in (0,1/\gamma
)$, the following alternative holds: either
\begin{itemize}
\item[(b1)] $I_{\lambda}$ possesses a global minimum, or

\item[(b2)] there is a sequence $\{u_{n}\}$ of critical points
(local minima) of $I_{\lambda}$ such that
\[
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\Phi(u_{n})=+\infty.
\]
\end{itemize}

(c) If $\delta<+\infty$; then for each $\lambda\in(0, 1/\delta)$,
the following alternative holds: either
\begin{itemize}
\item[(c1)] there is a global minimum of $\Phi$ which is a
local minimum of $I_{\lambda}$, or

\item[(c2)] there is a sequence $\{u_{n}\}$ of pairwise
distinct critical points (local minima) of $I_{\lambda}$ that
converges weakly to a global minimum of $\Phi$.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}

\section{Main results}

The following theorem is our first result.

\begin{theorem}\label{T1}
Let $K:[0,+\infty )\to \mathbb{R}$ be a continuous
function and let $f:\Omega \times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be an 
$L^{1}$-Carath\'{e}odory function. Assume that the following
conditions hold:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A1)] there exists a constant $m>0$ such that 
$\inf_{t\geq 0}K(t)\geq m$;

\item[(A2)] there exist constants $m_1>0$ and $m_2\geq 0$
such that
\[
\overline{K}(t)\leq m_1t+m_2,\quad \text{for every } t\in
[ 0,+\infty ),
\]
where $\overline{K}(t)=\int_0^{t}K(s)ds$ for $t\geq 0$;

\item[(A3)] there exist two constants $a_1>0$, $a_2\geq 0$
and $1<\alpha <2$ such that
\[
|f(x,u)|\leq a_1|u|+a_2|u|^{\alpha -1},\quad \text{for all }
x\in \Omega  \text{ and } u\in \mathbb{R};
\]

\item[(A4)] there exist $x_0\in \Omega $ and three
constants $\tau >\sigma >0$ and
\begin{equation}
\gamma >\frac{a_1m_1( | B(x_0,\tau )|
-| B(x_0,\sigma | ) }{mS_2^{2}(\tau
-\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|}>0,  \label{e3.1}
\end{equation}
such that
\begin{gather*}
B(x_0,\sigma )\subset B(x_0,\tau )\subseteq \Omega , \\
F(x,u)\geq 0,\quad \text{for all } (x,u)\in (\Omega \setminus
B(x_0,\sigma ))\times \mathbb{R}, \\
F(x,u)\geq \gamma u^{2},\quad \text{for all } (x,u)\in 
 B(x_0,\sigma )\times [ 1,+\infty ),
\end{gather*}
where
\[
F(x,u)=\int_0^{u}f(x,s)ds,\quad \text{for all } (x,u)\in \Omega\times \mathbb{R},
\]
and $B(x_0,\sigma )$ denotes the open ball with center at $x_0$
and radius $\sigma$.
\end{itemize}
Then for every
\[
\lambda \in \big( \frac{m_1( | B(x_0,\tau)| -| B(x_0,\sigma) | )}
{2\gamma (\tau -\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma
)|},\frac{mS_2^{2}}{2a_1}\big),
\]
Equation \eqref{e1} has a sequence of solutions $\{u_{n}\}$ in
$H_0^{1}(\Omega )$ satisfying
\[
\lim_{n\to +\infty }\| u_{n}\| =+\infty .
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $\Phi ,\Psi :H_0^{1}(\Omega )\to \mathbb{R}$ be
defined by
\begin{equation}
\Phi (u)=\frac{1}{2}\overline{K}( \| u\| ^{2}) ,\quad
\Psi (u)=\int_{\Omega }F(x,u)dx  \label{e3.4}
\end{equation}
and put
\[
I_{\lambda }(u):=\Phi (u)-\lambda \Psi (u)\quad \text{for all }
 u\in H_0^{1}(\Omega ).
\]
Using the properties of $f$, it is easy to verify that
 $\Phi ,\Psi \in C^{1}( H_0^{1}(\Omega ),\mathbb{R}) $ and for any 
$v\in H_0^{1}(\Omega )$, we have
\begin{gather*}
\langle \Phi '(u),v\rangle =K\Big( \int_{\Omega }|\nabla
u(x)|^{2}dx\Big) \int_{\Omega }\nabla u(x)\nabla v(x)dx, \\
\langle \Psi '(u),v\rangle =\int_{\Omega }f(x,u(x))v(x)dx.
\end{gather*}
So by the standard arguments, we deduce that the critical points of
the functional $I_{\lambda }$ are the weak solutions of 
\eqref{e1}.

Using (A1) and \eqref{e3.4} gives
\begin{equation}
\Phi (u)\geq \frac{m}{2}\| u\| ^{2}\quad \text{for all } u\in
H_0^{1}(\Omega ),  \label{e3.6}
\end{equation}
which implies that $\Phi $ is coercive. Moreover, it is easy to show that 
$\Phi $ is sequentially weakly lower semi-continuous and $\Psi $ is
sequentially weakly upper semi-continuous. Therefore, the
functionals $\Phi $ and $\Psi $ satisfy the regularity assumptions
of Theorem \ref{the1}.

Obviously, it follows from \eqref{e3.1} that
\[
\frac{m_1( | B(x_0,\tau )| -|
B(x_0,\sigma | ) }{2\gamma (\tau -\sigma
)^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|}<\frac{mS_2^{2}}{2a_1}.
\]
Now we fix
\[
\lambda \in \big( \frac{m_1( | B(x_0,\tau
)| -| B(x_0,\sigma) | )
}{2\gamma (\tau -\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma)|},\frac{mS_2^{2}}{2a_1}\big).
\]
Then for any $r>0$, using \eqref{e3.6} leads to
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)
&=\{u\in H_0^{1}(\Omega ):\Phi (u)<r\}   \\
&\subseteq \big\{ u\in H_0^{1}(\Omega ):\| u\| <\sqrt{2r/m} \big\} ,
\end{aligned} \label{e3.2}
\end{equation}
and combining (A3), we have
\begin{align*}
\sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (u)
&\leq \sup_{u\in \Phi
^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\int_{\Omega }|F(x,u(x))|dx
\\
&\leq \sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Big(
\frac{a_1}{2}\int_{\Omega }|u(x)|^{2}dx+\frac{a_2}{\alpha
}\int_{\Omega }|u(x)|^{\alpha }dx\Big)
\\
&\leq \sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Big( \frac{a_1}{2S_2^{2}}
\| u\| ^{2}+\frac{a_2}{\alpha S_{\alpha }^{\alpha }}\|
u\| ^{\alpha }\Big)  \\
&< \frac{a_1r}{mS_2^{2}}+\frac{a_2}{\alpha S_{\alpha }^{\alpha }}
( \frac{2r}{m}) ^{\alpha/2}.
\end{align*}
Thus,
\begin{align*}
\varphi (r)
&= \inf_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\frac{(
\sup_{v\in
\Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (v)) -\Psi (u)}{r-\Phi (u)} \\
&\leq  \frac{\sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (u)}{r} \\
&< \frac{a_1}{mS_2^{2}}+\frac{a_2}{\alpha S_{\alpha }^{\alpha
}}( \frac{2}{m}) ^{\alpha/2}r^{\frac{\alpha-2}{2}},
\end{align*}
which implies
\[
\gamma :=\liminf_{r\to +\infty }\varphi (r)\leq \frac{a_1}{
mS_2^{2}}<+\infty .
\]
Now we choose a sequence $\{\eta _{n}\}$ of positive numbers satisfying
$\lim_{n\to +\infty }\eta _{n}=+\infty $. For every $n\in \mathbb{N}$,
we define $v_{n}$ given by
\begin{equation}
v_{n}(x):=\begin{cases}
0, &  x\in \Omega \setminus B(x_0,\tau ), \\
\frac{\eta _{n}}{\tau -\sigma }(\tau -dist(x,x_0)),
&  x\in B(x_0,\tau )\setminus B(x_0,\sigma ), \\
\eta _{n}, &  x\in B(x_0,\sigma ).
\end{cases}   \label{e3.5}
\end{equation}
It is easy to verify that $v_{n}\in H_0^{1}(\Omega )$ and
\begin{align*}
\| v_{n}\| ^{2}
&= \int_{\Omega \setminus B(x_0,\tau
)}|\nabla v_{n}|^{2}dx+\int_{B(x_0,\tau )\setminus B(x_0,\sigma
)}|\nabla
v_{n}|^{2}dx+\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )}|\nabla v_{n}|^{2}dx   \\
&= \int_{B(x_0,\tau )\setminus B(x_0,\sigma )}\frac{\eta
_{n}^{2}}{(\tau -\sigma )^{2}}dx   \\
&= \frac{\eta _{n}^{2}}{(\tau -\sigma )^{2}}( |B(x_0,\tau)|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) .
\end{align*}
Then it follows from  (A2) and \eqref{e3.4} that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\Phi (v_{n})&\leq \frac{m_1}{2}\| v_{n}\|
^{2}+\frac{m_2}{2}  \\
&\leq \frac{m_1\eta _{n}^{2}(
|B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2(\tau -\sigma
)^{2}}+\frac{m_2}{2}.
\end{aligned} \label{e3.9}
\end{equation}
On the other hand, using (A4), from the definition of $\Psi $, we
infer that
\begin{equation}
\Psi (v_{n})\geq \int_{B(x_0,\sigma )}F(x,\eta _{n})dx. \label{e3.7}
\end{equation}
Thus, by \eqref{e3.9}, \eqref{e3.7} and
(A4), for every $n\in \mathbb{N}$ large enough, one has
\begin{align*}
I_{\lambda }(v_{n})
&\leq \frac{m_1\eta _{n}^{2}(
|B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2(\tau -\sigma
)^{2}}+\frac{m_2}{2}-\lambda
\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )}F(x,\eta _{n})dx \\
&<\frac{m_1\eta _{n}^{2}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma
)|) }{2(\tau -\sigma )^{2}}+\frac{m_2}{2}-\lambda
\int_{B(x_0,\sigma
)}\gamma \eta _{n}^{2}dx \\
&=\frac{m_1\eta _{n}^{2}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma
)|) }{2(\tau -\sigma )^{2}}+\frac{m_2}{2}-\lambda \gamma
|B(x_0,\sigma
)|\eta _{n}^{2} \\
&=\frac{m_2}{2}+\Big( \frac{m_1( |B(x_0,\tau
)|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2(\tau -\sigma )^{2}}-\lambda \gamma
|B(x_0,\sigma )|\Big) \eta _{n}^{2}.
\end{align*}
Since
\[
\lambda >\frac{m_1( | B(x_0,\tau )|
-| B(x_0,\sigma | ) }{2\gamma (\tau
-\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|}
\]
and $\lim_{n\to +\infty }\eta _{n}=+\infty $, we have
\[
\lim_{n\to +\infty }I_{\lambda }(v_{n})=-\infty.
\]
This shows that the functional $I_{\lambda }$ is unbounded from
below, and it follows that $I_{\lambda }$ has no global minimum.
Therefore, by Theorem \ref{the1} (b), there exists a sequence $\{u_{n}\}$
of critical points of $I_{\lambda }$ such that
\[
\lim_{n\to +\infty }\| u_{n}\| =+\infty ,
\]
since $\overline{K}( \| u_{n}\| ^{2}) \leq \frac{m_1}{2}
\| u_{n}\| ^{2}+\frac{m_2}{2}$ by (A2). Therefore, the
conclusion is achieved.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk3.2} \rm
Indeed, from  condition (A2), we can see that the potential $\overline{K}$
 has a sublinear growth. Moreover, it is not difficult to find
such continuous function $K$ satisfying (A1) and (A2), for example
\[
K(t)=1+\frac{1}{1+t^{2}},\quad t\geq 0.
\]
\end{remark}

Now, we state our second result.

\begin{theorem}\label{T2}
Let $K:[0,+\infty )\to \mathbb{R} $ be a continuous
function and $f:\Omega \times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be an
 $L^{1}$-Carath\'{e}odory function. Assume that (A1) and the following
conditions hold:

\begin{itemize}
\item[(A2')] there exist constants $l_1\geq 0$, $q\geq 1$ and $l_2>0$ such that
\[
K(t)\leq l_1t^{q-1}+l_2,\quad \text{for every } t\in [0,+\infty );
\]

\item[(A3')] there exist $b_1>0$, $b_2\geq 0$
and $2<\beta <2^{\ast }$ ($2^{\ast }=\frac{2N}{N-2}$ if $N\geq 3$,
$2^{\ast }=\infty$   if $N=1,2$)  such that
\[
|f(x,u)|\leq b_1|u|+b_2|u|^{\beta -1},\quad \text{for all }
 x\in \Omega \text{ and } u\in \mathbb{R};
\]

\item[(A4')] there exist $x_0\in \Omega $ and
three constants $\tau >\sigma >0$ and
\begin{equation}
\gamma >\frac{b_1l_2( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{
mS_2^{2}(\tau -\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|}>0,  \label{e3.8}
\end{equation}
such that
\begin{gather*}
B(x_0,\sigma )\subset B(x_0,\tau )\subseteq \Omega , \\
F(x,u)\geq 0,\quad \text{for all}\ (x,u)\in (\Omega \setminus, \\
B(x_0,\sigma ))\times \mathbb{R}, \\
F(x,u)\geq \gamma u^{2},\quad \text{for all } (x,u)\in
B(x_0,\sigma )\times [ 0,1],
\end{gather*}
where $B(x_0,\sigma )$ denotes the open ball with center at
$x_0$ and radius $\sigma $.
\end{itemize}

Then for every
\[
 \lambda \in (\frac{l_2( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|)
}{2\gamma (\tau -\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|},
\frac{mS_2^{2}}{2b_1}),
\]
Equation \eqref{e1} has a sequence of solutions, which converges strongly
 to zero in $H_0^{1}(\Omega )$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
It follows from \eqref{e3.8} that
\[
\frac{l_2( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|)
}{2\gamma (\tau -\sigma )^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma
)|}<\frac{mS_2^{2}}{2b_1}.
\]
Now we fix
\[
\lambda \in \Big( \frac{l_2( |B(x_0,\tau
)|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2\gamma (\tau -\sigma
)^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|},\frac{mS_2^{2}}{ 2b_1}\Big).
\]
Using the condition (A3') and \eqref{e3.2}, one has
\begin{align*}
\sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (u) 
&\leq \sup_{u\in \Phi
^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\int_{\Omega }|F(x,u(x))|dx \\
&\leq \sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Big[
\frac{b_1}{2}\int_{\Omega
}|u(x)|^{2}dx+\frac{b_2}{\beta }\int_{\Omega }|u(x)|^{\beta }dx\Big] \\
&\leq \sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}( \frac{b_1}{2S_2^{2}}
\| u\| ^{2}+\frac{b_2}{\beta S_{\beta }^{\beta }}\| u\|
^{\beta }) \\
&< \frac{b_1r}{mS_2^{2}}+\frac{b_2}{\beta S_{\beta }^{\beta
}}( \frac{2r}{m}) ^{\beta/2}.
\end{align*}
Thus, there holds
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\varphi (r) 
&= \inf_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\frac{(
\sup_{v\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (v)) -\Psi (u)}{r-\Phi (u)}   \\
&\leq \frac{\sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (u)}{r}   \\
&< \frac{b_1}{mS_2^{2}}+\frac{b_2}{\beta S_{\beta }^{\beta
}}( \frac{2}{m}) ^{\beta/2}\cdot r^{\frac{\beta
-2}{2}},
\end{aligned} \label{4-7}
\end{equation}
which implies 
\[
\delta :=\liminf_{r\to 0^{+}}\varphi (r)\leq \frac{b_1}{mS_2^{2}}
<+\infty .
\]
Now we choose a sequence $\{\eta _{n}\}$ of positive numbers satisfying 
$\lim_{n\to +\infty }\eta _{n}=0$. For all $n\in \mathbb{N}$, let 
$v_{n}$ defined by \eqref{e3.5} with the above $\eta _{n}$. Then, using
(A2') and (A4'), for every $n\in \mathbb{N}$ large enough one has
\begin{align*}
I_{\lambda }(v_{n}) 
&\leq \frac{l_1\eta _{n}^{2q}(
|B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) ^{q}}{2q(\tau -\sigma
)^{2q}}+\frac{l_2\eta _{n}^{2}( |B(x_0,\tau
)|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2( \tau
-\sigma ) ^{2}} \\
&\quad -\lambda \int_{B(x_0,\sigma )}F(x,\eta _{n})dx \\
&< \frac{l_1\eta _{n}^{2q}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma
)|) ^{q}}{2q(\tau -\sigma )^{2q}}+\frac{l_2\eta
_{n}^{2}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2(
\tau -\sigma )^{2}} \\
&\quad -\lambda \int_{B(x_0,\sigma )}\gamma \eta _{n}^{2}dx
\\
&=\frac{l_1\eta _{n}^{2q}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma
)|) ^{q}}{2q(\tau -\sigma )^{2q}}+\frac{l_2\eta
_{n}^{2}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2(
\tau -\sigma )
^{2}} \\
&\quad -\lambda \gamma |B(x_0,\sigma )|\eta _{n}^{2} \\
&= \frac{l_1\eta _{n}^{2q}( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma
)|) ^{q}}{2q(\tau -\sigma )^{2q}} \\
&\quad +( \frac{l_2( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{
2( \tau -\sigma ) ^{2}}-\lambda \gamma |B(x_0,\sigma)|)
\eta _{n}^{2} 
<0.
\end{align*}
Thus,
\[
\lim_{n\to +\infty }I_{\lambda }(v_{n})=I_{\lambda }(0)=0,
\]
which shows that zero is not a local minimum of $I_{\lambda }$.
This, together with the fact that zero is the only global minimum of
$\Phi $, we deduce that the energy functional $I_{\lambda }$ does
not have a local minimum at the unique global minimum of $\Phi $. 
Therefore, by Theorem \ref{the1} (c), there exists a sequence 
$\{u_{n}\}$ of critical points of $I_{\lambda }$, which converges weakly to zero. 
The proof is complete.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark} \label{rmk3.4} \rm
Now we give an example to illustrate Theorem \ref{T2}. Consider the
 Kirchhoff equation
\begin{equation} \label{Kab}
\begin{gathered}
-\Big( a+b\int_{\Omega }|\nabla u(x)|^{2}dx\Big) \Delta u
=\lambda f(x,u) ,  \quad \text{in } \Omega , \\
u=0,  \quad \text{on } \partial \Omega ,
\end{gathered}   %\tag{$K_{a,b}$}
\end{equation}
where $a>0,b\geq 0$ and $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^{N}$ is bounded
domain. Set $K(t)=a+bt$. Obviously, (A1) and (A2')
are satisfied. Let
\[
f(x,u)=\alpha(x)u,
\]
and $\alpha\in L^{\infty}(\Omega)$ with
\[
\inf_{x\in\Omega}\alpha(x)
>\frac{\sup_{x\in\Omega}\alpha(x)(
|B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma )|) }{2S_2^{2}(\tau -\sigma
)^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|},
\]
where $x_0$ is a point of $\Omega $ and two constants 
$\tau>\sigma >0$ satisfying
\[
B(x_0,\sigma )\subset B(x_0,\tau )\subseteq \Omega.
\]
Thus, (A3') and (A4') hold. Therefore, by Theorem \ref{T2}, 
Equation \eqref{Kab}  has infinitely many nontrivial solutions for every
\[
\lambda \in \Big( \frac{a( |B(x_0,\tau )|-|B(x_0,\sigma
)|) }{2\inf_{x\in\Omega}\alpha(x) (\tau -\sigma
)^{2}|B(x_0,\sigma )|},\frac{aS_2^{2}}{\sup_{x\in\Omega}
\alpha(x)}\Big).
\]
\end{remark}


\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
J. Sun is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (Grant Nos. 11201270 and 11271372), Shandong Provincial
Natural Science Foundation Grant (No. ZR2015JL002), China
Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2014M551494 and
2015T80491), and Young Faculty Support Program of Shandong
University of Technology. T.F. Wu was supported in part by the
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant
102-2115-M-390-002-MY2) and the National Center for Theoretical
Sciences, Taiwan.


\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{ACS} G. A. Afrouzi, N. T. Chung, S. Shakeri;
\emph{Existence of positive solutions for Kirchhoff type equations},
Electron. J. Differential Equations, Vol. 2013 (2013), No. 180, pp.
1--8.

\bibitem{ACM} C. O. Alves, F. S. J. A. Corr\^{e}a, T. F. Ma;
\emph{Positive solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type}, 
Comput. Math. Appl. 49 (2005), 85--93.

\bibitem{AS} P. D'Ancona, S. Spagnolo;
\emph{Global solvability for the degenerate
Kirchhoff equation with real analytic data}, Invent. Math.  108
(1992), 247--262.

\bibitem{A} S. Aouaoui;
\emph{Existence of three solutions for some equation of
Kirchhoff type involving variable exponents}, Appl. Math. Comput.
218 (2012), 7184--7192.

\bibitem{AP} A. Arosio, S. Panizzi;
\emph{On the well-posedness of the Kirchhoff
string}. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.\ 348 (1996), 305--330.

\bibitem{ACP} G. Autuori, F. Colasuonno, P. Pucci;
\emph{On the existence of stationary solutions for higher order
 $p$-Kirchhoff problems}, Commun. Contemp. Math.  16 (2014) (43 pages).

\bibitem{BB} A. Bensedki, M. Bouchekif;
\emph{On an elliptic equation of Kirchhoff-type with a potential asymptotically 
linear at infinity}, Math. Comput. Modelling 49 (2009), 1089--1096.

\bibitem{BD2} G. Bonanno, B. Di Bella;
\emph{Infinitely many solutions for a fourth-order elastic beam equation},
 Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 18 (2011), 357--368.

\bibitem{CCS} M. M. Cavalcanti, V. N. D. Cavalcanti, J. A. Soriano;
\emph{Global existence and uniform decay rates for the Kirchhoff-Carrier equation
with nonlinear dissipation}, Adv. Differential Equations 6 (2001),
701--730.

\bibitem{CKW} C. Chen, Y. Kuo, T. F. Wu;
\emph{The Nehari manifold for a Kirchhoff
type problem involving sign-changing weight functions}, J.
Differential Equations\ 250 (2011) 1876--1908.

\bibitem{CX} B. Cheng, X. Xu;
\emph{Existence results of positive solutions of
Kirchhoff type problems}, Nonlinear Anal. 71 (2009) 4883--4892.

\bibitem{CL} M. Chipot, B. Lovat;
\emph{Some remarks on non local elliptic and
parabolic problems}, Nonlinear Anal. 30 (1997), 4619--4627.

\bibitem{CP} F. Colasuonno, P. Pucci;
\emph{Multiplicity of solutions for $p(x)$-polyharmonic elliptic Kirchhoff equations},
 Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011) 5962--5974.

\bibitem{C} F. J. S. A. Corr\^{e}a;
\emph{On positive solutions of nonlocal and
nonvariational elliptic problems}, Nonlinear Anal. 59 (2004),
1147--1155.

\bibitem{GHK} J. R. Graef, S. Heidarkhani, L. Kong;
\emph{Variational approach to a Kirchhoff-type problem involving two parameters},
 Results. Math. 63 (2013), 877--889.

\bibitem{K} G. Kirchhoff;
\emph{Vorlesungen uber mathematische Physik}: Mechanik.
Teubner, Leipzig (1883).

\bibitem{HZ} X. He, W. Zou;
\emph{Infinitely many positive solutions for
Kirchhoff-type problems}, Nonlinear Analysis, 70 (2009), 1407--1414.

\bibitem{LLS} Y. Li, F. Li, J. Shi;
\emph{Existence of a positive solution to Kirchhoff
type problems without compactness conditions}, J. Differential
Equations, 253 (2012), 2285--2294.

\bibitem{L} J.-L. Lions;
\emph{On some questions in boundary value problems of
mathematical physics}, in: Contemporary Developments in Continuum
Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations, Proceedings of
International Symposium, Inst. Mat., Univ. Fed. Rio de Janeiro, Rio
de Janeiro, 1977, in: North-Holland Math. Stud., vol. 30,
North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 284--346.

\bibitem{LC} H. Liu, H. Chen;
\emph{Multiple solutions for an indefinite Kirchhoff-type equation with 
sign-changing potential}, Electron. J. Differential Equations, Vol. 2015 (2015),
No. 274, pp. 1--9.

\bibitem{LG} Z. Liu, S. Guo;
\emph{Existence and concentration of positive ground states
for a Kirchhoff equation involving critical Sobolev exponent}, Z.
Angew. Math. Phys. 66 (2015), 747--769.

\bibitem{MR} G. Molica Bisci, V. D. R\v{a}dulescu;
\emph{Mountain pass theorem for nonlocal equations},
 Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae, 39 (2014), 579--592.

\bibitem{R2} B. Ricceri;
\emph{A general variational principle and some of its
applications}. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 113 (2000) 401--410.

\bibitem{R} B. Ricceri;
\emph{A further refinement of a three critical points
theorem}, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011), 7446--7454.

\bibitem{R1} B. Ricceri;
\emph{On an elliptic Kirchhoff-type problem depending on
two parameters}, J. Glob. Optim. 46 (2010), 543--549.

\bibitem{SCW} J. Sun, Y. Cheng, T. F. Wu;
\emph{On the indefinite Kirchhoff type equations with local sublinearity
and linearity}, Appl. Anal.\ 2016,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2016.1160072.

\bibitem{SW1} J. Sun, T. F. Wu;
\emph{Existence and multiplicity of solutions for
an indefinite Kirchhoff-type equation in bounded domains}, Proc. Roy.
Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 146 (2016), 435--448.

\bibitem{SW} J. Sun, T. F. Wu;
\emph{Ground state solutions for an indefinite
Kirchhoff type problem with steep potential well}, J. Differential
Equations, 256 (2014), 1771--1792.

\bibitem{ZP} Z. Zhang, K. Perera;
\emph{Sign changing solutions of Kirchhoff type
problems via invariant sets of descent flow}, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,
317 (2006), 456--463.

\end{thebibliography}


\section{Addendum posted on September 29, 2016}

The authors would like to correct Theorems \ref{T1},
\ref{T2} and their proofs, since the assumptions of Theorems
\ref{T1} and \ref{T2} can not be verified. Also a new
example is given to illustrate Theorem \ref{T2} instead of the one
in Remark \ref{rmk3.4}. However, only the case of $N=1$ is done and
the case of $N\geq2$ has not been solved yet.

In Theorem \ref{T1}, we assume that $N=1$ and $\Omega=(a,b)$. The
assumption (A3) is removed and the assumption (A4) is replaced
by the following.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A5)]
there exist $x_0\in (a,b) $ and two constants $\tau>\sigma >0$
with $B(x_0,\sigma )\subset B(x_0,\tau)\subseteq (a,b)$ such
that
\begin{gather*}
F(x,u)\geq 0,\quad \text{for all}\ (x,u)\in (a,b)\times [0,+\infty), \\
\alpha_\infty<\frac{2m(\tau -\sigma)}{m_1(b-a)}\beta_\infty,
%\label{3-1}
\end{gather*}
where
\begin{gather*}
F(x,u)=\int_0^{u}f(x,s)ds,\quad \text{for all } (x,u)\in (a,b)
\times \mathbb{R}, \\
\alpha_\infty:=\liminf_{t\to+\infty}\frac{\int^b_{a}\max_{|\xi|\leq
t}F(x,\xi)dx}{t^2}, \quad
\beta_\infty:=\limsup_{t\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{B(x_0,\sigma
) }F(x,t)dx}{t^2}.
\end{gather*}
\end{itemize}
Moreover, the range of the parameter $\lambda$ becomes
$\big(\frac{m_{1}}{(\tau-\sigma)\beta_{\infty}},
\frac{2m}{(b-a)\alpha_{\infty}}\big)$.
Based on these changes, we restate Theorem \ref{T1} as follows.

\begin{theorem} \label{T3} Let $N=1$ and $\Omega=(a,b)$. Assume that conditions
{\rm (A1), (A2), (A5)} hold. Then for every interval
$(\frac{m_{1}}{(\tau-\sigma)\beta_{\infty}},\frac{2m}{(b-a)\alpha_{\infty}}\big)$,
Equation \eqref{e1} has a sequence of solutions $\{u_{n}\}$ in
$H_0^1(a,b)$ satisfying
\[
\lim_{n\to +\infty }\| u_{n}\| =+\infty .
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Now we fix $\lambda \in \big(\frac{m_{1}}{(\tau-\sigma)\beta_{\infty}},
\frac{2m}{(b-a)\alpha_{\infty}}\big)$.
Then for any $r>0$, inequality \eqref{e3.6} leads to
\begin{align*}
\Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r) 
&=\{u\in H_0^1(a,b ):\Phi (u)<r\}   \\
&\subseteq \Big\{ u\in H_0^1(a,b ):\| u\| <\sqrt{\frac{2r}{m}}\Big\}  \\
&\subseteq \Big\{ u\in H_0^1(a,b ): |u(x)|
\leq\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2r(b-a)}{m}}\quad \text{for all}\
x\in(a,b ) \Big\}, %\label{3-2}
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
\sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (u) 
&= \sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\int^b_{a}F(x,u)dx \\
&\leq \int^b_{a}\sup_{|u|\leq\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2r(b-a)}{m}}}F(x,u)dx.
\end{align*}
Thus,
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\varphi (r) 
&= \inf_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}
\frac{\big(\sup_{v\in
\Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (v)\big) -\Psi (u)} {r-\Phi (u)} \\
&\leq \frac{\sup_{u\in \Phi ^{-1}(-\infty ,r)}\Psi (u)}{r} \\
&< \frac{\int^b_{a}\sup_{|u|\leq\kappa\sqrt{\frac{2r}{m}}}F(x,u)dx}{r}.
\end{aligned}  \label{3-3}
\end{equation}
Let $\{t_{n}\}$ be a sequence of positive numbers such that 
$t_{n}\to+\infty$ and
\begin{equation}
\lim_{n\to+\infty}\frac{\int_{a}^b\sup_{|u|
\leq t _{n}}F(x,u)dx}{t^2_{n}}=\alpha_{\infty}. \label{3-11}
\end{equation}
We now choose another positive numbers sequence $\{r_{n}\}$ with
$r_{n}=\frac{2m}{(b-a)}t^2_{n}$ for every $n\in\mathbb{N}$. It
follows from \eqref{3-3}) and \eqref{3-11} that
\begin{equation*}
\gamma\leq\liminf_{n\to+\infty}\varphi(r_{n})
\leq\frac{(b-a)}{2m}\alpha_{\infty}<+\infty.
%\label{3-10}
\end{equation*}
Since $\frac{1}{\lambda}<(\tau-\sigma)\beta_{\infty}/m_{1}$,
there exists a sequence $\{\eta_{n}\}$ of positive numbers and
$\mu>0$ such that $\eta_{n}\to\infty$ and
\[
\frac{1}{\lambda}<\mu<\frac{(\tau
-\sigma)}{m_1}\frac{\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )
}F(x,\eta_{n})dx}{\eta^2_{n}}. %\label{3-10}
\]
Define $v_{n}(x)$ as in (\ref{e3.5}) with $\Omega=(a,b)$ and it is
easy to verify that $\| v_{n}\| ^{2}= \frac{2\eta
_{n}^{2}}{\tau -\sigma }$ when $N=1$. Moreover, by $(A5)$ one has
\begin{equation}
\Psi (v_{n})=\int_{a}^bF(x,v_{n})dx\geq\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )
}F(x,\eta_{n})dx. \label{3-7}
\end{equation}
Thus, it follows from \eqref{3-7} and (A2) that for
every $n\in \mathbb{N}$ large enough,
\begin{align*}
I_{\lambda }(v_{n})
&=\frac{1}{2}\overline{K}\left( \| v
_{n}\| ^{2}\right)-\lambda \int_{a}^bF(x,v _{n})dx \\
&\leq \frac{m_{1}}{2}\| v _{n}\| ^{2}+\frac{m_2}{2}-\lambda
\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )} F(x,\eta _{n})dx \\
&= \frac{m_1\eta _{n}^{2}}{\tau -\sigma }+\frac{m_2}{2}-\lambda
\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )} F(x,\eta _{n})dx \\
&< \frac{m_1\eta _{n}^{2}}{(\tau
-\sigma)}(1-\lambda\mu)+\frac{m_2}{2},
\end{align*}
which implies that the functional $I_{\lambda }$ is unbounded from
below, since $\eta_{n}\to+\infty$ and $1-\lambda\mu<0$.
It follows that $I_{\lambda }$ has no global minimum. Therefore, by 
Theorem \ref{the1} (b), there exists a sequence $\{u_{n}\}$ of critical 
points of $I_{\lambda }$ such that
\begin{equation*}
\lim_{n\to +\infty }\| u_{n}\| ^{2}=+\infty.
\end{equation*}
The conclusion is achieved.
\end{proof}

In Theorem \ref{T2}, we likewise assume that $N=1$ and
$\Omega=(a,b)$. The assumption (A3') is removed and the assumption
(A4') is replaced by the following.
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A6)]  there exist $x_0\in (a,b)$ and
three constants $\varepsilon>0$ and $\tau>\sigma >0$ with
$B(x_0,\sigma )\subset B(x_0,\tau)\subseteq (a,b)$ such
that
\begin{gather*}
F(x,u)\geq 0,\quad \text{for all } (x,u)\in (a,b) \times
[0,\varepsilon), \\
\alpha_0<\frac{2m(\tau -\sigma)}{(b-a)l_2}\beta_0, \label{3-1}
\end{gather*}
where
\begin{equation*}
\alpha_0:=\liminf_{t\to 0^+}\frac{\int_{a}^b\max_{|\xi|\leq
t}F(x,\xi)dx}{t^2},\quad
\beta_0:=\limsup_{t\to 0^+}\frac{\int_{B(x_0,\sigma )
}F(x,t)dx}{t^2}.
\end{equation*}
\end{itemize}
In addition, the range of the parameter $\lambda$ becomes
$\big(\frac{l_2}{(\tau-\sigma)\beta_0},\frac{2m}{(b-a)\alpha_0}\big)$.
In view of these, we restate Theorem \ref{T2} as follows.

\begin{theorem}
\label{T4} Let $N=1$ and $\Omega=(a,b)$. Assume that conditions
{\rm (A1), (A2'), (A6)} hold. Then for every interval
$\big(\frac{l_2}{(\tau-\sigma)\beta_{\infty}},
\frac{2m}{(b-a)\alpha_{\infty}}\big)$,
Equation \eqref{e1} has a sequence of solutions, which converges
strongly to zero in $H_0^1(a,b)$.
\end{theorem}

The proof is omitted here, since it is similar to that of Theorem
\ref{T1}.

Finally, we give a new example to replace the one in Remark
\ref{rmk3.4}.

\begin{example} \rm
Let $K(t)=1+t$. Then it is easy to verify that (A1) and (A2')
hold if we choose $m=l_{1}=l_2=1$ and $q=2$. Let $(a,b) =(0,1)$,
$x_0=\frac{1}{2}, \tau=\frac{1}{3}$ and $\sigma=\frac{1}{4}$. Then
$B(x_0,\sigma )\subset B(x_0,\tau)\subseteq (0,1)$.  We take
\[
f(x,u)=f(u)=\begin{cases}
u(2a-2\sin(\ln|u|)-\cos(\ln|u|)), &  \text{if } u\neq0, \\
0, &\text{if } u=0,
\end{cases}
\]
where $1<a<\frac{7}{5}$. A direct calculation shows that
\[
F(u)=\int_0^{u}f(t)dt=\begin{cases}
u^{2}(a-\sin(\ln|u|), &  \text{if } u\neq0, \\
0, & \text{if } u=0.
\end{cases}
\]
It is clear that $F(u)\geq0$ for all $u\in\mathbb{R}$,
\[
\alpha_0=\liminf_{t\to 0^+}\frac{\max_{|u|\leq t}F(u)}{t^2}=a-1
\]
and
\[
\beta_0=\limsup_{t\to 0^+}\frac{F(t)}{t^2}=a+1.
\]
Moreover, $\alpha_0<\frac{2m(\tau -\sigma)}{(b-a)l_2}\beta_0$, which
implies that (A6) holds. Therefore,  for every 
$\lambda \in \big(\frac{12}{a+1},\frac{2}{a-1}\big)$, the following problem
\begin{gather*}
-\Big(1+ \int_0^1|u'|^{2}dx\Big)
u''=\lambda f(u) ,  \quad \text{in } (0,1), \\
u(0)=u(1)=0, 
\end{gather*}
admits infinitely many nontrivial solutions strongly converging at
$0$ in $H^1_0(0,1)$.
\end{example}

\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
The authors would like to thank Prof. Biagio Ricceri for pointing out 
these errors and for giving us valuable suggestions during the change process.

End of addendum.

\end{document}

\end{document}
